Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR): Initial Findings from the NSABP P-2 Breast Cancer Prevention Study D.L. Wickerham, J.P. Costantino, V. Vogel,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR): Initial Findings from the NSABP P-2 Breast Cancer Prevention Study D.L. Wickerham, J.P. Costantino, V. Vogel,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR): Initial Findings from the NSABP P-2 Breast Cancer Prevention Study D.L. Wickerham, J.P. Costantino, V. Vogel, W.M. Cronin, R.S. Cecchini, J. Atkins, T. Bevers, L. Fehrenbacher, W. McCaskill-Stevens, N. Wolmark ASCO 2006

2

3 NSABP STAR Schema STRATIFICATION TAMOXIFEN 20 mg/day x 5 years
Risk-Eligible Postmenopausal Women STRATIFICATION Age Gail Model Risk Race History of LCIS TAMOXIFEN 20 mg/day x 5 years RALOXIFENE 60 mg/day x 5 years

4 STAR Trial Objectives Primary objective:
Evaluate the effect of raloxifene vs. tamoxifen in reducing the incidence of: Invasive breast cancer

5 STAR Trial Objectives Secondary objectives: Noninvasive breast cancer
Endometrial cancer Ischemic Heart Disease Fractures of the: Hip Spine Wrist (Colles’)

6 STAR Summary of Screening, Accrual and Follow-Up Information
Women screened for breast cancer risk Women who were breast cancer risk eligible Women randomly assigned treatment Total person-years of follow-up Average follow-up (months) 184,460 96,368 19,747 76,828 47.3

7 P-2 STAR Age Distribution
9% 50-59 50% 60-69 32% <49 70+

8 P-2 STAR Racial/Ethnic Distribution (%)
TAM RAL White 93.5 African-American 2.0 Hispanic 2.4 2.5 Other 2.1

9 P-2 STAR 5-year Predicted Risk of Breast Cancer among Participants at Entry
5+ 27% 11% <2 2 to 3 30% 3 to 5 32% Gail model risk score

10 P-2 STAR First-Degree Relatives with Breast Cancer
None 29% 3+ 3% 1 52% 2 16%

11 P-2 STAR Prior Hysterectomy 51.5% (10,027)

12 P-2 STAR Atypical Hyperplasia LCIS Total Number % of Randomized 1,789
9.2 4426 22.7

13 RESULTS

14 P-2 STAR Average Annual Rate and Number of Invasive Breast Cancers
2 4 6 8 10 Gail Model Projection TAM Raloxifene Av Ann Rate per 1000 312* 163 168 * # of events

15 P-2 STAR Cumulative Incidence of Invasive Breast Cancer
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 6 12 18 24 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 At Risk by Year # of Rate/1000 Treatment Events at 6 yrs. P-value Tamoxifen Raloxifene Cumulative Incidence (per 1000) Time Since Randomization (months)

16 P-2 STAR Average Annual Rate and Number of Invasive Breast Cancers by 5-year Gail Model Risk
8 7 Tamoxifen 77 70 6 Raloxifene 5 61 Av Ann Rate per 1000 4 47 3 44 2 32 1 <3 3 to 5 5+ Percent in 5 Years

17 P-2 STAR Estrogen Receptor of Invasive Cancers
72 28 68 32 20 40 60 80 100 Positive Negative Percent Tamoxifen Raloxifene

18 P-2 STAR Tumor Size (cm) of Invasive Cancers
30 61 9 37 8 55 20 40 60 80 100 <1 1.1 to 3 >3 Percent Tamoxifen Raloxifene

19 P-2 STAR Nodal Status of Invasive Cancers
76 24 80 20 40 60 100 Negative Positive Percent Tamoxifen Raloxifene

20 95% Confidence Interval: 0.98 to 2.00
P-2 STAR Average Annual Rate And Number Of Non-invasive (In Situ) Cancers 1 2 3 TAM Raloxifene Av Ann Rate per 1000 Relative risk = 1.40 95% Confidence Interval: 0.98 to 2.00 80 57* * # of events

21 P-2 STAR Cumulative Incidence of Non-Invasive Breast Cancer
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 6 12 18 24 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 At Risk by Year # of Rate/1000 Treatment Events at 6 yrs. P-value Tamoxifen Raloxifene Cumulative Incidence (per 1000) Time Since Randomization (months)

22 Average Annual Rate of Non-Invasive Breast Cancer by Treatment Group
 Tumor Type # of Events Rate per 1000 Risk Ratio RR 95% Confidence Interval TAM RAL DCIS 30 44 0.79 1.16 1.46 LCIS 21 29 0.56 0.76 1.37 Mixed 6 7 0.16 0.18 Total 57 80 1.51 2.11 1.40

23 P-2 STAR Average Annual Rate and Number of Invasive Breast Cancers by History of Atypical Hyperplasia and Lobular Carcinoma in Situ 3 6 9 12 Tamoxifen Raloxifene 33 33 Av Ann Rate per 1000 46 41 LCIS 1789 AH 4426

24 P-2 STAR Average Annual Rate and Number of Uterine Cancers
1 2 3 TAM Raloxifene Av Ann Rate per 1000 RR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.35 to 1.08 36* 23 * # of events

25 P-2 STAR Cumulative Incidence of Uterine Cancer
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 6 12 18 24 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 At Risk by Year # of Rate/1000 Treatment Events at 6 yrs. P-value Tamoxifen Raloxifene Cumulative Incidence (per 1000) Time Since Randomization (months)

26 Endometrial Hyperplasia
P-2 STAR Endometrial Hyperplasia TAM RAL Hyperplasia 84 14 with Atypia 12 1 w/o Atypia 72 13

27 # of Hysterectomies for Non-Cancer Reasons
TAM RAL

28 P-2 STAR Cumulative Incidence of Thromboembolic Events
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 6 12 18 24 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 At Risk by Year # of Rate/1000 Treatment Events at 6 yrs. RR Tamoxifen Raloxifene P-value= 0.01 Cumulative Incidence (per 1000) Time Since Randomization (months)

29 P-2 STAR Average Annual Rate and Number of Strokes
1 2 3 TAM Raloxifene Av Ann Rate per 1000 53* 51 * # of events

30 P-2 STAR Number of Ischemic Heart Disease Events
Type of event Tamoxifen # Raloxifene Risk Ratio (RR) RR 95% Confidence Interval Myocardial infarction 48 37 0.77 Severe Angina 51 63 1.23 Acute ischemic syndrome 15 26 1.72

31 P-2 STAR Number of Osteoporotic Fractures by Site and Treatment Group
Type of event Tamoxifen # Raloxifene Risk Ratio (RR) RR 95% Confidence Interval Hip 26 23 0.88 Spine 53 52 0.98 Radius (Colles’) Total 27 106 98 0.85 0.92

32 P-2 STAR Average Annual Rates of Cataracts
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 TAM Raloxifene Av ann rate per 1000 RR = 0.79; 95% CI 0.68 – 0.92 394* 313

33 Fewer thromboembolic events Fewer endometrial cancers and
P-2 STAR Summary Raloxifene is as effective as tamoxifen in the prevention of primary invasive breast cancer Raloxifene is less effective than tamoxifen in the prevention of non-invasive breast cancer (LCIS & DCIS) Compared to tamoxifen, raloxifene use results in: Fewer thromboembolic events Fewer endometrial cancers and Fewer cataracts

34


Download ppt "Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR): Initial Findings from the NSABP P-2 Breast Cancer Prevention Study D.L. Wickerham, J.P. Costantino, V. Vogel,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google