Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The Structure of Words 2. Basic Concepts

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "The Structure of Words 2. Basic Concepts"— Presentation transcript:

1 The Structure of Words 2. Basic Concepts
323 Morphology The Structure of Words 2. Basic Concepts 2.1 Lexemes and Word Forms Words are not easy to define. A preliminary definition is based on the English orthographic system. The spaces used in orthography represent words (usually). Most dictionaries list only one word of an inflected set: E.g. sing, sang, sung, singing, sings. The form ‘sing’ is always chosen as a dictionary entry. The form is technically an infinitive. In linguistics the term is lexeme represents the basic or dictionary form of the word. Lexemes are usually written in CAPS: SING Lexemes are abstract representations, which presumably are listed in the brain in a component called the lexicon. Each inflected form of a lexeme is called a word-form. E.g. ‘sing, sang, sung, singing, sings’ are each a word-form and each one belongs to the lexeme SING. The set of word-forms of a given lexeme is called a paradigm.

2 2.1 Lexemes and Word Forms By convention in each language, the dictionary representation may be the infinitive form of the verb as in Russian, the first person singular in Latin (which has no infinitive), the third person singular in Arabic, or perhaps by some other form. The entry form for nouns in normally the singular nominative case form of the noun: Latin, Russian, English, Czech, German. A lexeme family, or less formally a word family, is a set of lexemes that are related. They should share some phonological properties and be related semantically. The latter is easier said than determined. E.g. print, printable, unprintable, printer, printability, reprint. This list is not necessarily complete. Complex lexemes are lexemes formed with an affix (a morpheme). E.g. ‘able’, ‘un’, ‘er’, ‘ity’, ‘re’ in the above list. Complex lexemes must each be listed separately in a dictionary as the meaning may differ. The various word-forms of a given lexeme do not change the meaning of the lexeme. Which affixes that occur with which basic lexeme is not predictable. E.g. we find in English un-happy, un-ripe, but not *un-sad, *un- red, *un-tall, and so forth.

3 2.1 Lexemes and Word Forms Sometimes a lexeme with an affix occurs but the basic form does not exist: E.g. dis-gruntled but not *gruntled, in-cognito, but not *cognito, un-gainly, but not*gainly. Sometimes the expected affix does not occur but another affix does: E.g. natural-ness in place *natural-ity. Or the expected affix occurs with another meaning: E.g. cook, cook-er (an instrument for cooking, not a person who cooks, which is simply the noun ‘cook’. Kinds of morphological relationship inflection: the relationship between the word-forms of a lexeme. E. g. mask, masks; sit, sat, sitting, sits; blue, bluer, bluest. derivation: the relationship between lexemes of a lexical family. E. g. singer, singer; write, writer; cookV, cookN, cooker. Derivation usually implies forming one lexeme from another lexeme in the same lexical family. E.g. sing -> singer, write -> writer, cookV, cookN and cooker. Word is used whenever the distinction between derivation and inflection is uncertain. (no examples currently). Compound *lexeme) refers to words that are made up of two or more lexemes: doghouse, catfish, greenhouse, whiplash, tattletale, and so forth.

4 2.2 Morphemes A morpheme is the smallest constituent with a function. I prefer this distinction to ‘smallest constituent with meaning. There are some forms that appears to be constituents but have no discernable meaning, but have a function in terms of word building: E.g. doof-us, radi-us, cf. radi-al, radi-an. Some inflectional morphemes have no true meaning, but they have a grammatical function: E.g. he, him; who, whom; they, them, The suffix ‘-m’ marks the accusative (objective) Case. This is a syntactic relation and no meaning can be associated with it. The term function includes meaning. To go one step further than H., the hierarchy for constituents is: Sentence -> phrase -> word -> morpheme. Phrases are very important constituents in syntax. Some grammatical categories cannot be expressed in terms of morphemes. For example, note the following partial inflection of the English verb sing and others similar to it: E.g. sing, sang, sung. The past tense is marked by a change of the root vowel. The latter form marks two distinct grammatical functions — the passive form of the verb and the perfect form of the verb. Each form is a distinctive morpheme with a different function but phonologically the same.

5 2.3 Affixes, Bases and Roots
Affixes are morphemes that are adjoined to the left of the base of a word or to the right of the base of a word: A prefix is an affix that is adjoined to the left of the base of a word. E.g. ‘un-’ in un-happy, un-regulated; ‘re-’ re-do, reheat, re-write, and so forth. A suffix is an affix that is adjoined to the right of the base of a word. E.g. ‘s’ in book-s, cat-s; eat-s, smell-s; linguistic-s. An infix is an affix that is inserted into the base of the word forming a non- contiguous base. There are no infixes in English. Infixes occur in the Semitic language. E. g. “ktb” is the base for book and read and words which refer to book/read in some related sense. To form the noun in Arabic, the infixes ‘I’ and ‘a’ are inserted into the base between the firsts two consonants and the second two consonants, respectively: E.g. kitab. A circumflex is an affix that occurs on both sides of the base. (H.) E. g. (per H) German ge-les-en ‘read’ (passive participle). English dialects: a-walk-ing, a-read-ing.. The English “a-” is etymologically related to the German “ge-”. Stem, Base and Root A root is a morpheme that cannot be broken down into further morphemes. A base is one or more morphemes formed of a root plus affixes.

6 2.3 Affixes, Bases and Roots
A stem is a base that has lexical meaning (meaning that is stored in the lexicon). It is also called a lexeme: E. g. Pen is a root, a base and a stem (null affix) (=a lexical item). E. g. Gruntle is a root, but a stem since no lexeme corresponds to it. E. g. Disgruntle is not a root, it is a base, but not a stem. E. g. disgruntled is not a root, but it is a base and a stem. E.g. -ed is a suffix; it is not a root, base or stem. In English the word dog, for example, is a root since it cannot be broken into further morphological units: E. g. ‘do’ is not a morpheme of dog, it is basically a verb. There is no morpheme ‘og’ that has any kind of function. Dog is also a base. It has lexical meaning. The English word disgruntled consists of three morpheme dis-, gruntle, and ed. ‘dis’ is a prefix, and ed’ is an inflectional affix marking the past tense among other functions. The morpheme gruntle is a root, since two affixes are adjoined to it. It is not a base, since it has no lexical meaning (what does gruntle mean?) Once both affixes are adjoined to it, then disgruntled, which is a base, is a lexical stem since it does have meaning. Technically, the prefix ‘dis-’ is adjoined first to gruntle to form the base ‘disgruntle’. Apparently this form has no lexical meaning and remains a base. Once the adjectival suffix ‘-ed’ is added to disgruntle then the base receives lexical meaning and is a stem. English has several words usually considered compounds, where at least one member of the compound doesn’t behave like a normal prefix or affix.

7 2.4 Formal Operations E. g. tele-graph. Although graph may have lexical meaning, tele- does not. It does not occur in isolation. The form is borrowed from Greek where it means ‘far’. It is more like a root that cannot become a stem in its own right, but it may be adjoined to a stem to form a new stem. 2.4 Formal Operations Some words such as derive imply a process. A true process is a historical phenomenon and does not imply a process in terms of how language is represented in the mind (the grammar of a language). Diachronic refers to a temporal process. E. g. Middle English -> modern English. Synchronic refers to a grammar at a particular point in time. E. g. Modern English, Modern French. In addition to affixation and compounding, there is another ‘process’ or operation that refers to inflection formed without affixation and word formation formed without affixation. It is called a non-concatenative operation: (Some) Albanian nouns form their plural by palatalizing their final consonant: E. g. armik (Sg.), armiq [c] (pl.) ‘enemy, ies’. A few nouns in English are formed from verbs by voicing their final consonant: E. g. hoof (Sg.), hooves (Pl.).

8 2.4 Formal Operations Causative verbs in Arabic are formed by geminating the second root consonant. Gemination is the doubling of a consonant: E. g. darasa (root DRS) ‘learn’, darrasa ‘cause to learn’. The first person singular of Huallaga Quechua verbs is formed by lengthening the final stem vowel: E. g. aywanqui ‘you (Sg.) go’,aywa: ‘I go’. Stem = AYWA. Intransitive verbs are formed by shortening the stem vowel of Hindi transitive verbs: E. g. maar ‘kill, [trans].’ mar ‘die’. Adjectives in Chalcontongo Mixtex are derived from nouns by raising the tone on the final vowel of the noun: E. g. ká?ba ’filth’, ká?bá ’dirty’. The past tense of a certain class of English verbs and verbs of several Indo-European languages replace the stem vowel of the verb with another: E. g. sit -> sat; sing -> sang; German sing-en -> sang ‘sing, sang’. The replacement (which it really isn’t) of Arabic vowels in inflection and derivation is called transfixation: E. g. root KTB ‘write, book’, kataba ‘wrote’. H mentions several other operations such prereduplication, postreduplication, duplifxation,and subtraction. (pp. 23 and 24). With the addition of the above operations, the definition of a stem as a root plus affixes is obviously insufficient. definition: a stem is a root plus morphological operations (both concatenative and non-concatenative). I prefer to think of these morphological operations in terms of set theory. Set theory belongs to pure logic and is used in various logic-related fields such as mathematics where extensive use of it is made. I will delve in set theory just a tiny bit to enlighten the class.

9 2.4 Formal Operations A set is a group of one object or two or more objects. Any two or objects can form a set. In linguistics, we will restrict a set to two or more objects that are related in some linguistic way. E. g. {noun, verb, adjective, adverb, quantifier (and so forth)} E. g. {infix, suffix, prefix} E. g. all vowels are a set: {a, e, o. I, u} in 5 vowel languages. E. g. all lexemes are a set. E. g. all phrases are a set. E. g. each alternating vowel in a paradigm is a set: {i, a, u} in S_NG. One vowel is consider the default or basic vowel, the others are marked in that they occur in specific contexts. E. g. ‘a’ occurs in the context of the past tense, and ‘u’ occurs in the context of the passive and the perfect grammatical categories of the English verb sing. ‘I’ is the default, since it occurs in word-formation: sing-er. The evidence that is beginning to appear in neural representations of language is the formal lexical representation of the lexeme SING is more properly S{I, A, U}NG. In the present tense, the default vowel ‘I’ is selected from the set. In the past tense the vowel ‘a’ is selected from the set. I can’t go to much further here at this time. I will make reference from time-to-time of set theory in linguistics, but I will not make this the standard theory here.

10 2.4 Morphemes and Ållomorphs
An allomorph is one of the variant forms of a morpheme: E. g. the two forms of the English lexeme HAVE: ha-, and hav(e), phonetically /hæ/ and /hæv/ as in ha-d, ha-s; and have, hav-ing. The dropping of the letter ‘e’ in the progressive participle is an orthographic (spelling) operation unrelated to morphology. In set theory, a member is the generic name for subsets; in linguistics each member of a morpheme is called an allomorph. This alternation is a true morphological alternation. The morpheme is a set, which contains two members (allomorphs), {/hæ/ /hæv/}. Note: in set theory, a comma means the two or more members are ordered. Here there is no ordering. Therefore, a comma cannot be used to separate the two allomorphs. One thing that most morphologists do is confuse the nature of the alternation. For example, the past tense if almost always said to consist of three allomorphic suffixes: [-∔d], [-d], and [-t]. In a technical sense, the alternation is determined by phonological rules, not morphological rules. [-d] is the default (the elsewhere condition), [-t] is the variant following voiceless obstruents, and [∔d] is the variant which occurs between homorganic stops. E. g. loved [lʌv-d], [play-ed], cite [sayt-∔d]. Note: allophones are members of the set called the phoneme. We note from H that Korean has two allomorphs for the accusative singular suffix: {‘ul’ ‘lul’}. It is obvious that ‘ul’ follows consonants and ‘lul’ follows vowels. If the phonological rules of Korean predict that alter alternation ‘ø’ and ‘l’, then the alternation phonological. If it can’t be, then the alternation is morphological.

11 2.4 Morphemes and Ållomorphs
In Turkish the first person possessive suffix has 5 forms: ‘im’, ‘üm’, ‘um’, / m’ and ‘m’. Turkish is well-known of the vowel harmony which occurs in the language.. All these variations are part of the phonological system. H p. 26. In German final voiced stops ‘become’ voiceless at the end of a word or if they precede a voiceless obstruent. H p. 26. Assimilation is definitely phonological and if word boundaries count as phonological markers (they do), then we can consider obstruent devoicing as part of the phonological system. In English there are subtle differences when the voicing stops in final voiced obstruents. This is purely phonological. In Russian and nearly all of the Slavic languages, the vowels /e/ and /o/ (which are reduced in Russian and Byelorussian, are deleted if they are not stressed. This does not happen to all of them, just certain classes. This is a morphological alternation and it is phonologically unpredictable. Underlying Forms The standards theories since about 1960 or so is that there is an underlying from for all the allomorphs of a particular morpheme and all the allophones of a particular phoneme.

12 2.4 Morphemes and Ållomorphs

Download ppt "The Structure of Words 2. Basic Concepts"

Similar presentations

Ads by Google