Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byFranklin Tugwell Modified about 1 year ago

1
Teaching Mathematics, History, and the History of Mathematics

2
Dedicated to the memory of Louise Karlquist (who knew all the QA numbers by heart)

3
And thanks to The Ohio State University Libraries particularly Danny Dotson Mary Scott

4
Fermat’s Last Theorem

5
1993 Andrew Wiles lectures in Cambridge “Modular forms, elliptic curves, and Galois representations” Concluded with Fermat’s last theorem X n + Y n = Z n is impossible in positive whole numbers if n > 2 Flurry of email Front page New York Times

6
Found a gap in the proof Proof withdrawn in December 1993 Wiles student Richard Taylor contributed Proof complete by October 1994 Published April 1995, Annals of Mathematics

8
Greek Texts of Euclid J.L. Heiberg – 1883 – 1916 Sir Thomas L. Heath, Dover Stamatis, 1974 (in library) New (cheap) reprint with new translation by Richard Fitzpatrick

9
OSU’s Euclid, 1570 The elements of Geometrie of the most auncient Philosopher Euclid of Megara. Faithfully (now first) translated into the Englishe toung by H. Billingsley, Citizen of London. Whereunto are annexed certaine Scholies, Annotations, and Inuentions, of the best Mathematicians both of time past, and in this our age. With a very fruitful Paeface made by M.I. Dee.

13
Al-Tusi

14
Plimpton 322

15
Pythagorean Triples in P-322 3 2 + 4 2 = 5 2 5 2 + 12 2 = 13 2 119 2 + 120 2 = 169 2 65 2 + 72 2 = 97 2 541 2 + 546 2 = 769 2 12709 2 + 13500 2 = 18541 2

16
Plimpton 322 Otto Neugebauer: “The Exact Sciences in Antiquity” R.C. Buck: “Sherlock Holmes in Babylon” Eleanor Robson: Words and Pictures, New Light on Plimpton 322Words and Pictures, New Light on Plimpton 322

17
Bill Casselman on Plimpton 322 Plimpton 322

18
Pythagorean Triples X 2 + Y 2 = Z 2 X = m 2 – n 2 Y = 2mn Z = m 2 + n 2

19
Diophantus of AlexandriaDiophantus of Alexandria 200-284 Links to the MacTutor history of math site at St. Andrews, Scotland

20
Bachet’s Diophantus Cover Page

21
Pierre de Fermat 1601 -1665

22
Fermat’s Marginal Note

23
Cubem autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et generaliter nullum in infinitum ultra quadratum potestatem in duos eiusdem nominis fas est dividere: cuius rei demonstrationem mirabilem sane detexi. Hanc marginis exiguitas no caparet. Fermat in the margin

24
Fermat’s Last Theorem NOVA page from PBS MacTutor Page Sophie Germain Kummer and algebraic number theory Andrew Wiles, 1993Andrew Wiles

25
X 4 + Y 4 ≠ Z 4 Fermat really proved this case The “method of infinite descent”

26
Leonhard Euler 1707-1783

27
X 3 + Y 3 ≠ Z 3 Euler’s contribution 1770 Small gap fixed by Gauss

28
Sophie Germain 1776-1831 Pen-name letters to Gauss Sophie Germain primes p and 2p+ 1 both prime 3 (and 7); 5 (and 11); 11(and 23) Case I X p + Y p ≠ Z p if p does not go into X,Y,Z

29
Gabriel Lame 1795-1870 Cyclotomic integers ζ = cos (2π/p) + I sin(2π/p) X p + Y p = (X+Y)(X + ζ Y)…(X+ ζ p-1 Y) Arithmetic in the ring Z[ζ] Unique factorization into primes?? Nope, too bad.

30
Ernst Eduard Kummer 1810-1893 Ideals and ideal numbers Unique factorization into ideal factors “class number” measures failure of prime factorization of numbers Regular Primes Kummer: criterion for regular primes, FLT for regular primes 3,5,7,11,13,17,19,23,29,31, (not 37), 41, 43,53, 59, 61, (not 67), 71, 73, 79,...

31
So – FLT motivated a lot of algebraic number theory

32
A Century of Computation Wolfskehl prize Flurry of wrong proofs Regular primes not so hard Irregular primes tough but possible Exponent by exponent Try out new computers! Dead end?

33
What next? “Elliptic Curves” Arose from integrals trying to measure the length of an ellipse Not an ellipse! Cubic Group Structure Really hot stuff starting in the 50s Main line algebraic number theory Andrew Wiles – dissertation at Cambridge

34
Taniyama Taniyama – Shimura – WeilWeil Technical conjecture describing elliptic curves Frey curve 1984 TSW implies Fermat Once again, FLT inspired main line math Andrew Wiles started working (secretly) on TSW Seven years in the attic

35
Andrew Wiles in Cambridge

36
Back to 1993 Proof withdrawn in December 1993 Wiles student Richard Taylor contributed Proof complete by October 1994 Published April 1995, Annals of Mathematics Full force of Taniyama-Shimura-Weil now proved

37
Maybe a Moral? Fermat’s Last Theorem easily understood and looks like just a puzzle Motivated a great deal of mathematics –Rings of Algebraic Integers –Applications of Elliptic Curves –Even more Galois Theory Mathematics swings from very concrete to the very abstract and back again.

38
What about Math 504? Required by State of Ohio for a secondary teaching license Strongly recommended by the College of Education for admission to the MSAT program Audience is mostly math majors who aspire to high school teaching Varying math skills, writing skills, history skills, geography skills,........

39
What to emphasize?? History vs. Heritage? –Grattan-Guinness Mathematics as a human endeavor? Historical Approach? Capstone for a Math major? Using History to teach Math?

40
Third Writing Course Babcock Committee 1988/McHale Report 2006 Book Review Biography Long Paper Oral Presentation But only ten weeks...

Similar presentations

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google