We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDimitri Romer
Modified over 2 years ago
© 2003 SHRM SHRM HRGames Team Advancement Methodology
© 2003 SHRM Prior to 2004 Advancement was based on either win- loss record or total points accumulated. Matches in which both teams ended with negative point totals would still count as a “win” Changes sought to even the playing field and bring consistency to state and regional competitions
© 2003 SHRM New Advancement Matrix Measures consistency over the length of the preliminary rounds Minimizes the won-loss unfairness Not complex to administer Used to determine semi-finalists and finalists in state and regional HRGames
© 2003 SHRM The New Method: Step 1 Teams compete head-to-head. We’ll use a nine-team, three round competition schedule to illustrate this method: Note: Because of the odd number of teams competing, several teams will have a bye each round. This means that they do not play during a specific round.
© 2003 SHRM The New Method: Step 2 Arrange teams in order from the highest points scored in the round, to the lowest: In this example, all teams will have one “bye” for the competition. This does not hurt their overall ranking.
© 2003 SHRM The New Method: Step 3 Award “wins” to each team based on total points scored compared to the other teams’ scores in that round: Note: Tied point totals count as wins. In this example, both “C” and “D” scored 4400 points. That score of 4400 was better than the points scored by 5 other teams. As a result, “C” and “D” would be awarded 5 “wins” plus an additional “win” for tying with one another. Team “A”s score of 7200 was better than the other 8 teams competing. Thus, they are awarded 8 “wins” for round 1. Team “B”s score of 6300 was better than 7 of the other teams competing. They would be award 7 “wins.” Negative scores and byes (when applicable) will be scored as zero wins.
© 2003 SHRM The New Method: Step 4 Repeat steps 1-3 for each of the remaining preliminary rounds:
© 2003 SHRM The New Method: Step 5 When the preliminary rounds are completed, sum up the total number of points and “wins” for each team, and rank the teams in descending order based on the number of “wins.” In the example below, “A” accumulated 16 wins and would be ranked 1 st :
© 2003 SHRM Determining Semi-Finalists a.Total “wins” accumulated. b.Total points accumulated. c.Head-to-head competition. d.Strength of schedule. Strength of schedule refers to the “quality” of competition you faced in the preliminary rounds. In step 5, teams were ranked from highest to lowest based on “wins.” If two teams are tied based on “wins,” rank by total points. Create a category called “SOS.” Sum up the rankings of each of the opponents each team faced. e.Won-loss record in the preliminary rounds. If two teams competing both score in the negative for a round, neither team will be awarded a win (for the purposes of a tie breaker). f.Coin toss. Use the following order to determine your semi-final teams:
© 2003 SHRM Calculating SOS In this example, “A” (ranked 1 st ) played “C” (who is ranked 4 th ) and “G” (who is ranked 3 rd ). That would give “A” an SOS score of 7. The team with the lower SOS would advance: “A” played, and won against, “C” and “G” “C” is ranked 4 th and “G” ranked 3 rd Thus, “A”s SOS is 4+3= 7
© 2003 SHRM Rationale for Not Scoring Byes An uneven number of teams will likely mean that there may be an uneven distribution of byes throughout the competition (i.e., in one round, one team might have a bye; in others, three or five teams will). As a result, there may be an uneven distribution in “wins” per round. In a nine-team competition, if only one team has a bye, each of the other teams will have a chance to get 8 “wins,” whereas if there are three or five teams on bye, the other teams will only have a chance at, respectively, 6 or 4 “wins.” Consequently, to create equity, byes are scored as zero.
© 2003 SHRM Semi-Finals Once the four semi-final teams are determined, the semi- final round should have the first and fourth place teams and the second and third place teams competing: The winners of each semi-final round will face off in the final round. In the example given, if “A” defeats “C” and “B” defeats “G”, “B” and “A” would meet in the final round despite “G” scoring more points than “A.” Teams “A” and “B” would compete in the final match to determine the competition winner.
© 2003 SHRM A Few Closing Reminders… It is useful to prepare multiple competition schedules in case teams drop out. This presentation is for illustration purposes only and your actual competition may have more than 9 teams. For the full text of this presentation, please consult the HRGames Manual.
New rules Set system Recurve vs. Compound Set system The winner of the match is decided by the number of points accumulated by each archer on the basis.
Impossible to reach upper divisions (A, B, C) 5+ years for New teams 3+ years for existing lower division teams (H,G,F) Teams play almost same teams season.
Event Management Scheduling.
The Houston Army-Navy Scramble Army Alumni; West Point Society of Greater Houston vs. Navy Alumni; USNAAA Gulf Coast Chapter Golf Tournament / October.
Survival 101: What to Expect at Your First Competition Thomas Gill, Team 6705 Motorbolts.
1. Huntsville 2. Buckhorn 3. Madison Academy 4. Austin WinLossWinLoss 1. Huntsville 2. Buckhorn 3. Madison Academy 4. Austin SetsMatches Pool A – Court.
NCAA Division I Women’s Volleyball Selections, Seeding and Bracketing Sharon K. Cessna Director of Championships December 18, 2003.
Competitions Outline Lucidchart - Diagrams Done Right.
NCAA Mens Basketball Tournament The 64 teams that play in the elimination rounds are divided into four groups of 16 teams. The four groups represent the.
Formatting of game by Candace R. Black © All rights reserved. Formatting of Game by Candace R. Black © All Rights Reserved. This line of text.
Seeding and Ties. How to seed Based on league or divisional competition Above not available: –Competed with each other or other team(s) in other competitions.
HIGH SCHOOL ROBOTICS KITTATINNY REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL MR. SHEA Minesweeper Competition
Competitions Forum Outdoor: National League Division 1 (M&W) The team finishing in position 1 in Division 1 after 18 matches will be Division.
PERL 105 Practicum: Scheduling Session. Factors to Consider Availability of space Availability of space Facility (size and suitability) Facility (size.
E PLURIBUS HUGO “Out of the Many, a Hugo” v0.98. What does E Pluribus Hugo do? EPH is a way of tallying nominations that minimizes the effects of slates.
How to Keep Score for Tennis How to Keep Score for Tennis
Scottish Hockey Competitions Outdoor National League 1 and 2(Women) 2014/15 2 National League Divisions Top of League are the League Champions.
Edit the text with your own short phrase. The animation is already done for you; just copy and paste the slide into your existing presentation.
FIDE Arbiters Seminar. The only totally satisfactory tie break is to have a play-off under the same conditions. This is seldom possible so alternative.
BOCCIA IN ACTION! A short presentation of Boccia, so you can learn how this wonderful game is played!
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.