We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJalen Gingell
Modified about 1 year ago
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2012 Chapter 9: The Common Agricultural Policy There is a common misconception that the CAP is about helping small struggling farmers and looking after the European rural environment. But in reality the bulk of these funds end up in the pockets of the wealthiest farmers and processors while also doing enormous harm to developing countries. Luis Morago, Head of Oxfam International in Brussels
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2012 The Common Agricultural Policy The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is a set of policies aimed at raising farm incomes in the EU. The CAP is problematic: -it accounts for almost half the EU budget but farmers continue to leave the land; -it accounts for many of the quarrels among EU members and between the EU and third nations; -it is a massively complex matrix of policies; -it started as simple price support policy in 1962 when the EU was net importer of most food and agriculture was very important in terms of employment and GDP (but not anymore).
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2012 To a large extent, the CAP has been a programme aimed at buffering the worst pain of the inevitable downsizing of the agricultural sector. The Common Agricultural Policy
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2012 Simple price support with tariff When the EU was a net importer, a price floor could be implemented with ‘variable levies’ (i.e., tariffs) to ensure that imports never pushed EU prices below the price floor.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2012 Food tax and subsidy interpretation Price floor supported by tariff is like all-in-one package made up of simpler policy measures: -free trade in the presence of -a consumption tax equal to T and -a production subsidy equal to T. This illustrates that consumers are the ones who pay for a price floor enforced with a variable levy: part of what they pay goes to domestic farmers (area A), part of it goes to the EU budget (area B) and part is wasted (areas C 1 and C 2 ). Also notice that the price instability typical of food markets is eliminated for EU producers: only the tariff varies.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2012 Uneven distribution of benefit EU farms are very heterogeneous:
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2012 Uneven distribution of benefit Heterogeneity leads to uneven distribution of benefits. Price floors help all farmers but most of the gains go to large farmers who tend to be richer in the first place.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2012 Changed circumstances and CAP problems Initially, the CAP made everyone happy: -higher and stable prices to farmers; -tariff revenue for the EU budget; -and consumers were also happy: more food and lower dependence on food imports; empathy with farmers. Post-war period saw productivity gains: the ‘green revolution’: -high guaranteed prices encourage investment; -output rises much faster than consumption; -EU becomes a net exporter of agricultural goods. Price floor cannot be maintained with a tariff: EU actually has to purchase the surplus food.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2012 Changed circumstances and CAP problems
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2012 Unintended consequences: budget problems CAP cost from 8% of EU budget in 1965 to 90% of EU budget in 1969.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2012 Unintended consequences: storage and dumping Storage issue: wheat, beef and butter mountains. Dumping into international markets lead to international trade problems, with particular harm for developing countries.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2012 Unintended consequences: farm income problem Despite massive budgetary cost, the CAP failed to bring the reward to farming in line with the incomes of average EU citizens. Farmers showed their discontent with the CAP by ‘voting with their feet’:
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2012 Unintended consequences: CAP paradox How could farming be unattractive to the average farmer despite the CAP’s billions? Because of uneven payments.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2012 Unintended consequences: other problems ‘Industrialization of farming’ had a negative environmental impact: -pollution; -animal welfare: ‘mad cow’ disease; ‘foot and mouth’ disease.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2012 The new economic logic of the CAP Political power of farms makes it infeasible to eliminate price floors: -farmers had invested heavily in restructuring their farms to focus on the goods most heavily supported by the CAP; -small farmers earned much less from the CAP but without the higher prices, many would be driven out of farming altogether. -and opinion polls show that most EU citizens support the CAP. It was impossible to just eliminate the price floor: lowering or elimination of price floors with compensation payments paid directly to farmland owners. To break the link between payments and overproduction, the payments were ‘decoupled’ = size of payment not related to the amount currently produced (set according to historical production levels).
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2012 Decoupled payments The decoupling reform lowers the price to the world price. If farmers are fully compensated, the direct payments must equal a + b + c.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2012 CAP reform Supply control attempts in the 1980s’ to discourage production: generally failed. MacSharry Reforms (1992): -cap prices and compensate farmers with direct payments; -essential to complete the Uruguay Round Reforms: similar to MacSharry reforms but not enough to allow Doha Round to finish. Health Check 2008: pushed the market orientation of the CAP even further and reduced amount of direct payments.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2012 CAP today Two pillar structure: -‘Single Payment Scheme’ (SPS) based on historical payments in EU15 while money per hectare in new member states Farmers must comply with various rules: ‘Good agricultural and environmental conditions’ and ‘Statutory management requirements’; -Rural Development: improving agricultural competitiveness; managing the land in an environmentally friendly, sustainable manner; improving the quality of life in rural areas. Over the period : increasing role of second pillar, especially in new member states.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2012 CAP today
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2012 Remaining problems Not all of the payments are fully decoupled, so the production distortions persist in some sectors. Farmers only get half of the support: much of the support ends up in the pockets of input suppliers (e.g., non-farming landowners and agrochemical firms). Future reforms post 2013 (just announced but not yet approved): -an almost complete shift away from price support; -a fairer distribution of direct payments; -a ‘Green’ payment for preserving long-term productivity and ecosystems; -a simpler CAP.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2012 Remaining problems Proposed shift of CAP money towards direct payments:
Raed Safadi Deputy-Director, OECD Trade and Agriculture Directorate Workshop on Recent Analysis of the Doha Round, Geneva, 2 November 2010 Environmental.
Chapter 5 Investment and Saving. Equivalence of Saving and Investment One of the key relationships in the NIPA balance is that investment must always.
ECONOMICS IN SOUTHERN AND EASTERN ASIA STANDARD: SS7E8 The student will analyze different economic systems. a. Compare how traditional, command, market.
ABHISHEK CHAKRAVARTY LECTURE 4 EC336 Economic Development in a Global Perspective.
Slides prepared by Thomas Bishop Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 9 The Political Economy of Trade Policy.
Import Tariffs and Quotas Under Perfect Competition 1 A Brief History of the World Trade Organization 2 The Gains from Trade 3 Import Tariffs for a Small.
New Direct Payments Scheme: targeting and redistribution in the future CAP Alan Swinbank University of Reading 29 February 2012.
Middle East Unit Three Government & Economics. A nation’s type of government refers to how that state’s executive, legislative, and judicial organs.
CAP Reform Ref: CAPreform feb07 Introduction Original system – problematic Pressure for reform –Budget –External –Consumer –Environmental Fig1: welfare.
Trading with the World CHAPTER 20. After studying this chapter you will be able to Describe the trends and patterns in international trade Explain comparative.
Brentwood School 20 th January Thank you For inviting me and I hope we can work together to improve your knowledge of the EU I have given Mr Rees.
Slides prepared by Thomas Bishop Chapter 9 The Political Economy of Trade Policy.
Lecture 5: Common Agricultural Policy Cont Based on Sloman Chapter 3.4; Chapter 8, Baldwin & Wyplosz and Chapter 8, Swann Lecture 5: Common Agricultural.
Hall & Leiberman; Economics: Principles And Applications, Comparative Advantage and the Gains from International Trade Consumers love bargains Should.
BARRIERS TO ECONOMIC GROWTH & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS – A COURSE COMPANION, p SECTION 5: DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS 1.
Threats and Opportunities for African Agro-Food Companies By Charles Anudu Managing Director The Candel Company Limited At The Mazungumzo Roundtable Brussels,
Key Issue #4 Chapter 10. Key Issue 4: Economic Issues of Agriculture Economic issues of commercial farmers – Access to markets – Overproduction – Sustainable.
The Common Agricultural Policy Jo Eldridge, Alison Fox, Lizzie Simpson, George Tickell and Chris Wenzinger,
Agricultural Policy, Food Prices and Poverty Presentation to the School of International Development, University of East Anglia 23 September 2009 Alan.
Industrialization and Economic Development. What is economics? Economics is the social science that analyzes the production, distribution, and consumption.
Case Study On The EU. Content The deepening of European integration –Single Market –Euro The widening of European integration The regional dimension of.
EU Days The Single Currency. Joining the Euro Introducing the Euro Introducing the Euro Economic and monetary union (EMU) comprises various stages. Economic.
Poverty Alleviation and Governance Governance Education Network First International Conference on Governance, Islamabad, December 2009 Arne Tesli.
Government Intervention in International Trade Activity 51 by Advanced Placement Economics Teacher Resource Manual. National Council on Economic Education,
EC 100 Mock Exam (Micro). Mock Exam Class Discussion -This week: Discuss the Mock Exam. -Mock Exam is structured very similar to typical final examinations.
Chapter 8 The Instruments of Trade Policy Amended slides originally prepared by Thomas Bishop, Pearson-Addison-Wesley.
1 Multiple Choice Tutorial Chapter 32 International Trade and Finance.
Copyright © by Holt, Rinehart and Winston. All rights reserved. ResourcesChapter menu What Is Environmental Science? Environmental Science is the study.
AGGREGATE DEMAND (AD): The quantity of real GDP demanded at different price levels. -The price level is measured using the GDP deflator. -The quantity.
Principles Of Economics Power Point Presentation Chapter 16 Free Trade: To Be Or Not To Be ©J. Patrick Gunning April 23, 2007.
© 2016 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.