Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byJourney Bastow Modified about 1 year ago

1
IBC PAPER ENGINEERING USE OF LOW-STRENGTH CONCRETE IN HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION Y. Frank Chen, Ph.D., P.E., Professor, Penn State Harrisburg Daniel J. Hacker, P.E., Dawood Engineering Inc., Enola, PA. Contributors: Thomas J. Imholte, Thomas C Rowader, Amelia Stum, Namita Sinha, and Jason Taylor, Dawood Engineering Inc. 1IBC PAPER 08-42

2
RESEARCH MOTIVATION Class C concrete (f´ c = 2,000 psi) is permitted and often selected as replacement for unsuitable material or as leveling fill material below footing on or near rock in order to reduce construction costs by the DOTs. However, engineering guidance or standard on the use of Class C mass concrete is not readily available. Engineers are often questioned by DOT’s officials about the legitimate use of Class C concrete thicker than 3 ft. 2IBC PAPER 08-42

3
DEFINITION OF MASS CONCRETE ACI 211.1: The minimum cross-sectional dimension of a solid concrete mass 2-3 ft, or concrete with cement content > 600 pcy, or concrete with the use of accelerating mixtures ASTM C150 Type III cement or ASTM C1157 HE cement. ACI 116R: Any large volume of cast-in-place concrete with dimensions large enough to require that measures be taken to cope with the generation of heat and attendant volume change to minimize cracking. This is a better definition. IBC PAPER

4
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES To describe and discuss a sound engineering approach related to applications of unreinforced Class C mass concrete, including the important issues of external stability, internal stability, and thermal cracking To identify the possible dimensional limitations on the use of unreinforced Class C mass concrete IBC PAPER

5
THE GENERAL ANALYSIS PROCEDURE IBC PAPER

6
EARTH WALL SYSTEM ON CLASS C MASS CONCRETE IBC PAPER

7
UNFACTORED HORIZ. EARTH LOADS (EH i ) AND UNFACTORED LIVE-LOAD SURCHARGE LOADS (LS hi & LS vi ) FOR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION STAGE EH 3 acts at 0.4 D cc from the base. EH 1 acts at 0.6 D cc from the base. IBC PAPER

8
UNFACTORED HORIZ. WATER LOADS (WA hi ) FOR BOTH TEMPORARY AND FINAL CONSTRUCTION STAGES WA h1 = WA h4 = ½ D cc ⅓ D cc from the base WA h2 = w (H + h – D wf ) D ½ D cc from the base WA h3 = w (H + h – D wb ) D ½ D cc from the base IBC PAPER

9
EXTERNAL STABILITY H u,ftg, V u,ftg, and M u,ftg : Computed by PennDOT ABLRFD Program (Ver. 1.6) M u,cc = -(M u,ftg + H u,ftg ∙ D cc ) – M u,O + M u,R IBC PAPER

10
EXTERNAL STABILITY- CONT’D Overturning: e c = M u,cc /V u,cc ≤ ⅜ B cc [1998 AASHTO LRFD] Bearing: q u,max ≤ q R [1998 AASHTO LRFD] Sliding: H u,cc ≤ Q R [1998 AASHTO LRFD] q R = factored bearing resistance Q R = factored sliding resistance IBC PAPER

11
INTERNAL STABILITY Trapezoidal Pressure Distribution q u = q u,min + (q u,max – q u,min ) ∙ [(B cc – D cc tan – b)/B cc ] IBC PAPER

12
INTERNAL STABILITY- CONT’D 1 Triangular Pressure Distribution q u = q u,max ∙ [(L 1 – D cc tan - b)/L 1 ] IBC PAPER

13
INTERNAL STABILITY- CONT’D 2 Shear-Friction between Wall Footing and Class C Mass Concrete: H u,ftg ≤ v V n1 [2002 ACI 530] Shear of Class C Mass Concrete: V u = ½ (q u + q u,max ) ∙ (D cc tan + b) ≤ v V n2 [2002 ACI 530] Flexure of Class C Mass Concrete: M u = ½ q u (D cc tan + b) 2 + ⅓ (q u,max – q u ) (D cc tan + b) 2 ≤ b M cr [2002 ACI 530] 2002 ACI 530: v = 0.80 and b = IBC PAPER

14
ALLOWABLE MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE DIFFERENTIAL ( T) Current Practice (A Conservative Assumption) PCA: T = 36 0 F TxDOT & Others: T = 35 0 F 14IBC PAPER 08-42

15
T- CONT’D 1 Theoretical MTD Moment curvature, = ( T /I) T(y) y dy dz = (12 T /I) T(y) y dy for a unit width of 12 in. T(y) = T ∙ (1 – 2y/h) M = E I T = 12 E T T(y) y dy = E T T h 2 Thermally-induced tensile stress, f t = M/S = E T T/ ACI 530: E = 1800 ksi, T = 4.5x10 -6 (1/ o F), and f r (rupture strength) = 250 psi. f t ≡ f r T = F (considered “too high”) for f c = 2,000 psi (Class C concrete) Similarly, T = F for f c ≥ 2,500 psi (structural conc.) Deemed “more reasonable” for Class C conc. 15IBC PAPER 08-42

16
T- CONT’D 2 Level 1 Cracking Analysis (Corps of Engineers) Max. tensile strain, t = f r /E c = 0.250(ksi)/1800(ksi) = 138.9x10 -6 in/in total = T T K R K f = t + cr K R = the structure restraint factor L/h and the location within the mass concrete K f = the foundation restraint factor E f /E c cr = the strain due to the thermal gradient = w cr /ℓ = 0.125(in)/1200(in) = 104.2x10 -6 in/in 2002 ACI 207.2R: Permits K R = K f = 1.0 conservatively. T = F (deemed “probable”) 16IBC PAPER 08-42

17
MASS CONCRETE- REQUIRED COOLING TIME & CEMENT CONTENT Cooling Time, t (hr) t ≈ 6.72 h 2 for two-side cooling per PCA, where h = the thk. of mass conc. (ft) t ≈ h 2 for five-side cooling Temperature Rise of Concrete due to Heat Generation of Cement, T r ( 0 F) T r = C H/S where C = proportion of cement in concrete by weight, H = heat generation due to hydration of cement (Btu/lb), and S = specific heat of concrete (avg = 0.24 Btu/ 0 F). The Required Pozzolan Content, C p (pcy) C p = (C ct – T S conc /H)/(1 – R h ) where C ct = total cement content (pcy), R h = reduction rate of hydration heat. R h = 15% max. if mixed with fly ash or 50% max if mixed with slag per PennDOT. The Required Cement Content, C c (pcy) C c = C ct – C p 17IBC PAPER 08-42

18
A CASE STUDY C ct = pcy and f c = 2,000 psi, min. per PennDOT. Type II & Type IV portland cement. H = 15.93, t w = 1.5, N = 1, a = 2, h = 2, B f = 10.75, D wf = 9.59, D wb = 2.93’, b = 1, D cc = 5.5, = 37 0 s = kcf, sat = kcf, H f = 4.75, q s = ksf, k ah = IBC PAPER 08-42

19
REPRESENTATIVE OVERTURNING RESULTS Overturning is the most critical external stability issue and is considered as the second most critical overall engineering issue. 19IBC PAPER 08-42

20
REPRESENTATIVE SLIDING RESULTS Sliding is less critical than overturning. 20IBC PAPER 08-42

21
REPRESENTATIVE BEARING RESULTS Bearing is less critical than sliding. 21IBC PAPER 08-42

22
REPRESENTATIVE INTERNAL STABILITY RESULTS Flexural cracking is most critical, followed by shear and shear-friction. Flexural cracking is the most critical overall engineering issue. Shear-friction is not a real concern. 22IBC PAPER 08-42

23
HYDRATION OF CEMENT VALUES (i.e., H VALUES) Based on the 1994 PCA “Design and Control of Concrete Mixtures” 23IBC PAPER 08-42

24
H VALUES- CONT’D IBC PAPER

25
REDUCTION OF HYDRATION HEAT (R h ) VALUES FOR MTD = 36 0 F (CONSERV.) Type II portland cement: h max = N/A (cement only), 4´ (w/ fly ash), and 4-9.5´ (w/ slag). Type IV portland cement: h max = 5´ (cement only), 5-8.5´ (w/ fly ash), and ´ (w/ slag). 25IBC PAPER 08-42

26
R h VALUES FOR MTD = 43 0 F (MORE REASONABLE) Type II portland cement: h max = 4´ (cement only), 4-6´ (w/ fly ash), and 6-52´ (w/ slag). Type IV portland cement: h max = 10´ (cement only), 10-16´ (w/ fly ash), and 16-57´ (w/ slag). 26IBC PAPER 08-42

27
R h VALUES FOR MTD = 43 0 F- CONT’D IBC PAPER

28
R h VALUES FOR MTD = 54 0 F (PROBABLE) Type II portland cement: h max = 6´ (cement only), ´ (w/ fly ash), and ´ (w/ slag). Type IV portland cement: h max = 24´ (cement only), ´ (w/ fly ash), and ´ (w/ slag). 28IBC PAPER 08-42

29
R h VALUES FOR MTD = 54 0 F- CONT’D IBC PAPER

30
SUMMARY OF THERMAL CRACKING ANALYSIS RESULTS 30IBC PAPER 08-42

31
CONSTRUCTION COSTS (SAMPLE STUDY) L = 40 ft. 31IBC PAPER 08-42

32
CONSTRUCTION COSTS- CONT’D 1 Conventional Construction w/o the use of Class C Mass Concrete (BFE = 836): $130,640 (Case 1) Proposed Construction w/ the Use of Class C Mass Concrete (BFE = 841.5) Type II portland cement mixed w/ slag: $120,040 (Case 2) Type IV portland cement mixed w/ fly ash: $122,240 (Case 3) Cost Savings Case 2 vs. Case 1: 8.1% Case 3 vs. Case 1: 6.4% These cost savings will rise for larger projects. IBC PAPER

33
CONSTRUCTION COSTS- CONT’D 2 Construction Schedule Benefit Proposed Construction: The mass concrete can be poured right after the excavation work is done and the wall system may then be constructed 3-7 days after the mass concrete is cast. Conventional Construction: Water pumping, forming and bracing are required prior to the cons of the wall system, which could take up to two weeks. The proposed construction with the use of unreinforced Class C concrete is clearly better in terms of cost and construction schedule benefits. IBC PAPER

34
CONCLUSIONS Based on the results from the parametric studies, the following conclusions can be made: For external stability of the mass concrete, overturning is most critical, followed by sliding and bearing. For internal stability of the mass concrete, flexural cracking is most critical, followed by shear and shear-friction. Among all engineering issues, flexural cracking is most critical followed by overturning. Shear-friction is not a real concern. The thickness of mass concrete is governed by the thermal cracking criteria and MTD. Current assumption of MTD = 36 0 F appears to be intended for the more cementitious structural concrete (i.e., f c ≥ 2,500 psi), and is considered fairly conservative for concrete with lower strength and lower cement content. The construction with the use of unreinforced Class C mass concrete is more beneficial in terms of cost and construction schedule. With mixed cement (with fly ash or slag), Class C concrete offers a wide rage of applications. 34IBC PAPER 08-42

35
RECOMMENDATIONS To avoid the potential flexural cracking of mass concrete, b ≤ 1 ft and ≤ 37 0 are recommended. 35IBC PAPER 08-42

36
RECOMMENDATIONS- CONT’D To minimize the thermal cracking of mass concrete, portland cement Type II or Type IV with low total cement content (< 400 pcy) and low compressive strength (f c ≤ 2,000 psi) are recommended. Experimental work for justifying the adoption of higher MTD value such as 43 0 F (more reasonable) or 54 0 F (probable) is warranted. IBC PAPER

37
THANK YOU. QUESTIONS? IBC PAPER

Similar presentations

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google