Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Munich 2008 Portland 2009 WG1: Benchmarking of asset management methods Portland 22 nd – 23 rd October 2009.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Munich 2008 Portland 2009 WG1: Benchmarking of asset management methods Portland 22 nd – 23 rd October 2009."— Presentation transcript:

1 Munich 2008 Portland 2009 WG1: Benchmarking of asset management methods Portland 22 nd – 23 rd October 2009

2 Munich 2008 Portland 2009 WG1: Benchmarking of asset management methods Group members MunichKalgoorliePortland Ramesh Sinhal (Chairman)UK  Alfred Wenninger-VycudilAustria  Gerhard EberlAustria  Dominique RafanomezanaMadagascar  Ricardo Solorio MurilloMexico  Sophia TekieNamibia  Bert de WitNetherlands  Chris ParkmanNew Zealand  Donald MorrisonScotland  Fernando Varela SotoSpain  Richard AbellUK  Stephen GajUSA  Viktor BardoczkyHungary  Rachid TabbouchyMorocco Jose Ortiz-GarciaColombia 

3 Munich 2008 Portland 2009 WG1: Benchmarking of asset management methods Case Studies Benchmark development Benchmark confirmation Reporting Group Task Identify best practice in asset management systems with key aspects for road authorities at different stages of development to consider when choosing a system. Review costs associated with asset systems and recommend where costs are focused. Strategies Main stages of the work

4 Munich 2008 Portland 2009 WG1: Benchmarking of asset management methods Case Studies 1.Namibia – Draft prepared 2.New Zealand – Draft prepared 3.Netherlands – Draft prepared 4.UK: Scotland – Draft prepared 5.USA – Draft prepared 6.UK: England – Draft in preparation 7.Spain (PPP) – To be prepared 8.Mexico – To be prepared 9.Colombia ?

5 Munich 2008 Portland 2009 Case Study Review 1.Scotland - Netherlands 2.Namibia - England 3.USA - England 4.Netherlands - Scotland 5.New Zealand - Namibia 6.England – USA 7.Mexico – Spain 8.Spain – Mexico WG1: Benchmarking of asset management methods Overall synthesised report – WG Chairman

6 Munich 2008 Portland 2009 WG1: Benchmarking of asset management methods Benchmarking Framework For Asset Management and Costs Subject Areas Aspects to be considered to show level of achievement

7 Munich 2008 Portland 2009 WG1: Benchmarking of asset management methods Benchmarking Framework For Asset Management and Costs Subject Areas Goals and Objectives Organisational issues People and Culture Data and Information Risk Management Delivery and Resource Allocation Planning Systems and Processes Costs Benefits

8 Munich 2008 Portland 2009 WG1: Benchmarking of asset management methods Benchmarking Framework For Asset Management and Costs Aspects to be considered Goals and Objectives Short and long-term goals Achievable objectives Stewardship of assets Meeting stakeholders requirements Performance driven decisions Measurable performance targets

9 Munich 2008 Portland 2009 WG1: Benchmarking of asset management methods Call for Papers – proposed text Identification and benchmarking of best practice in approaches to asset management for road authorities at different stages of development. Issues that may be considered include : Organisation, people and culture Coverage and integration of asset types Efficient and effective use of data Risk management Planning, decision making and delivery Costs and benefits Achievements and challenges

10 Munich 2008 Portland 2009 WG1: Benchmarking of asset management methods Proposed work programme Update case studies for Scotland, Namibia, USA, Netherlands, New Zealand and England – Christmas Prepare case studies for Mexico and Spain (PPP) – Christmas Contact Colombia about preparation of case study – 9 th Nov Circulate draft benchmarking framework – 9 th Nov Comments on draft benchmarking framework - 1 st Dec Comments on case studies – 31 st January Final case studies - 28 th February Circulate updated benchmarking framework – 28 th February 2010

11 Munich 2008 Portland 2009 WG1: Benchmarking of asset management methods Work programme Issue: WG1 - Benchmarking of asset management methods Description of the selected strategies Identify best practice in asset management systems with key aspects for road authorities at different stages of development to consider when choosing a system. Review costs associated with asset systems and recommend where costs are focused. Working group leaderRamesh Sinhal Cooperation within PIARCTC-D2 Cooperation with other organisationsAustroads (Chris Parkman) COST Actions (To be identified - Alfred) ERANET roads (To be identified - Alfred) OutputsCalendar Technical reportsCase Studies (Current Position and Best Practice) Overview and Benchmark (Requirements for Asset Management approaches) 2009 Q Q4 ArticlesSummary of Case Studies (Current Position and Best Practice)2011 Q1 PIARC international seminarsPresentations of case studiesTo be confirmed Sessions at XXIV World Road CongressBenchmarking of asset management methods2011 Q3 Other eventsICMP8 (Chile) EPAM4 (Sweden) ? TRB Q Q3 ? 2012 Q1 ? Aspects more specifically relevant to developing countries and countries in transition Case studies to identify current practices and potential areas for improvement. Seminar in Madagascar?


Download ppt "Munich 2008 Portland 2009 WG1: Benchmarking of asset management methods Portland 22 nd – 23 rd October 2009."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google