Presentation on theme: "Theory of Reasoned Action/ Planned Behavior and the Integrated Behavioral Model Presentation by Irving Rootman to SFU Class on Principles and Practices."— Presentation transcript:
1Theory of Reasoned Action/ Planned Behavior and the Integrated Behavioral Model Presentation by Irving Rootman to SFU Class on Principles and Practices of Health PromotionSeptember 27, 2010
2Development of TheoryTheory of Reasoned Action (TRA) developed by Fishbein in mid-1960’sFishbein and Ajzen modified TRA in 1970’s and called it the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB)Kasprzyk and Montano collaborated with Fishbein to produce further extension of the TRA/TPB called the Integrated Behavioral Model (IBM) in the 1990’s
3Description of TRA/TPB TRA/TPB concerned with individual motivational factors as determinants of the likelihood of performing a specific behaviourTRA includes measures of attitude and social normative perceptions that determine behavioural intention, which in turn affects behavior.TPB contains an additional construct: perceived control over performance of the behaviour
4Definitions of TRA Constructs Behavioral intention: “perceived likelihood of performing the behavior”Attitude toward behavior: “evaluation of the behavior”Subjective norm: “belief about whether most people approve of disapprove of the behavior”
5Definitions of TRA Constructs (Cont.) Behavioral beliefs: “belief that behavioral performance is associated with certain attributes or outcomes”Evaluation of behavioral outcomes: “value attached to a behavioral outcome or attribute”Normative beliefs: “belief about whether most important people approve or disapprove of behaviour”Motivation to comply: “Motivation to do what each referent thinks”
6Definitions of TPB Constructs Perceived behavioral control: “perceived control over the behavior”Control belief: “perceived likelihood of occurrence of each facilitating or constraining condition”Perceived power: “perceived effect of each condition in making performance difficult or easy”
8Measurement: Example of Glove Use (Levin, 1999) Behavioral Intention: How likely is it you will wear gloves each time?Attitude Toward Behavior: How important do you think wearing gloves is?- Behavioral Belief: Is wearing gloves when there is contact with blood… awkward/inconvenient/keep you safe?- Evaluation of Behavioral Outcome: How likely is it that wearing gloves will be effective?Subjective Norm: To what extent do the majority of people think it is a good idea to wear gloves?- Normative beliefs – Do most people in healthcare think it is important to wear gloves?- Motivation to comply – How much do you want to comply?Perceived Behavior Control:- Control beliefs: Is it up to you whether or not you wear gloves?- Perceived power: Do you have the ability to put on gloves?
9Description of IBM (Cont.) Substitutes “Evaluations of behavioral outcomes” with “Feelings about behavior” and “Perceived power” with “Efficacy beliefs”Divides “Normative beliefs” into “Others’ expectations” and “Others’ behavior”Drops “Motivation to comply”
10Description of Integrated Behavioral Model (IBM) Most important determinant of behaviour is still intention to perform behaviourAdds 4 other determinants of behaviour: Knowledge and skills; Salience of behaviour; Environmental constraints; and HabitExpands and renames Attitude, Normative and Control elements
11Definitions of new or changed constructs in IBM Experiential attitude: “Affective evaluation of the behaviour”Instrumental attitude: “Cognitive evaluation of the behaviour”Injunctive norm: Called “subjective” norm in TRA/TPBDescriptive norm: “what others in one’s social networks are doing”
12Definitions of new or changed constructs in IBM (Cont.) Personal agency: “bringing one’s influence to bear on one’s own functioning and environmental events” (Bandura, 2006)Self-efficacy: “ones degree of confidence in the ability to perform the behavior in the face of various obstacles or challenges”Feelings about behavior: Not definedControl beliefs: “beliefs about the likelihood of occurrence of various constraining or facilitating conditions”Efficacy Beliefs: “perceived effect of these conditions in making behavior easy or difficult”
14Steps in Applying IBM Framework Clearly specify behaviorConduct elicitation studyUse findings to design surveyConfirm that measures explain behavioral intentionUse findings to analyze and identify specific beliefs for interventionDevelop arguments to change beliefsSelect and train channels for communicationIntroduce and evaluate intervention
15StrengthsHelps organize thought and planning of research, interventions and analysisProvides framework to understand cognitive factors and motivation behind behavioursRequirement of elicitation studies and precise measures provide evidence relevant to individuals, groups or populationsPredicts and explains wide range of health behavioursHas evolved over time based on research and experienceHas been used extensively to develop interventions
16LimitationsUncertainties regarding whether or not intentions will yield behavior changeNew alternative ways to conceptualize intentionsAttitudes often affect behavior directlyIntentions can change over timeSome variables not extensively testedDoes not address emotional elementsTime consuming/expensive to collect dataFocus related to individual motivationTRA and TPB predictors based on subjective factorsDoesn’t include interpersonal, group and community factors to any great extent
17Implications for Aging Only one of the references in Chapter 4 of the Glanz book mentioned seniors (Montano, D. & Kasprzk, 2008)In a search of published literature from on TPB several papers involving seniors appeared, many having to do with predicting physical activity among seniorsA search over the same time period in relation to the IBM yielded no papers on aging or seniors.
18Example of Project Using TRA in relation to Aging (Albarracin, et al Purpose: Test utility of structural and volitional factors as determinants of support-seeking intentionsSample: 106 middle-aged women in ArgentinaMethods: TRA questionnaire on support-seeking behaviors; women asked about (1) intention to visit doctor one a year after age 55; (2) intention to visit family member at least once a week after 55Findings: Intentions could be successfully predicted from attitudes and norms but not from structural factorsConclusion: Study provides support for TRA as predictor of intentions to seek social support in old age
19Example of Project Using TPB in relation to Aging (Dean et al., 2007) Purpose: Use TPB constructs to understand factors influencing older adults’ participation in strength trainingSample: 200 men and women aged 55+ purposely sampled from seniors’ centres in OntarioMethods: TPB questionnaire; Regression analysisFindings: Subjective norm and perceived behavioral control predicted 42% of variance; Gender and current strength-training did not moderate relationshipConclusion: interventions targeting subjective norm and perceived control might be helpful in promoting strength-training behavior among older adults.
20ReferencesAlbarracin, D., Fishbein, M. & de Muchinik, E. (1997). Seeking social support in old age as reasoned action. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27 (6),Dean, RN, Farrell, JM, Kelley, ML, Taylor, MJ &Rhodes, RE. (2007). Testing the efficacy of the theory of planned behavior to explain strangth training in older adults. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 15 (1), 1-12.Levin, P. (1999). Test of the Fishbein and Ajzen models as predictors of health care workers’ glove use. Research in Nursing & Health, 22,Montano, D. & Kasprzk, (2008). The Theory of Reasoned Action, Theory of Planned Behavior and the Integrated Behavioral Model. In Glanz, K.M., Rimer, B.K.& Viswanath, K. (Eds.). Health behavior and health education: Theory, research and practice, pp , 4th Edition, San Francisco, California: Jossey- Bass.