Presentation on theme: "MEMA Regional Forum 2012 Amman, October 3rd , 2012."— Presentation transcript:
1 MEMA Regional Forum 2012Amman, October 3rd , 2012
2 Agenda GS1 Key 5 Top Priorities 2012-2015 OGSM 2012/2013 Update GS1 Key 5 Top Priorities (Details)Strengthen The CoreBecome a Key Player in the Connected World (internet)Winning and Engaging New Strategic SectorsStep Change Brand AwarenessContinue Developing a World Class, Interdependent OrganizationGS1 Management BoardThe Consumer Goods Forum (CGF)
4 Top 5 Priorities 2012/15 – MB Approved Continue strengthening our Core: providing Excellent Service to our Core Strategic Sectors (Retail, Healthcare, and Transport & Logistics) by driving the GS1 System (AIDC, eCom, GDSN, and EPC)Become a key player in the connected world (internet) by:Business-to-Consumer (B2C)Data Quality (DQ)VisibilityWinning and engaging New Strategic SectorsStep-change GS1 Brand Awareness by implementing the new Brand ArchitectureContinue developing a world-class, interdependent organisationDriving Momentum Together4
9 Top 5 Priorities 2012/15 – MB Approved Continue strengthening our Core: providing Excellent Service to our Core Strategic Sectors (Retail, Healthcare, and Transport & Logistics) by driving the GS1 System (AIDC, eCom, GDSN, and EPC)Become a key player in the connected world (internet) by:Business-to-Consumer (B2C)Data Quality (DQ)VisibilityWinning and engaging New Strategic SectorsStep-change GS1 Brand Awareness by implementing the new Brand ArchitectureContinue developing a world-class, interdependent organisationDriving Momentum Together9
10 1. Strengthening the Core GS1 Key 5 Top Priorities:1. Strengthening the Core
12 AIDC Data Carrier Adoption Trends Mature deployment for EAN/UPC, GS1-128, ITF14Trending adoption of GS1 DataBar on Fresh FoodsTrending adoption for GS1 DataMatrix in HealthcarePromotion of RFID in EAS applicationsPromotion of 2D for B2C Extended Packaging
14 AIDC Data Carrier Adoption Challenges ManagementSunrise vs. Driving AdoptionBe aligned that GS1 cannot set sunrise dates for a carrier. GS1 can actively promote a carrier for an application but adoption is a mutual agreement of trading partnersBe aligned on new carriers and existing sunrise dates (e.g. DataBar in ‘14)Common AIDC Investment DirectionEnsure MOs provide common AIDC investment advice to industryResearch and DevelopmentPOS Technology Gap for FMCGResolve POS Technology Gap to provide “dynamic data” (expiry dates, serial numbers) in AIDC on all POS products
16 Bar Code Conformance Next Steps Objective Status Issues OGSM Measure FY12/13StatusComplete 1D Test Center deployment in 10 EU MOs plus New Zealand and Australia by December 2012On targetObjectiveComplete 1D Test Center deployment in 12 MOs by December 2012StatusApproved: GS1 Starting and Managing GS1 Bar Code Verification Service GuidelineIn eBallot: GS1 Bar Code Verification Process GuidelineIssuesNoneNext StepsUpdate Conformance Training Materials and Marketing/CommunicationsDraft AIDC Test Plan to analyze current Bar Code minimums (if too restrictive)Complete 3rd Party Accreditation Proposal
17 GS1 Bar Code Conformance 3Y Plan 201320142012Update StandardsComplete GuidelinesDeploy 12 MOsAccreditation Proposal1D ConformanceTraining & Marketing UpdatesVerifiersAvailableApprove New StandardsComplete GuidelinesDeploy 12 MOsAccreditation Proposal2D ConformanceTraining & Marketing UpdatesValidate Current Bar Code Minimum SpecificationsDraft PlanComplete testing & initiate Standards UpdatesUpdate Standards…Ratified standard or work finalizedWork in progress or plannedWork requested by MOs17
19 GS1 eCom Update Objective Progress Issues Next Steps Execute GS1 eCom StrategyProgressGS1 XMLeCom Major Release 3 – ratified and publishedSupport material publishedGS1 XML Technical User Guide Release 3Standard Business Document Header (SBDH) Version 1.3 Technical Implementation GuideTransport management implementation guideDeployment projects launched with 6 MOs (see O2C update)IssuesNo current issuesNext StepsEANCOM 2002 Edition 2012 (End 2012)AS4 Protocol guideline & profile, incl. update of AS2 guide (2013)XML 3.1 incl. Intelligent Packaging (2012) and Warehousing (2013)
20 eCom implementation trends Highlights:GS1 EANCOM® is far from being an ‘old and obsolete’ technology. The number of users amongst GS1 member companies is now more than 100,000 companies and the in 2011 it is forecasted to increase by furtherThe relatively new – comparing to the ‘classic’ EDI – GS1 XML standard after a period of modest implementation levels grew during first two years, approaching the level of companies. The Web EDI implementation is also growing at a similar rate, which indicates that also smaller companies and organisations are increasingly embracing eCom based information exchange. In general, the interest and actual adoption of the electronic form of business documents exchange is constantly growing, confirming the benefits the companies can get from this form of business integration.
21 Order-to-Cash Deployment OGSM Measure FY12/13StatusDeployment completed from 6 to 8 MOs by June 2013On targetObjectiveIncrease GS1 eCom adoption in Order-to-Cash by providing MOs with best practices in local deploymentProgress6 MOs engaged in deployment phase (GS1 Belgium, Chili, Brazil, Italy, China, South Africa)Regional training in Chile in May 2012IssuesNoneNext StepsOn-going support to MOs in deployment phase (training, marketing plan, implementation support)Regional training in China in Fall 2012
23 GDSN Operations and Strategy Execution ObjectiveExecute GDSN 2012 / 2013 OGSMProgress10+ Million items registered (+21% over last year, FY start: July 1, 2011)24,610 trading partners registered (+22% over last year, FY start: July 1, 2011)153 countries; 30 certified DPsGPC: Million GTINs in Global Registry coded with GPC (87%)Country Expansion Programme for Healthcare – In ProgressData Quality Strategy Renewal – In ProgressIssuesNone at this timeNext StepsMaintenance Release 5 and GPC – Deployment to Production October 2012Major Release and Certification Event (Modular Item) – Dates TBD via Network Deployment StrategyAdoption: GS1 Denmark joinedGDSN developing an Implementation Toolkit in to support MOs as they launch “Project Etoile type” of user implementation programmes17 : 24 DPs actively Synching in 66 countriesMarketing:2nd quarterly newsletter ready for release – led by Jan Denecker and Alan Hyler----XXXX downloads of our first versionDevelopmentGDSN operating cost reductionIntellectual property for GR to transfer to GS1 / GDSNDecision to rebuild/enhance GR is not part of this projectMust consider GS1 overall registry requirements (ONS, Authentication)Assumed responsibility for Manila dev team this month - interim
25 EPC Update (1/2) Objective Progress OGSM Measure FY12/13 Status EPC BoG approval of new EPCglobal OGSM by June 2013On TargetObjectiveDrive adoption of EPCglobal Standards, focusing on 2 key sectors (Apparel and T&L)ProgressExtensive adoption of EPC in Apparel and General Merchandise driven by Wal-MartStrong focus on Item-Level tagging at source(Re-)launch of Apparel, Fashion & Footwear User GroupNFC Forum: MoU signed and in implementation phaseEPC Board extension with 5 new Governors : GS1 Canada, Macy’s, Gerry Weber, DHL & C&A.EPC IP Subcommittee: Extensive work to re-examine Round Rock patents in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO).
27 GSMP UpdateMerge of old GSMP and EPCglobal standard development processes completedNew communication and educational materials available on-line (full transparency of project status to users and MOs)Start of GSMP Best In Class project to be completed in June 2013
28 GSMP Membership as of 30 June 2012 Dec 31, 2011March 31, 2012June 30, 2012Total Company ParticipationNew GSMP245268284Additional Companies Operating only in Former GSMP Groups65(5 groups)8(1 group)Total Company Participation310276
30 GLN Registries Framework OGSMGLN Registry Framework Pilot Project Report by March 2013ProgressProject will develop a global solution to connect all GLN (Global Location Number) registries to enable users the look up of GLN and basic party information from any other registryGlobal Index data attributes have been AgreedPilot Global Index development - CompletedPilot infrastructure has been AgreedPhase 1 Pilot, Columbia, US – CompletedOther MOs welcome for pilot work through early DecemberPilot Period / pilot activities complete by early December 2012
31 Input from GS1 US and GS1 Colombia GLN Registry PilotInput from GS1 US and GS1 Colombia
32 GLN Registries Interoperability Pilot Phase 1 Pilot Purpose:Prove interoperability of GLN Registries model using a Global IndexPilot Participants Profiles:GS1 Colombia14,601 items in GLN RegistrySupporting the Retail, Manufacturer, Healthcare and other 23 sectorsGS1 US390,000 items in GLN RegistrySupporting the Healthcare sectorOn average 68 GLN additions and 62 GLN changes dailyPilot Criteria & Execution:Use of existing standards; no standards developmentTested GLN attribute registration, modification, search query and responseAll attributes were required to be registered and returned in GLN query responses
33 GLN Registries Phase 1 Pilot Pilot Findings Phase 1:GS1 US and GS1 Colombia executed test plan twice during pilot weekSuccess in proving pilot model design; can interoperate GLN Registries using Global IndexResponse times for pilot test cases within expected rangePilot Key Learnings:Key Focus placed on searching against Global IndexCase Sensitivity will need to addressed with a broader group; should it be on or off?International phone number format; Organization names, street, city, country etc.?Data consistency is outside of the scope of this project; would be discussed as part of the production operations of this serviceSeeking additional Member Organization participation during Pilot Period
34 GLN Registries Next Steps PilotExecute additional pilot activity through December 2012Prepare Pilot Report in Q1 CY 2013Production TechnologyWithin the GLN Registry GroupDetermine which technical learnings will carry forward to production technical designFormalize discussion of technical options for inclusion of MO issued GLNs within the GLN Registry GroupProduction Business IssuesAddress within GLN Registry Group and escalate business decisions to GS1 GO LT and governanceForm GLN Registry Data Quality committee to develop best practices, education, communications and audit approach
36 MO Deployment Kits Order to Cash Bar Codes in Retail Solution ProvidersBuilding partnerships to enable GS1 Standards ImplementationsFood TraceabilityFresh FoodsTransport Management
37 ContentsThe MO Deployment Kits summarise the experience and best practices from GS1 MOs worldwide, includingMarket understandingSurveysCreating partnershipsDeveloping a marketing planSupporting users in the implementation phaseMeasuring successMarketing collateral (case studies reference documents)Technical informationTraining tools
38 MO Contributors and GO Owner GS1 GER, FR, US, UK, BEL, SP, MEX, SWE, IT, NL, JP, AUS, ARGAnders Grangard/Nora KaciBar Codes in RetailGS1 FR, UK, NZ, NIGERIA, IND, COL, SLO, MALAY, US, MEX, RU, SAUDI A., CADavid BuckleySolution Providers ProgrammeGS1 AUS, AT, FR, GER, HUN, IRE, MEX, NOR, SA, SP, SWE, UK, USJulio GasetFood TraceabilityGS1 ARG, BE, BR, CHI, CRO, FR, GER, HK, IRE, MEX, NZ, PERU, SA, THAI, USCarolyn LeeFresh FoodGS1 AT, AUS, BELUX, BR, CA, FR, IRE, KO, NL, PO, SA, UK, USGreg RoweTransport ManagementGS1 SWE, GER, FR, NL, AUS, DK, AT, SWITNora Kaci/Audrey Kramer
39 2. Become a Key Player in the Connected World (internet) GS1 Key 5 Top Priorities:2. Become a Key Player in the Connected World (internet)
41 DQ PreambleThe attached presentation aims to address the MB and GA request to make DQ a top priority for GS1 in coming next years. Therefore, the decisions made at the GA 2012 have been strengthenedDue to the new services (e.g. WCO, etc.) that will be based on existing GS1 registries (GEPIR, GLN MO Registries, etc.), the scope of the DQ proposal has been enlarged to include them
42 DQ: Objective and Scope Strive for achieving 100% data quality in all GS1 dataScopeAs this is a major undertaking, we will approach by phases.DataInternal: GEPIR and GLNExternal: GDSN Data Pools and B2C AggregatorsAttributesProduct and Party informationGeographiesPrimary focus on AC / G20 countries but open to other countriesSectorsConsumer Goods and Healthcare
43 DQ Internal (MOs): DQ Objective & Plan Objective: Target 100% data quality in GEPIR and GLN Registries by end 2014PlanDevelop Best Practices Protocol to clean and update GEPIR and GLN Registries (GO, March 2013)Clean current data bases:Develop Best practices to add/maintain data for GEPIR and GLN Registries (GO, June 2013)Run annual DQ audits by external auditorsFundingUse Global reserves to contribute to this project with a 5% discount on 2013 annual fee (to be paid to each participant MO after successful, external audited conclusion of the project within due date)GEPIRGLN RegistriesAC/G20BalanceEnd 2013Mid 2014End 2014
44 DQ External (Users): Background Multiple Data Crunch reports have shown the low quality of B2B data. The B2C research also shows similar resultsMost Large Enterprises (LE) are not ready to deliver directly quality data to their trading partners in the next 2-3 years. This represents major changes in their internal business processes and IT systems. They provide the data through complex, inaccurate and expensive alternative systemsMany LEs are sharing product data using the GDSN framework, that is growing year after year in products and companiesMost LE manufacturers have make clear that they want to provide their data at their own pace. Most LEs (manufacturers & retailers) have clearly stated that mandates to suppliers is not the right approach to get suppliers to join a DQ projectHowever, there is also an increasing number of non-GDSN data repositories that host product data used by LEs and SMEs, primarily, to:Store basic product and label information for B2C purposesShare Basic B2B information (weight and dimensions) for Shelf Planograms
45 DQ External (Users): Objectives & Plan (1 of 2) Objective: Strive for 100% data quality for B2B and B2C applications, in Consumer Goods and HC by 2015 (?)PlanExecute DQ strategy agreed at GA 2012Leverage the current DQF, collateral and tools to:Launch an aggressive awareness, education and marketing campaign to educate MOs and key stakeholders by training 90% of TCGF Board Companies on DQFDrive alignment of DQ, B2C, GDSN to harmonize messagingEnhance and extend all DQ materials by refreshing DQ training, website and collateral and case studiesPropose DQ Measure for TCGF Global ScorecardRenew of the current DQ Strategy and DQF to support B2B2C (GDSN 12 / 12 OGSM)Ask TCGF Board and HC LT companies to provide achievable dates to deliver this DQ objective (2015 ?)
46 DQ External (Users): Objectives & Plan (2 of 2) Plan (cont…)AC/G20 MOs to strengthen the basic plan by:GDSN users: Making sure they facilitate all users access to the GDSN framework (via own Data Pool or collaboration with an existing GDSN DP)Non-GDSN users:Sign a strategic collaboration agreement with Non-GDSN key data repositories to guarantee:Use of GS1 attributesInteroperability with other GS1 framework and, in the future, with the GS1 Global Data BackboneProvide data repository services (Aggregator), leveraging existing Aggregators (for simplicity and cost reasons), for all users that do not want to use the GDSN frameworkProvide data capture & measuring services, directly or indirectly, for B2C (TSD) and B2B (Shelf Planograms) basic data
47 DQ: Next Steps AC Support to: DQ Internal (Internal)DQ External (Users)Get support from Users (GDSN Board and B2C Project Board) (October 2012)Get support from MB (November 2012)
49 Agenda TSD Standards Status Global Index Implementation for TSD FrameworkTSD Aggregator CertificationTSD Framework NamingIssues, suggestions & Project Board supportQ&A
50 TSD Standard Prototype Objective:Trial TSD Standard Specification to improve the quality of the final standard.Aggregator Participants:1Sync, epcSolutions, GS1 Colombia, GS1 France, GS1 Italy, GS1 Russia,Timing:Original completion date Sept 2012 (new date TBD by group)
53 TSD Framework Naming Supported by Project Board
54 ObjectiveCreate a global umbrella name for the Trusted Source of Data FrameworkName will describe the framework of data aggregators providing access to digital product dataAnalogous to GS1 GDSNGS1 GDSN FrameworkGS1 TSD FrameworkGS1 TSD Framework
57 Issue 1 - Brands are not ready! It’s not “we don’t want to”, it’s more like “we can’t”Brands do not have the attributes we require in a single internal database so don’t know how to provide itThe company representatives on our boards know this and are delaying because they don’t want to commit to something they know they can’t deliver
58 Issue 2 – TSD is NOT their top priority Despite all of the market research and analysis of brand data on the internet, the project is the top priority for brandsOur message to date has focussed on:Protection of brand value by providing consumers with accurate data upon which they base buying decisions – product data accuracyThe risk of consumers not buying a product if they are using an application and the product is “not found” – product data completeness
59 TSD Actions – Proposed to B2C PB MO’s - Ask board members when they will be in a position to populate the TSD service on a sustainable basis and local MOs to benchmark what the companies are currently doing to support B2C requirements of IAPsSupported by Project BoardMO’s – Ask retailer members who have an existing GDSN mandate with supplier in force, whether they would be willing to extend the mandate for their pre-packaged food and beverage suppliers asking them to fill in the 19 nutritional attributes currently supported by their Data Pool by June 2013NOT Supported by Project BoardMOs - Ask for a mandate from retailers that suppliers send a physical sample of every new or modified product to the MO or a 3rd party for data collection before they will list it
60 TSD Actions – Proposed to B2C PB GO & MOs - Utilise the “EU One-Pager” to show that the GS1 TSD is the easiest and most cost effective solution for brands to comply with the upcoming EU legislation and use this as a tool to get them to provide dataSupported by Project Board but NOT as a mandate for adoptionGO – organise and help finance a “business pilot” with those Aggregators who have a critical mass of data in advance of the EU Regulation coming into forceSupported by Project Board
61 Next Steps Participating MOs to contact their board members and ask: When they will be in a position to populate the TSD data in their country on a sustainable basisWhat they are currently doing to support the B2C demands of IAPs (mobile apps and internet sites)Participating MOs to circulate the EU Legal Impact Assessment and the one-pager to all relevant members to try to raise the awareness and priority of the projectGO to draft a project plan for the “business pilot” with Aggregators that feel they will have a critical mass of data available. Plan to be completed by end of 2012.
63 Anti-Counterfeit : The Problem Anti-counterfeiting impacts:EconomyAnti-counterfeit trade estimated to reach USD $1.77 trillion by 2015G20 member countries lose USD $77.5 billion in tax revenues and incur an additional USD $25 billion increased cost of crimeAn estimated 2.5 million jobs have been lost, increasing the annual cost of welfare paymentsPublic HealthFake tuberculosis and malaria drugs alone are estimated to kill 700,000 people a yearG20 member countries are reporting 3,000 deaths p.a. due to counterfeitsNational Securitycounterfeit electronic components in military and defence equipment pose a national security risk
64 Anti-Counterfeit – Identified GS1 risks Risk to GS1 CoreAnalysisSolution providers extending their authentication solutions to include object identity (GTIN role) and track and traceMultiple solution providers exists and a lack of awareness of GS1 is leading to alternate strategies when GS1 could form core solutionSolution providers comparing anti-counterfeit measures (serialization and secure labels) with a standard GS1 barcode and packaging labelLack of awareness of GS1 among some big players leading to alternate strategiesFood industry assigning additional code for authentication and track and trace (HarvestMark example)GS1 losing out on greater role in authentication and traceability of food - growing in other sectorsISO anti-counterfeit group focused on interoperability of multiple services & solutionsMultiple solution providers pushing various methods. GS1’s big pharma not happy with developments – and working with GO on interventions
65 Anti-Counterfeit – Strategy RecommendationsWhatExamplesShort TermEngage with anti-counterfeiting solution providers and leverage the use of GS1 keys and services in their solutionWCO IPMSMS services e.g. for PharmaMedium TermLeverage the EPCIS network and the rest of the GS1 system as core infrastructure requirementsHong Kong Consumer Connect using EPCISEPFIA model using DataMatrixLong TermRemain active in key standards associations to ensure that the solutions they publish are compliant with GS1 standardsISO anti-counterfeit group
66 Anti-Counterfeit : Short-term Expand and support current work with WCOCurrently:Brand-owners (over 400, mainly multi-nationals)Provide details of the anti-counterfeit measures used on their products to an IPM database used by the IPM toolWCOAugment the product information with examples/pictures of detected counterfeit products in circulationNational customs authorities (currently 40)Search manually in IPM by entering free text on brand and/or productObjective:Establish GS1 as a core infrastructure requirement – use the GTIN as the product keyUtilise GEPIR + future possibility of ONS, GDSN & TSD
67 Anti-Counterfeit : Short-term Produce a compendium of Solution Providers operating anti-counterfeit services by region and provide to MOs (together with GS1 benefit case) for local engagement and education.Cell phone carriers & Solution providers produce numerous SMS services, particularly in Africa:Airtel & U.S. tech company Sproxil partner to provide a Mobile Product Authentication™ (MPA™) service. mPedigree have a similar systemA scratch-off label is placed on products by the manufacturer or importer and the code registered in a databaseWhen consumers purchase a product they scratch off the label to reveal the unique codeThe code is then keyed in by the consumer, sent via SMS and the consumer receives a reply indicating whether the product is genuine
69 Anti-Counterfeit : Medium-term Develop and publish integrated solutions with key GS1 members e.g. EU pharma strategy with EFPIA (European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry & Associations) model
70 Anti-Counterfeit : Medium-term Investigate adapting and expanding GS1 HK solution for product authentication using only GS1 keysDemonstrates integrated solutions with multiple solution providersShowcases EPCIS role in Anti-Counterfeit
71 Anti-Counterfeit : Long-Term Continue work with ISO anti-counterfeit group to ensure that their draft functional model for interoperable object identification and authentication services has GS1 standards/services aligned to the process steps
72 Anti-Counterfeit – Issues Review of EPCIS standards to ensure that they fully supports the requirements of mass serialisation e.g. How should we handle Batch/Lot number versus SKU (work already initiated)Proliferation of the use of holograms in various countries, particularly on pharmaceutical products
73 3. Winning and Engaging New Strategic Sectors GS1 Key 5 Top Priorities:3. Winning and Engaging New Strategic Sectors
75 T&L - ObjectiveThe Objective of GS1 regarding Transport and Logistics (T&L) is to improve efficiency and visibility of the T&L operations of supply chain stakeholders through the use of GS1 Global Standards
76 Adoption of Logistics Identifiers Adoption of LIM EDI Messages GS1 T&L – Key GoalsAdoption of Logistics IdentifiersAdoption of LIM EDI MessagesAdoption of Visibility StandardsIncrease Membership through relevant External Relations activities
77 GS1 T&L 11/12 Update Strategy approved Transport messages ratified Transport Management Deployment Kit including Implementation guideline deliveredGS1 T&L MO Interest Group strengthenedGS1 Id Keys in T&L position paper ready for GSMP reviewCustoms Engagement Starter Kit deliveredGS1 T&L Online containing engagement support tools for MOs launchedMarketing tools delivered
78 Example: GS1 T&L online Steps for engagement Overview Marketing Tools PresentationSteps for engagementHow to get StartedTalking PointsCustoms Engagement KitStandardsGS1 eCom (XML & EANCOM) Transport & Logistics messagesLogistics Interoperability Modal (LIM)Standard International Logistics Label (STILL)Marketing ToolsGS1 Marketing FrameworkValue propositionCase studiesBrochuresTraining & Implementation ToolsIntroduction to GS1 T&LSSCC VideoRelevant StandardsFull content:See more details in Appendix
79 GS1 eSeal Objective Status Issues Next Steps Cancel GS1 eSeal project OGSM Measure FY12/13StatusMB decision to move forward by November 2012On Nov. MB AgendaObjectiveGS1 eSeal Implementation Guideline - MB decision to move forward by November 2012StatusStatement of Business Need developedCall to Action launchedIssuesNo User community supportNext StepsCancel GS1 eSeal project
80 Collaboration with WCO GS1 has a long-time working relationship with the WCO since both organisations are committed to enabling a secure, efficient global supply chainIn 2007, a MoU between GS1 and WCO was signed in recognition of the wide range of business interest shared by our organisations.Cooperation Agreement between GS1 & WCO signed 4th Sep 2012 addressing the integration of the GS1 System into Interface Public-Members (IPM) Anti-Counterfeiting tool
81 More information in separate deck on GS1 – WCO IPM Cooperation WCO IPM OpportunityThe GS1 System enhances Customs ability to accurately identify unsafe and/or counterfeit goods.Interface Public-Members (IPM) is a secured permanent training and communication tool for the fight against counterfeiting and piracyIPM is a cornerstone tool in the WCO’s anti-counterfeiting strategyIntegration of the GS1 System into the WCO’s IPM Anti-counterfeiting toolAutomated access to additional product categories through GS1 KeysMore information in separate deck on GS1 – WCO IPM CooperationIPM is an international centralized database permitting Customs to retrieve authentication information about products targeted for inspectionBrand owners manually register information they consider important to share with CustomsNational Customs use a search engine to access brand owner information with a key word/free textWCO is working on version to provide information on additional products (CPG etc.) this is where GS1 comes in.
83 Fresh Foods Solutions Objective Progress Issues Next Steps OGSM Measure FY12/13StatusFresh Foods Integrated Guide published by June 2013On targetDeployment in 5 MOs by June 2013ObjectiveFresh Foods Integrated Guide published by June 2013Train 5 MOs on Fresh Foods Deployment KitProgressStatement of Business Need and Work Request completed for Fruit & Vegetable Master Data Guideline and GTIN Rules enhancementsGS1 in Europe Training on Deployment Kit Sep in OsloIssuesNoneNext StepsFruit & Vegetable Master Data Guideline and GTIN Rules to Public Review by Dec 2012Regional requirements and priorities for Meat, Poultry, and Seafood identified by Feb 2013 (industry input to FY Business Plan)
85 Financial Services Update As an output from the G20 Leaders Summit approval of the Financial Stability Board (FSB) Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) Expert report which highlights a federated model, the FSB has commissioned a Private Sector Preparatory Group (PSPG)Provide active co-ordination and collaboration between the public and private sectors in implementing the global LEI.GS1 contributions areas will include governance, operations, and funding.GS1 holds 5 member seats in this group with an additional 5 seats being held by TCGF companies.The PSPG held an initial meeting on 25 July.
86 Financial Services Update (2) PSPG Members – MOs and member companiesGS1 Global Office – Ken TraubGS1 Germany –Christian PrzybillaGS1 India – Ravi MathurGS1 Mexico – Juan Manuel Calderón AlvaradoGS1 UK - Laura WatersTim Smucker - J M Smucker CompanyBen Johnson – J M Smucker CompanyChris Nolan - The Coca-Cola CompanyMike Yorwerth - TescoMona Chugh - Nestle
87 Financial Services Update (3) Next stepsNext PSPG physical meeting is scheduled to be held on October in Basel.FSB is striving towards a recommendation in March 2013ROC to be formed and the COU BOD named. COU BOD that will be making decisions about who does what.GS1 MO’s providing insight and assistance efforts to educate local governments and industry stakeholders on how GS1 could play a role to help.GS1 “What If” team continues work to determine how we would respond should the FSB ask GS1 to fulfill one or more roles in the proposed global LEI solution. Situation remains fluid; not clear how/if consensus will be reachedRecommendation that GS1 should continue to be involved on a measured basis.
91 KEY Considerations for the 2013 GA How can the annual General Assembly become a catalyst for the GS1 organization to become better prepared for the future?How can the agenda evolve to create a compelling program with innovative speakers in key areas critical to GS1’s future?How does the GA help position GS1 as a global thought leader that attracts C suite executives for enrichment and dialog?How does the GS1 40th Anniversary help frame GS1’s role as an organization that has been critical to and will be vital for, the future successes of businesses and industries in the next 40 years?
92 GS1 is at a critical time in its history Case for changeGS1 is at a critical time in its historyThere is tremendous change happening for its global membershipEconomic, Competitive, Regulatory, Customer & ConsumerTechnology, Data Integrity, MobilityDisruptive Influences
93 The 40th Anniversary provides the perfect opportunity for gs1 to set the stage for what it can achieve in the next 40 years
94 Case for change How does GS1 succeed in the next 40 years? INNOVATION LEADERSHIPEMERGINGOPPORTUNITYGLOBALIZATIONINTERDEPENDENCYBusiness and industrywill continue to change through innovation makingit necessary for GS1 to evolve with its customers.Business has become global creating aneven greater need for GS1 Standards to be the common languagefor business.In a fast moving world where change is constant, leadership will be critical to remain relevant.New markets offer opportunity and the need for GS1 Standards ensure that future marketplaces will continue to thrive wherever they exist.GS1 Standards enable business and industry to seamlessly move and source products and services around the world. Global commerce will continue to rely on GS1 Standards, and GS1 Member Organizations need to work together as one to move business and industry forward.
95 Case for change ONE VOICE Beginning in May 2013 through all of 2014, GS1 can leverage its rich history to build awareness and on its first credibility for its future.The 40th Anniversary offers the opportunity to be the milestone that is leveraged to re-establish GS1’s relevance globally.Maximizing the 40th Anniversary opportunity will require a unified effort for GS1 as a whole (Global Office + MO’s) to “speak with one voice”.THE NEXT 40 YEARSGS1 Member Organizations need to work together as one to move business and industry forward.
96 Structure Change to GA Agenda GOAL: To provide an engaging and thought-provoking program for GS1 MO’s and C suite guests and attendees.HOW:Dynamic keynote speakers to focus on Innovation, Globalization, Leadership, Emerging Markets and Interdependency rounding out the importance of these company priorities.Optional, off-site field trips to view/tour distribution centers, headquarters, and manufacturing plants of top nearby companies
97 Enhanced Agenda at a glance MONDAYTUESDAYWEDNESDAYTHURSDAYMorningBoard Committee for Standards Meeting Optional Group Field Trip: Macy’s Distribution CenterOpening Plenary Guest Speaker: Sir Ken Robinson (topic: innovation) Guest Speaker: Noreena Hertz GS1 Panel: US, EU, China (topic: globalization/economy)General Assembly:Official BusinessOptional Group Field Trip:Bloomingdale’s Retail visitbefore opening to showcaseRFID item level taggingAfternoonManagement Board MeetingOptional Group Field Trip:McKeeson hosted visit to a pharmaceutical or healthcare centerGuest Speaker: Marshall Goldsmith(topic: leadership)Guest Speaker: Gary KovacsPanel: GS1 US Emerging Markets Reps(topic: Emerging Digital World)Keynote Speaker: Muhtar KentPresident & CEO, Coca-ColaMO Recognition &Closing PlenaryOptional Hollywood TourEveningWelcome Reception CocktailJoint Boards DinnerPresidents / CEOs SessionGala DinnerOptional Networking Dinner
99 HIGH-LEVEL PITCHIn 1973 industry leaders selected a single standard for product identification, known today as the GS1 bar codeToday, the GS1 System of standards provides unique identification that can be used anywhere in the world. Key benefits for the business include better visibility, efficiency, and security
100 CAMPAIGN OBJECTIVEThe 40th Anniversary provides the perfect opportunity for GS1 to set the stage for what it can achieve in the next 40 yearsUse and leverage this historical milestone to develop and launch a 1-year global marketing campaign:Step-change GS1 brand awarenessUnderline the benefits of using our standards and solutionsTarget:C-levels and supply chain experts from companies in our core and new sectorsMedia / Focused press (locally)Combine creative advertising, employee and community relations and out of the box public relations to get lasting benefits from our anniversary.100
101 CAMPAIGN STRATEGYBuild and deploy a Global Marketing & PR plan to be leveraged in all MOsMarketing Kit (anniversary logo and web animation, corporate presentation, promotional micro-website videos, users’ testimonials, merchandising, signature, digital templates and artwork, etc)PR kit (impactful messaging, PR dissemination guidelines and recommendations, high-level pitch, storylines, B-roll, talking points, FAQs, etc)Create opportunities to get Board Members companies involved and support the campaign (high level users testimonials videos, ad…)Global campaign virtual kick-off on Apr 3rd, 2013Kick-off worldwide celebrations at the GA 2013 (20-23 May in LA)101
102 40TH ANNIVERSARY MERCHANDISE Concept Merchandise that celebrates the barcode and 40th Anniversary Overview Expand brand awareness and create an emotional connection with the GS1 brand by applying the barcode, barcode designs, and anniversary logo to merchandise for expanded brand awareness. Examples include apparel, iPod cover, backpacks, etc. NOTE: Universal Site of ‘basic’ merchandising items (pens, mug, candles, t-shirts, etc) for all MO’s or individual MO’s can use the artwork to produce and sell their own items
103 ARTIST COMPETITION & AUCTION ConceptArt that is created using the barcodeOverviewHave artists from around the world consider theimpact of the barcode on their culture and entertheir interpretation in a competition.Create a digital collection of all entries for MO websitesand customers, and to share with potential MOs.This would not only celebrate the barcodeitself, but also connect GS1 with a greater cause thatmatters to GS1 and its customers.NOTE: This idea has options. It can be a traveling art show around the globe, or a localized contest. The winner from each MOs country could then compete globally. This will be a great tool to generate PR and media interest.
104 LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARD Concept An award that recognizes and commemorates individual(s) that have made very significant contributions to GS1. This could be a scalable concept that could be made on both the global and MO level. Overview We are celebrating the UPC barcode's great achievements because of those who had the vision and fortitude to pave the way and make it happen. On behalf of GS1, this award will be presented to those (external contributor) who've made a difference in the world of standards. Recipients will be nominated based on deserved criteria. This award can be given out annually at the GA.
105 GOOGLE DOODLEConceptGoogle’s name designed with icons/drawings that allude to the anniversary, celebration of the barcode, and GS1OverviewGoogle has a global presence and known for creating a “doodle” or series of images that celebrates important events. Google has done a barcode for a previous anniversary; we could have them celebrate the 40th Anniversary in a new way that would enhance the GS1 brand and celebrate connectivity on a global platform.We could possibly do series of doodles over several days that reference the artist competition and auction.
106 HISTORICAL TIMELINEConcept Timeline that shows when each MO first scanned a barcode and what product it was that had the barcode Overview The barcode has a rich history; each country adopted standards at different times and with different products. A visual representation of the timeline of the 111 first scans (products and dates) in each country could illustrate the global reach, and depth and breadth of the barcode’s role over the last 40 years.
107 BARCODE SHORT VIDEOConcept Exciting video to have available on the website, media kit, YouTube, opening etcs, What would the world and supermarkets be without barcodes? Overview The invention of the Universal Product Code (U.P.C.) barcode nearly 40 years ago fundamentally changed our world. Created to speed grocery store check out and improve inventory management, the U.P.C. laid the foundation for a technological revolution that started with a simple barcode. This short video will highlight the ways in which barcoding has impacted business and our world (and vice versa)—and look to the future with great optimism.
108 CUSTOMER SUPPORTED ADS OverviewDue to the profound impact that the barcode has had, the opportunity exists to leverage the anniversary to build awareness. This could come in the form of having companies acknowledge the impact that GS1 has had over the years. Considerations could include strategically placed advertising that is sponsored by member companies as well as creating a compelling business story that can be released to key media outlets.Full-page ad in a significant newspaper or magazine that is supported by key companies that are participating
109 MO MARKETING TOOLKIT Concept Create a kit for international use that MOs can easily adapt for use in local marketsOverviewWe will create a complete kit that MOs can take, alter as needed, and release through local outlets. MOs can use all of the following or only select pieces, as appropriate for their markets:Anniversary logoFull-page ad where MOs can insert their country-specific copy/graphicCelebration ‘footage/testimonials’ edited story for media outlets. This could be the inspirational videoDigital assets: flash animation for each MO website, newsletter header, signoff templatePPT about the anniversary and GS1 milestones (for Board to use, etc.) that MOs can translatePromotional web site (explained in following slide)
110 PROMOTIONAL SITE Counter of Scans Concept A microsite dedicated to the celebration of the barcode for each MO (as a part of the Marketing Toolkit)OverviewHave one hub of information about the anniversary with interesting resources and history about the barcode and its impact throughout the world. Examples of content could be information about GS1, a history, global and local press, barcode counter, an inspirational video, and barcode merchandise. Create a button or banner for MOs to put on their websites that lead to the promotional sites.Counter of ScansA counter that records each scan across the globe in real-time within each promo site
111 LOCAL SPECIFIC MARKETING Easily duplicated ideas for events & advertisingCar-wraps • Billboards • Floor graphics
112 OTHER LOCAL EXAMPLES GS1 Trivia International Collection Concept A game where people are tested on their barcode and GS1 knowledgeOverviewCreate a game that has players ask each other questions on the 40 year history, GS1, and use of the barcode and standards around the world.International CollectionA basket of products that were first scannedCreate a basket of products that were first scanned atcheckout. Different baskets could be created throughoutthe year to commemorate categories of productsor industries. This is an idea that can be customizedper country for a localized marketing effort.
113 MO PR TOOLBOXConcept The PR toolbox will consist of a kit for international use that MOs can easily adapt for use in local markets Each GS1 office will have access to the toolbox to implement a local public relations campaign to raise GS1’s brand awareness. The tool box will consist of:PR Guidelines (how to respond to media inquiries, how to pitch stories to print, broadcast and online media, how to organize a media event)12 Press releases that will contain the global PR theme and key messages that local MOs can use in their marketsImage LibraryTalking PointsFrequently Asked Questions (media perspective)Celebration ‘B Roll’ edited story for broadcast media
114 CAMPAIGN TIMELINE (1) 2012 2013 Marketing Network Webinar AC Meeting Aug 22, 2012Sep 25-27, 2012Nov 6-8, 2012Jan, 2013Feb 18-22, 2013Marketing Network WebinarShare PR and Marketing planGet MOs inputAC MeetingShare Anniversary planGet AC supportCreate Project Plan Execution TeamMB MeetingShare Anniversary planGet MB companies supportInform ALL MOsShare campaign timeline and GuidelinesPR Kit distribution to MOs:Usage guidelinesCatchy campaign theme and key messagesPress kit & Media GuideTalking points12 press releasesFAQsMarketing Kit distribution to MOs:Anniversary artworksLogo (image + animation)Material and collaterals (video, corporate presentation, historical timeline, merchandising, etc)Dedicated workshops at the Global Forum114
115 CAMPAIGN TIMELINE (2) 2013 2014 Ongoing MO events and PR activities Apr 3, 2013May 20-23, 2013Feb, 2014Jun 26, 2014Ongoing MO events and PR activitiesPR global and local campaign LaunchGoogle Doodle Day 1 (barcode artwork)Local kick-off events and activitiesGlobal + Local press release (1)GS1 community Anniversary celebrations at the GAVideo testimonialsFestive activitiesCommemorative giftAwards…Share campaign results and celebrate achievements at the Global ForumEnd of the1-year campaignCelebrating the first product scanned in a store (Ohio)115
116 Confirmed MOs with local activities GS1 AustriaGS1 AustraliaGS1 BelgiLuxGS1 CanadaGS1 ChinaGS1 ColombiaGS1 Costa RicaGS1 CroatiaGS1 DenmarkGS1 EgyptGS1 FinlandGS1 FranceGS1 HKGS1 IndiaGS1 ItalyGS1 IrelandGS1 MexicoGS1 SwedenGS1 UKGS1 USOther TBCCombine creative advertising, employee and community relations and out of the box public relations to get lasting benefits from our anniversary.Organisations in orange confirmed their participation in the Project Team116
117 40th Anniversary Preliminary US Campaign Plan Commemorative Brand – Work in ProgressCombine creative advertising, employee and community relations and out of the box public relations to get lasting benefits from our anniversary.117
118 Joint GS1/TCGF/Capgemini Research Future of StandardsJoint GS1/TCGF/Capgemini Research
119 Cap Gemini-GS1-TCGF strategic research Objective: Perform a GS1/TCGF/CG strategic research study aimed at identifying requirements for supply chain standards and servicesTarget: 50 C-level executives (CEOs or Chief Supply Chain Officers, CIOs, CMOs, etc.) , of TCGF Board companies designated by the CEOsProcess:1. TCGF invited their Board members to participate2. Interviews in June, July, August3. Research Report in October4. Presentation to TCGF board (Jose Lopez) in NovemberCosts: €75K paid by GS1Report: Sponsored by GS1, TCGF and Cap Gemini (including logos)
120 Initial Findings Tomorrow’s standards will need to support: Consumer demand for product informationExtension of supply chain data to B2CConsumer safety (especially for food products)Providing information on origin and ingredientsEnsuring contamination does not occurBeing able to recall products quickly and easilySustainabilityGrowing pressure from governments, NGOs and consumersConsumers want to be able to compare and contrast the sustainability measures for products from different companiesFull visibility from production to shelfFaster and more open access to point-of-sale (POS) dataClosing the visibility gap the last 50 yards – especially to minimize out of stockSupply Chain EfficiencyPockets of waste can still be eliminated across the value chain by working collaboratively e.g. less-than-truckload (LTL) shipments/empty trucks, excess inventory
121 Leveraging the report Leveraging the Report The research report will be presented to TCGF and GS1 Board members in November 2012Marketing material will be developed for MOsOne-page flyerPress releasePPT and talking pointsVideo from CapgeminiArticles in GO newslettersWebinar for MOs with Capgemini
123 McKinsey White Paper Project Timelines = TodayMcKinsey White Paper Project TimelinesReview work completed to-dateConduct interviews of senior executives across industryDevelop data request templatesAssess potential for building business case with existing dataConduct additional analytics if necessaryDevelop case studies of successful global standards implementationsLaunch data collection with industry participantsCollect templates and analyze resultsLaunch data analysisLaunch development of public health caseLaunch business case quantificationVerify collected data if possibleComplete development of public health caseComplete quantification of business caseDevelop communication for senior executivesDevelop high-level roadmap for industry adoptionAssess mechanisms for increasing adoptionDeliverablesAssessment of work completed to-dateSummary of interview findingsData request templatesCompleted data requestKey findings from industry data gatheringWhite Paper directed to C-suite audience on benefits of global standards adoption in HealthcareCONFIDENTIAL
124 McKinsey White Paper Communication Plan Marketing Tools for MOsWhite Paper Brochure (full document)Collateral: White Paper leaflet (2 pager summary)Talking points for MOs to be issued prior to GS1 healthcare conferencePPT for oral presentationsShort version for presentationsLong version for trainingVideo of stakeholders and McKinseyCommunication ChannelsWhite Paper to be released to Tier 1 media by McKinseyWhite paper published on McKinsey and GS1 websitesWhite Paper integrated in GS1 & McKinsey NewslettersGlobal Webinar to be presented by McKinsey for MOs and usersMOs Roadshows with McKinsey speakers and healthcare stakeholders as available
125 Global Standards in Healthcare White Paper by McKinsey – Communication Plan Timeline Aug-Oct 12Nov 12-Jan 13Feb 13-onwards23 OctoberFinalisation White Paper by McKinseyMktg MO Expert group createdMarketing Toolkit alignedInterview Katy George (McKinsey) – teaser prior to ConferenceMOs to identify Tier 1 newspapers and select trade and local media for McKinsey outreach24 Oct:White Paper Brochure available for MOs2 Pager Flyer of WPPPT short version availablePublication White Paper and online promotion of WP on GS1 and McKinsey websites & newslettersGlobal Forum presentation by McKinsey to promote White PaperGO to Train MOs on content of White Paper (long version PPT)Stakeholder’s videoLocal Roadshows by McKinsey for MOs.
126 31 Local Healthcare user groups driving adoption of GS1 standards worldwide Missing AC MOsChinaCroatiaHong KongIndiaMexicoPolandMoroccoNetherlandsNew ZealandPortugalRussiaSerbia & MontenegroSingaporeSloveniaSpainSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandUKUSAustraliaAustriaBelgium and LuxemburgBrasilCanadaColombiaDenmarkFranceGermanyItalyJapanJordanMacedoniaMalaysia
127 5. Continue Developing a World Class, Interdependent Organization GS1 Key 5 Top Priorities:5. Continue Developing a World Class, Interdependent Organization
130 Governance: Actions to date: Summary All MOs with issues contacted (except those that are part of the government)Focused on 7 priority MOs + SingaporeSeveral MOs promised changes in Governance and BrandingExcellent response to request to send Auditor’s letter (AL)Status:Governance: 14 MOs with outstanding issuesBranding: 9 MOs not yet fully compliantAuditor’s letter: 13 MOs still need to send their letter
131 Governance Update Overall, progress has been positive - see before. Several issues have however appeared when asking for changes in Governance in organisations which are not independent (e.g. part of Chamber):Separate legal entity created but owned by the mother organisationUser Board created but without decision powerUser Board created with non GS1 users - members of the mother organisationAudit reports are sent but with doubts on their content (no separate accounting)Conclusion: GS1 current rules and regulations do not enable the ICC to enforce governance changes in these MO’s if the mother organisation is not cooperating in good faith
132 Next StepsClarify, in GS1 Statutes and Internal Regulations, the definitions and wording which leaves room for interpretation (requires GA approval)E.g: “Not-for-profit” = Income of MO only used to further the aims & objectives of the MO and no distribution of MO revenue/profit to members, Board members, owners and managementE.g: “User Governed” = MO has a Management Board composed in majority of GS1 user companies (member companies) and Management Board is accountable to the users/membersAuthorize the GS1 CEO, upon request from the ICC, to request additional information from MO’s to investigate their compliance (requires MB approval)E.g: request additional details on the Revenues and CostsPropose a list of possible sanctions for the non compliant MO’s with expulsion as last resort (escalation mechanism)
134 Business Methods Update Self Declaration for Business Methods:Principle approved at GA 2013Detailed template being finalized by ICCTo be completed by all MO’s by end March 2013Self-assessment for GS1 System Integrity and Unique Identification:Detailed template agreed by ICCGS1 System Certificate (eLearn with 7 modules & certification)To be completed by all MO’s by end December 2013
136 Financial Strength: Proposal ECR:All ECR fees/revenues are excludedECR Membership Fees are included except if these are separate fee (i.e. distinct from GS1 membership)Government revenues:Project financing, grants, subsidies etc should be included except when this is specifically prohibited by law or by contractRevenues of or equivalent to membership fees / subscriptions, including contributions to membership fees should be includedGenerally, in case of doubt about whether to include or not the revenue in its financial strength, the MO should consult with the ICC
137 Financial Strength – Proposed New Definition CURRENT / OLD DEFINITIONMO “Financial Strength” or “Gross Revenue” is defined as:All funds collected annually by the MO, including those from parent, sister or subsidiary organizations, which derive from or are received in relation to the GS1 System including the EPC System.PROPOSED NEW DEFINITIONMO “Financial Strength” is defined as:All revenues which derive from or are received in relation to the GS1 System (i.e. GS1 standards, services and solutions) and which are earned annually by :the MO itself;any legal entity (hereafter the "Parent"), which holds a shareholding interest or any other form of financial stake in the MO, including under the form of a membership, a partnership or suchlike.any legal entity in which the MO (hereafter the “Daughter”) or the Parent holds a shareholding interest or any other form of financial stake, including under the form of a membership, a partnership or suchlike. The funds of the Daughter to be included in the MO Financial Strength declaration should be in proportion to the percentage of the shareholding interest or financial stake held by the MO.any entity, with or without legal personality, under the auspices of which the MO is operating.
138 Financial Strength Arbitration Body Current text from Internal Regulation:“In the event of any dispute regarding the list of examples in Schedule 1 and/or Schedule 2, the only arbiter in these matters will be an Arbitration Body comprising the MO CEOs that are members of the GS1 Management Board”.Proposal:“In the event of any dispute regarding the revenues included or excluded from a MO’s declaration of its Financial Strength, the only arbiter will be the Internal Compliance Committee who will make its recommendations to the Management Board for final decision”
140 Next Steps GOVERNANCE Management Board approval: Change in Statutes and Internal Regulations (for GA in May)Additional requests to be made by the CEOFinancial Strength Definition and Arbitration Body (for GA in May)Hold face to face scheduled meetings with some (non compliant) MO’s,BUSINESS METHODSCommunicate the GS1 System Integrity and Unique Identification Self-assessment and the Business Methods MO Self-declaration and the deadlineCommunicate the need to complete the GS1 System Certificate for 50% of the staff and the deadlineInitiate the assessment of the MO’s on the 5 Business MethodsContinue to follow up with MOs with outstanding governance, branding and Auditor’s letter issues.
142 GEPIR Strategy Execution ObjectivesGEPIR Strategy executionAll MOs participating in GEPIR network as part of MO Core ServicesProgress108 of 111 MOs in GEPIR (Only 1 MOs with no commitment at this point)Updates to GEPIR MO Support Website and content for GEPIR – CompleteGEPIR V4.0 Requirements Process / Specification Design – In ProgressData Quality Initiative (Service Levels, Conformance, Attributes) – In ProgressQuarterly Updates of GEPIR data for Hosted MOs – Launched with ICCIssuesNone at this timeNext StepsFinalise GEPIR V4.0 Requirements / Specification DesignExecute Quality Assessment & Completeness of GS1 MO data for use in GEPIR* Reference: GEPIR Network Update Document
143 GEPIR Statistics as of September 2012 Goal : All MOs using supported versions (2.0, 3.0, 3.1, 3.2)STATUS: 3 Remaining non-conformant MOs(108 / 111 MOs in GEPIR)108 MOs have data available through GEPIR63 MOs hosted at Global Office+45 MOs locally hosted+ 3 MOs not yet operating in GEPIR (Only 1 with no contact)=111 Member Organizations7 MOs on Version 2.07 MOs on Version 3.094 MOs on Version 3.1 / 3.2 [63 hosted, 31 local MO]11 MOs-V3.1 July MOs - V3.1/V3.2 September 2012
145 BackgroundGS1 is a federated organisation where decisions are reached through consensus. Unlike a hierarchical organisation, it requires frequent personal contacts across regions and MOs to align and prepare decisions.We have always tried to optimise the multiple global and regional meetings, but there are still some opportunities to improve.
146 ObjectivesOptimise travel frequency and cost for GS1 MOs, GO, and GS1 MembersChange the perception that GS1 is meeting in remote, “non-business” locationsIncrease participation in major events and meetings
147 Scope X Global Forum General Assembly Management Board JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSeptOctNovDecGlobal ForumXGeneral AssemblyManagement BoardAdvisory CouncilGSMP EventsGDSN BoardEPCglobal BoardHealthcare ConferenceGS1 ConnectTCGF BoardTCGF SummitRegional Forums
148 Proposal 1: GF and GACombine the Global Forum and GA/MB in May in Brussels:Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday: best practices sessions and Boards (GDSN, B2C, etc.)Thursday: MB and training sessionsFriday morning: GA and training sessionsPro’s:Reduce travel for many (high overlap of attendants)Improve GS1 and users contactsHigher participation of number of countriesCon’s:GF’s and GA’s are a growing success. The merger could have a negative impact.Packed week with less or no time for internal alignment, training and best practices sharingLess opportunities to contact with/between MO’sDifficult logisticsTiming: 1st ‘merged’ event could be in 2015
149 Summary Proposal Priority 1 GF + GA Low 2 AC + GSMP Medium 3 MB + TCGF 4HubsHigh (except GA)5Sept. ACQuestion: Would we be responsive enough by implementing these changes in the timeframe, or do we need to be faster?
150 Proposal 2: AC and GSMP Events Have the April and/or September AC in the same week and location as the GSMP eventPro’s:MO CEO’s can have more contacts with users and other MO’sReduce travel significantly for GO (high overlap of attendants) but minimally for MO CEO’s (very low overlap)Could potentially increase GSMP participationCon’s:GO LT would miss key GSMP sessionsTiming: 1st ‘merged’ event could be in 2014
151 Proposal 3: MB and TCGF Board (Nov.) Have the November MB in the same week and location as the TCGF Board (Nov)Possibly combined with the EPCglobal Board meetingPro’s:Increased GS1 MB members (i.e. users) attendanceCon’s:Difficult logistics and “politics” with TCGFMinimal MO CEO’s overlapTiming: 1st ‘merged’ event could be in 2014
152 Proposal 4: Meeting in Hubs All or some major GS1 events (GA, MB, AC, GSMP, HC) to take place in one of the following hubs:Europe: BrusselsUS: Newark or BrooklynAsia: Hong Kong or Kuala LumpurMore suitable events: MB (October), AC, GSMP, HCPro’s:Simple and easy accessLower costCon’s:Lower contacts with countriesTiming: For the AC’s already planned for , the hosting MO’s would have the opportunity to cancel. The location would be replaced by one of the hubs above.
153 Proposal 5: September AC 1st option: cancel and replace September AC meeting with:1-day review meeting of Global Initiatives at every Regional Forum1-day review meeting with GS1 US and GS1 Canada2nd option: book the September AC meeting dates and confirm only if major strategic topics are required for the GAPro’s:Simple for GOLower costCon’s:Long period without key MO’s alignmentTiming: 1st opportunity in 2014
154 GF & GA & MB Option 1 Feb : GF (Brussels) + Chairmen track day May : MB (hub)GA (eVote)Option 2May GF/MB/GA (new structure) (Brussels tbc)Option 3No change (LA Berlin concepts)
156 TCGF Update Meeting in TCGF HQ, Paris, on Sep 3rd, 2012 Attendants: Jean-Marc Saubade, Sabine Ritter and Miguel A. Lopera
157 TCGF Update: Governance & Strategic Alliances DISCUSSIONAGREEMENTS1. There is a growing focus on Asia (especially in China) on issues relating to food safetyNo action required from GS12. TCGF/GFSI (Global Food Safety Initiative) has signed an MoU with the Chinese government to benchmark Food Chinese standards with GFSI food quality standards3. TCGF/GFSI, Food Industry Asia (FIA) and GMA will work together to set a common vision and working platform on Food Safety in Asia
158 TCGF Update: Emerging Trends DISCUSSIONAGREEMENTS1. Objective: Provide the think tank for the CGF and transform emerging trends into Industry actions to better and more efficiently serve consumers and shoppers around the world2. On-line survey to CEOs to evaluate the relevance of trends. Top priorities are (work in progress):Health & Wellness (e.g., social health, healthy cosmetics, functional food, increasing life expectancy)Fight for Resources (e.g., rising energy demand, commodity prices, food/water security)Sustainability (e.g., CSR, reusability, recycling, fair trade, image impact)Digital Life (e.g., new technologies, "big data" analysis, transparency, connectivity)Future Working (e.g., new work styles, higher flexibility, access to qualified labour)3. Issue a new trends report (Future Value Chain 2022 – name not decided yet) after workshop in OctoberAppoint GS1 representative in the group
159 TCGF Update: Sustainability DISCUSSIONAGREEMENTSPriorities:DeforestationRefrigerationProduct Sustainability MeasurementWaste ManagementGS1 involved in Sustainability and Waste Management2. Product Sustainability Management:Achieving a harmonised global system for measuring product sustainability impact remains a priorityThere are about 20 Working Groups that are led by the Sustainability Consortium to avoid work duplication1. TCGF supports GS1 IP Policy.Future WGs that will produce protocols to become global standards should be briefed by GS12. GS1 to meet with the SC to explain GS1 IP Policy3. Global Product Packaging Sustainability (GPPS).Issue: The protocol has been developed without IP declaration. Some parts may be subject to IP claimsGS1 & TCGF have contacted all participant companies. A decision will be proposed by GS1 at the next MB in November4. Waste Management.Preliminary research underway. A potential project work will be recommended to the CGF board in NovemberGS1 requested to submit Waste Management learnings in MOs (DONE)
160 TCGF Update: Health & Wellness DISCUSSIONAGREEMENTSRequest to Board members to implement H&W resolutions:Access & Availability: of products and services that support the goals of healthier diets and lifestyles.Product Information & Responsible Marketing: Transparent, factbased product information that will help consumers and shoppers make informed product choices and usagesCommunication & Educational Programmes: to help raise consumer awareness on health & wellness and energy balance to inspire healthier diets and lifestyles.Liaise with H&W group to support resolutions via the B2C project (e.g. nutritional information)Global Food Safety InitiativeReduce food safety risks by delivering equivalence and convergence between effective food safety management systemsManage cost in the global food system by eliminating redundancy and improving operational efficiencyDevelop competencies and capacity building to create consistent and effective global food systemsProvide a unique international stakeholder platform for collaboration, knowledge exchange and networkingGFSI is mainly focus on food quality while GS1 is on traceability. Traceability is not a priority for GFSI now but it will be in the future. This is why there is low practical collaboration between the two organizationsTop to top meeting between GFSI and GS1 to offer our traceability knowledge for the future
161 TCGF Update: Operational Excellence DISCUSSIONAGREEMENTSRequest to participate in Operational Excellence Steering Committee (comprised of Chief Commercial Officers from companies).It will be discussed at the next Steering CommitteeB2C presentation was postponed due to the last minute absence of the two Co-Chairs and presenters. Proposal was sent by mail to the CGF board members by the two Co-ChairsTCGF was informed about the new EU regulation to provide digital information as of December 2014TCGF feedback is that companies are well aware of the B2C project, they support it but they need longer time to provide the information.It was suggested:Check at country level (Phase I countries) when they can provide the information and report it to the boardRun a business test to find issues, challenges and opportunities before broad adoptionReport B2C progress to the board in November if there are specific actions required
162 TCGF Update: Other Topics DISCUSSIONAGREEMENTSCap Gemini report will be completed on timePreliminary results will be presented to the CGF board in NovemberFull GS1 presentation to the board postponed until GS1 Chairman is available (Jose Lopez cannot make at next meeting)Communicated that Lynda Costa, new GS1 VP Industry Engagement, Retail Sector, will coordinate Retail projects with TCGFAgreed a meeting with Paul Voordeckers and Lynda Costa
164 Overall Satisfaction: Mean score YearResult20124.3 (4.26)20114.2 (4.17)20104.1 (4.09)
165 How to read the following charts... +-83% of respondents were FAVOURABLE (gave a score of 4 or 5)4% of respondents were UNFAVOURABLE (gave a score of 1 or 2)% FAVS/UNFAVS20102009Overall SatisfactionWhat is your overall satisfaction with GS1 Global Office?83/4
166 Overall Satisfaction: Strong % FAVS/UNFAVS201220112010Overall SatisfactionWhat is your overall satisfaction with GS1 Global Office?89/088/183/4
167 Quality of Service: Portfolio + Communication % FAVS/UNFAVS20122011Quality of ServiceGS1 Global Office is prompt (less than 3 days) in dealing with Member Organisations’ questions95/580/5GS1 Global Office provides reliable information85/085/5The GS1 products and services portfolio meets my market needs50/1535/15GS1 Global Office has a strategic plan to meet global users' needs 60/560/10GS1 Global Office communicates well with MOs on plans and priorities75/10
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.