1. Federal Education Policy Update Noelle Ellerson AASA October 29, 2013

2. Overview ESEA: Reauthorization & Waivers Funding & Sequestration E-Rate Perkins IDEA

3. ESEA: Reauthorizations & Waivers Reauthorization: It’s a matter of willingness vs. capacity (aka politics) Administration that dislikes both House and Senate bill Reality: 42 states in some phase of waiver implementation – Onus is on administration and Congress to make sure reauthorization doesn’t collide with waivers The bills are……here. And reported out of committee! And out of the House!

4. ESEA Reauthorization: House Bill Eliminates AYP, AMO, SES, and 100% proficiency Returns control of assessments and accountability to the states Maintains math and ELA testing requirements; adds science Continues data disaggregation Reauthorizes REAP Promotes growth models and multiple measures Includes computer adaptive assessment Adjusts 1 and 2 percent caps Requires 4 year adjusted cohort graduation rate and allow states to calculate 5, 6 and 7 year rates

5. ESEA Reauthorization: Senate Bill More or less eliminates AYP, AMO, SES, and 100% proficiency SAG (Sufficient Academic Growth), performance targets and student achievement levels Prescriptive in intervention (who and how) Returns control of assessments and accountability to the states Has math, ELA and science testing requirements Maintains data disaggregation Reauthorizes REAP Promotes growth models and multiple measures Includes computer adaptive assessment Adjusts 1 and 2 percent caps Requires 4 year adjusted cohort graduation rate Includes Ed Tech program Expanded school climate requirements (SNDA)

6. Standards & Assessments WAIVERS College and career ready standards in math/EL Maintain science standards and assessments from NCLB Eliminates use of modified assessment for SWD (2% test) States must develop and administer college- and career-ready reading and math assessments by 2014-15 States must adopt English language proficiency standards that align with college- and career-ready standards SENATE (S.1091) States adopt reading and math standards aligned to college and career readiness by 2015. Eliminates use of modified assessment for SWD (2% test) States must adopt English-language development standards that articulate no fewer than four levels of proficiency Content assessments would have to be provided in native languages in states where 10 percent of the EL population shares a native language and 10,000 students speak that language HOUSE (HR 5) Requires states to adopt standards in reading, math and science Computer adaptive assessments OK Maintains alternate assessment and modified assessment and removes caps on # of students eligible to take assessments Requires districts to annually assess the English proficiency of all English language learners. Such assessments must be aligned with the state’s English language proficiency standards

7. Senate Bill: Expanded Reporting Student achievement at each performance level on the State academic assessments % of students who do not take the state tests 3‐year trend in each subject tested Comparison with the state average for each subject tested % of students taking remedial coursed in IHEs Evaluation results for teachers and principals (4 place scale) Rate of students earning college credit for high school courses # of pregnant and parenting students in secondary schools and rates of pregnant and parenting students in mainstream & alternative schools # and % of P and P achieving proficiency by grade and subject Incidence of bullying, violence, drug abuse, alcohol abuse, in school suspensions, out of school suspensions, expulsions, referrals to law enforcement, disciplinary transfers, and student Detentions for each disaggregated category Average class size by grade Most recent NAEP results disaggregated # of districts using PBIS # of students served in early intervening programs and who were put in SPED after EIS # of districts that have school mental health programs Comparison of athletic opportunities, salaries, facilities, coaches and uniforms for boys and girls # of students in foster care

8. ESEA Reauth: Conferencing a Bill?! Standards, Accountability and Assessment School Improvement/Turn Around Funding Portability/School Choice Maintenance of Effort Comparability Funding Flexibility Class Size Reduction Ed Tech RttT and i3 Moot? HQT/Teacher Eval

9. ESEA Waivers WaiverDescription ESEA Waiver 42 states, 3 policy priorities, 11 areas of flexibility, granted by USED 8 states w/o waivers: MT, ND, CA, NE, WY, IL, IA, VT, Teacher Evaluation and Testing Waiver USED sent a letter to all 50 state chief state school officers, outlining increased flexibility for states to postpone using student growth on state tests as a factor in staffing decisions. In particular, the waiver would allow states to delay the timeline one year, to the 2016-17 school year. The waiver would also allow those states implementing field tests associated with the new online assessments in the 2013-14 school year to administer either the statewide test OR the field test, as a way to avoid double testing. Accountability levels would be frozen at the 2012-13 level. Title I 15% Carryover Waiver USED issued a letter to all chief state school officers related to waivers from the Title I 15% carryover limit; allow states to apply for a blanket waiver so they can grant LEAs flexibility to carryover more than 15% of their FY12 Title I funds, in recognition of the impact of sequestration. Specifically, it allows a waiver to be granted more than once every three years, which is the current statutory limit. Title I Supplement/Suppla nt & Sequester Flexibility USED sent a letter to state Title I Directors clarifying that if a district/school were to use local funds to cover the cuts in federal Title I funding dues to sequestration and then replace those local funds with Title I funds in future years, that district/school would not be in violation of the 'supplement, not supplant' requirements.

10. ESEA Waivers: Renewing Renewal of state flexibility, expansion of conditions For renewal: –States must use teacher evaluation data to ensure that poor/minority students are not disproportionately taught by ineffective teachers (relative to their peers) by Oct 2015 –Districts will have to demonstrate that they are using Title II Part A dollars to ensure professional development for teachers and districts is “deepening their knowledge of college and career ready standards”, that PD if evidence-based, and that principals and teachers collaborated to prepping the district PD plan –States must demonstrate they are really intervening in priority and focus schools, and must describe how the SEA will increase the rigor of interventions and supports

11. Sources: CEF Calculations based on An Update to the Economic and Budget Outlook: Fiscal Years 2013 to 2023, CBO, February 2013; OMB Report Pursuant To The Sequestration Transparency Act Of 2012, September 2012; the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, January 2013; House Budget Committee’s Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Resolution Discretionary Spending table and Senate Budget Committee’s FY 2014 Budget Resolution Discretionary Spending Summary

12. FY14 Appropriations Senate and House budgets have drastically different philosophical foundations. Appropriations bills are on completely different trajectories We have a CR. President Obama’s FY14 budget includes $1.2 billion in new funding for K12. ALL of it competitive. Sequester! It happened, it isn’t resolved.

13. There was a shutdown! Contributing Factors: Budget/Appropriations Process and differences between House and Senate Fiscal Pressures: Sequestration, Affordable Care Act, Revenues (Taxes), Debt Ceiling What’s in the deal: –Dec 13: Budget Conference Report Due –Jan 15 CR Expires –Feb 7 Debt Ceiling Extension Expires Looking Ahead –Congress is asking itself to finalize a budget deal and agree on policy. –Sucks the air out of the room for other policy discussions (ESEA?) –The close proximity of these timelines does tee up the threat of another shutdown –Continued confluence of tricky fiscal policies –MUST address sequestration!

14. US Map: Federal Revenue in Local Edu Budgets

15. E-Rate Dan was nominated to USAC Board overseeing E- Rate President Obama announced ConnectEd, 5-year plan for higher connectivity NPRM update! Priority: NEW funding in addition to programmatic changes, which may include: – Streamlining applications – Backlog of appeals – Flexibility in use – Student-focused Stay engaged!

16. Perkins CTE House Education Committee (Winter 2013) Desire for bipartisan bill Stumbling blocks to bipartisanship –Funding levels –MOE –Competitive funding –Joint secondary/post-secondary funding

17. IDEA Funding IDEA Funding always #1 Priority MOE –With sequester, 100% MOE becomes more difficult –Need commonsense changes to MOE Waiver option Aligning IDEA MOE with Title I

18. Other School Nutrition Vouchers/Charters Epinephrine Pens Early Education IDEA Full Funding And more: –Seclusion/Restraint –IDEA and Due Process –Bullying –School Safety –Background Checks –Missing Children

19. Stay Connected! Noelle Ellerson nellerson@aasa.org @Noellerson Sasha Pudelski spudelski@aasa.org @Spudelski Francesca Duffy fduffy@aasa.org @fm_duffy Leslie Finnan lfinnan@aasa.org AASA Leading Edge Blog www.aasa.org/aasablog.aspx www.aasa.org/aasablog.aspx AASA Advocacy Newsletters Legislative Corps Advocacy Network Policy Insider Legislative Trends