Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

SEARCHING QUESTION AND ANSWER ARCHIVES Dr. Jiwoon Jeon Presented by CHARANYA VENKATESH KUMAR.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "SEARCHING QUESTION AND ANSWER ARCHIVES Dr. Jiwoon Jeon Presented by CHARANYA VENKATESH KUMAR."— Presentation transcript:

1 SEARCHING QUESTION AND ANSWER ARCHIVES Dr. Jiwoon Jeon Presented by CHARANYA VENKATESH KUMAR

2 Discussion Current Information Retrieval systems?

3 OVERVIEW Introduction Q&A Retrieval Test Collections Translation Based Q&A retrieval framework Learning word-to-word translations

4 INTRODUCTION Q&A Retrieval problem Challenges Semantically similar questions Problem : Word mismatch problem Solution : Machine translation-based information retrieval model Quality of the Answers Problem : Many answers to a given question Solution : Answer Quality Prediction Technique

5 What is New? New Type of Information System New Translation-based Retrieval Model New Document Quality Estimation Method Integration of Advances in Multiple research Areas New Paraphrase Generation Method Utilizing Web as a Resource for Retrieval

6 OVERVIEW Introduction Q&A Retrieval Test Collections Translation Based Q&A retrieval framework Learning word-to-word translations

7 Q & A RETRIEVAL Question & Answer Archives Websites with FAQ Community based question answering services Task Definition

8 Q & A Retrieval (Contd..)

9 Advantages Handle natural language questions Return answers instead of relevant documents Disadvantages Can answer only previously answered questions

10 Q & A RETRIEVAL SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE

11 CHALLENGES Finding relevant Question & Answer Pairs Importance of question parts Word mismatch problem Estimating Answer Quality Importance

12 OVERVIEW Introduction Q&A Retrieval Test Collections Translation Based Q&A retrieval framework Learning word-to-word translations

13 TEST COLLECTIONS Components : Set of documents Set of information needs (queries) Set of relevance judgment Pooling Method

14 WONDIR COLLECTION Earliest community based QA service in the US. 1 million question and answer pairs used from this service Average question length = 27 words Average answer length = 28 words

15 Examples

16 Queries Closed-class questions that ask fact based short answers. E.g.: Where is Charlotte located? Relevance Judgment 220 relevant Q&A pairs for 50 queries using pooling method. Relevance Judgment Criteria

17 WebFAQ COLLECTION by Jijkoun and Rijke Collection of FAQs using web crawlers- made public for research purposes. Found web pages that contain the word “FAQ”. Used heuristic methods to automatically extract question and answer pairs from the web pages.

18 NAVER COLLECTION Leading portal site in South Korea Community-based answering service Collection A : Category information – To test category specific translations Collection B : Non-Textual Information – To build answer quality prediction technique

19 Naver Collection (Contd..) Question – Title & Body Naver Test Collection A Naver Test Collection B Relevance : Question semantically related to query and Question contains all query terms Q&A pair was clicked multiple times for the query.

20 Comparison of test Collections

21 OVERVIEW Introduction Q&A Retrieval Test Collections Translation Based Q&A retrieval framework Learning word-to-word translations

22 Translation Based Q&A Retrieval framework Use of Machine Translation technique for information retrieval Word mismatch problem Translation based approach

23 IBM Statistical Machine translation Models Do not require any linguistic knowledge of the source or target language. Exploits only co-occurrence statistics of terms in training data.

24 IBM Models Model 1 Treats every possible word alignment equally Model 2 Assumes only positions of terms are related to the word alignment Model 3 The first term and the second term generated from the same term are independent

25 IBM Models (Contd..) Model 4 First order alignment model Every word is dependent only on the previous aligned word. Model 5 Reformulation of Model 4

26 Advantages of Model 1 Efficient implementation is possible using a form of query expansion. Performance gain of using low level translation models is high. Can be easily integrated into the query likelihood

27 IBM Model 1 Equation The probability that a query Q of length m is the translation of a document D (of length n) is given as

28 IBM Model 1 Equation

29 Translation based Language Models Language model is a mechanism for generating text. Unigram language model Assumes each word is generated independently Concerns only probabilities of sampling a single word.

30 Language modeling approach to IR In maximum likelihood estimator, unseen words in a document have zero probability. Smoothing : Transfers some probability mass from the seen words to the unseen words. Dirichlet smoothing – good performance and cheap computational cost.

31 Language modeling approach to IR (Contd..) The ranking function for the query likelihood language model with Dirichlet smoothing can be written as

32 IBM Model 1 vs. Query Likelihood Comparable components in the two models

33 Self Translation Model Every word has some probability to translate to itself. Cannot be 1 If too low – deteriorate retrieval performance

34 TransLM Final ranking Function looks like

35 Efficiency Issues and Implementation of TransLM Flipped Translation Tables

36 Term-at-a-time Algorithm

37 OVERVIEW Introduction Q&A Retrieval Test Collections Translation Based Q&A retrieval framework Learning word-to-word translations

38 Properties of Word Relationships Not Symmetric Not fixed Change depending on retrieval or translation tasks. must be given as probability values.

39 Training Sample Generation Key Idea If two answers are very similar, then the corresponding questions are semantically similar. Similarity Measures Cosine Similarity Query Likelihood scores between two answers (LM SCORE) LM-HRANK

40 Word Relationship Types P(Q|A) Source – Answer ; Target – Question P(A|Q) Source – Question ; Target – Answer P(Q|Q) P(Q Q)

41 EM Algorithm Find word relationships that maximize the likelihood of sampling the target text from the source text in training samples.

42 EM Algorithm (Contd..) The translation probability from a source word t to a target word w is given as

43 EM Algorithm (Contd..) The translation probability from a source word t to a target word w is given as

44 Examples

45 Examples (Contd..)

46 SUMMARY Introduction Q&A Retrieval Test Collections Translation Based Q&A retrieval framework Learning word-to-word translations

47 Coming Up Next… Estimating Answer Quality Experiments


Download ppt "SEARCHING QUESTION AND ANSWER ARCHIVES Dr. Jiwoon Jeon Presented by CHARANYA VENKATESH KUMAR."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google