Presentation on theme: "Naturalizing Racial Differences Through Comedy Asian, Black, and White Views on Racial Stereotypes in Rush Hour 2."— Presentation transcript:
Naturalizing Racial Differences Through Comedy Asian, Black, and White Views on Racial Stereotypes in Rush Hour 2
If blatant stereotypes are embodied in films, why do people enjoy them? Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen Bad Boys II
Rush Hour 2 Enormous commercial success: -$226 Million in US -$329 Million Worldwide The success of the franchise spawned other comedies with non-traditional leads including I Spy (2002), Shanghai Knights (2003), and the Harold and Kumar Films
Breakdown Topic: Naturalizing Racial Differences Through Comedy Focus: Racial Stereotypes in Rush Hour 2 Methods: Textual/Audience Analysis Goals/Themes: Comedy as a source to encourage an audience to naturalize racial differences rather than challenge racial stereotypes. Target: All Races
Key Quotes “Comedy as a genre essentially extends the alleged harmlessness of interpersonal jokes, which allows controversial content in mainstream films to be considered acceptable” (King as cited in Park et al. 2006, 160). “Most people claim to be color blind and antiracist; however, race continues to serve as an important cognitive category with which people make sense of their social world” (Park et al. 2006, 160). “Racial stereotypes play a signi ﬁ cant role in maintaining the racial ideology in post–civil rights America where blatant declarations of racist views, bigotry, and violence have become uncommon and unacceptable” (Park et al as cited in Essed, 1991; Myers & Williamson; van Dijk, 1984, 1987). “Racial stereotypes play a signi ﬁ cant role in maintaining the racial ideology in post–civil rights America where blatant declarations of racist views, bigotry, and violence have become uncommon and unacceptable” (Park et al as cited in Essed, 1991; Myers & Williamson; van Dijk, 1984, 1987).
“Denzin (2002) suggests that the conventional narrative in the interracial buddy ﬁ lms, where two men of different races develop trust and friendship, can be read as an imaginary utopia in which racial differences do not matter. In fact, comedy often inverts stereotypes to generate humor” (Park et al. 2006, 159).
“Although a critical analysis suggests that these textual devices serve an ideological function by promoting the acceptability and believability of racial stereotypes, such devices can simultaneously be read as strategies to subvert or disrupt the racial status quo” (Park et al. 2006, 165).
Issues to Discuss Several textual devices in Rush Hour 2 diffuse viewers’ potential claims of racism and promote the acceptability of racial stereotypes. First, the minority status of two main characters signals that their racial jokes are acceptable and not racist. Because people of color are usually portrayed as victims rather than perpetrators of racism, they are not perceived as having power over the others. Second, racial jokes in the ﬁ lm cross color lines, creating an impression that all races are subject to stereotypes. Third, the ﬁ lm’s stereotypes are coded as realistic and natural and based on the characters’ personality differences and the execution of the plot. For instance, Carter’s impulsive behavior is used to propel the plot and causes Lee to engage in ﬁ ghts with the Triad gang members. Carter is also always the funny distraction when Lee is responsibly investigating the crime. Third, the ﬁ lm’s stereotypes are coded as realistic and natural and based on the characters’ personality differences and the execution of the plot. For instance, Carter’s impulsive behavior is used to propel the plot and causes Lee to engage in ﬁ ghts with the Triad gang members. Carter is also always the funny distraction when Lee is responsibly investigating the crime. Fourth, the two leading men are portrayed as good friends. Because neither Carter nor Lee is hurt by the racial remarks, the ﬁ lm encourages viewers to interpret the humor as acceptable. They are seen singing together in the car, and they often help each other out of dif ﬁ cult situations.
Viewers Response Offensiveness -Jeff (White male, 19): It’s not as offensive when you know it’s supposed to be funny, as opposed to just coming out of nowhere, and you’re like, ‘‘what?’’ -Justin (Asian male, 18): I think since it’s in a comedy movie, people can let it go. -Ethan (White male, 20): The movie works because it’s two minorities. They can rag on each other. It wouldn’t be acceptable if one of them was White because.. It just wouldn’t work out. People would be offended and stuff. Stereotypes -Justin (Asian male, 18): Chris Tucker and Jackie Chan complement each other. Obviously Jackie Chan is better in ﬁ ghting and stuff. But Chris Tucker is better at talking and everything. So they kind of cancel each other out. They are a good combo. But I think with a White person and an Asian person, it always feels like the White person is better than the Asian person.
“The absence of a major White character did not alienate White viewers because the inclusion of a White character verbalizing racial stereotypes could have implicated White people as perpetrators of racism and thus would have made White viewers uncomfortable and resistant” (Park et al. 2006, 169).
Ken (Asian male, 19): Stereotypes are based on some types of truth. Does this have any truth to it?
Issues with Article First, it is very difficult to understand the authors thesis if the audience has not seen Rush Hour. The authors decided to split up the focus groups based on ethnicity because they believed it would help foster honest responses from viewers. Do you agree this is the best approach? Since the authors concluded that the respondents thought the material was not offensive or racist, I would be curious to see what the responses would have been if the focus groups were mixed by race.
Chris Tucker Tucker’s roots are in the comedic genre. Got his first big break House Party 3 and followed with roles in Money Talks and the Rush Hour Franchise. Throughout his career in stand up and film, he has been type casted as outlandish and has struggled in other roles. Carter is a high pitched, childish, irresponsible, and hypersexual. He even solves the crime instead of committing one.
Jackie Chan Started working in Hong Kong Cinema in the late 1970’s First major American exposure was in Rumble in the Bronx. In American Cinema he has had success in Action-Comedy Films such as the Rush Hour Franchise and Shanghai Noon Films. Other, more serious roles without a comedic partner were not received well either critically or commercially. Has become frustrated in Hollywood due to the lack of range in the roles he receives and creative control. Less is respectful but culturally ignorant and asexual Asian man that excels in Kung-Foo.
TCM Rush Hour 2
Why is it that Hollywood has created this almost fabricated Asian for American audiences? Why are Asians never portrayed as American? They are always foreigners that come and go? What are some films in which Asians are portrayed as American?
TCM Rush Hour 2 (Con’t)
Activity Is it ok to laugh at stereotypes and racism, even in comedy?