Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Growth Curve Models (being revised) Thanks due to Betsy McCoach David A. Kenny August 26, 2011.

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Growth Curve Models (being revised) Thanks due to Betsy McCoach David A. Kenny August 26, 2011."— Presentation transcript:

1 Growth Curve Models (being revised) Thanks due to Betsy McCoach David A. Kenny August 26, 2011

2 2 Overview Introduction Estimation of the Basic Model Nonlinear Effects Exogenous Variables Multivariate Growth Models

3 3 Not Discussed or Briefly Discussed Modeling Nonlinearity LDS Model Time-varying Covariates Point of Minimal Intercept Variance Complex Nonlinear Models (see extra slides at the end)

4 4 Two Basic Change Models Stochastic –I am like how I was, but I change randomly. –These random shocks are incorporated into who I am. –Autoregressive models (last week) Growth Curve Models –Each of us in a definite track. –We may be knocked off that track, but eventually we end up back on track. –Individuals are on different tracks.

5 5 Linear Growth Curve Models We have at least three time points for each individual. We fit a straight line for each person: The parameters from these lines describe the person.

6 6 The Key Parameters Slope: the rate of change –Some people are changing more than others and so have larger slopes. –Some people are improving or growing (positive slopes). –Some are declining (negative slopes). –Some are not changing (zero slopes). Intercept: where the person starts Error: How far the score is from the line.

7 7 Latent Growth Models (LGM) For both the slope and intercept there is a mean and a variance. –Mean Intercept: Where does the average person start? Slope: What is the average rate of change? –Variance Intercept: How much do individuals differ in where they start? Slope: How much do individuals differ in their rates of change: Different slopes for different folks.

8 8 Measurement Over Time measures taken over time –chronological time: 2006, 2007, 2008 –personal time: 5 years old, 6, and 7 missing data not problematic –person fails to show up at age 6 unequal spacing of observations not problematic –measures at 2000, 2001, 2002, and 2006

9 9 Data Types –Raw data –Covariance matrix plus means Means become knowns: T(T + 3)/2 Should not use CFI and TLI (unless the independence model is recomputed; zero correlations, free variances, means equal) Program reproduces variances, covariances (correlations), and means.

10 10 Independence Model Default model in Amos is wrong! No correlations, free variances, and equal means. df of T(T + 1)/2 – 1

11 11 Specification: Two Latent Variables Latent intercept factor and latent slope factor Slope and intercept factors are correlated. Error variances are estimated with a zero intercept. Intercept factor –free mean and variance –all measures have loadings set to one

12 12 Slope Factor free mean and variance loadings define the meaning of time Standard specification (given equal spacing) –time 1 is given a loading of 0 –time 2 a loading of 1 –and so on A one unit difference defines the unit of time. So if days are measured, we could have time be in days (0 for day 1 and 1 for day 2), weeks (1/7 for day 2), months (1/30) or years (1/365).

13 13 Time Zero Where the slope has a zero loading defines time zero. At time zero, the intercept is defined. Rescaling of time: –0 loading at time 1 centered at initial status standard approach –0 loading at the last wave centered at final status useful in intervention studies –0 loading in the middle wave centered in the middle of data collection intercept like the mean of observations

14 14 Different Choices Result In Same –model fit ( 2 or RMSEA) –slope mean and variance –error variances Different –mean and variance for the intercept –slope-intercept covariance

15 15 no intercept variance intercept variance, with slope and intercept being negatively correlated some intercept variance, and slope and intercept being positively correlated

16 16 Identification Need at least three waves (T = 3) Need more waves for more complicated models Knowns = number of variances, covariances, and means or T(T + 3)/2 –So for 4 times there are 4 variances, 6 covariances, and 4 means = 14 Unknowns –2 variances, one for slope and one for intercept –2 means, one for the slope and one for the intercept –T error variances –1 slope-intercept covariance

17 17 Model df Known minus unknowns General formula: T(T + 3)/2 – T – 5 Specific applications –If T = 3, df = 9 – 8 = 1 –If T = 4, df = 14 – 9 = 5 –If T = 5, df = 20 – 10 = 10

18 18 Three-wave Model Has one df. The over-identifying restriction is: M 1 + M 3 – 2M 2 = 0 (where M is mean) i.e., the means have a linear relationship with respect to time.

19 19 Example Data Curran, P. J. (2000) Adolescents, ages 10.5 to 15.5 at Time 1 3 times, separated by a year N = 363 Measure –Perceived peer alcohol use –0 to 7 scale, composite of 4 items

20 20 Intercept Factor

21 21 Intercept Factor with Loadings

22 22 Slope Factor

23 23 Slope Factor with Loadings

24 24 Estimates

25 25 Parameter Estimates Estimate SE CR MEANS Intercept Slope VARIANCES Intercept Slope Error Error Error COVARIANCE* Intercept-Slope *Correlation = -.378

26 26 Interpretation Mean –Intercept: The average person starts at –Slope: The average rate of change per year is.555 units. Variance –Intercept +1 sd = = sd = 1.30 – 1.56 = –Slope +1 sd = = sd =.56 –.63 = % positive slopes P(Z > -.555/.634) =.80

27 27 Model Fit 2 (1) = 4.98, p =.026 RMSEA =.105 CFI = ( – 5 – )/ ( – 5) =.991 Conclusion: Good fitting model. (Remember that the RMSEA with small df can be misleading.)

28 28 Nonlinearity Latent Basis Model: Some Loadings Free Fix the loadings for two waves of data to different nonzero values and free the other loadings. SlopeIntercept 01 ?1 21 In essence rescales time.

29 29 Results for Alcohol Data Wave 1: 0.00 Wave 2: 0.84 Wave 3: 2.00 Function fairly linear as 0.84 is close to 1.00.

30 30 Trimming Growth Curve Models Almost never trim –Slope-intercept covariance –Intercept variance Never have the intercept cause the slope factor or vice versa. Slope variance: OK to trim, i.e., set to zero. –If trimmed set slope-intercept covariance to zero. Do not interpret standardized estimates except the slope-intercept correlation.

31 31 Using Amos Must tell the Amos to Estimate means and intercepts. Growth curve plug-in It names parameters, sets measures intercepts to zero, frees slope and intercept factors means and variance, sets error variance equal over time, fixes intercept loadings to 1, and fixes slope loadings from 0 to 1.

32 32 Second Example Ormel, J., & Schaufeli, W. B. (1991). Stability and change in psychological distress and their relationship with self- esteem and locus of control: A dynamic equilibrium model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, Dutch Adults after College Graduation 5 Waves Every Six Months Distress Measure

33 33 Distress at Five Times

34 34 Parameter Estimates Estimate SE CR MEANS Intercept Slope VARIANCES Intercept Slope All error variances statistically significant COVARIANCE* Intercept-Slope *Correlation = -.433

35 35 Interpretation Large variance in distress level. Average slope is essentially zero. Variance in slope so some are increasing in distress and others are declining. Those beginning at high levels of distress decline over time.

36 36 Model Fit 2 (10) = , p <.001 RMSEA =.161 CFI = ( – 14 – )/ ( – 14) =.886 Conclusion: Poor fitting model.

37 37 Alternative Options for Error Variances Force error variances to be equal across time. – 2 (4) = 19.1 (not helpful) Non-independent errors –errors of adjacent waves correlated 2 (4) = 10.4 (not much help) –autoregressive errors (err1 err2 err3) 2 (4) = 10.5 (not much help)

38 38 Exogenous Variables Often in this context referred to as covariates Types –Person – e.g., age and gender –Time varying: a different measure at each time See extra slides. Need to center (i.e., remove their mean) these variables. –For time-varying use one common mean.

39 39 Person Covariates Center (failing the center makes average slope and intercept difficult to interpret) These variables explain variation in slope and intercept; have an R 2. Have them cause slope and intercept factors. –Intercept: If you score higher on the covariate, do you start ahead or behind (assuming time 1 is time zero)? –Slope: If you score higher on the covariate, do you grow at a faster and slower rate. Slope and intercept now have intercepts not means. Their disturbances are correlated.

40 40 Three exogenous person variables predict the slope and the intercept (own drinking)

41 41 Effects of Exogenous Variables Variable Intercept Slope Age.606*.057 Gender * COA * R (4) = 4.9 Intercept: Older children start out higher. Slope: More change for Boys and Children of Alcoholics. (Trimming ok here.)

42 42 Extra Slides Relationship to multilevel models Time varying covariates Multivariate growth curve model Point of minimal intercept variance Other ways of modeling nonlinearity Empirically scaling the effect of time Latent difference scores Non-linear dynamic models

43 43 Relationship to Multilevel Modeling (MLM) Equivalent if ML option is chosen Advantages of SEM –Measures of absolute fit –Easier to respecify; more options for respecification –More flexibility in the error covariance structure –Easier to specify changes in slope loadings over time –Allows latent covariates –Allows missing data in covariates Advantages of MLM –Better with time-unstructured data –Easier with many times –Better with fewer participants –Easier with time-varying covariates –Random effects of time-varying covariates allowable

44 44 Time-Varying Covariates A covariate for each time point. Center using time 1 mean (or the mean at time zero.) Do not have the variable cause slope or intercept. Main Effect –Have each cause its measurement at its time. –Set equal to get the main effect. Interaction: Allow the covariate to have a different effect at each time.

45 45 Interpretation Main effects of the covariate. –Path:.504 (p <.001) – 2 (3) = 8.44, RMSEA =.071 –Peer affects own drinking Covariate by Time interaction –Chi square difference test: 2 (2) = 4.24, p =.109 –No strong evidence that the effect of peer changes over time.

46 46 Time Varying Covariates

47 47 Results Main effects model Interaction model –Changes the intercept at each time. –Covariate acts like a step function.

48 48 Covariate by Time Interaction Covariate by Time (linear), Phantom variable approach

49 49 Partner Drinking as a Time-varying Covariate: V1 and V2 Are Latent Variables with No Disturbance (Phantom Variables)

50 50 Results Main Effect of Peer: (p =.038) Time x Peer: (p =.427) The effect of Peer increases over time, but not significantly.

51 51 Multivariate Growth Curve Model

52 52 Example Basic Model: 2 (4) = 8.18 –Correlations Intercepts:.81 Slopes:.67 Same Factors: 2 (13) = –One common slope and intercept for both variables. –9 less parameters: 5 covariances 2 means 2 covariances Much more variance for Own than for Peer

53 53 Point of Minimal Intercept Variance Concept –The variance of intercept refers to variance in predicted scores a time zero. –If time zero is changed, the variance of the intercept changes. –There is some time point that has minimal intercept variance. Possibilities –Point is before time zero (negative value) Divergence or fan spread Increasing variance over time –Point is after the last point in the study Convergence of fan close Decreasing variance over time –Point is somewhere in the study Convergence and then divergence May wish to define time zero as this point

54 54 Computation Should be computed only if there is reliable slope variance. Compute: s slope,intercept /s slope 2 Curran Example /0.170 = , just before the last wave Convergence and decreasing variability Peer perceptions become more homogeneous across time.

55 55 More Elaborate Nonlinear Growth Models Latent basis model –fix the loadings for two waves of data (typically the first and second waves or the first and last waves) and free the other loadings Bilinear or piecewise model –inflection point –two slope factors Step function –level jumps at some point (e.g., treatment effect) –two intercept factors

56 56 Bilinear or Piecewise Model Inflection point Two slope factors

57 57 Bilinear or Piecewise Model OPTION 1: 2 distinct growth rates –One from T1 to T3 –The second from T3 to T5 OPTION 2: Estimate a baseline growth plus a deflection (change in trajectory) –One constant growth rate from T1 to T5 –Deflection from the trajectory beginning at T3 Two options are equivalent in term of model fit.

58 58 Option 1: Two Rates Slope1Slope2Int Slope1Slope2Int Option 2: Rate & Deflection

59 59 Piecewise Bilinear Model

60 60 Results Bilinear: 2 (6) = , p <.001 –RMSEA =.204 Piecewise: 2 (6) = , p <.001 –RMSEA =.204 Conclusion: No real improvement of fit for these two different but equivalent methods

61 61 Step Function: Change in Intercept Level jumps at some point (e.g., point of intervention) Two intercept factors SlopeInt1Int Note Int2 measures the size of intervention effect for each person.

62 62 Results Change in intercept – 2 (6) = –RMSEA =.199 Conclusion: No real improvement of fit

63 63 Modeling Nonlinearity Quadratic Effects Seasonal Effects Empirically based slopes of any form.

64 64 Add a Quadratic Factor Add a second (quadratic) slope factor (0, 1, 4, 9 …) Correlate with the other slope and intercept factor. Adds parameters –1 mean –1 variance –2 covariances (with intercept and the other slope) No real better fit for the Distress Example – 2 (6) = 98.59; RMSEA =.199

65 65 Modeling Seasonal Effects Note the alternating positive and negative coefficients for the slope

66 66 Results 2 (6) = 65.41, p <.001 –RMSEA =.120 No evidence of Slope Variance (actually estimated as negative!) Conclusion: Fit better, but still poor.

67 67 Empirically Estimated Scaling of Time Allows for any possible growth model. Fix one slope loading (usually one). No intercept factor.

68 68 Results Curvilinear Trend Wave 1: 1.00 Wave 2: 0.74 Wave 3: 0.95 Wave 4: 0.83 Wave 5: 0.87 Better Fit, But Not Good Fit 2 (9) = 62.5, p <.001

69 69 Latent Difference Score Models Developed by Jack McArdle Creates a difference score of each time Uses SEM Traditional linear growth curve models are a special case Called LDS Models

70 70 LDS Model

71 71 Relation to a Linear Growth Curve Model The same if a = 0 If a not equal to zero, the model can be viewed as a blend of growth curve and autoregressive models.

72 72 Nonlinear Growth: Negative Exponential One Unit Moving Through Time Constant Rate of Change (no error) The Force Pulling the Score to the Mean Is a Constant The First Derivative Is a Constant

73 73 More Complex Nonlinear Growth Sinusoid –Nonzero first and second order derivative Pendulum –dampening

74 74 Estimation Using AR(2) Model Negative Exponential 1 > a 1 > -1 (the rate of change) and a 2 = 0 Sinusoid 2 > a 1 > 1 and a 2 = -1 Cobb formula for period length = /cos -1a 1 Pendulum dampening factor = 1 - a 2 Cobb formula for period length = /cos -1a 1

75 75 Go to the next SEM page. Go to the main SEM page.

Download ppt "Growth Curve Models (being revised) Thanks due to Betsy McCoach David A. Kenny August 26, 2011."

Similar presentations

Ads by Google