Presentation on theme: "TITLE VII INTRODUCTION TO TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 (as amended) Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, prohibits employment."— Presentation transcript:
1TITLE VIIINTRODUCTION TO TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 (as amended)Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.A form of discrimination is harassment.Title VII prohibits harassment on the basis of race, color, religion, sex and national origin as well.
2TITLE VIIINTRODUCTION TO TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 (as amended)September 11, 2001Immediately after September 11, 2001 the EEOCissued a press release affirming that Title VII of theCivil Rights Act of 1964 forbids workplace bias based on the following:Religion, ethnicity, birthplace, culture, or linguistic characteristics;Marriage or association with persons of a national origin or religious group;Membership or association with specific ethnic or religious groups;Physical, linguistic or cultural traits closely associated with a national origin group, for example, discrimination because of a person's physical features or traditional Arab style of dress; andPerception or belief that a person is a member of a particular national origin group, based on the person's speech, mannerisms, or appearance.
3TITLE VIIINTRODUCTION TO TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 (as amended)Increased Number of EEOC ClaimsSince September 11, 2001, the EEOC has received a significant number of charges alleging discrimination by those who are, or are perceived to be, of Middle Eastern descent.Between September 11 and December 6, 2001, 166 EEOC charges were filed by Arab, Muslim, Middle-Eastern, South Asian, or Sikh employees alleging either harassment or discrimination as a direct result of the events of September 11.During this same time period, the charges filed by Muslims alleging religion based discrimination were more than double for the same period in 2000.
4TITLE VII Joint Statement INTRODUCTION TO TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 (as amended)Joint StatementIn an effort to stop this unfortunate trend, on November 19, 2001, the EEOC, together with the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, the Department of Labor, and the Civil Rights division of the Department of Justice, issued a joint statement stating that these agencies intend to intensify their efforts to combat discrimination based on religion, ethnicity, national origin, or immigration status in the workplace.In the joint statement, these agencies encouraged employers to focus on the following four areas in an effort to prevent workplace discrimination:Send the message that discrimination and harassment will not be tolerated in the workplace;Communicate policies prohibiting discrimination, harassment and retaliation;Encourage employees to report improper conduct through internal complaint procedures; andVoluntarily cooperate with the agencies to resolve any cases of discrimination.
5TITLE VII RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of l964prohibits employers from discriminatingagainst individuals because of theirreligion in hiring, firing, and other termsand conditions of employment.The Act also requires employers toreasonably accommodate the religiouspractices of an employee or prospectiveemployee, unless to do so would createan undue hardship upon the employer. Thus, an employer does not fulfill its legal obligation by simply eliminating religious harassment and discrimination in the workplace.Unlike the other protected characteristics under Title VII (i.e., race, color, sex and national origin), religion has a reasonable accommodation component much like that for disabilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act.The meaning of undue hardship is not all together clear. Neither Title VII nor the EEOC's enforcement guidelines provide a specific definition for the term. The United States Supreme Court, however,, has defined "undue hardship" as any costs greater than de minimis (i.e., a nominal cost) in Trans World Airlines v. Hardison, 432 U.S. 63 (1977)
6TITLE VII RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION Flexible scheduling, voluntary substitutions or swaps, job reassignments and lateral transfers are examples of accommodating an employee's religious beliefs.Employers cannot schedule examinations or other selection activities in conflict with a current or prospective employee's religious needs, inquire about an applicant's future availability at certain times, maintain a restrictive dress code, orrefuse to allow observance of a Sabbath or religiousholiday, unless the employer can prove that notdoing so would cause an undue hardship.An employer can claim undue hardship whenaccommodating an employee's religious practicesif allowing such practices requires more than ordinaryadministrative costs.
7TITLE VII Examples of costs that courts have found to exceed the de minimis standard (defined above),include accommodations that would require theemployer to pay overtime to replacementworkers, that create staffing shortages, or thatcircumvent the seniority system.Other examples of undue hardship include havingto hire an extra employee to act as a floater;insufficient workers for a shift; co-workers who say they are tired of covering for the employee seeking the accommodation; and production data showing that use of replacement workers results in more mistakes and less efficiency.Overall, the undue hardship test for religious accommodation under Title VII is less stringent than the undue hardship test for accommodating disabilities under the ADA.In contrast to Title VII's de minimis standard for reasonable accommodation, the ADA defines the term to mean a significant difficulty or expense from accommodating the disability.
8TITLE VII RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION Undue hardship also may be shown if changing abona fide seniority system to accommodate oneemployee's religious practices denies anotheremployee the job or shift preference guaranteedby the seniority system.An employee whose religious practices prohibit payment of union dues to a labor organization cannot be required to pay the dues, but may pay an equal sum to a charitable organization. Mandatory "new age" training programs, designed to improve employee motivation, cooperation or productivity through meditation, yoga, biofeedback or other practices, may conflict with the non-discriminatory provisions of Title VII.Employers must accommodate any employee who gives notice that these programs are inconsistent with the employee's religious beliefs, whether or not the employer believes there is a religious basis for the employee's objection.
9TITLE VII According to Title VII, a religion includes all aspects of religious observance and practice,as well as moral or ethical beliefs sincerely heldwith the strength of traditional religious views.The EEOC's Guidelines on DiscriminationBecause of Religion provide that as long asthese beliefs are sincerely held with the strengthof traditional religious views, they may fall underthe protection of Title VII.The fact that no religious group espouses such beliefs or the fact that the religious group to which the individual professes to belong may not accept such belief, has no bearing on whether the belief should be classified as religious in nature.The employee's religious beliefs are assumed to be sincerely held unless proved otherwise.
10TITLE VII RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION Undue hardship also may be shown if changing a bona fide seniority system to accommodate one employee's religious practices denies another employee the job or shift preference guaranteed by the seniority system.An employee whose religious practices prohibit payment of union dues to a labor organization cannot be required topay the dues, but may pay an equal sum to acharitable organization. Mandatory "new age"training programs, designed to improveemployee motivation, cooperation orproductivity through meditation, yoga,biofeedback or other practices, mayconflict with the non-discriminatoryprovisions of Title VII.Employers must accommodate any employeewho gives notice that these programs areinconsistent with the employee's religiousbeliefs, whether or not the employer believesthere is a religious basis for the employee's objection.
11TITLE VIIAccording to Title VII, a religion includes all aspects of religious observance and practice, as well as moral or ethical beliefs sincerely held with the strength of traditional religious views.The EEOC's Guidelines on Discrimination Because of Religion provide that as long as these beliefs are sincerely held with the strength of traditional religious views, they may fall under the protection of Title VII.The fact that no religious groupespouses such beliefs or the fact thatthe religious group to which theindividual professes to belong maynot accept such belief, has no bearingon whether the belief should be classifiedas religious in nature.The employee's religious beliefs are assumedto be sincerely held unless proved otherwise.
12TITLE VII RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION Determining whether an accommodation is required and whether a particular accommodation is reasonable can be extremely difficult.This is particularly true when the employer is unfamiliar with the beliefs and practices of a particular religion.Sometimes, it may be a struggle to make the initial determination that an employee is making a legitimate request for an accommodation.Supervisors often are unfamiliar with the tenets of various religions and may suspect that some employees are making a request for a religious accommodation solely to avoid distasteful duties or work hours.
13TITLE VII PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION The Pregnancy Discrimination Act is an amendment to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of Discrimination on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions constitutes unlawful sex discrimination under Title VII.Women affected by pregnancy or related conditions must be treated in the same manner as other applicants or employees with similar abilities or limitations.Hiring (Pregnancy Discrimination Act)An employer cannot refuse to hire a woman because of her pregnancy related condition as long as she is able to perform the major functions of her job.An employer cannot refuse to hire her because of its prejudices against pregnant workers or the prejudices of co-workers, clients or customers.
14TITLE VII PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION Pregnancy and Maternity Leave (Pregnancy Discrimination Act)An employer may not single out pregnancy related conditions for special procedures to determine an employee's ability to work.An employer may use any procedure used to screen other employees' ability to work.For example, if an employer requires its employees tosubmit a doctor's statement concerning their inabilityto work before granting leave or paying sickbenefits, the employer may require employeesaffected by pregnancy related conditions tosubmit such statements.If an employee is temporarily unable to perform her jobdue to pregnancy, the employer must treat her the sameas any other temporarily disabled employee. (Byproviding modified tasks, alternative assignments,disability leave or leave without pay.)
15TITLE VII Pregnant employees must be permitted to work as long as they are able to performtheir jobs.If an employee has been absent fromwork as a result of a pregnancy relatedcondition and recovers, her employer maynot require her to remain on leave until the baby's birth.An employer may not have a rule which prohibits an employee from returning to work for a predetermined length of time after childbirth.Employers must hold open a job for a pregnancy related absence the same length of time jobs are held open for employees on sick or disability leave.
16TITLE VII PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION Health Insurance (Pregnancy Discrimination Act)Any health insurance provided by an employer mustcover expenses for pregnancy related conditions onthe same basis as costs for other medical conditions.Health insurance for expenses arising from abortionis not required, except where the life of the motheris endangered.Pregnancy related expenses should be reimbursedexactly as those incurred for other medicalconditions, whether payment is on a fixed basisor a percentage of reasonable and customarycharge basis.
17TITLE VIIThe amounts payable by the insurance provider can be limited only to the same extent as costs for other conditions.No additional, increased or larger deductible can be imposed. If a health insurance plan excludes benefit payments for pre-existing conditionswhen the insured's coverage becomeseffective, benefits can be denied formedical costs arising from an existingpregnancy.Employers must provide the same levelof health benefits for spouses of maleemployees as they do for spouses offemale employees.
18TITLE VII PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION Fringe Benefits (Pregnancy Discrimination Act)Pregnancy related benefits cannot be limited to married employees.In an all-female workforce or job classification, benefits must be provided for pregnancy related conditions if benefits are provided for other medical conditions.If an employer provides any benefits to workers on leave, the employer must provide the same benefits for those on leave for pregnancy related conditions.Employees with pregnancy related disabilities must be treated the same as other temporarily disabled employees for accrual and crediting of seniority, vacation calculation, pay increases and temporary disability benefits.
19TITLE VII RACE/COLOR DISCRIMINATION Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of1964 protects individuals againstemployment discrimination on thebasis of race and color as well asnational origin, sex, or religion.It is unlawful to discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of his/her race or color in regard to hiring, termination, promotion, compensation, job training, or any other term, condition, or privilege of employment.Title VII also prohibits employment decisions based on stereotypes and assumptions about abilities, traits, or the performance of individuals of certain racial groups.
20TITLE VIITitle VII prohibits both intentional discrimination and neutral job policies that disproportionately exclude minorities and that are not job related.Equal employment opportunity cannot be denied because of marriage to or association with an individual of a different race; membership in or association with ethnic based organizations or groups; or attendance or participation in schools or places of worship generally associated with certain minority groups.
21TITLE VII RACE/COLOR DISCRIMINATION Race-Related Characteristics and ConditionsDiscrimination on the basis of an immutablecharacteristic associated with race, such as skincolor, hair texture, or certain facial featuresviolates Title VII, even though not all membersof the race share the same characteristic.Title VII also prohibits discrimination on thebasis of a condition which predominantly affectsone race unless the practice is job related andconsistent with business necessity.For example, since sickle cell anemia predominantly occurs in African-Americans, a policy which excludes individuals with sickle cell anemia must be job related and consistent with business necessity. Similarly, a "no-beard" employment policy may discriminate against African-American men who have a predisposition to pseudofolliculitis barbae (severe shaving bumps) unless the policy is job related and consistent with business necessity.
22TITLE VII Harassment Harassment on the basis of race and/or color violates Title VII.Ethnic slurs, racial "jokes,"offensive or derogatorycomments, or other verbalor physical conduct based on an individual's race/color constitutes unlawful harassment if the conduct creates an intimidating, hostile, or offensive working environment, or interferes with the individual's work performance.
23TITLE VII RACE/COLOR DISCRIMINATION Segregation and Classification of EmployeesTitle VII is violated when minority employees are segregated by physically isolating them from other employees or from customer contact.Title VII also prohibits assigning primarily minorities to predominantly minority establishments or geographic areas.It is also illegal to exclude minorities from certain positions or to group or categorize employees or jobs so that certain jobs are generally held by minorities.Coding applications/resumes to designate an applicant's race, by either an employer or employment agency, constitutes evidence of discrimination where minorities are excluded from employment or from certain positions.
24TITLE VII RACE/COLOR DISCRIMINATION Pre-Employment Inquiries Requesting pre-employment information whichdiscloses or tends to disclose an applicant'srace suggests that race will be unlawfullyused as a basis for hiring.Solicitation of such pre-employment informationis presumed to be used as a basis for makingselection decisions. Therefore, if members ofminority groups are excluded from employment, the request for such pre-employment information would likely constitute evidence of discrimination. However, employers may legitimately need information about their employees' or applicants' race for affirmative action purposes and/or to track applicant flow.One way to obtain racial information and simultaneously guard against discriminatory selection is for employers to use "tear-off sheets" for the identification of an applicant's race. After the applicant completes the application and the tear-off portion, the employer separates the tear-off sheet from the application and does not use it in the selection process.
25TITLE VII Speak-English-Only Rule NATIONAL ORIGIN DISCRIMINATIONSpeak-English-Only RuleA rule requiring employees to speak only English at all times on the job may violate Title VII, unless an employer shows it is necessary for conducting business. Courts have upheld limited English-only rules where the employers had legitimate, non-discriminating reasons for the rules, and the affected employees were bilingual.To have lawful English-only work rules, public employers must also ensure that such rules do not impact the delivery or accessibility of services to the public.
26TITLE VIIAccentAn employer must show a legitimate non-discriminatory reason for the denial of employment opportunity because of an individual's accent or manner ofspeaking.Investigations will focus on thequalifications of the person andwhether his or her accent or mannerof speaking had a detrimental effecton job performance.Requiring employees or applicants to befluent in English may violate Title VII if therule is adopted to exclude individuals of aparticular national origin and is not relatedto job performance.
27TITLE VII NATIONAL ORIGIN DISCRIMINATION Harassment Harassment on the basis ofnational origin is a violationof Title VII.An ethnic slur or other verbalor physical conduct becauseof an individual's nationalityconstitute harassment if they create an intimidating, hostile or offensive working environment, unreasonably interfere with work performance or negatively affect an individual's employment opportunities.Employers have a responsibility to maintain a workplace free of national origin harassment.Under certain circumstances, an employer may be responsible for the acts of non-employees who harass their employees at work.
28TITLE VII Racial and Ethnic Harassment on the basis of an individual's NATIONAL ORIGIN DISCRIMINATIONRacial and Ethnic Harassmenton the basis of an individual'srace or national origin violatesTitle VII.Racial or ethnic slurs, jokes,offensive or derogatory comments, or other verbal or physical conduct based on race or nationality are unlawful if the conduct creates an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment, or if it unreasonably interferes with an employee's work performance.
29TITLE VIIImmigration Related Practices Which May Be Discriminatory (National Origin Discrimination)The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA) requires employers to prove all employees hired after November 6, 1986, are legally authorized to work in the United States.IRCA also prohibits discrimination based on national origin or citizenship.An employer who singles out individuals of a particularnational origin or individuals who appear to be foreignto provide employment verification may have violatedboth IRCA and Title VII. Employers who imposecitizenship requirements or give preference to U.S.citizens in hiring or employment opportunities may haveviolated IRCA, unless these are legal or contractualrequirements for particular jobs.Employers also may have violated Title VII if arequirement or preference has the purpose oreffect of discriminating against individuals of a particular national origin.
30TITLE VII EEOC REQUIRED DOCUMENTS The EEOC requires larger employers to file an EEO-1 report each year, whichprovides a breakdown of the employer'swork force by race, sex, and national origin.Employers with fewer than 100 employeesand federal contractors with fewer than 50employees and contracts under $50,000are exempt from this requirement.
31TITLE VII EMPLOYMENT RECORDS In general, employers must keep all personnelor employment records for one year.If an employee is involuntarily terminated,his/her personnel records must be retainedfor one year from the date of termination.If a claim of discrimination is filed, allrelevant personnel records must be retained untilfinal disposition of the matter. Under "Age Discrimination in Employment Act" recordkeeping requirements, employers must also keep all payroll records for three years.Employers must keep on file any employee benefit plan (such as pension and insurance plans) and any written seniority or merit system for the full period the plan or system is in effect and for at least one year after its termination.
32TITLE VII www.eeoc.gov EEOC DISCRIMINATION CHARGES - PROCESS The EEOC has 50 field offices all across the country.An employee or applicant for employment who believes that he or she has been discriminated against can file a charge of discrimination in any EEOC field office. EEOC will send a copy of the charge to the employer.EEOC will immediately dismiss charges that raise no legal claim under EEOC-enforced laws. Otherwise, EEOC will investigate the charge to determine whether there is reasonable cause to believe discrimination occurred.EEOC will request the employer to provide information on the matters raised in the charge.
33TITLE VII EEOC DISCRIMINATION CHARGES - PROCESS There are a number of ways a charge may be handled:A charge may be assigned for priority investigation if the initial facts appear to support a violation of law. When the evidence is less strong, the charge may be assigned for follow up investigation to determine whether it is likely that aviolation has occurred.EEOC can seek to settle a chargeat any stage of the investigation if thecharging party and the employerexpress an interest in doing so. Ifsettlement efforts are not successful, theinvestigation continues.
34TITLE VIIEEOC DISCRIMINATION CHARGES - PROCESSEEOC may make written requests for information, interview people, review documents, and, as needed, visit the facility where the alleged discrimination occurred. When the investigation is complete, EEOC will discuss the evidence with the charging party or employer, as appropriate.the charge may be selected for EEOC's mediation program if both the charging party andthe employer express an interest in this option.Mediation is offered as an alternative to a lengthyinvestigation. Participation in the mediation program isconfidential, voluntary, and requires consent from bothcharging party and employer. If mediation isunsuccessful, the charge is returned for investigation.
35TITLE VII EEOC DISCRIMINATION CHARGES - PROCESS A charge may be dismissed at any point if, in the agency's best judgment, further investigation will not establish a violation of the law.A charge may be dismissed at the time it is filed, if an initial in-depth interview does not produce evidence to support the claim.When a charge is dismissed, a notice is issued in accordance with the law which gives the charging party 90 days in which to file a lawsuit on his or her own behalf.A charging party may file a lawsuit within 90 days afterreceiving a notice of a "right to sue" from EEOC.
36TITLE VII EEOC DISCRIMINATION CHARGES - PROCESS A charge must be filed with EEOC within 180 days from the date of the alleged violation.This 180-day filing deadline is extended to 300 days if the charge also is covered by a state or local anti-discrimination law.Many states and localities haveanti-discrimination laws and agenciesresponsible for enforcing those laws.EEOC refers to these agencies as"Fair Employment Practices Agencies”(FEPAs).Through the use of "work sharingagreements," EEOC and the FEPAsavoid duplication of effort while at the same time ensuring that a charging party's rights are protected under both federal and state law.
37TITLE VII EEOC DISCRIMINATION CHARGES - PROCESS If a charge is filed with a FEPA and is also covered by federal law, the FEPA "dual files" the charge with EEOC to protect federal rights.The charge usually will be retained by the FEPA for handling.If a charge is filed with EEOC and also is covered by state or local law, EEOC "dual files" the charge with the state or local FEPA, but ordinarily retains the charge for handling.If the evidence shows there is noreasonable cause to believediscrimination occurred, EEOC willnotify both the charging party and theemployer, and the charging party willbe given a notice of right to sue in court.
38TITLE VIIEEOC DISCRIMINATION CHARGES - PROCESSIf the evidence shows there is reasonable cause to believe discrimination occurred, EEOC will seek to conciliate the charge by working with the employer to achieve a voluntary resolution.In conciliation, EEOC will require the employer to provide the appropriateremedies for the discrimination.If conciliation fails, the case maybe litigated by EEOC or the chargingparty.
39TITLE VII EEOC DISCRIMINATION CHARGES - PROCESS If I've violated the law, what could happen?Under EEOC-enforced laws, principal remedies for unlawful employment discrimination include reinstatement or hiring, court orders to eliminate discriminatorypractices, restoration of lost wages,damages, and attorney's fees.An employer is responsible for thefull amount of lost wages and attorney'sfees. Lost wages are not considereddamages.Under most EEOC-enforced laws,compensatory and punitive damagesalso may be available where intentionaldiscrimination is found.
40TITLE VII EEOC DISCRIMINATION CHARGES - PROCESS Damages may be available to compensate for actual monetary losses, for future monetary losses, and for mental anguish and inconvenience.Punitive damages also may be available if an employer acted with malice or reckless indifference. Punitive damages are not available against the federal, state or local governments.The size of the employer determines the"cap" on damages available to a complainingparty:$50,000 maximum for employerswith employees$100,000 maximum for employerswith employees$200,000 maximum for employerswith employees$300,000 maximum for employerswith more that 500 employees
41TITLE VII SUMMARY One of the more popular claims filed with the EEOC is Sexual Harassment and SexDiscrimination. These particular issues arecovered in the "Sensitivity Training" portionof this website that all employees mustcomplete.As managers the most important thing youmust remember - early intervention preventsa small problem from becoming a problem that takes on a life and a budget of it's own. Utilizing the Management Hotline when you believe a problem may exist, being aware of what is happening in your department and taking all complaints seriously will go a long way in preventing these issues from growing into an EEOC claim or worst yet, a litigious event.
42TITLE VIIThe information contained herein is for general summary purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. If you have any questions about the specific application of the matters discussed herein or desire a more detailed explanation, please contact the HR hotline or legal counsel.