Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Critical Design Review

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Critical Design Review"— Presentation transcript:

1 Critical Design Review
Heavens Bound Halibut (HBH) February 8, 2012

2 Changes Made Since PDR Changes made to vehicle criteria:
Rocket is 133 inches The main parachute and drogue parachute have switched places. Payload is located in the nose cone. Rocket separates into four pieces Fuselage weighs lbs ACDS separated from parachute deployment ACDS controller switched to BeagleBone Changes made to payload criteria: None Changes made to activity plan:

3 Budget Description Cost Number Sub Cost Running Tally
Fiberglass Nosecone, 24/6 $99.95 1 Bluetube Body 6", length 48" $66.95 3 $200.85 $300.80 Blue Tube 54mm $23.95 $324.75 Thrust Ring Retainer, 54mm $40.00 $364.75 1/2" 9-Ply Birch Centering Rings, 54mm $8.67 $26.01 $390.76 1/2" 9-Ply Birch Bulkhead Plates $6.34 4 $25.36 $416.12 20 ft. Rocketman Main Parachute $300.00 $716.12 5 ft. Rocketman Drogue Parachute $45.00 $761.12 L2200G-P reload kit (propellant) $280.00 $1,041.12 RMS-75/5120 reload casing $520.00 $1,561.12 Carbon fiber kits $143.90 $1,705.02 Stratologger $69.99 $279.96 $1,984.98 GPS Tracker $2,284.98 linear actuator $400.00 $2,684.98 processor $100.00 $2,784.98 air speed sensor $50.00 $2,834.98 analog device IMU sensor $900.00 $3,734.98 siren $60.00 $3,794.98 rocket beeper $12.95 $3,807.93 XL Variable-Capacity Ejection Canister $9.99 $29.97 $3,837.90

4 Timeline February 1st -30th: Component testing
February 3rd -28th: Rocket Assembly February 14th – March 26th: Full Scale Launch February 14th – March 24th : Parachute Tests March 26th: Deliver FRR on Website

5 Gross Liftoff Weight (lb)
33.000 24.000 18.000 21.000 37.000 Vehicle Dimensions Payload Vehicle Properties Diameter (in) 6 Length (in) 133 Gross Liftoff Weight (lb) 54.65 Launch Rail Size (in) 1.0 Motor Retention thrust ring Electronics and ACDS

6 Fins

7 CP and CG analysis The center of pressure (CP) is located inches from the nose cone. The center of gravity (CG) is located inches from the nose cone. The stability margin has increased to 1.83. Total Mass (Lbs) 54.64 Nose Cone 0.22 Payload 1.5 Parachute Bays 4.34 Main Parachute 8.14 Drogue Parachute 5.57 ACDS Tube 17.25 Motor Tube 17.62

8 Flight Simulations

9 Scale Model Results

10 FROSTE System Risk Matrix
Technical Schedule Likelihood Categories 5 Very High No understanding of design or no experience implementing similar designs.  No one is working on the subsystem 4 High Little understanding of design or little experience implementing similar designs  Only one student working on this who will graduate before it is expected to be done. 3 Moderate Some understanding of design or some experience implementing similar designs Only one student working on this who has many classes this semester. 2 Low Great understanding of design or good experience implementing similar designs  There are two (or more students working in this 1 Very Low Previously implemented design or extensive experience implementing similar designs  Subsystem almost done and a clear path to finalization is determined Consequence Categories Risk Type 1 Very Low 2 Low 3 Moderate 4 High 5 Very High Technical No impact to full mission success criteria Minor impact to full mission success criteria Moderate impact to full mission success criteria. Minimum mission success criteria is achievable with margin Major impact to full mission success criteria. Minimum mission success criteria is achievable Minimum mission success criteria is not achievable Schedule Negligible or no schedule impact Minor impact to schedule milestones; accommodates within reserves; no impact to critical path Impact to schedule milestones; accommodates within reserves; moderate impact to critical path Major impact to schedule milestones; major impact to critical path Cannot meet schedule and program milestones Cost <2% increase over allocated and negligible impact on reserve Between 2% and 5% increase over allocated and can handle with reserve Between 5% and 7% increase over allocated and can not handle with reserve Between 7% and 10% increase over allocated, and/or exceeds proper reserves >10% increase over allocated, and/or can’t handle with reserves Goddard Space flight center 5x5 risk matrix High Risks Moderate Risks Low Risks

11 FROSTE System: Risk Analysis
H O D Trend Rank App Risk Title 1 M Development Delays 2 Motor Shipping Issues 3 Funding 4 A Material Acquisition 5 W Facilities Schedule Conflicts 6 Student Schedule Conflicts 7 R FAA Waiver Issues 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 4 3 7 6 5 CONSEQUENCES Approach M – Mitigate W – Watch A – Accept R – Research Criticality High Med Low L x C Trend  Decreasing (Improving)  Increasing (Worsening)  Unchanged * New since last month 11

12 Component testing The testing will be done in house
Blue tube and carbon fiber are the primary materials The materials will have four tests: compression, tensile, torsion, and bending. The ACDS linkages will be compressed to find point of highest strength vs. weight

13 Physical Payload Integration
Payload is in P-POD shell Slides into nose cone Secured by 8 quarter inch bolts

14 Payload The Alaska Research CubeSat (ARC)

15 ARC Mission Objectives
Education Mission Objective 1 (EMO1): Provide an authentic, interdisciplinary, hands-on student experiences in science and engineering through the design, development, operation of a student small satellite mission. Science Mission Objective 1 (SMO1): Characterize thermal and vibration environment inside the launch vehicle from ignition to orbit insertion. Science Mission Objective 2 (SMO2): Validate a novel low power Attitude Control and Determination Systems (ACDS). Science Mission Objective 3 (SMO3): Validate a high bandwidth communication system by obtaining images of changing snow/ice coverage in arctic regions.

16 ARC Launch Environment Data Logger (LEDL): Risk Analysis
Trend Rank App Risk Title 1 R Launch Detect 2 W Software / testing 3 A Memory 4 M / R Sensor Header Failure 5 4 3 2 1 1 4 2 3 Approach M – Mitigate W – Watch A – Accept R – Research Criticality High Med Low L x C Trend  Decreasing (Improving)  Increasing (Worsening)  Unchanged * New since last month CONSEQUENCES

17 Deployment Charges and Shear Pins
The modules are held together by 2-56 nylon shear pins, each having a shearing force of 25 pounds. Each module will be held in place by 4 shear pins, totaling 100lb of force needed for separation. To separate the modules, 4F black powder will be used.

18 Parachute System Dual Deployment Method
Main Parachute switched with Drogue Drogue has 5’ diameter Main has 20’ diameter Terminal Velocity: 68.3 ft/s Impact velocity: 16.7 ft/s Max impact energy 74.7 ft-lb

19 Parachute Performance

20 Parachute: Risk Analysis
O D Trend Rank App Risk Title 1 R/M Parachute folding technique 2 M Air Brake interference with parachute deployment 3 Bulkhead attachment strength 4 A Altimeter failure 5 Deployment accelerations on rocket body 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 5 4 CONSEQUENCES Approach M – Mitigate W – Watch A – Accept R – Research Criticality High Med Low L x C Trend  Decreasing (Improving)  Increasing (Worsening)  Unchanged * New since last month 20

21 AirBrake Linkage Four-Bar-Linkage 3 six inch long flaps
Slider Rocket (ground linkage) 3 six inch long flaps One link per flap

22 AirBrake Linkage Linear actuator drives slider down guide shaft
Links are forced out of rocket body Flaps open up

23 Linkage Dimensions AirBrake compartment length is 15in
Flaps are 6in long Connecting links are 6.52in long Slider sleeve length is 6.125in Guide shaft length is 3.5in Slider displacement is 2.35in which allows flaps to open 56 degrees

24 ACDS: Electrical Diagram

25 ACDS Control ACDS uses a proportional navigation algorithm in conjunction with a PID controller. ACDS controller determines the altitude and orientation of the rocket by filtering and combining sensor data with an Unscented Kalman filter. Sensor Manufacturer Model Range - Range + Accuracy +- Drift +- Accelerometer Bosch BMA180 16 g 512 LSB/g +-3.0% 0.01 %/K Gyroscope STMicroelectronics L3G4200D 2000 dps 70 mdps/digit 0.04 dps/C Differential Pressure Sensor Honeywell 24PCDFA6D -30 30 Psi N/A Barometer BMP085 300 hPa 1100 hPa 1.0 hPa 1.0 hPa in 12 months Temperature -40 85 C 1.0 C

26 Unscented Kalman Filter Block Diagram

27 ACDS: Risk Analysis L 5 I 4 K E 3 2 H O 1 D 1 2 3 4 5 CONSEQUENCES
Trend Rank App Risk Title 1 R/M Kalman filter implementation and tuning issues 2 M Erroneous control loop commands 3 INS Drift 4 I2C Implementation 5 Linear actuator weight limitations 6 R Linear actuator force limitations 7 Unpredicted flight characteristics with airbrake use 5 4 3 2 1 3 1 2 5 6 7 4 CONSEQUENCES Approach M – Mitigate W – Watch A – Accept R – Research Criticality High Med Low L x C Trend  Decreasing (Improving)  Increasing (Worsening)  Unchanged * New since last month 27

28 Educational Engagement & Outreach
OUTREACH GOALS: Reach kids in Alaska’s interior & groups underrepresented in STEM outreach. Show kids that they possess the skills to become future engineers and innovators and inspire them to pursue a STEM career. Make a difference in Alaska’s interior schools and to enrich STEM education. OUTREACH ACTIVITIES: Rocketry Presentations Hybrid Motor Demonstration Rocket Building Workshops Launch at Poker Flat Rocket Range

29 Educational Engagement & Outreach (Cont.)
SCHEDULE: BUDGET:


Download ppt "Critical Design Review"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google