2Some Approaches to the Study of Language Ancient Indian thinkers paid a good deal of attention to the nature of language; Panini’s Ashta:dhya:yi: is a significant work in the tradition.Saussure’s concept of language (Early 20th Century)Austin’s use-theory of language (1962)Chomsky’s biolinguistic assumptions (1957 onwards)
3Saussure’s Concepts about Language Diachrony vs. SynchronyLangue vs. ParoleSignifier vs. SignifiedAssociative vs. Syntagmatic Relation
4Diachrony vs. Synchrony Studying a language at two different points of time; relating two different stages of a languageSynchronyStudying a language as a complete system at a particular point of time
5Langue vs. Parole Langue Parole The ‘system’ of a language exists in a speech community, in the collectivity; it is shared by all the speakers of that speech communityParoleAn individual’s use of the system of ‘langue’
7Signifier-Signified Relationship The sound/utterance which is related to a ‘concept’SignifiedThe ‘concept’ which is related to the sound/utteranceThe signifier and the signified are not separable; together, they form a sign.The relation between the signifier and the signified is not natural, but arbitrary. Thus, languages are different from one another
8Language as a FormLanguage is a form shaping both thought and utterance simultaneously.
9Associative vs. Syntagmatic Relation Associative RelationA sign is associated with other signs of a language by similarity and difference. The associated signs are in a set of choices.Syntagmatic RelationA sign occurs with other signs in a chain (e.g. in a phrase or in a sentence).Language is organised by selecting from a set of choices of signs to a chain of signs.
10Some examples of the relations 1) The old man2) The young man3) The tall manIn (1), the sign old is in syntagmatic relation with the and manAs (2) and (3) show, the sign old in (1), is associated with young and tall, and is substitutable by them.The associative relations are not visible in a construction; they are related in absentia; the syntagmatic relations are in presentia.Concept of sign applies to every unit of a language, such as a phoneme, a morpheme, etc.
11Austin’s Use-theory of Language (How to Do Things with Words) Language does not merely refer to things; it is used in the society to perform certain communicative functions.The use theory of language attempts to arrive at a restricted set of conditions for the language use.Using language means doing things
12Utterance types Constative vs. Performative Constative Performative Constative utterances are statements; their function is to describe some event, process or state-of-affairs; and they (or the propositions expressed by them) have the property of being either true or false.PerformativePerformative utterances, by contrast, have no truth value; they are used to do something, rather than to say something is or is not the case. They refer to the fact of their own successful performance.
13Speech Acts Locutionary act Locutionary,Illocutionary and Perlocutionary ActsLocutionary actUttering noise you know have meaningIllocutionary actUtterance invokes a conventional force. Doing something in saying something. Some examples :Asking a questionMaking a promiseMaking an appealPerlocutionary actUtterance brings about an effect on the hearer. Doing something by saying something. Some examples:Warn someonePersuade someone
14Generative Grammar and Chomsky’s Biolinguistic Assumptions Language is a biological endowmentIt is innateIt interacts with other cognitive systems
15InnatenessAs a part of our brain, there is a Faculty of Language (FL).A human child is born with innate biological abilities to learn any human language.A child does not “learn” language but it matures by being exposed to the linguistic environment, in the same way as the vision matures. In both the cases the innate biological abilities mature.
16Some Speculations about FL FL is relatively a recent biological development.The basic nature of the FL is symbolic; it has no direct correspondence to physical objects.Its development may not be strictly for communication. (Chomsky, 2004)
17FL: Its Initial State and Modifications FL has an Initial State: L0The L0 can be modified. But, the possible modifications are highly regulated.L0 is modified with the exposure to the target Language.L1, L2, L3…. are modifiable states; they correspond to different natural languages.A natural language is an instantiation of one such modifiable states of L0
18Principles and Parameters The set of initial properties available to the L0 is called the set of principles.The set of variations possible within the principles are called parameters, which allow the languages to be different from one another.This approach in generative grammar is called the ‘Principles and Parameters’ (PP) approach.
19AdequaciesTo account for a particular language the grammar has to meet ‘Descriptive Adequacy’.To account for the L0, the Universal Grammar (UG), the grammar has to meet ‘Explanatory Adequacy’.
20The Architecture FL PF LF The Faculty of Language (FL) interfaces with two other systems; they are:Sensory Motor (Articulatory-Perceptual) systemit is expressed by the Phonetic Form (PF)Systems of thought (Conceptual-Intentional system)It is expressed by the Logical Form (LF)FLPF LF
21FL should be Legible to Other Systems For FL to be usable by the PF and LF interface systems, it should be legible to themLanguage is an optimal solution to legibility conditions. (Chomsky, 2002)
22What principles are available to the Faculty of Language? A possible Principle:The Structure DependencyLanguage shows a hierarchical structural organisation.So an underlying structures has to be assumed behind the linear sequence of elements.