Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Complications in refractive surgery

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Complications in refractive surgery"— Presentation transcript:

1 Complications in refractive surgery
Modified by Corina van de Pol, O.D., Ph.D. July 28, 2001 James Colgain, OD Mitch Brown, OD, FAAO

2 Complications of PRK refractive laser healing over/undercorrection
Regression Central Islands laser Decentered ablation healing Epithelial compromise Corneal infection Corneal haze Corneal scar infection - rare 1:5,000

3 Over/under-correction
Cause: inaccurate refraction unstable CTL warpage especially in HCL or GPHCL undetected pathology (KCN) unpredictable healing induced cylinder occult autoimmune disorder

4 Over/under-correction
Treatment: based on refractive stability change no greater than 0.5D over 1 month wait longer in higher myopes and hyperopes most surgeons wait at least 3 months ok to treat interim over-correction with SCL UCVA >20/40 based on expectations, patient desire

5 Regression <0.25D myopic regression over 1 year
US Navy study (n=100) Retreatment possible based on refractive stability and visual symptoms/complaints

6 Central islands Cause: Rare in Lasik, rarer still with scanning lasers
plume/debris water Rare in Lasik, rarer still with scanning lasers Not as prevalent with newer software and scanning lasers

7 Central islands Treatment: observe customized ablation
>90% of islands resolve spontaneously customized ablation based on height and diameter of island

8 Epithelial compromise
Cause: underlying basement dystrophy prior trauma dry eye smoking

9 Epithelial compromise
Treatment: patient selection copious tears consider punctal occlusion bandage CTL proper fit Acuvue 8.8 for K<40 Acuvue 8.4 for K>40 topical antibiotic until epithelium healed

10 Corneal infection Rare (<1:5,000)
Worked up and treated like CTL-related microbial keratitis if <2 mm, mid-periphery to limbus, consider empiric therapy with fluoroquinolone if >2 mm and/or central/paracentral, consider scraping for culture and sensitivity and aggressive topical fortified antibiotics (cefazolin and tobramycin)

11 Corneal haze Cause: unclear ? UV exposure
? Over-exuberant healing response

12 Corneal haze Treatment: unclear >95% of haze clears eventually
based on vision and refraction probably no treatment required if not visually significant if K's are steepening and refraction shifting toward myopia, consider trial of FML >95% of haze clears eventually

13 Corneal scar Unresolved haze, refractory to FML
Potential for vision loss Consider PF Consider corneal scraping Consider mitomycin-C or thio-tepa

14 Complications of LASIK
refractive over/undercorrection induced astigmatism central islands - rare laser decentered less with tracking more with longer ablations angle kappa and visual axis? flap buttonhole in pupil free cap if small epithelial defects especially with older patients and dry eyes wrinkles, striae decentration inflammation (DLK) epithelial ingrowth (primary and secondary) infection - rare 1:5,000

15 Buttonhole Cause: steep K (>46), greater risk
cornea "buckles" during microkeratome pass, creating central area where blade exits cornea then re-enters. This is often in the visual axis and is disastrous to vision if the ablation occurs. May re-cut deeper in cornea in 3-6 months

16 Buttonhole Treatment: do NOT perform laser ablation
irregular astigmatism WILL be induced replace flap or don’t lift at all allow cornea to heal (at least 3 months) re-cut thicker flap and decenter entry of the MK so as not to disturb initial plane

17 Free cap Cause: flat K (<40D) these are at greater risk
microkeratome travels completely across flap no hinge created ALK used to be performed in this fashion Surgeon MAY proceed if he bed, cap and area for ablation are normal Always necessary to mark cornea so the epi side is placed up when repositioned

18 Free cap Treatment: save free cap in antidessication chamber
complete laser ablation replace cap, aligning with preplaced marks, epithelium UP consider suture (usually not required) and bandage CTL

19 Epithelial defects Cause: pre-existing condition
ABM dystrophy recurrent erosion prior trauma dry eye greater suction and torquing motion dry surface during microkeratome pass

20 Epithelial defects Treatment: patient selection
pre-existing epithelial conditions listed above are relative contraindications to LASIK. Consider surface PRK for above conditions copious irrigation during procedure wet cornea just prior to keratome pass bandage CTL intraoperative defects may end up being areas of RCE during healing phase

21 Flap striae May result in irregular astigmatism and lost BCVA Cause:
technique flap laid back with poor attention to detail not smoothed properly more significant in higher myopes patient rubbed eye/flap during day one to week one possible to dehisce flap completely in first hours

22 Flap Striae at 6 weeks post-op

23

24 Flap striae Treatment: technique patient
meticulous attention to smoothing flap at time of ablation and positioning with attention to “gutter” and pre-op marker alignment consider "pressing" flap consider refloating flap if visually significant rarely, suturing required to stretch flap patient clear shield at night for first week caution patient not to rub eye use tears for irritation

25 Flap de-centration Cause: eye torques when suction applied
may result in decentered ablation the larger the ablation zone - especially in hyperopes the more significant this issue prior to treatment, the surgeon may view the area of ablation on most lasers to determine whether the bed area is OK for the treatment

26 Flap de-centered nasally ~1.5mm

27 Flap decentration Treatment:
if ablation can be performed without hitting flap edge, consider proceeding if ablation cannot be accomplished without hitting flap edge, abort laser, replace flap, allow cornea to heal (at least 3 months) and recut deeper, centered flap possibly using a different MK

28 Inflammation Received the most press as potential complication following LASIK Called many names: Diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK) Sands of the Sahara syndrome (SOS) May occur in “groups or outbreaks” Causes (many potential, none proven): metallic debris, meibomian secretions, staph toxin, keratome oil, infection

29 Early 1 day P/O

30 6 weeks P/O

31 Inflammation Treatment (stage-dependent):
stage I: increased frequency of FML stage II: switch to Pred Forte stage III: lift flap, irrigate and add Pred Forte stage IV: stage III Rx and pray vision loss probable

32 Epithelial ingrowth Causes (2 types):
nests of cells deposited under flap during procedure migration of epithelium at flap edge

33 Epithelial cells under flap

34 Epithelial ingrowth Treatment: observe for progression
if progressive, lift flap, scrape with Weckcell, irrigate well and reposition flap may require lifting flap more than once risk of epithelial ingrowth increases each time flap is lifted More risk with older patients and poorer epithelium follow up, early detection and treatment critical to the best outcome

35 Infection (lamellar keratitis)
Potentially the most devastating complication associated with LASIK Fortunately, a rare complication (<1:5,000) Causes: poor Betadine prep poor lid/lash drape bad luck post op introduction of infectious agent

36 Infection Treatment: consider lifting flap to scrape for culture and sensitivity consider aggressive topical fortified antibiotics (cefazolin and tobramycin)

37 Flap Dislodgment after Lasik
Rare: no real studies just reported events No one knows when the flap heals Able to lift some patients 3 years out Events leading to flap dislodgment or striae from trauma after 30 days Airbag, cat and dog scratch, cardboard box edge, fingernail scratch during fight, retinal buckle surgery, tree branch hitting cornea, snowball hit eye

38 PRK Advantages Disadvantages safer longer track record costs less
slower recovery more discomfort corneal haze limited range

39 LASIK Advantages Disadvantages faster recovery increased risk
less discomfort less follow-up enhancements easier high myopia Disadvantages increased risk late flap displacement increased cost

40 PRK vs. LASIK Same destination; Different journey
Day one: “Oowww!” Less surgical risk Slower recovery 80% 20/20 Haze No flap 0.2 – 0.3% risk visual loss (>2 lines) LASIK Day one: “Wow!” Greater surgical risk Quicker recovery 80% 20/20 No haze Flap 0.2 – 0.3% risk visual loss (>2 lines)


Download ppt "Complications in refractive surgery"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google