Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Joint Hospital Surgical Ground Round April 2014 Hwang Wan Wui Winston Queen Elizabeth Hospital.

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Joint Hospital Surgical Ground Round April 2014 Hwang Wan Wui Winston Queen Elizabeth Hospital."— Presentation transcript:

1 Joint Hospital Surgical Ground Round April 2014 Hwang Wan Wui Winston Queen Elizabeth Hospital

2 Presentation Outline Chicago Classification Scheme High Resolution Esophageal Pressure Topography Achalasia Presentation Investigation Treatment

3 Chicago Classification Scheme High Resolution Esophageal Pressure Topography Achalasia Presentation Investigation Treatment

4 The Chicago Classification Investigators in the Northwestern University in Chicago developed a new classification scheme to facilitate the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders by interpretation of high resolution esophageal pressure topography (EPT) Esophageal pressure topography is a combination of high resolution manometry (HRM) and pressure topography

5 Esophageal Pressure Topography V.S. Conventional Manometry Esophageal Pressure Topography (EPT)Conventional Manometry (CM) SensorsClosely spaced pressure sensors, 1cm apart 8 sensors: 4 in esophageal body & 4 at level of GEJ. Pressure sensors 3-5cm apart SwallowsSeries of 10 test swallows of 5ml water each PositionSupine position Advantage-Results shown as topographic pressure reading over time - Allow detection of more subtle differences

6 The Chicago Classification EPT Metrics MetricDescription IRP Integrated Relaxation Pressure Mean of the lowest EGJ pressure over 4 seconds measured in the ten-second window after deglutitive UES relaxation DCI Distal Contractile Integral Volume (amplitude x duration x length) from proximal to distal pressure troughs CDP Contractile Deceleration Point Transition from peristaltic propagation to late phase of esophageal emptying (proceeds much more slowly) CFV Contractile Front Velocity Slope between the proximal pressure troughs and CDP DL Distal Latency Interval between UES relaxation and the CDP, duration of peristalsis Peristaltic BreaksGaps of the peristaltic contraction between the UES and EGJ IRP Integrated Relaxation Pressure Each metric developed to characterize a specific feature of deglutitive esophageal function

7 Esophageal Pressure Topography V.S. Conventional Manometry Esophageal Motility Characteristic EPTCM LES Relaxation1. Integrated Relaxation Pressure (IRP) <15mmHg 1. LES relaxation <8mmHg more than gastric pressure Peristaltic Propagation 2. Contractile Deceleration Point (CDP) No corresponding 3. Contractile Front Velocity (CFV) 2. Wave progression between pressure sensors 8 and 3 cm above the LES 4. Distal Latency (DL)No corresponding Contractile Vigor5. Distal contractile Integral (DCI) 3. Peristaltic amplitude EPT allows more sophisticated interpretation of esophageal motility

8 The Chicago Classification YES NO IRP >= upper limit of normal AND absent peristalsis Achalasia Type I: Classic Type II: Pan-esophageal pressurization Type III: Spastic IRP >= upper limit of normal AND some instances of intact or weak peristalsis EGJ Outflow Obstruction Achalasia variant Mechanical obstruction IRP is normal BUT abnormalities in other metrics Other Esophageal Motility Disorders Distal esophageal spasm Hypercontractile esophagus Absent peristalsis Nutcracker esophagus

9 Chicago Classification Scheme High Resolution Esophageal Pressure Topography Achalasia Presentation Investigation Treatment

10 Achalasia - Presentation Dysphagia both liquid and solid Regurgitation Chest pain Cough Aspiration pneumonia Weight loss

11 Achalasia - Investigations Barium Esophagogram Classical “bird’s beak” appearance Dilated esophageal body High Resolution Manometry Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Rule out pseudoachalasia Most common cause is malignancy infiltrating the EGJ

12 Achalasia – Type I (Classic Achalasia) Mean IRP >= upper limit of normal (IRP =42mmHg) 100% failed peristalsis

13 Achalasia – Type II Mean IRP >= upper limit of normal No normal peristalsis Panesophageal pressurization with >20% of swallows, which may exceed LES pressure, causing the esophagus to empty

14 Achalasia – Type III (Spastic Achalasia) Mean IRP >= upper limit of normal No normal peristalsis Fragments of premature (spastic) distal contractions with 20% of swallows Although this is also associated with rapidly propagated pressurization, the pressurization is attributable to an abnormal lumen obliterating contraction

15 Achalasia Treatment Pharmacological Calcium channel blockers and nitrates short lived response side effects: headache, dizziness and pedal edema Botulin toxin injection prevents the release of acetylcholine at terminal nerve endings results last 6-9 months. [1] Pharmacological therapies are less effective than endoscopic or surgical therapies [1] Pasricha PJ, Ravich WJ, Hendrix TR, Sostre S, Jones B, Kal- loo AN. Intrasphincteric botulinum toxin for the treatment of achalasia. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 774-778

16 Achalasia Treatment Pneumatic Dilation Aims at disrupting the LES by forceful dilation using air filled balloons Many use a graded dilation protocol starting with 3.0 cm, then stepping up to 3.5cm and 4.0cm

17 Achalasia Treatment Pneumatic Dilation Promising short term results Long term follow-up showed recurrence [1] Eckardt VF, Gockel I, Bernhard G. Pneumatic dilation for achalasia: late results of a prospective follow up investigation. Gut 2004; 53: 629-633 [2] Katsinelos P, Kountouras J, Paroutoglou G, Beltsis A, Zavos C, Papaziogas B, Mimidis K (2005) Long-term results of pneu- matic dilation for achalasia: a 15 years’ experience. World J Gastroenterol 11:5701–5705 Author, JournalStudy DesignNNo. of PDResults Eckardt VF, et al Gut 2004 [1] Prospective cohort 5415 year remission rate 40% 10 year remission rate 36% Katsinelos P, et al World J Gastroenterol 2005 [2] Prospective cohort 391-35 year remission 78% 10 year remission 61% 15 year remission 58.3%

18 Achalasia Treatment Laparoscopic Heller’s Myotomy (LHM) Myotomy from 1.5-3cm distal to the EGJ dividing the longitudinal and oblique muscle to 6-8cm proximal to the EGJ dividing longitudinal and circular muscle of esophagus Partial fundoplication is routinely performed as incidence of reflux after Heller’s myotomy is >50%

19 Achalasia Treatment Laparoscopic Heller’s Myotomy (LHM) LHM considered superior to pneumatic dilation and the first choice of treatment for achalasia Prospective trials have shown promising long term results of LHM A prospective trial in Italy followed up 6 years after laparoscopic Heller-Dor operation [1] Primary outcome was therapeutic success in terms of symptoms improvement At 6 years, 81.7% of patients still have significant improvement in their symptoms [1] Costantini M, Zaninotto G, Guirroli E, et al. The laparoscopic Heller-Dor operation remains an effective treatment for esophageal achalasia at a minimum 6-year follow-up. Surg Endosc 2005;19:345-51

20 Achalasia Treatment Laparoscopic Heller’s Myotomy (LHM) Multicenter RCT published by European Achalasia Trial group in 2011 [1] Primary outcome was therapeutic success, measured by Eckardt score After 2 years of follow up, the study concluded LHM was not superior to pneumatic dilation Limitations: 2 year cohort study with no evidence on intermediate and long-term remission rates All patients in the PD group received 2 to 3 sessions of redilation [1] Boeckxstaens GE, Annese V, des Varannes SB, Chaussade S, Costantini M, Cuttitta A, Elizalde JI, Fumagalli U, Gaudric M, Rohof WO, Smout AJ, Tack J, Zwinderman AH, Zaninotto G, Busch OR. Pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller’ s myotomy for idiopathic achalasia. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 1807-1816

21 Achalasia Treatment in Different Subtypes Author Journal Study TypeNFollow up Results Pandolfino JE, et al Gastroenterology 2008 [1] Retrospective cohort 2133 years-Type II achalasia more likely to respond to any therapy -Type II (Botox 71%, pneumatic dilation 91%, Heller’s myotomy 100%) -Type I (56% overall) -Type III (29% overall) Salvador R, et al J Gastrointest. Surg 2010 [2] Prospective cohort 24631month s - Treatment failure rates: -Type I 14.6%; Type II 4.7% ; Type III 30.4% - Type II and LES resting pressure >30mmHg were independent predictors of positive outcome Rohof WO, et al Gastroenterology 2013 [3] Multicenter RCT 1762 yearsTreatment success rates: -Type I 81%; Type II 96%; Type III 66% Type II: success rate for PD was significantly higher than LHM [1] Pandolfino JE, Kwiatek MA, Nealis T, Bulsiewicz W, Post J, Kahrilas PJ. Achalasia: a new clinically relevant classification by high-resolution manometry. Gastroenterology 2008;135:1526-1533. [2] Salvador R, Costantini M, Zaninotto G, et al. The preoperative manometric pattern predicts the outcome of surgical treatment for esophageal achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg 2010;14:1635–1645 [3] Rohof WO, Salvador R, Annese V, et al. Outcomes of treatment for achalasia depend on manometric subtype. Gastroenterology 2013; 144:718–725

22 Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) Dissection of inner circular muscle layer of the esophagus Dissection begins around 7cm proximal to EGJ and down to 2cm distal to EGJ Good short-term results Long-term results not available yet

23 Conclusion Pharmacological therapies are not recommended unless patient is not fit for endoscopic or surgical therapies Pneumatic dilation is the most effective nonsurgical treatment with promising short term results but high recurrence rate in the long term Laparoscopic Heller’s myotomy should be advocated for patients fit for surgery The Chicago Classification Scheme is providing a better classification for esophageal motility disorders. It has great impact on how we approach esophageal motility disorders, predict treatment outcomes and choose treatment options

24 Winston Hwang Queen Elizabeth Hospital

25 References Goldblum JR, Rice TW, Richter JE. Histopathologic features in esophagomyotomy specimens from patients with achala- sia. Gastroenterology 1996; 111: 648-654 Richter JE. Achalasia – An Update. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. Jul 2010; 16(3): 232–242 Boeckxstaens GE, etal. Achalasia. Lancet 2014; 383: 83-93 Stefanidis D, et al. SAGES guidelines of the surgical treatment of esophageal achalasia. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 296-311

Download ppt "Joint Hospital Surgical Ground Round April 2014 Hwang Wan Wui Winston Queen Elizabeth Hospital."

Similar presentations

Ads by Google