Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

U.S. Army Logistics Innovation Agency https://lia.army.mil UNCLASSIFIED Acquisition Manager’s Guide to CLOE/CBM+ (AMG2CC) And Dashboard 25 February 2015.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "U.S. Army Logistics Innovation Agency https://lia.army.mil UNCLASSIFIED Acquisition Manager’s Guide to CLOE/CBM+ (AMG2CC) And Dashboard 25 February 2015."— Presentation transcript:

1 U.S. Army Logistics Innovation Agency https://lia.army.mil UNCLASSIFIED Acquisition Manager’s Guide to CLOE/CBM+ (AMG2CC) And Dashboard 25 February 2015 AMG2CC Conference

2 UNCLASSIFIED Agenda  Background & Staffing Process  Staffing Comments, Feedback and Observations  AMG2CC Overview  Dashboard Overview and Demonstration  DASA-APL Path Forward  Wrap-Up 2

3 UNCLASSIFIED BACKGROUND 3

4 UNCLASSIFIED AMG2CC Purpose and Approach 4 AMG2CC and Dashboard Facilitate Measurement Of Implementation Progress Checklist-driven dashboard tool  The purpose of AMG2CC is to assist Platform-Level PMs to be interoperable with the Logistics Enterprise through the CLOE and to Achieve CBM+ Functionality  Provide “how to” guidance to PMs for selecting and implementing CLOE/CBM+ capabilities  Support Self–Assessment of CLOE/CBM+ progress via an accompanying dashboard tool “How to” guidance for implementing CLOE/CBM+ Implementation progress reported at system acquisition reviews

5 UNCLASSIFIED AMG2CC Staffing & Trial-Use Period 2015 PM-HBCT CECOM LRC & PM ASA(ALT) Vector Check PM- STRYKER, JLTV, AMPV PM EE&SS PM APACHE Log TACOM ILSC 2014 AMG2CC Rev 1 AMG2CC Rev 1 DASA APL Guidance Memo Conference Coordination Conference 2013 Penn State ARL NAVSEA USMC 5

6 UNCLASSIFIED Review - Objectives  AMG2CC  How-to, Not A Strategy or Business Case Document  ~40 Pages In Main Body, Rest In Appendices  Dashboard  Support PM Self-assessment Of CBM+ Topic areas Described In AMG2CC  Staff AMG2CC through Army CLOE/CBM+ stakeholders  LIA Conducted Preliminary Staffing With Support From ATEC and The Army Materiel Command Life-Cycle Management Commands at TACOM, AMCOM and CECOM  ODASA(APL) Promoted staffing Through PEOs/PMs For Trial Use Period  Wrap-Up Conference & Workshop  Provide Update to Stakeholders on Staffing Process  Provide Penn State ARL, NAVSEA and USMC Perspectives on RCM and CBM+  Provide ODASA (APL) Path Forward for AMG2CC and Dashboards 6

7 UNCLASSIFIED Update  Selection of Lead Organization for Army CBM+ Store & Forward (SaF) Implementation  Lead Organization: PEO EIS / PD-AMIS; Supporting Organizations: CASCOM, HQ AMC, G- 4/LIA, TACOM/AMCOM/CECOM LCMCs, CERDEC  Recent CBM+ Activities  AMC CBM+ 5 Year Plan  CASCOM CBM+ CONOPS  CBM+ SaF Problem Statement  CBM+ SaF Course of Action Analysis and Recommendations  Continuing Efforts  Army Integrated Logistics Architecture (AILA)  CERDEC CBM+ Communication Systems Architecture (CCSA)  Common CBM+ Architecture (CCA )  Governance  Army CBM+ Executive Steering Committee (ACSC) – In addition to AMC G-3/4; G-44(M) and CASCOM Chief of Ordnance added as Co-Chairs  HQDA Business Process Council and Army Business Council 7

8 UNCLASSIFIED Comment Summary, Feedback & Observations 8

9 UNCLASSIFIED Current Status: Comments To-Date # Organization # Comments 1 ASA(ALT) ASA(ALT), Director of Policy & Staff 28 2 LIA (CLOE) CLOE 26 3 AILA (Govt & contractor teams) 30 PNNL HQ AMC HQ, AMC CBM+ Systems Engineering IPT 31 6 ATEC IPS Evaluator, Mounted Systems 5 7 PEO Soldier29 8 PM PM-ABCT (VHMS) (CPC) 29 9 PM-GCV ILS 8 PM-ABCT Govt JNN7 12 JLTV6 13 CERDEC CERDEC CBM UNIVERSITY PSU ARL 5 TOTAL COMMENTS258 Twelve Organizations Fourteen Reviewing Teams 258 Comments 9

10 UNCLASSIFIED Feedback 1.Positives a)All Stakeholders Liked The Concept Of The Dashboard. b)No Stakeholder Disagreed With The Use Of The Dashboard Compliance Gauge In The SQC. 2.Negatives a)None; The 262 Written Comments Received Were All Constructive Criticisms. 3.Principal Change Recommendations a)Stakeholders Suggested Scoring Criteria Changes for Dashboard Categories For Platform Software And Platform COMM 10

11 UNCLASSIFIED Observations 3.Surprises a)Most PM Log Divisions Are Not Familiar With DODAF - They Have To Search To Find DODAF Expertise (PD-MBTS /VHMS Is The Exception). b)Most PMs We Talked To Do Not Implement RCM. They Do Implement Reliability Programs. 4.Principal Improvement Suggestions a)Incorporate Dashboard Scoring Criteria In The Body Of The AMG2CC. b)Have A CLOE-CBM+ Acquisition SOW Template In The AMC2CC for New Programs. c)Need Tighter Synchronization Between CAPDEV and MATDEV WRT Army RCM Policy 11

12 12 AMG2CC Discussion

13 UNCLASSIFIED AMG2CC Topics  Introduction, Scope  CBM+ Concepts and Platform Examples  Tactical Wheeled Vehicles (MRAP & FMTV)  Fighting Vehicles (Abrams, Stryker)  Aircraft (AH-64)  C4ISR (SICPS w/TQG)  CLOE/CBM+ Implementation Assessment Topics (6)  RCM  DODAF Architecture  Standards and the CLOE STDV-1  CLOE/CBM+ Hardware and Software Infrastructure  CBM+ Data Categories, Routing and Formatting  Platform Communication Capabilities 13

14 UNCLASSIFIED AMG2CC Topics Dashboard Reliability - Centered Maintenance (RCM) 2CLOE/CBM+ DODAF Architecture 3 DataStandards 4 Network Communications 5 CBM+ Hardware & Software 6 CBM+ Data Categories 1 Each Topic Addresses: 1.Concept 2.Policy 3.Standards 4.Checklist 14 Dashboard Cites Weapon System Examples of Hardware & Software Implementation

15 UNCLASSIFIED Army Platform Examples of CBM+ Imple- mentation 15

16 16 DASHBOARD OVERVIEW

17 UNCLASSIFIED Dashboard(s)  There Are Two Dashboards  Dashboard 1  A Worksheet-style Dashboard With The Checklists For Five Of The Six CLOE- CBM+ Compliance Topic Areas In The AMG2CC, Which Is Used To Build The Second Dashboard  Dashboard 2  A Dashboard Without The Checklists, Adding RCM Status (Completing the 6 CLOE-CBM+ Topic Areas)  Why Have Two Dashboards?  Cleaner Presentation of CLOE/CBM+ Implementation Topics Without Clutter on the GUI. 17

18 UNCLASSIFIED What The Dashboard(s) Are  The Dashboards Are Adobe Flash Objects, Created Using A Software Program Called SAP Dashboard. As Flash Objects, They Can Be Embedded License-free In Microsoft Office Applications, Such As Word And PowerPoint, And Adobe PDF Documents.  The Dashboards Present The Six Implementation Topics In The Form Of Gauges That Give A Sense Of Implementation Progress And Status.  Each Of The Six Topics Are Summed Into One Master Status Gauge 18

19 UNCLASSIFIED 1 Platform Worksheet 2 Master Assessment 3 Black-bezel Gauge Readings on Left are Transferred to Right 4 RCM Status Acts as a “Throttle” on the Master Gauge 1 Outer Black-bezel Gauges Readings are Determined by Input Mechanisms 2 Inner Black-bezel Gauges Sum The Outer Gauges The Dashboards 19

20 UNCLASSIFIED Sustainment Quad Chart with CLOE/CBM+ Implementation Assessment 20

21 UNCLASSIFIED PM Self-Assessment Example 21

22 UNCLASSIFIED 22 PM ABCT (VHMS) Platform Self-Assessment

23 UNCLASSIFIED Dashboard Operation (Separate Demonstrations) 23

24 UNCLASSIFIED CCA Discussion 24 CCA: Common CBM+ Architecture

25 UNCLASSIFIED What is the CCA?  WHAT: The CCA Is An Integrated Architecture Description Which Describes The CBM+ Infrastructure For End-to-End CBM+ Capabilities And Contains Metrics For Analysis.  WHY: Solutions For Achieving CBM+ capabilities for A MATDEV Will Vary. However, The Infrastructure Which Those Solutions Utilize Is Common Across The Army. 25

26 UNCLASSIFIED Value of the CCA Reduces Risk Provides a Common Approved Infrastructure Verified and Validated by ASA(ALT) and TRADOC Ensures Alignment to the CLOE Ensures Interoperability with LOGSA and the CCBMDW Reduces Cost and Schedule Single Integrated Communication Solution vs Multiple Shortens Development timelines Promotes Data Re-Use Eliminates Redundant Efforts Provides Architecture Analysis Capability to perform SoS Interoperability Analysis Network Performance & IA Analysis Supports and Leverages Technology Insertion Supports Effective Decision Making Support Compliancy to Army and DoD AILA Integrated Achieved through the CCA Supports All PM efforts in CLOE Compliance (AMG2CC) Compliant with: CJCSI F, AR 70-1, AR 750-1, DoDI , etc. PM B PM CPM A Data Function Services Standards Common Standards Common Services Function Specifics Data Specifics Redundant EffortsCommon Infrastructure Vs

27 UNCLASSIFIED What is at the Core of the CCA? End-to-End “Common” CBM+ Infrastructure encompassing Information and Network Systems 26 DoDAF v2.02 Compliant Views 50 Key Systems (Information and Transmission) 35+ Platform Placeholders include ground, air and C4ISR platforms. 300,000+ Data Attributes organized to provide efficient analysis with minimal effort to support effective decision making Data Attributes 27

28 UNCLASSIFIED Integration Process The AMG2CC identifies at a high level how to integrate with the CCA. The CCA Integration Plan v1.0 is comprised of the following topic areas (Appendix C of the AMG2CC): – Integration Methodology – Pre-Integration Check List – Purpose & Scope Consistency – Integration Boundaries – Architectural Effectiveness Measurement – Integration Methods – IV&V Process – Transition to Integrating Stakeholder (PM / LCMC) 28

29 UNCLASSIFIED 29

30 UNCLASSIFIED 30 Path Forward

31 UNCLASSIFIED DASA APL Path Forward  Sustainment Quad Chart  Sustainment Quad Chart Is Preferred Approach for CLOE-CBM+ Implementation Progress Reporting  Institutionalize in Army Policy (e.g., AR )  Continuing AMG2CC Support (TBD)  DASA (APL)  LIA  ATEC  HQ AMC  Institutionalizing AMG2CC and Dashboard  DA PAM proposal 31

32 UNCLASSIFIED Discussion 32


Download ppt "U.S. Army Logistics Innovation Agency https://lia.army.mil UNCLASSIFIED Acquisition Manager’s Guide to CLOE/CBM+ (AMG2CC) And Dashboard 25 February 2015."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google