Presentation on theme: "Historical context for today’s immigration policy debates Goshen High School June 23, 2011 Dr. Steven M. Nolt."— Presentation transcript:
Historical context for today’s immigration policy debates Goshen High School June 23, 2011 Dr. Steven M. Nolt
The big picture: Patterns of immigration in U.S. history and some implications for today Immigrants then and now: Five similarities and differences Origins of immigration restriction and the beginning of legal/illegal immigration (1882- present) Current (1965) framework for immigration policy: Changes and unintended consequences Outline of presentation:
CLARIFYING TERMINOLOGY: Authorized immigration/unauthorized immigration “Immigration” and choice
THE BIG PICTURE: Patterns of immigration in U.S. history Immigration is a multi-sided process – Push factors, pull factors, and means of travel – Talking about U.S. immigration policy is one part of a larger international puzzle
Movement of people, movement of borders: Two examples: Example 1: In the 1600s and 1700s, supply and demand for labor resulted in a great deal of forced immigration from Africa and Europe
Status of immigrants to what would become the United States (%) Years Slaves Prisoners Indentured Free servants labor 1607-1699 17 1 49 33 1700-1775 47 9 18 26 Source: Aaron S. Fogleman, “From Slaves, Convicts, and Servants to Free Passengers: The Transformation of Immigration in the Era of the American Revolution,” Journal of American History 85 (June 1998), 43-76.
Example 2: In 1848, the U.S. border crossed about 75,000 people living in northern Mexico.
Immigration has been a major factor in the U.S. population and economy from the 1600s to the 2000s – Two exceptional periods when immigration was less common: 1775-1815 and 1925-1965 – Every year, more people have entered the U.S. than have left, except for 1932-1935
Another part of the pattern: Reverse migration; people leave the U.S. to return to their country of origin – For many European immigrants, coming to America was a strategy to make money to send back or take back to country-of-origin – Between 1860-1930, somewhere between 1/3 and 1/2 of all immigrants to the United States did not stay permanently.
Remigration Rates: 1890-1930 – Bulgarians 87 % – Romanians 66 % – Russians 65 % – Greeks 54 % – Hungarians 47 % – Italians 46 % – Slovaks 36 % – Poles 33 % – French 24 % – Finns 22 % Examples from Thomas Archdeacon, Becoming American: An Ethnic History (New York: Free Press, 1983), p. 139.
A final pattern: For much of U.S. history, the percentage of the U.S. population that was foreign born was a constant 13-14%
Foreign born as percentage of U.S. population 1860 13.2 % 1870 14.0 1880 13.3 1890 14.7 1900 13.6 1910 14.7 1920 13.2 1930 11.6
The lowest point in the foreign-born percentage of the U.S. population was 1970 In 1970, only 4.7 % of the U.S. population was foreign born (and they were disproportionately elderly)
Foreign born as percentage of U.S. population 1860 13.2 % 1870 14.0 1880 13.3 1890 14.71970 4.7 % 1900 13.6 1910 14.71990 7.9 1920 13.22000 11.1 1930 11.6 2009 12.5
Immigrants then and now: Five similarities and differences 1. ORIGINS: 1820-1920 – 85% from Europe Today – 75% from Latin America and Asia 40% of today’s immigrants come from five countries: 1.Mexico 2.India 3.China 4.Philippines 5.Vietnam
Immigrants then and now: Five similarities and differences 2. AGE AND FAMILY PROFILE: 1820-1920 – Overwhelmingly single young adult men Today – Still disproportionately youth and young adult, but more balanced sex- ratios and more families
Immigrants then and now: Five similarities and differences 3. EDUCATION LEVEL: 1820-1920 – Typically had less formal education than general population Today – Typically have less and more formal education than general population
Education level of immigrants (age 25+) in New York City, late 20 th century Source: Nancy Foner, From Ellis Island to JFK: New York’s Two Great Waves of Immigration (Yale, 2000). Education completed by post-1965 immigrants aged 16-64, and native-born population.
Immigrants then and now: Five similarities and differences 4. SOCIALLY: A similarity between 1820-1920 and today – the most recent immigrants face resistance or resentment from other Americans
Immigrants then and now: Five similarities and differences 5. POLITICALLY: Prior to 1920 in many places, immigrant men could vote even if they were not naturalized. This is a difference between then and now, and gave European immigrant communities a bit more political influence in shaping the society that they were joining.
Origins of immigration restriction and the beginning of legal/illegal immigration Immigration and the Constitution 1875 U.S. Supreme Court: immigration is exclusively federal domain
1882 CHINESE EXCLUSION ACT – Began a process of seeking to limit immigration to “desirable” populations – 1907 ban on Japanese immigration – 1917 general ban on immigration from all of Asia (except Philippines) – Asians were “aliens ineligible for citizenship”
OTHER EXAMPLES OF RESTRICTING IMMIGRATION – 1891 barred insane, paupers, those persons suffering from contagious disease, felons, polygamists, and (after 1903) anarchists. In percentage terms, few turned away for any of these reasons (less than 1%) – 1917 Literacy test Restriction movement culminated in National Origins Act (1924) that banned immigration from Asia and severely limited immigration from eastern and southern Europe. No numeric limits on Canada or Latin America
After 1882, with immigration limited for the first time, it was now possible to have unauthorized entry (illegal immigration) — Excluded Europeans and Asians went to Canada or Mexico and crossing into U.S.
U.S. Supreme Court grappled with the constitutional implications of restricted immigration: Did government have the power to deport, and if so, on what grounds? 1893 Fong Yue Ting v. U.S. – Federal power to deport, but it is a civil proceeding not a criminal one 1924 creating of U.S. Border Patrol
Special situation of immigration from Mexico Combination of legal welcome and ill-treatment (examples from 1910s and 1930s) – Congress repeatedly exempted Mexico from immigration restriction measures Congressmen from Western states and Texas very much wanted Mexican workers and wanted an open trade border with Mexico – Bracero program for ‘guest workers’ (1942-1964) 4.7 million participants “Operation Wetback,” 1954
Our current framework for immigration policy: Changes and unintended consequences Cold War political pressure to reform immigration policy culminated in 1965 Hart-Celler Act: – Did away with the 1924 racially-discriminatory categories for the Eastern Hemisphere, but placed Western Hemisphere under quota limit for the first time. – Ended Bracero program. – Retained a cap on number of immigrants each year, but now allotted visa slots in a way that deemphasized work skills and employment preferences
Consequences of 1965 immigration reform – Immigration from Asia swelled – Immigration from Latin America was suddenly restricted in significant ways – Employment-based visa allotments do not match labor supply and demand – By the late 1970s, unauthorized immigration had become a major political debate
Federal policy debates – President Ronald Reagan combined tighter border enforcement with path to citizenship for unauthorized immigrants (1986) – Since 1990, emphasis has been on border enforcement. Not much interest in changing visa allotments. Not much attention to the larger push- and-pull factors behind immigration