Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byLia Charlton Modified over 2 years ago

1
The ILC low power option Andrei Seryi SLAC ILC08 and LCWS08 November 17, 2008 Photo: Dan Chusid, 2003

2
ILC Low P, Andrei Seryi, November 17, 2008 2 Low P option in RDR The RDR “low power” option may be a machine “cost saving” set but it is not a favorite set for detectors: The RDR “low power” option may be a machine “cost saving” set but it is not a favorite set for detectors: Improved Low P may require tighter IP focusing, and use of “travelling focus” [V.Balakin, 1990] Improved Low P may require tighter IP focusing, and use of “travelling focus” [V.Balakin, 1990]

3
ILC Low P, Andrei Seryi, November 17, 2008 3 Motivation Reduction of beam power => potential cost reduction Reduction of beam power => potential cost reduction reduced cryo system; smaller diameter damping rings, etc. reduced cryo system; smaller diameter damping rings, etc. Application of special techniques to keep luminosity and reduce beamstrahlung Application of special techniques to keep luminosity and reduce beamstrahlung travelling focus travelling focus shaping of longitudinal profile of the bunch shaping of longitudinal profile of the bunch Reduction of peak luminosity from 2E34 to 1E34 may also be considered => even higher cost saving Reduction of peak luminosity from 2E34 to 1E34 may also be considered => even higher cost saving Oide argues that high peak luminosity is not necessarily optimal from the integrated luminosity point of view Oide argues that high peak luminosity is not necessarily optimal from the integrated luminosity point of view Lower peak L~1E34 may give the same integr. L? (to be studied) Lower peak L~1E34 may give the same integr. L? (to be studied)

4
ILC Low P, Andrei Seryi, November 17, 2008 4 Cases considered RDR cases RDR cases 1: Nominal RDR 1: Nominal RDR 2: Low Power RDR 2: Low Power RDR Travelling focus cases: Travelling focus cases: 3: similar as “2”, but longer z 3: similar as “2”, but longer z 30: similar as “3”, FLAT Z distribution, lower y 30: similar as “3”, FLAT Z distribution, lower y 4: even Lower P, FLAT Z, long z 4: even Lower P, FLAT Z, long z 5: FLAT Z, not so long z 5: FLAT Z, not so long z Analytical predictions not valid – use Guinea-Pig code Analytical predictions not valid – use Guinea-Pig code

5
ILC Low P, Andrei Seryi, November 17, 2008 5 Candidates for new Low P parameter sets Nom. RDR Low P RDR new Low P Case ID1233045 E CM (GeV)500 N2.0E+10 nbnb 26251320 11051320 F (Hz)555555 P b (MW)10.55.3 4.45.3 X (m) 1.0E-05 Y (m) 4.0E-083.6E-08 3.0E-08 x (m) 2.0E-021.1E-02 7.0E-031.5E-02 y (m) 4.0E-042.0E-04 1.0E-04 Travelling focusNo Yes Z-distribution *Gauss Flat x (m) 6.39E-074.74E-07 3.78E-075.54E-07 y (m) 5.7E-093.8E-09 2.7E-092.5E-09 z (m) 3.0E-042.0E-043.0E-04 5.0E-042.0E-04 Guinea-Pig E/E 0.0230.0450.036 0.0390.038 Guinea-Pig L (cm -2 s -1 )2.02E+341.86E+341.92E+341.98E+342.00E+342.02E+34 Guinea-Pig Lumi in 1%1.50E+341.09E+341.18E+341.17E+341.06E+341.24E+34 *for flat z distribution the full bunch length is z *2*3 1/2

6
ILC Low P, Andrei Seryi, November 17, 2008 6 Case 4: even Low P, TRAV_FOCUS, FLAT_Z

7
ILC Low P, Andrei Seryi, November 17, 2008 7 Case 3 Low P & offset sensitivity Luminosity kept by tighter focusing ( * y < z ) while the moving focus and beam-beam force keep beam focusing each other Luminosity kept by tighter focusing ( * y < z ) while the moving focus and beam-beam force keep beam focusing each other Higher disruption needed, which produces higher sensitivity to offset of the beams Higher disruption needed, which produces higher sensitivity to offset of the beams Operation of intratrain luminosity optimization is more challenging Operation of intratrain luminosity optimization is more challenging Case 3

8
ILC Low P, Andrei Seryi, November 17, 2008 8 e+e- pairs Edge of pairs distribution in -P t important for VX background RDR Low P: edge higher=> unfavorable for background New Low P: edge location similar as RDR Nominal Pairs above the line increase background in VX detector Case 3 Need to be verified by full simulations

9
ILC Low P, Andrei Seryi, November 17, 2008 9 Creating travelling focus, 2 ways Small (~%) uncompensated chromaticity and E-z correlation Small (~%) uncompensated chromaticity and E-z correlation Need z =k L* E Need z =k L* E where k is relative amount of uncompensated chromaticity where k is relative amount of uncompensated chromaticity and E is 2-3 times > incoherent spread in the bunch and E is 2-3 times > incoherent spread in the bunch E.g. E = 0.3%, k=1.5%, L* eff =6m E.g. E = 0.3%, k=1.5%, L* eff =6m Transverse deflecting cavity giving z-x correlation in one of FF sextupoles Transverse deflecting cavity giving z-x correlation in one of FF sextupoles That gives z-correlated focusing That gives z-correlated focusing parameters to be figured out parameters to be figured out

10
ILC Low P, Andrei Seryi, November 17, 2008 10 Couple more peculiar cases… Although this may have only academic interest… Although this may have only academic interest… There are parameter cases which give L~1E34, and have extremely low beamstrahlung energy spread… There are parameter cases which give L~1E34, and have extremely low beamstrahlung energy spread… Two examples are shown below Two examples are shown below You will see their possible applications in a moment… You will see their possible applications in a moment…

11
ILC Low P, Andrei Seryi, November 17, 2008 11 Nominal RDRE-R-NE-R-T E CM (GeV)500 N2.0E+105.0E+09 nbnb 26251500011000 Tsep (ns)369.290.0 Iave in train (A)0.00870.0089 f rep (Hz)555 P b (MW)10.515.011.0 X (m) 1.0E-052.0E-064.0E-06 Y (m) 4.0E-082.0E-08 x (m) 2.0E-024.0E-022.0E-02 y (m) 4.0E-041.0E-034.0E-04 x (m) 6.39E-074.04E-07 y (m) 5.7E-096.4E-094.0E-09 z (m) 3.0E-04 6.0E-04 Dx0.170.110.21 Dy19.06.721.2 Uave0.0470.0180.009 BB 0.0230.0040.002 P_Beamstrahlung (MW)0.240.0600.024 ngamma1.290.520.53 Hd1.701.841.53 Geom Lumi (cm-2 s-1)1.14E+345.77E+336.69E+33 Luminosity (cm-2 s-1)1.95E+341.06E+341.02E+34 Analytical, except: Calculated with Guinea-pig Parameter sets with very low beamstrahlung Parameter sets with very low beamstrahlung N: normal N: normal T: travelling focus (Gauss z distr.) T: travelling focus (Gauss z distr.) Further optimization is possible Further optimization is possible Low beamstrahlung

12
ILC Low P, Andrei Seryi, November 17, 2008 12 About 97% of luminosity is in 1% peak Cumulative distribution of disrupted beam About 92% of beam have dE/E < 1% Outgoing beam within =200 mm*mrad 92% of the beam can be decelerated from 250GeV/beam down to 10GeV 92% of the beam can be decelerated from 250GeV/beam down to 10GeV Where its dE/E will be 25% Where its dE/E will be 25% Emittance do not limit deceleration Emittance do not limit deceleration => beam and/or its energy can be recycled => beam and/or its energy can be recycled recover major part of RF energy, dump the beam at low energy or reuse it recover major part of RF energy, dump the beam at low energy or reuse it environmentally friendly: electricity and radiation environmentally friendly: electricity and radiation E-R-T

13
ILC Low P, Andrei Seryi, November 17, 2008 13 Beam & Energy recycling? Certainly not very serious at the moment Certainly not very serious at the moment If it were possible, one would need to avoid collision of bunches in the linac, e.g. like this: If it were possible, one would need to avoid collision of bunches in the linac, e.g. like this: Beam delivery 5km 10km Path difference /2 of RF, to get to deceleration Extract and dump at ~10GeV Collimate about ~5-10% of beam here, to reduce dE/E to about 1% IP Linac May create E-z correlation here, for better deceleration e+ e- Use mini-trains with gaps to avoid collisions in the linac: length of mini-trains equal to full length of beam delivery gap between mini-trains = 2* linac length to extraction point + BDS length Train format

14
ILC Low P, Andrei Seryi, November 17, 2008 14 Beam & Energy recycling? The previous slide, where recycled beam decelerated in the same linac, require longer RF pulse (more cryo loss), possibly redesign of cavities to reduce HOMs, etc. The previous slide, where recycled beam decelerated in the same linac, require longer RF pulse (more cryo loss), possibly redesign of cavities to reduce HOMs, etc. Alternative approach is to make dual aperture cryomodule? Alternative approach is to make dual aperture cryomodule? Cryomodule more expensive, but not factor of two Cryomodule more expensive, but not factor of two No need for longer train and gaps No need for longer train and gaps LHC, dual bore For acceleration For deceleration Dual aperture ILC cryomodule? ILC cryomodule

15
ILC Low P, Andrei Seryi, November 17, 2008 15 Beam & Energy recycling? For ILC, beam and energy recycling may likely be very difficult or practically impossible… For ILC, beam and energy recycling may likely be very difficult or practically impossible… The approach to parameter optimization, resulted in very low B, is worth applying to multi-TeV case, to study if there are possibility to reduce beamstrahlung The approach to parameter optimization, resulted in very low B, is worth applying to multi-TeV case, to study if there are possibility to reduce beamstrahlung Acknowledgement of comments and critics on beam/energy recycling: Chris Adolphsen, Greg Loew, Nikolai Solyak, Slava Yakovlev Acknowledgement of comments and critics on beam/energy recycling: Chris Adolphsen, Greg Loew, Nikolai Solyak, Slava Yakovlev

16
ILC Low P, Andrei Seryi, November 17, 2008 16Conclusion New low P parameter set New low P parameter set Gives 2E34 with ½ of beam power Gives 2E34 with ½ of beam power Better for background than RDR Low P Better for background than RDR Low P Travelling focus helps recovering luminosity while keeping lower beamstrahlung B and Y and avoiding the need to have short bunches Travelling focus helps recovering luminosity while keeping lower beamstrahlung B and Y and avoiding the need to have short bunches Rely on tighter focusing Rely on tighter focusing Have higher sensitivity to beam offset at IP Have higher sensitivity to beam offset at IP Need to be evaluated by full background simulations Need to be evaluated by full background simulations Will be further discussed within ILC “minimal machine” study Will be further discussed within ILC “minimal machine” study

Similar presentations

OK

Design challenges for head-on scheme Deepa Angal-Kalinin Orsay, 19 th October 2006.

Design challenges for head-on scheme Deepa Angal-Kalinin Orsay, 19 th October 2006.

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on relations and functions for class 11th notes Ppt on electricity generation in india Mis ppt on hospitality Ppt on brand building and management Flexible display ppt on tv Wireless communication ppt on slideshare A ppt on loch ness monster video Ppt on school life vs college life Ppt on atomic structure Ppt on infrared remote control