We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJesse Chessman
Modified over 2 years ago
Effects of Self-Directed Summary of Performance on Students’ Participation in Person Centered Planning Meetings For additional information, please contact: Kelly R. Kelley, firstname.lastname@example.org or Valerie L. Mazzotti, email@example.com Introduction Young adults with disabilities typically experience poorer post-school employment and education outcomes compared to young adults without disabilities (Newman et al., 2011) and moving from school to post-school life can be challenging. In 2004, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) attempted to facilitate this process by requiring schools to develop a Summary of Performance (SOP) for each youth with a disability to facilitate communication between schools and communities. While the SOP is a document mandated under IDEA (2004), the Self-Directed SOP can be a beneficial bridge into all aspects of post-school life for young adults with disabilities and self-advocacy experiences, whether moving from high school or from postsecondary settings. Results Results demonstrated a functional relationship between the SD-SOP and participants’ ability to participate in PCP meetings. Additionally, participants’ were able to generalize new skills to real PCP meetings with PCP meeting members present and to employment settings. Additional Results Interrater Reliability collected on 34.1% across BL, IV, M Ranged from 93.3% to 100% with a mean of 98.9% across all phases including pre/post-test real PCP meetings and interviews with employers Treatment Integrity collected on 42.4% of sessions Ranged from 90% to 100% with a mean of 98.6% Maintenance Collected 2 and 6-weeks after intervention Andrew: 27 points at 2 weeks; 26 points at 6 weeks with mean of 26.5 Erin: 27 points at 2 weeks; 26 points at 6 weeks with mean of 26.5 Conroy: 28 points at 2 weeks; 23 points at 6 weeks with mean of 25.5 Generalization Andrew: Baseline 0 points; 23 points in real post meeting; 17 points with employer Erin: Baseline 1 point; 28 points in real post meeting; 25 points with employer Conroy: Baseline 0 points; 29 points in real post meeting; 28 points with employer Social Validity Participants: Ranged from 3.67 to 4.00 with agree or strongly agreed the SD-SOP intervention helped Employers: Average or above average ratings across all 3 participants Teacher: Strongly agreed the SOP was easy to implement and had active participation from participants Discussion Limitations and Implications for Future Research Included small number of participants (n=3) Collected less than five data points for each phase PNDs are non-parametric and do not provide true effect size Lack of long-term maintenance data Generalization maintained from 2 of 3 participants Future research should ensure more relevance across lessons for students Implications for Practice Intervention could be used on postsecondary and secondary settings Consider disability group when designing instruction (using picture cues, simple language) Explicit instruction must occur before students participate in IEP or PCP processes to actively engage and have a voice in planning their future Setting and Participants Rural accredited university located in southeastern United States near the Blue Ridge Mountains in a postsecondary program office suite 3 young adults (22-27 years old) with mild to moderate intellectual and/or developmental disabilities (IDD) 2 males, 1 female (Caucasian) All lived and participated in a fully inclusive postsecondary program Completing last year of the 2-year program Purpose To investigate the effects of the SD-SOP on participation in PCP meetings with young adults with intellectual disability participating in an individualized inclusive postsecondary program Design A multiple probe across participants design was used to evaluate the effects of the SD-SOP on students’ participation in PCP meetings Figure 1. Number of points correct on 30-point probe indicating student participation during PCP meetings. First break in x-axis indicates winter break for students; second break in x-axis indicates spring break for students; SD-SOP = Self-Directed Summary of Performance Materials Macintosh laptop with Microsoft PowerPoint © Google images © and modified SD-SOP Recording devices: Flip video camera and/or iPad2 © Data collection sheets, clipboard, pens, pencils Dependent Variables Student participation in PCP meetings measured using a 30-point probe (15 steps of the SD-SOP with 0 = incorrect, 1= partially correct, 2 = correct) Pre/post-test measure of real PCP meetings Interviews with employers to determine if participants could generalize information related to the SD-SOP to advocate for accommodations and supports in a work setting Valerie L. Mazzotti, PhD University of Oregon Kelly R. Kelley, PhD Western Carolina University
What Is TRANSITION & Transition PLANNING?
Summary of Performance: A New Tool for NC Teachers November 18, 2013 Dr. Valerie L. Mazzotti National Post-School Outcomes Center University of Oregon.
Summary of Performance (SOP) Content from November 18, 2013 presentation by Dr. Valerie L. Mazzotti National Post-School Outcomes Center University of.
DR. JASON M. NARANJO UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON-BOTHELL & DR. JOHN R. JOHNSON SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY PRESENTED TO: CA TRANSITION ALLIANCE & THE SECONDARY.
Policy and Practice Implications for Secondary and Postsecondary Education and Employment for Youth With Disabilities September 18 and 19, 2003 Washington,
Single Subject Research (Richards et al.) Chapter 8.
Improving Secondary Transition Services: Meeting the Requirements of Indicator 13 National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center.
Increasing Skill Performances of Problem Solving in Students with Disabilities Debra Cote, Ph.D. California State University Fullerton.
Do jobs identified as high and low preference in a video assessment correspond with high levels of performance on the jobs identified?
ALL ROADS LEAD TO EMPLOYMENT Skills for Employment: Your GPS Guide PRESENTED BY: The Center for Change in Transition Services.
Self-Regulated Strategy Development for Students with Asperger Syndrome: A Discussion May 13, 2011 Min-Chi Yan.
A Practical Transition Assessment Framework Jim Martin, Ph.D. OU Zarrow Center
Transition Collaborators. Team Models Multidisciplinary Interdisciplinary Transdisciplinary.
Preparing Interns to teach Emergent Literacy and Self- Care Skills to Students with Significant Intellectual Disabilities in Inclusive Reading Groups OSEP.
Research and Training Center on Community Living, Institute on Community Integration UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Mark Olson and Renáta Tichá Active Support.
ALL ROADS LEAD TO EMPLOYMENT Skills for Employment: Self-Determination PRESENTED BY: The Center for Change in Transition Services.
Article Review EDEX 745, Spring 2005 Lisa Harris Losardo, A. & Bricker, D. (1994). Activity-based intervention and direct instruction: A comparison study.
Part B Indicator 13 FFY 09 SPP/APR Writing Suggestions Western Regional Resource Center APR Clinic 2010 November 1-3 San Francisco, California.
Autism Observation Instrument General Education Classrooms
Transition and Indicator 13 Writing Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) That Meet the Legal Mandate A Webinar Series Presented by The California Community.
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.