Presentation on theme: "Joint Group on Pollution Prevention"— Presentation transcript:
1 Joint Group on Pollution Prevention Chartered byJoint Logistics Commanders (JLC)Joint Group on Pollution Prevention (JG-PP):Partnering for ProgressJoint Technology Exchange Group (JTEG) andCommercial Technologies for Maintenance Activities (CTMA)“Technology Transition as a Continuous Process Improvement”24-25 July 2007Lorraine Wass, BMC Inc.Consultant/Pollution Prevention Support toNaval Air Systems Command and the Joint Group on Pollution Prevention(207)Good MorningThank you for the opportunity to spend a few minutes with you to tell you about JG-PP.I am a contractor supporting Mr. Nick Paraskevas (NAVAIR) and Mr. Andy Del Collo (N45) the Joint Group on Pollution Prevention
2 Overview Mission Leadership Benefits Methodology and Process List of ProjectsInitiativesContactsThese are the topics that are in this presentation.
3 Mission DoD/NASA flag officer group Chartered to Originally created in 1994 at industry requestChartered by JLC/NASA HQsChartered toReduce or eliminate system hazardous material requirements: Project BenefitsAvoid duplication of effort: Consensus BuildingReduce technical risk: Stakeholder OwnershipTransfer technology: DocumentationLeverage opportunities, reduce costs: Cost ControlDual focus on uniform implementationAcquisition (Contractor design) and sustainment community (Depot) needsManufacturing and maintenance processesFor those of you not familiar with the JG-PP, it is a flag officer level body from the services, NASA and DLA chartered by the Joint Logistics Commanders in 1994.As you see the charter, there is a focus on avoiding duplication of efforts in P2 projects.The JG-PP origins lay within the acquisition community, both in the program offices and the OEMs. From the P2 perspective, the aim is to harmonize processes used in the development of a weapon system with those used to sustain the system once it has been deployed.
4 Leadership JLC Principals Working Group General Benjamin S. GriffinCommanderU.S. Army Materiel CommandWorking GroupMajor General Fred D. Robinson Jr.CommanderHQ, Army Research, Development andEngineering CommandMs. Maryalice MillerU.S. Army REDCOMEnvironmental Acquisition and Logistics Sustainment ProgramVice Admiral Justin D. McCarthyDeputy Chief of Naval Operations,(Fleet Readiness and Logistics)Mr. William G. MattheisDeputy Director, Environmental Readiness DivisionChief of Naval Operations (N45)Mr. Andy Del ColloTechnology Development & Implementation Action OfficerChief of Naval Operations (N451T)Major General Willie J. WilliamsCommanding GeneralMarine Corps Logistics CommandMr. Michael T. MaddenJG-PP ChairpersonExecutive Deputy OperationsMarine Corps Logistics CommandGeneral Gregory S. MartinCommanderAir Force Materiel CommandMr. Gary LeitnerJG-PP Working Group ChairMarine Corps Logistics CommandThis is the leadership of the JG-PP.Brigadier General Francis M. BrunoDirector of Logistics and SustainmentHQ Air Force Materiel CommandVice Admiral Keith W. LippertDirectorDefense Logistics AgencyMr. Warren AssinkDepot Maintenance and Logistics OfficeHQ, Air Force Materiel CommandMs. James LeatherwoodDirector, Environmental ManagementNational Aeronautics and SpaceAdministrationMr. David A. Amidei (Acting)Kennedy Space CenterNational Aeronautics and SpaceAdministrationMr. Frederick N. BailleExecutive Director, Distribution & Reutilization PolicyDefense Logistics AgencyMr. Marvin WilliamsRegulated Programs BranchHQ Defense Logistics Agency
5 The Right Time For Decisive Action BenefitsCoordinate/facilitate projectsAdvocate fundingReduce individual participant’s costsReduce alternative technical riskAssist in qualified alternative implementationCoordinate/facilitate project managementContact stakeholdersProgram offices, OEMS, process owners in the depotsDepending upon the project the JG-PP can prepare and coordinate project documentsDevelop project management plans, etcEnsure stakeholder requirements are documentedAdvocate fundingEncourage POM for start of project to implementationFacilitate/coordinate project startSell project – get buy-inReduce DoD costsBring funds to the tableShare costs with other stakeholdersConduct cost/benefit analysesReduce RiskCollaborate with diverse knowledgeable personnelAssist in implementation as neededThe Right PeopleThe Right PlaceThe Right Time For Decisive Action
6 Six Phase Methodology Identify P2 Needs Stakeholder Buy-in Joint Test ProtocolLessons LearnedI. IdentificationPotential Alternatives ReportVI. Evaluation/ FeedbackII. Technical/ BusinessCost-Benefit AnalysisV. ImplementationIII. Alternatives TestingFunding AgreementsJG-PP applies a Six-Phase Methodology on each project to implement material or process changes at Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) or depot/maintenance facilities.Methodology is flexible to account for different needs of OEMs, programs, and depotsProvides technical and business support and facilitates the projectsAssists in identifying resources for validation testing of alternativesTarget – continuous process Inner Circle – Project Cycle Outer Circle - ProductsPhase 1 – Identification Products: Joint 1-N needs list- Participants select target hazardous material(s)- Obtain contractor/program managers agreement to participatePhase 2 – Technical/Business Products: JTP, Stakeholder Buy-in, PAR, CBA- Define performance requirements Joint Test Protocol (JTP) report; Identify alternatives to hazardous material(s) usage; Obtain consensus among stakeholders- Determine who benefits from the project; Identify sources of funding; Develop plan to satisfy project expensesPhase 3 - Alternatives Testing Products: JTR- Validate alternative(s) (lab testing/field demonstration )Phase 4 - Process Change/Authorization Products: Authorization Letter, Manual/Spec ChangesFor industry, changes not required if material/process change satisfies performance requirements specified in contract; DCMS Single Process Initiative can execute a change modification (block change) for changes to single/multiple contracts as required.Each Program Office/Depot process owner is responsible for issuing approval for change to material and application within their respective manufacturing and maintenance processesProcess Change Authorization - OEMs will utilize the Single Process Initiative (SPI) block change process or performance based specifications to modify contracts for implementation across all affected systems and components.Depots will utilize their respective service/agency change mechanism for implementation.Phase 5 - Implement alternative(s) Product: Technology TransferImplementation plan, follow-up on transition for success stories/issues/concernsPhase 6 – Evaluation/Feedback- Review effectiveness and inefficiencies of process and identify new areas for improvementsImplementation PlanIV. Process Change AuthorizationJoint Test ReportBlock Change or Approval Letters
7 JG-PP Project Development Process Within Agency Needs IdentificationJoint Needs Identification and PrioritizationCONOPS Specifies Criteria Used to Develop 1-N ListJoint Project DevelopmentSchedule Revised to Match Funding OpportunitiesGround Vehicle and Aircraft Working GroupsResource Identification and PursuitAgency Funding and In-Kind SupportJG-PP Support ContractESTCP ProgramNDCEE Congressional AddsNCMS/CTMA ProgramWithin Agency Needs Identification- Each services reviews their high priority needs and determine which have joint service partnership potentialJoint Needs Identification and PrioritizationProject Sub-committee reviews all needs submitted by Services/NASA and ranks them – average is the final JG-PP 1-N list ranking/prioritizationJoint Project DevelopmentTimeline developed to ID each Service/NASA funding opportunities as well as others such as ESTCP to enhance funding opportunities for timely preparation for proposal and submissionsResourcesLeverage Agency funding and in-kind supportJG-PP Contract Support (CTC)Working relationship with ESTCP Program Managers, Chuck Pellerin/Bruce Sartwell and Jeff MarqiseeLeveraging NDCEE Congressional AddsRecently, a Letter was sent to Mr. Chuck Ryan, NCMS Vice President, Technology to establish a partnership in the near future
8 Strengths and Challenges Improves communicationFacilitates partnershipsIdentifies shared opportunitiesReduces duplicationReduces riskLeverages funding resourcesChallengesObtaining agreement and buy-in from StakeholdersEngaging Acquisition and OEM CommunitiesDecreasing R&D budgetsImproved communication – Cross feeding of efforts across DoD/NASAensures all potential solutions are identified and all concerns are voiced by collaborating together ideas and test results of similar test effortsreduces duplication of effort in performing common tests across DoD/NASA/IndustryReduced Technical Risk- Through the collaboration/coordination with a diverse experienced knowledge base of personnel consisting of laboratory, engineering, field level personnel, management, and industrial hygienist, to name a few.Leverage Funding ResourcesThrough established partnerships/collaboration, limited funds/resources go a bit further with cost sharing between DoD and IndustryChallengesGetting stakeholder buy-in upfront – identifying appropriate personnel and getting them involved early in the projectengaging Acquisition and OEM community (working with AT&L, AIA, DMCA)the continuing decrease in R&D budget to work on new technology/processes and most importantly – getting them implemented.
9 Each Project Becomes a Journey OSDSERDPOSDESTCPNDCEEJSINavyDem/ValArmyJS3WGImplementSolutionsJG-PPCoordinationEach project becomes a journey – here is an example of the JS3WG journeyIllustrates the extent of collaboration involvedJS3 WG initially consisted of Army/Navy/AFThrough JG-PP Coordination, now includes NASA, DLA, MC, and potentially OEM/SuppliersJG-PP coordination enabled the leveraging of funding from NDCEE, ODS, JSI for joint solutions to common problems.Air ForceNASADLAUSMCOEMJoint Service Solvent Substitution Working Group’s Journey
10 Completed Projects Low- VOC Identification Marking POC: Andy Del Collo, Navy (703)Low-VOC Topcoats and PrimersPOC: Warren Assink, AF (937)Non Chrome Primer forAircraft Exteriors MoldlinesPOC: Warren Assink, AF (937)Solventless Seawater Ballast TankCoating SystemsPOC: Andy Del Collo, Navy (703)The next few slides is complete list of projects (completed, in transition, ongoing and new starts). For more details – go to JG-PP website (jgpp.com)Most common Categories/Process: Painting, Depainting, Plating, Surface TreatmentTargeted HAZMAT: Chromium VI, Cadmium, VOCsI will only highlight several projects -Low-VOC ID Markings – Lockheed Martin2 alternative inks were qualified and various label systems –reduced labor costs since no masking, unmasking and cleaning was requiredLow-VOC Topcoats and Primers – Raytheon3-commercially available paint systems met the system critical performance requirements and approved for useRaytheon instituted two SPI/Block changes, changing all their affected drawings to allow use of qualified low-VOC primers and topcoatsSPI allows OEMs to make modifications to several contracts at one time and reduced the process time by as much as three hours piece part.Lead-Free Surface Finish and Low-VOCConformal Coating (CCAMTF)POC: Dave Amidei, NASA (202)
11 Completed Projects (cont’d) Chromium - Free Primer forInserts and FastenersPOC: Warren Assink, AF (937)Chrome-Free Conversion CoatingsPOC: Maryalice Miller, Army (410)Alternatives to ElectrodepositedCadmium for Corrosion Protectionand Threaded Part Lubricity ApplicationsPOC: Andy Del Collo, Navy (703)Chromium-Free Primers and Threaded Fasteners (Pratt & Whitney)Two alternatives validated as acceptable alternatives to Zinc Chromate primers for galvanic corrosion protection in aircraft engine manufacturing by Pratt and Whitney – United Technologies CorporationChrome Free Conversion Coatings – (Hughes Missile Systems Co./NCMS)Although no alternative technology was implemented, the project's screening test results and JTP have since been used by other commercial and governmental organizations to evaluate new chemical conversion coatings.Alternatives to Electrodeposited Cadmium (BOEING)two viable (Zinc Nickel and IVD Aluminum) alternatives qualified for use on low strength (> 200ksi) stainless steel, aluminum, copper alloysLead-Free Dry Film LubricantsPartnering with PEWGPOC: Mary Swinford, PEWG (937)
12 Completed Projects (cont’d) Space InitiativeLow Emission DepaintingPOC: Dave Amidei, NASA (202)Lead Free Solder – more of a logistics issue than P2 (NASA, JCAA, OEMs)JG-PP assisted the OEMs and Joint Council on Aging Aircraft to study the effects of environmental testing on relative reliability of lead-free and tin-lead solder joints and provide baseline data from the evaluation lead-free solders and finishes.the tests generated critical reliability datafollow-up efforts under new project title NASA DoD Lead Free Electronics Phase II is underway.Lead-Free Solder (Reliability Study)POC: Dave Amidei, NASA (202)
13 Completed Projects (cont’d) Non-ODC Oxygen Line CleaningPOC: Warren Assink, AF (937)Low/No-VOC and NonchromateCoating System forSupport EquipmentPOC: Warren Assink, AF (937)Portable Laser Coating Removal System - ServicesQualified a portable hand-held Nd:YAG laser system that does not significantly affect the substrate materials and considered an effective versatile tool that can be used for coating removal applications in small areasBeing implemented within various AF and Army maintenance facilitiesAdditional technology transfer is being pursued.Follow-on Robotic Laser Coating Removing System underway.Portable Laser Coating RemovalSystem Partnering with ESTCPPOC: Warren Assink, AF (937)
14 Completed Projects (continued) Chromium Electroplating Alternatives Partnering with HCAT and ESTCPHVOF Thermal Spray Coatings Technology onLanding gearPOC: Warren Assink, AF (937)Prop HubsPOC: Andy Del Collo, Navy (703)HVOF – HCAT/ESTCPHigh Thermal Oxygen Fuel (HVOF) Thermal Spray technology has been evaluated for use on external components such as Landing Gear, Propeller Hubs, Actuators.HVOF coatings has proven to be better than Hard Chrome Plating and is also more wear resistant, thus extending the life cycle of the components, reducing maintenance hours, and most importantly, more environmentally friendly alternative that reduces the risk to maintenance workers.ActuatorsPOC: Warren Assink, AF (937)
15 Transitioning Project Nonchromate Aluminum PretreatmentsPOC: Andy Del Collo, Navy (703)Joint Service InitiativeCorn Hybrid Polymer (CHP) Coating Removalon Delicate SubstratesPOC: Andy Del Collo, Navy (703)These projects have completed all testing/field demonstrations and final reports are being prepared:NCAP– Tri-Valent Chromium (TCP) has been qualified for use- being implemented across DoD maintenance facilitiesCHP– proven very effective in coating removal on delicate substrates such as radomes. Being implemented across Navy and Air Force- Plans are to transition further where practical.Space InitiativeAlternative to Aliphatic IsocyanateUrethane (Space)POC: Dave Amidei, NASA (202)
16 On-going Projects Cadmium Replacements for DoD and NASA ApplicationsPOC: Andy Del Collo, Navy (703)Low Temperature Cure Powder Coating –POC: Warren Assink, AF (937)These project are Ongoing - in various testing phasesCadmium Replacements for DoD and NASA ApplicationsHigh Strength Steel Structural components and Landing Gear is main focus at this time – Other potential areas include HSS Fasteners, electrical connectors, springsPhase II testing is underway and some test results are being evaluatedLow temperature Cure Powder Coatingsome lab tests are complete, and looks very promising for aluminum substrates – but not for steel substrates.low temperature will enable use of powder coatings on more componentsHVOF on Dyn Components- This is the last HVOF technology dem/val on Helo Dyn Components.- All Lab testing is completed – NAVAIR is continuing the field evaluations and hopes to complete by end of FY09.Chromium Electroplating Alternatives Partnering with HCAT and ESTCPHVOF Thermal Spray Coatings onHelicopter Dynamic ComponentsPOC: Andy Del Collo, Navy (703)
17 On-going Projects (continued) Solvent Substitution Alternatives Partnering with JS3WGPOC: Andy Del Collo, Navy (703)Non-Chromate Primer for Military ApplicationsPartnering with AERMIPPOC: Andy Del Collo, Navy (703)JG-PP partnered with the Joint Service Solvent Substitution Working group (comprised of DoD services/NASA/DLA/OEM/Suppliers) – addresses solvent substitution alternativesJG-PP assists in implementing the framework that support coordination and open communicationMethodology identifies tasks to ensure full implementation (id of stakeholders, acceptance criteria/test protocols, field demo and execution strategy.JS3 Database is a tool to store and disseminate info on DoD/NASA efforts. MFG are encouraged to enter their HAP free cleaners to increase visibility of their products within DoD and NASAJS3 website lists project efforts underway.Non-Chromate Primer for Military Applicationsfor a total Non-Chromate Coating System, a non-chromate primer is the key component still being investigated.NAVY aircraft has worst environmental exposure and corrosion is still a factor deterring a total non-chromate systemBiodiesel Used in DoD Tactical Vehiclesanother example of collaborative efforts - Stakeholders include NAVY, AF, ARMY, USMC,JTP being developed,If results are satisfactory, plans are to implement through a policy letter by direction of ASN.Biodiesel Used in DoD Tactical Vehicles(Non-Deployable)POC: Andy Del Collo, Navy (703)
18 New Projects Bio-based Hydraulic Fluids Partnering with DLA POC: Marvin Williams, DLA (703)NASA DoD Lead Free Solder Electronics Phase IIPartnering with IndustryPOC: David Amidei, NASA (202)New Start include:Bio-based Hydraulic Fluids for machine toolsapproached by DLA to partner and ensure requirements for Military applications are metStakeholders (NASA, AF, MC, NAVY, DLA) are evaluating current specification requirements and identifying any new requirements to be incorporated into a JTPNASA/DoD Lead Free Electronics Phase IIFollow-on to initial LFS efforts (reliability study)Building on results and focusing on the rework of Tin-Lead and LF solder alloys (to include mixing of tin-lead and LF solder alloys) to generate reliability data for circuit cards manufactured and reworked and subjected to rigorous environmental exposure conditions.Purpose: Provide baseline data for aerospace and defense high performance applications – JTP being developed
19 Potential New Projects High Strength Steel Fasteners Cadmium and Hexavalent Chromium Coating Replacements for DoD ApplicationsNon-Chromate Coating SystemCorn Hybrid Polymer – Follow-onThese are potential new starts in the near futureHSS Fasteners- Prepoposal did not make ESTCP Phase II review – reviewing other sources of funding availableSome discussion with Automotive Industry on the alternatives they implementedNon-Chromate Coating System –Much work has been done – some services have accomplished total NCCS, however NAVY has worst corrosion environment and still requires chromates in coating system (pretreat or primer).Non-Chromate Primer is key to total NCCS and being pursued by NAVAIRCHP – Follow-onPreproposal did not make ESTCPH Phase II reviewSeeking funding to further transition this technology.Three ESTCP Preproposals that did make ESTCP Phase II review and JG-PP assisting as needed in developing full proposals.Ultraviolet Curable Powder CoatingElectrostatic Precipitator (ESP) Modification for Fume Control during Welding and CuttingDisposable Dual-Component Aerosol Technology (DCAT)Demonstration/Validation
20 Initiatives Strengthen acquisition community ties Improve funding Improve collaborationStrengthen process project selectionthrough execution and implementationJG-PP Initiatives are to:Strength acquisition communities ties to help eliminate use of hazmats early in the design process (JSF is good example of cooperative efforts in doing just that)Establish partnerships/cooperation that will improve funding and collaboration with other government agencies and -- ESTCP/HCAT/PEWG/JCAT/JDMAG/NDCEE and hopefully CTMA/NCMS in the near future- avoid duplication of efforts, minimize costs, reduce technical risksLeverage knowledgable expertise with diverse experience base consisting of laboratories, engineers, managementStrengthen process for project selection through execution and implementation- Ensure stakeholder/process owner buy-in up front for successful transition to the OEM/Maintenance facilities.
21 Working Group Core Members ContactsWorking Group Core MembersMs. Maryalice Miller HQ REDCOM, (410)Mr. Andy Del Collo CNO (N451), (703)Mr. Gary Leitner USMC, (229)Mr. Warren Assink HQ AFMC/LGPE, (937)Mr. David Amidei (Acting) NASA-KSC, (202)Mr. Marvin Williams DLA, (703)Visit our website -
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.