Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byMelanie Varden Modified over 2 years ago

1
Ray Martin *Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) includes Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR). Discounted Cash Flow* Leads to Better Financial Decisions Because... IRR is Okay!

2
Ray Martin Background l Mainstream corporate finance texts cite IRR as being inferior to IRR for financial decision-making. One professor calls it “IRR bashing.” l Framing NPV and IRR as either-or choices... –overstates minor difficulties with IRR; –ignores coexistent difficulties with NPV; and –forces an unnecessary, unproductive choice between the two. l The two measures... –consider the time value of money; –are complementary; –are best used together; and –are reconcilable, each with the other and with discounted payback. l In short, IRR is Okay. l This presentations compares... –the mainstream view explained in Principles of Corporate Finance (Richard A. Brealey and Stewart C. Myers, 6th edition, Irwin-McGraw-Hill, 2000) to... –an alternative view explained in Internal Rate of Return Revisited.Internal Rate of Return Revisited l Mainstream corporate finance texts cite IRR as being inferior to IRR for financial decision-making. One professor calls it “IRR bashing.” l Framing NPV and IRR as either-or choices... –overstates minor difficulties with IRR; –ignores coexistent difficulties with NPV; and –forces an unnecessary, unproductive choice between the two. l The two measures... –consider the time value of money; –are complementary; –are best used together; and –are reconcilable, each with the other and with discounted payback. l In short, IRR is Okay. l This presentations compares... –the mainstream view explained in Principles of Corporate Finance (Richard A. Brealey and Stewart C. Myers, 6th edition, Irwin-McGraw-Hill, 2000) to... –an alternative view explained in Internal Rate of Return Revisited.Internal Rate of Return Revisited

3
Ray Martin

5
Topics Covered (Brealey & Myers, Chapter 5 Only)

6
Ray Martin

7
Internal Rate of Return B&M Example: Purchase a gadget for $4,000. The investment should generate $2,000 and $4,000 in cash flows in years 1 and 2 respectively. What is the IRR on this investment? Relevant IRR

8
Ray Martin

9
Internal Rate of Return Lending or Borrowing? (Criticism Number 1) * l With net-negative cash flows, project NPV nonsensically increases with the discount rate when expressed as a positive value. l This is obvious if you include the NPV at a zero discount rate, i.e., the total, in the calculations. l Express projects sensibly... –from the point of view of making money, –with positive values and rates, and –reject projects with net negative cash flows without discounting. l This is the same as both lender and borrower using the same mortgage loan amortization table. Lending or Borrowing? (Criticism Number 1) * l With net-negative cash flows, project NPV nonsensically increases with the discount rate when expressed as a positive value. l This is obvious if you include the NPV at a zero discount rate, i.e., the total, in the calculations. l Express projects sensibly... –from the point of view of making money, –with positive values and rates, and –reject projects with net negative cash flows without discounting. l This is the same as both lender and borrower using the same mortgage loan amortization table. * Refers to the criticism cited in the original paper, Internal Rate of Return Revisited.Internal Rate of Return Revisited

10
Ray Martin

11
Internal Rate of Return Criticism Number 1 - Lending or Borrowing? l With NPV expressed negatively it nonsensically increases as the discount rate increases. l This is correctable by viewing the project from the point of view of making money--by inverting the cash flows. l This expresses the relationship the same as the familiar yield curve. Criticism Number 1 - Lending or Borrowing? l With NPV expressed negatively it nonsensically increases as the discount rate increases. l This is correctable by viewing the project from the point of view of making money--by inverting the cash flows. l This expresses the relationship the same as the familiar yield curve. Discount Rate NPV Relevant Range + - Nonsensical +

12
Ray Martin Internal Rate of Return Multiple Rates of Return (Criticism Number 3) l Each sign change after the first can generate and additional “IRR.” l This project has two sign changes at C 1 and C 6. l The cash flows below give NPV=0 at -50% and +15.2%. l The net total cash flow is +$250 l A negative IRR with net positive cash flows is nonsensical and can be safely ignored. Multiple Rates of Return (Criticism Number 3) l Each sign change after the first can generate and additional “IRR.” l This project has two sign changes at C 1 and C 6. l The cash flows below give NPV=0 at -50% and +15.2%. l The net total cash flow is +$250 l A negative IRR with net positive cash flows is nonsensical and can be safely ignored. "When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth." -- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, popularized by Leonard Nemoy in the original Star Trek

13
Ray Martin

14
Internal Rate of Return Multiple Rates of Return (Criticism Number 3) l Each sign change over the first can generate and additional “IRR.” l A negative IRR with net positive cash flows is nonsensical and can be safely ignored. Multiple Rates of Return (Criticism Number 3) l Each sign change over the first can generate and additional “IRR.” l A negative IRR with net positive cash flows is nonsensical and can be safely ignored. Discount Rate 0 Relevant IRR=15.2% “IRR”=-50% NPV 1000 500 -500 -1000

15
Ray Martin

16
Internal Rate of Return Mutually Exclusive Projects (Criticism Number 2) l IRR says nothing about project scale (relative size). l NPV says nothing about project risk (relative rates of return). l Larger projects should give a larger NPV, ceteris paribus. –This is another way of saying more money is better than less, even when discounted. –Project E has lower risk in that less money is at risk. –Return and risk are inseparable for decision-making. l NPV and IRR together provide information on both relative size (return) and relative rates of return (risk). Mutually Exclusive Projects (Criticism Number 2) l IRR says nothing about project scale (relative size). l NPV says nothing about project risk (relative rates of return). l Larger projects should give a larger NPV, ceteris paribus. –This is another way of saying more money is better than less, even when discounted. –Project E has lower risk in that less money is at risk. –Return and risk are inseparable for decision-making. l NPV and IRR together provide information on both relative size (return) and relative rates of return (risk).

17
Ray Martin Internal Rate of Return l Calculating IRR manually can be laborious. l Financial calculators and spreadsheets calculate –IRR assumes reinvestment at the IRR. –XIRR assumes reinvestment at the discount rate. l Some caution is needed with both NPV and IRR. –Both can give nonsensical answers at extremes. –IRR can be incalculable making NPV is suspect as well. –Nonsensical answers are... obvious with IRR, but not obvious with NPV. l The DCF program calculates the relevant IRR. l Calculating IRR manually can be laborious. l Financial calculators and spreadsheets calculate –IRR assumes reinvestment at the IRR. –XIRR assumes reinvestment at the discount rate. l Some caution is needed with both NPV and IRR. –Both can give nonsensical answers at extremes. –IRR can be incalculable making NPV is suspect as well. –Nonsensical answers are... obvious with IRR, but not obvious with NPV. l The DCF program calculates the relevant IRR.

18
Ray Martin

19
Internal Rate of Return Term Structure Assumption (Criticism Number 5) l The usual assumption is that discount rates are constant during the term of the project. l Without adjustment, IRR assumes that positive cash flows generated are reinvested at the IRR, which is inconsistent with the reinvestment assumption above. l If reinvestment at the IRR is a poor assumption, simply use a better one, e.g.,... –either assume positive cash flows are reinvested at the discount rate by using the XIRR function in Excel®, Lotus 1- 2-3® and many financial calculators, or –include what is done with the cash flows in the project itself when using the DCF program or a custom spreadsheet. Term Structure Assumption (Criticism Number 5) l The usual assumption is that discount rates are constant during the term of the project. l Without adjustment, IRR assumes that positive cash flows generated are reinvested at the IRR, which is inconsistent with the reinvestment assumption above. l If reinvestment at the IRR is a poor assumption, simply use a better one, e.g.,... –either assume positive cash flows are reinvested at the discount rate by using the XIRR function in Excel®, Lotus 1- 2-3® and many financial calculators, or –include what is done with the cash flows in the project itself when using the DCF program or a custom spreadsheet.

20
Ray Martin Internal Rate of Return and Discounted Payback l “The perfect is the enemy of the good.” -- Author unknown l It is generally better to calculate all relevant financial measures, then reconcile and explain any apparent differences than it is to... l hang on to one, and explain all others as flawed or ignore them. l “The perfect is the enemy of the good.” -- Author unknown l It is generally better to calculate all relevant financial measures, then reconcile and explain any apparent differences than it is to... l hang on to one, and explain all others as flawed or ignore them. NPV Discounted Payback Relevant IRR

21
Ray Martin

22
Payback (Undiscounted) l The payback period of a project is the amount of time it takes before the cumulative forecasted cash flow equals the initial outlay. l This method is flawed for other than short-term projects because... –it ignores the time value of money, and... –if used without caution, it will miss downstream cash flow reversals. l Solution: Present discounted payback along with undiscounted payback and explain any apparent discrepancies between it and the DCF solution (incorporating NPV and IRR together). l The payback period of a project is the amount of time it takes before the cumulative forecasted cash flow equals the initial outlay. l This method is flawed for other than short-term projects because... –it ignores the time value of money, and... –if used without caution, it will miss downstream cash flow reversals. l Solution: Present discounted payback along with undiscounted payback and explain any apparent discrepancies between it and the DCF solution (incorporating NPV and IRR together).

23
Ray Martin Discounted Payback l The discounted payback period of a project is the amount of time it takes before the discounted cumulative forecasted cash flow equals the initial outlay. l This discounted payback guideline evaluates projects in terms of how long it takes to recoup the initial investment. l Discounted payback... –accommodates a decision-maker preference for payback; –is easily reconciled with the NPV and IRR measures of DCF; –gives an indication of risk along with IRR; –considers the time value of money; and therefore... –overcomes the major difficulty with undiscounted payback; however... –it retains the shortcoming of no insight into possible downstream cash flow reversals; and therefore... –should be used in conjunction with DCF. l The discounted payback period of a project is the amount of time it takes before the discounted cumulative forecasted cash flow equals the initial outlay. l This discounted payback guideline evaluates projects in terms of how long it takes to recoup the initial investment. l Discounted payback... –accommodates a decision-maker preference for payback; –is easily reconciled with the NPV and IRR measures of DCF; –gives an indication of risk along with IRR; –considers the time value of money; and therefore... –overcomes the major difficulty with undiscounted payback; however... –it retains the shortcoming of no insight into possible downstream cash flow reversals; and therefore... –should be used in conjunction with DCF.

24
Ray Martin

25
Discounted Payback A

26
Ray Martin Discounted Payback B l Compares a 3-year project to a 2-year project: –Neither NPV nor discounted payback are reliable for comparison. –Can use uniform annual inflow instead. l Reject the project on all grounds: NPV, IRR below discount rate, no discounted payback period, negative uniform annual inflow. l Compares a 3-year project to a 2-year project: –Neither NPV nor discounted payback are reliable for comparison. –Can use uniform annual inflow instead. l Reject the project on all grounds: NPV, IRR below discount rate, no discounted payback period, negative uniform annual inflow. Discounted Payback B Uniform annual inflow

27
Ray Martin Discounted Payback C l Compares a 3-year project A to 2-year project C. l Excluding risk, Project A is more attractive on all grounds except discounted payback (misses $3,756.34 discounted revenue in Year 3). l Risk deserves special attention with Projects A and C because... –Example A has a larger IRR, suggesting lower relative risk for A. –Example A has a longer discounted payback, suggesting lower relative risk for C. l Compares a 3-year project A to 2-year project C. l Excluding risk, Project A is more attractive on all grounds except discounted payback (misses $3,756.34 discounted revenue in Year 3). l Risk deserves special attention with Projects A and C because... –Example A has a larger IRR, suggesting lower relative risk for A. –Example A has a longer discounted payback, suggesting lower relative risk for C. Discounted Payback C

28
Ray Martin Conclusion l This presentation... –addresses disagreement over the treatment of IRR only. –is not a critique of any other aspects of the Principles text. l Little has changed between the 6th and prior editions of Principles of Corporate Finance as far as treatment of IRR is concerned. l The differences were discussed in the papers at: –http://members.tripod.com/~Ray_Martin/DCF/nr7aa003.htmlhttp://members.tripod.com/~Ray_Martin/DCF/nr7aa003.html –http://members.tripod.com/~Ray_Martin/DCF/B-MFAQs.htmlhttp://members.tripod.com/~Ray_Martin/DCF/B-MFAQs.html –http://members.tripod.com/~Ray_Martin/NSF9914/RejctRev.htmlhttp://members.tripod.com/~Ray_Martin/NSF9914/RejctRev.html l Thank you for your review. l Click for a >>> Home Page Menu.Home Page Menu l This presentation... –addresses disagreement over the treatment of IRR only. –is not a critique of any other aspects of the Principles text. l Little has changed between the 6th and prior editions of Principles of Corporate Finance as far as treatment of IRR is concerned. l The differences were discussed in the papers at: –http://members.tripod.com/~Ray_Martin/DCF/nr7aa003.htmlhttp://members.tripod.com/~Ray_Martin/DCF/nr7aa003.html –http://members.tripod.com/~Ray_Martin/DCF/B-MFAQs.htmlhttp://members.tripod.com/~Ray_Martin/DCF/B-MFAQs.html –http://members.tripod.com/~Ray_Martin/NSF9914/RejctRev.htmlhttp://members.tripod.com/~Ray_Martin/NSF9914/RejctRev.html l Thank you for your review. l Click for a >>> Home Page Menu.Home Page Menu

Similar presentations

OK

2-1 Copyright © 2006 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited prepared by: Sujata Madan McGill University Fundamentals of Corporate Finance Third Canadian Edition.

2-1 Copyright © 2006 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited prepared by: Sujata Madan McGill University Fundamentals of Corporate Finance Third Canadian Edition.

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on natural disasters Ppt on strategic brand management Ppt on history of australia timeline Ppt on nuclear family and joint family images Ppt on economic and labour force in india Ppt on burj khalifa download By appt only movie device Ppt on job evaluation process Ppt on bond length trend Ppt on social entrepreneurship