Presentation on theme: "‘European Union OSH Policy and Regulatory Framework in the Extractive Industries Matthew Heppleston International Conference on Occupational Health and."— Presentation transcript:
1‘European Union OSH Policy and Regulatory Framework in the Extractive Industries Matthew HepplestonInternational Conference on Occupational Health and Safety in Mines.Istanbul04th December 2014
2Structure of the presentation Strategic FrameworkEx post evaluationOSH in the Extractive IndustriesConclusion
3The EU Strategic Framework on Health and Safety at Work 2014-2020 Format is a Communication from the CommissionPublished in BrusselsNumber COM(2014) 332 final(Use your favourite web search engine)
4What are the main challenges? A stocktake of the previous strategy shows key challenges are common across the European union and require further policy action.Three major challenges identified:Implementation in Member StatesAging workforce, emerging or new risks, prevention of occupational diseasesTackling demographic change
5First challenge : How to improve the implementation record in MS? The scope and effectiveness of OSH management remains a challenge for micro and SMEs. Show lower levels of compliance with rules.Effective protection of workers’ health and safety has to be ensured in all workplaces regardless of size.Simpler, more efficient solutions that take into account the situation of micro and small enterprises:simplifying legislation where appropriate, andproviding tailored guidance and support to micro and small enterprises to facilitate risk assessment.There are different approaches to practical implementation of OSH legislation across the Member States. This is particularly relevant as regards the degree to which requirements are met in private companies and public-sector bodies, across different sectors of economic activity and across different sizes of companies.In most cases, the scope and effectiveness of OSH management remains a particular challenge for micro and small enterprises. Smaller establishments still tend to show lower levels of compliance with national and EU rules, and report fewer OSH management measures as compared with large establishments.The causes of this are multiple and range from inherent difficulty in respecting regulatory and administrative provisions, often due to a lack of directly available expertise, to a lack of awareness of obligations, absence of guidance or deficient enforcement. Compliance costs are also higher for SMEs in relative terms.Practical guides and materials on good practice to support implementation of OSH measures in SMEs. The online interactive risk assessment tool (OiRA) developed by EU-OSHA is a major contribution to facilitating SMEs’ compliance with OSH requirements.However, a more concentrated effort is needed at EU and national level. Policy-makers should consider the particular circumstances and limitations of micro and small enterprises when setting out and putting in place OSH regulatory measures. Policy-makers cannot assume that the obligations arising from OSH rules will be implemented equally by, or have the same relative costs to, large and small enterprises.
6Risk is not related to the size of the undertaking: How can we facilitate compliance with OSH legislation, particularly by micro and small enterprisesRisk is not related to the size of the undertaking:Small enterprises may have high risk activities e.g. foundries, machine shops, construction work etc. Risk relates to the activity being performed and is also a dynamic process which needs to be kept under ongoing review: Need to help SME to better understand their obligations of risk assessment (i.e. it is not the end point) and how it is used in a process which leads onto effective risk control.Read slide contents then add:The causes of failure to comply are multiple and range from inherent difficulty in respecting regulatory and administrative provisions, often due to a lack of directly available expertise, to a lack of awareness of obligations, absence of guidance or deficient enforcement. In relative terms with respect to turnover compliance costs are also more significant for SMEs.One solution is the development of practical guides and materials on good practice to support SMEs’ implementation of OSH measures.The online interactive risk assessment tool (OiRA) developed by EU-OSHA is a major contribution to facilitating SMEs’ compliance with OSH requirements. However, a more concentrated effort is needed at EU and national level.Policy makers should consider the particular circumstances and limitations of micro and small enterprises when setting out or putting in place OSH regulatory measures. Policy makers cannot assume that the obligations arising from OSH rules will be implemented equally by, or have the same cost to, large and small enterprises.
7Second challenge: aging workforce, emerging or new risks, prevention of occupational diseases Issues with stress, ergonomic risks and moving loads as well as anxiety and depression are by far the most often mentioned health problems caused or worsened by work (Euro Barometer survey 2014).Industrial application of new technologies and new work organization, despite their obvious benefits, can entail risks (e.g. nano, bio and green technologies)it is necessary to gather and evaluate sound scientific evidence, to identify how emerging new risks can best be addressed.Occupational ill-health, including diseases caused or aggravated by adverse working conditions, puts a heavy burden on workers, companies and social security systemsAccording to a recent Eurobarometer survey, workers consider stress to be one of the main occupational risks (53%), followed by ergonomic risks (repetitive movements or tiring or painful positions (28%)) and lifting carrying or moving loads on a daily basis (24%)While many new technologies and innovations in work organisation have substantially improved well-being at work and working conditions, effective prevention of work-related diseases requires anticipating potential negative effects of new technologies on workers’ health and safety.The industrial application of new technologies leads to new products and processes, which need to be sufficiently tested and checked in order to ensure that they are safe and do not represent major hazards for consumers and workers.Nanomaterials are one example, as they may possess unique properties which may require new toxicity testing methods and risk prediction tools from the product development phase onwards, to properly consider safety aspects.At the same time, non-legislative action was taken, including dissemination of information, exchange of good practice and the launch of bi-annual pan-European awareness-raising campaigns by EU OSHA.
8The assessment of new emerging risks. Second challenge: aging workforce, emerging or new risks, prevention of occupational diseases.(continued)Identify ways to promote the physical and psychological health of older workers.Changes in work organisation through IT developments could allow more flexible and interactive working.Raise awareness of: psychosocial and mental health disorders, occupational cancers, lung diseases, skin diseases, asthma and other chronic conditions, ergonomics and musculoskeletal disorders.The assessment of new emerging risks.Based on scientific evidence, the results will be crucial parts of the ex post evaluation of current OSH legislation.Changes in work organisation brought about by information technology developments, in particular those that allow for constant connectivity, open up enormous possibilities for flexible and interactive work processes.There is also increasing workforce diversity, as reflected in new atypical contractual arrangements and work patterns, and a higher job turnover associated with shorter job assignments, especially for younger workers..Specific attention should be given to addressing the impact of changes in work organisation in terms of physical and mental health. In particular, women can face specific risks, such as musculoskeletal disorders or specific types of cancer, as a result of the nature of some jobs where they are over-represented.Major efforts were made to prevent occupational diseases and new or emerging risks. EU legislation was put in place to regulate chemicals, with the aim of ensuring a high level of protection for human health and the environment (REACH and CLP ), as well as addressing exposure to electromagnetic fields
9Third challenge: Tackling demographic change The EU population is becoming older and the working population is also ageing.In order to ensure sustainable social security, an extension of working life is necessary. This will require appropriate working conditions throughout the entire working life.Successfully prolonging working careers depends on appropriate adaptation of workplaces and work organisation, including working time, workplace accessibility and workplace interventions targeted at older workers.Reintegration and rehabilitation measures allowing for early return to work after an accident or disease are needed to avoid early exclusion from the labour market.The EU population is becoming older, with the number of people aged 60 and over in the EU increasing by more than two million every year.The working population is also ageing, as the proportion of older workers in employment increases relative to that of younger workers.According to Eurostat population projections (Europop 2010), the working population aged between 55 and 64 in the EU-27 is expected to increase by about 16 % between 2010 and 2030.Sound health and safety for workers is necessary for a sustainable working life and active and healthy ageing, especially in light of the ageing working population and the extension ofworking life. This requires the creation of a safe and healthy environment, throughout the working life of an increasingly diversified workforce. The promotion of a culture ofprevention is essential to achieving this.Successfully prolonging working careers depends strongly on appropriate adaptation of workplaces and work organisation, including working time, workplace accessibility and workplace interventions targeted at older workers.The concept of "Life time employability" should also be developed to cope with workers’ changing capabilities because of ageing.In addition, reintegration and rehabilitation measures allowing for early return to work after an accident or disease are needed to avoid the permanent exclusion of workers from the labour market.
10Key Strategic Objectives: Actions will be implemented or developed in close collaboration with member States, social partners and other stakeholders.Progress in delivering the action plan will be the subject of systematic monitoring and evaluation.Results will feed into the evaluation of OSH legislation.7 key tasksIn order to respond in a holistic, cross-thematic way to the three challenges identified above, the Commission proposes a range of actions to be implemented or developed in close collaboration with Member States, social partners and other stakeholders, grouped under seven key strategic objectives.The extent to which these objectives are met and progress in delivering the action plan will be the subject of systematic monitoring and evaluation, and will be taken into account as part of the evaluation of OSH legislation.
11Key Strategic Objectives: 7 key tasks 1. Further consolidate national strategies 2.Facilitate compliance 3. Better enforcement in Member States 4. Simplify existing legislation 5. Aging workforce, new risks, diseases 6. Improve statistical data 7. Coordinate EU and international effortsThe coordinating role of the EU is widely recognised and seen as a credible reference.The evaluation of the EU OSH Strategy showed that 27 Member States have put in place national OSH strategies in line with the EU Strategy.A summary analysis of national strategies shows that they generally reflect the priorities set out in the EU Strategy, while adapting them to the relevant national context. In most MemberStates, stakeholders at national level emphasised the role of the EU OSH Strategy in putting OSH high on the national political agenda and influencing national decision-making processes in this area. However, there is scope for a stronger and more systematic EU role in supporting the implementation of national strategies, through policy coordination, mutual learning and the use of EU funding. Member States are invited to consider reviewing their national strategies in light of the new EU-OSH strategic framework, in close consultation with relevant stakeholders, including social partners.
12Strategic FrameworkEx post evaluationOSH in the Extractive IndustriesConclusion
13Ex-post evaluation OSH - general New five-yearly exercise under the OSH Framework Directive 89/391/EEC.First exercise covering period 2007 to 2012.Evaluation of 24 EU Directives on health and safety at work according to relevance, effectiveness, coherence.Commission report by the end of 2015 at the latest.
1424 EU Directives concerned (1) Directive 89/391/EEC on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work (Framework Directive)- Workplaces Directive (89/654/EEC);-Work equipment Directive (2009/104/EC);- Personal protective equipment Directive (89/656/EEC);- Manual handling of loads Directive (90/269/EEC);- Display screen equipment Directive (90/270/EEC);- Chemical agents Directive (98/24/EC);- Carcinogens and mutagens Directive (2004/37/EC);- Asbestos Directive (2009/148/EC);- Biological agents Directive (2000/54/EC);- Construction sites Directive (92/57/EEC);
1524 EU Directives concerned (2) - Safety and/or health signs at work Directive (92/58/EEC);- Pregnant workers Directive (92/85/EEC);- Mineral-extracting industries through drilling Directive (92/91/EEC);- Surface and underground mineral-extracting industries Directive (92/104/EEC);- Fishing vessels Directive (93/103/EC);- Medical treatment on board vessels Directive (92/29/EEC);- Explosive atmospheres Directive (1999/92/EC);- Physical agents (vibration) Directive (2002/44/EC);- Physical agents (noise) Directive (2003/10/EC);- Physical agents (electromagnetic fields) Directive (2004/40/EC);- Physical agents (artificial optical radiation) Directive (2006/25/EC);- Fixed-duration employment relationship or a temporary employment relationship Directive (91/383/EEC);- Young workers Directive (94/33/EC);
16Ex-post evaluation – main elements for final Commission report National implementation reports –Commission Decision C(2011) 9200 defines the structure and questionnaire to be followed by Member States (all reports received by now)Independent study by an external consortium – due May 2015Commission's own experience with Directives
17Ex-post evaluation – main tasks Task 1 : Mapping of the practical implementation.Task 2: Evaluation according to the criteria of relevance, effectiveness and coherence.Task 3 : Recommendations.
18Ex-post evaluation – actors involved Advisory Committee for Safety and Health at Work (ACSH) Working Party on Evaluation of OSH Directives.Inter-Service Steering Group (ISSG) with representatives from 13 Commission DGs, the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) and the European Agency for Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound) agencies.All deliverables of the study are discussed in detail within ACSH and ISSG.
19Ex-post evaluation - state of play 2nd interim report received in June 2014.3rd interim report expected November 2014.Validation seminar 9th December 2014.Draft final report due February 2015.Final report due May 2015.Commission report due end 2015.Review of EU OSH Strategic Framework in 2016
20Social DialoguePlay an important role in designing and implementing OSH policiesCan assist in innovative solutions to reach micro and SME'sTripartite Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work and the European social dialogue structures have a key role in this respectIn accordance with the Treaty provisions, EU social partners play an important role in designing and implementing OSH policies and in promoting a safe and healthy environment in Europe. EU social partners have shown the capacity to find responses which meet both workers’ and companies’ interests, and they have directly contributed to implementing EU strategies in this area.EU social partner agreements (e.g. the multi-sector agreement on crystalline silica and sectoral agreements on the use of sharp instruments in the healthcare sector and on working conditions in the maritime sector), implemented autonomously or through legislation, and other social partner initiatives have a direct impact on workers’ safety and health.The Commission will continue to support the work of EU social partners and their national affiliates in relation to OSH policies under their autonomous work programmes. It invites social dialogue committees to consider how to effectively reach micro and small enterprises and to develop innovative OSH solutions.The EU social partners are also invited to contribute to the on-going evaluation of the EU legislative acquis.There is a need to improve synergies between the contributions of the EU social dialogue at cross-industry or sectoral level and the implementation of EU strategic priorities on OSH, while fully respecting the autonomy of the social partners.It is essential to ensure ownership of the present EU Strategic Framework by social partners, including by involving them in the design and implementation of specific initiatives at EU, national, local and workplace level.The tripartite Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work and the European social dialogue structures should play a key role in this respect.
21Structure of the presentation Strategic FrameworkEx post evaluationOSH in the Extractive IndustriesConclusion
22Advisory Committee and the SWP COUNCIL DECISION of 22 July 2003 setting up an Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work(2003/C 218/01)The Committee shall have the task of assisting the Commission in the preparation, implementation and evaluation of activities in the fields of safety and health at work. This task shall cover the public and the private sectors of the economy.(Article 5 (1)). Within the Committee, there shall be three interest groups, made up of representatives of national governments, trade unions and employers' organisations respectively.(Article 6(4)), set up a standing working party made up of 5 experts for each interest group, to deal, on a regular basis, with questions relating to safety and health at work in the mining and other extractive industries.
23ACSH Standing Working Party Mandate for 2013-2015 Provide advice and support to the Committee to achieve its tasks with reference to the mining and other extractive industries; andSubmit draft opinions for adoption by the Committee on future Community initiatives which affect safety and health at work in the mining and other extractive industries.Specific tasks of the Standing Working Party (SWP):Cooperation with the SSDC EIContinue to ensure close cooperation with the European Social Partners in the Sectoral Social Dialogue Committee, Extractive Industries (SSDC EI)
242. Promoting the exchange of information with the EU Member States on aspects related to the health and safety of workers in the mining and other extractive industries sectors, e.g. through the organisation of workshops or meetings with participation of experts from the individual Members States. Specific areas of concern include:Occupational health related issuesGeneral safety of machinery and vehiclesAutomisation and collision protectionMine rescueExtraction through drillingUnconventional gas extractionUnderground carbon storageOffshore oil and gas
253. Accidents:Continue to evaluate improvements to be made in areas of: Worker qualifications, aging workforce, subcontractors and self-employed persons, accidents and their causesCollection and communication of best practice examples in the fields of: Risk analysis and assessment, incl. human factors, analysis of near misses4. Advising the Commission on cooperation with other countries in respect to health and safety in the mining and the extractive industries sectors.
265. Continue to provide comments on Commission draft legislative acts and to give advice on aspects and regulatory measures discussed in the Advisory Committee which have a significant impact on the health and safety of workers in the mining and other extractive industries. Requests for such advice will be forwarded via the Bureau.(E.g. Nitrous oxides, carbon monoxide)
27Evidence-based policy making Shaped by evidenceTackling real problemsSetting clear long-term objectivesGood data – robust analysis
28Communication and information. Success of any OSH policy depends upon effectiveness of communicationNeed innovative approach to media disseminationEU-OSHA plays a crucial rolehttps://osha.europa.eu/The success of any OSH policy depends largely on the effectiveness of the communication channels and tools used to reach the various players concerned, from policy makers to workers themselves.Media such as the internet, online applications and social networks provide a range of possible tools to be further explored that may be more effective than conventional approaches in reaching younger workers.The Commission will encourage wider stakeholder involvement, including social partners, OSH experts, representatives of micro and small enterprises and professional associations, in implementing OSH legislation.EU-OSHA plays a crucial role in collecting and disseminating relevant information on OSH, facilitating the exchange of good practice and developing awareness-raising campaigns and thus contributing to more efficient implementation of OSH policy at EU level.EU-OSHA’s development of an OSH good practices database will contribute to better implementation of OSH policies by companies. They will continue to carry out pan-European campaigns to raise awareness on OSH issues, while ensuring better interaction using social media.
29Conclusion: The EU strategic framework will meet the challenges and help seize the opportunities from having good OSHImproving prevention is a business enabler that pushes companies to perform better.Investment costs in prevention can be used to make a contribution to achieving company objectives.Good prevention becomes a key part of corporate culture.Prevention is not only about legal compliance, it gives a competitive advantage and improves business performance.Final message:We need to move away from the prevalent idea in many quarters that health and safety is a costly exercise that reduces the bottom line.Instead we should see good worker health in a different light whereby it becomes a cherished objective that will enable companies to be more competitive.
30Thank you for your attention and let's keep working healthily