Presentation on theme: "Pension Reform and Financial Markets: Encouraging Households Savings for Retirement Anita Tuladhar International Monetary Fund June 2007 Conference on."— Presentation transcript:
Pension Reform and Financial Markets: Encouraging Households Savings for Retirement Anita Tuladhar International Monetary Fund June 2007 Conference on International Forum on Pension Reform: Exploring the Link to Labor and Financial Market Reforms The views expressed herein are those of the author and should not be attributed to the IMF, its Executive Board, or its management.
Background Rapidly ageing populations Unsustainable pension system and public finances in the long run Introduction of funded pensions system with mandatory private individual account and voluntary supplemental accounts, including in the region. – 1998 (Hungary, Kazakhstan); – 1999 (Poland); – 2001 (Latvia); – 2002 (Croatia, Estonia, Bulgaria); – 2003 (Russia); – 2005 (Macedonia, Slovakia); Shifting of responsibility for old-age income to households (by working more or higher financial savings)
Question: How to encourage household financial savings for retirement? Outline of this presentation: Examination of household financial savings – in particular, pension savings in some emerging and mature markets Factors affecting pension fund savings – Descriptive analysis using cross country data – Empirical analysis using more detailed pension fund data from Latin America. Policy implications for pension fund regulations
Household balance sheets: Share of financial assets in total wealth varies considerably.
Household balance sheets: Share of liquid assets in financial assets significantly larger in emerging markets.
Household balance sheets (contd.) The low share of pension fund savings also observed in the OECD.
Factors Affecting Pension Fund Assets: A Cross-Country Comparison
Pension fund assets in non-OECD countries remains relatively low.
Household savings 1. Level 2. Composition Macroeconomic conditions Income Wealth Real Interest Rates Inflation Unemployment Alternative Income Sources Public pensions (features and financing) Public transfers Household size Demographics Dependency ratio Preferences Financial Market Development Investment Opportunities Liquidity constraints Theoretical foundations on determinants of household savings
Per Capital Income: Pension fund savings are positively correlated with income levels.
Demographics: An older population or a faster pace of ageing Is not related to significantly higher pension fund savings
Alternative income sources: Public pension policy affects incentives to save in pension funds.
Alternative income sources: Generosity of public pensions likely reduces incentives to save in pension funds.
Pension Reforms: The maturity of the mandatory funded system is a significant determinant of the size of pension fund savings.
Financial market development: Pension fund savings shows a strong positive relation with financial market development. Direction of causality?
Financial market development: Pension fund savings are inversely related to financial market volatility. Market stability or preference for safer assets?
Financial market development: Pension fund savings are inversely related to risk adjusted returns in the equity market. Investment limitations or lack of deep liquid markets?
Empirical analysis Question: What factors enhance participation and pensions savings? Equations: 1. Change in pension fund participation = f (fund performance, years since reform, change in income, change in unemployment rate) 2. Change in pension fund assets per participant = f (fund performance, change contribution rate, change in income, rates of return on alternative investments) Data: – Pension fund data: FIAP on Latin American countries – Macroeconomic data: WEO – Financial Market data: IFS, World Development Indicators, Bloomberg Unbalanced Panel Data with 8 countries
Key Factors and Challenges to Pension Fund Savings Structural factors limit pension fund coverage – high unemployment rate – low income levels Pension savings on a voluntary basis low reflecting – still generous public pension system – level of financial sector development that limits investment opportunities or low financial awareness thereof, or – myopia Improved performance on pension funds encourage savings Other variables: savings incentives, other income sources, demographic factors
Policy Implications Enhancing coverage of pension income: – creates a need for non-contributory social safety net for retirees (minimum public pensions or the zero pillar) – make pension fund savings mandatory or require automatic enroll enrollment as default option to improve participation In CEC’s generally, participation to funded pensions is designed as a carve-out of existing public pension contribution which is mandatory for younger workers. (~20 yrs for SVK, EST, MKD, HUN, ~30 yrs POL and LVA, ~40 yrs CRA, BLG, all for KZK) – awareness/financial literacy
Policy Implications Regulations for improving fund performance/net risk- adjusted returns: – Investment in an optimum portfolio: regulations on asset allocation. For eg - shift from quantitative investment limits to prudent person rule or loosen tight regulations taking into consideration the development of local securities markets regulations on guarantees: For eg – minimum guaranteed return relative to industry – Tax incentives on voluntary pension savings – Minimizing fees and costs: regulations on fees, industry structure
Pension portfolios mostly in government bonds, reflecting both regulatory restrictions and lack of investment opportunities
Pension portfolios are shifting from bank deposits towards capital markets and international investments
Investment limits: Need to enable diversification, and also allow life-cycle investing
Policy Implications Gradual easing of investment limits, especially on foreign investments – facilitates diversification gains especially in lack of domestic investments, limits foreign exchange market volatility Public debt management: – Longer term instruments, inflation hedge, establishing liquid benchmark instruments, – ensuring pension funds don’t become captive markets for government financing that provides cheap financing. Measures to strengthen capital market development – Privatization, increasing available investment instruments, corporate governance regulations to improve supply – Liquidity of these instruments also important
Minimum Return Guarantees (MRG): Significantly affects asset allocation and leads to herding behavior Relative to the Pension Industry – Kazakhstan, Poland, Croatia, Slovakia Relative to a benchmark – Hungary No guarantees – Bulgaria, Latvia, Estonia, Macedonia If MRG invoked, requires paying up from reserves, guarantee funds, etc.
Regulations on Guarantees: Flexibility in parameters of Minimum Return Guarantees, including setting of benchmark and portfolio choice
Other considerations: Tax incentives for voluntary savings not very effective for lower income and liquidity constrained individuals. No evidence of an increase in overall savings while mixed evidence of impact on composition of savings Effectiveness of tax incentives depend on the substitutability of different savings alternatives. Non- substitutability could arise from the motivation for – (i) precautionary savings if liquidity constrained – (ii) bequest to heirs Strong distributional effects with benefits accruing to older and richer individuals who face higher marginal tax rates. Fiscal costs
Industry structure: trending towards consolidation requiring a balance between competition in returns and scale economies to keep costs low
Minimizing fees and costs are important to ensure high net returns High fixed costs has more distributional impact on low- income savers. Centralization of basic services with scale economies such as account management, collections. This is already the case in most CECs. Minimizing costs from regulatory burden (for reserves, reporting, etc) and initial marketing costs. Regulatory ceilings for fees on contributions/assets which decline over time as asset size grows. Balance the costs with high concentration in the industry.
Financial Awareness Financial education and awareness particularly if given choice of portfolio Greater need if low-income savers Dynamic default portfolio for passive investors Public information including availability of simulation models to analyze potential net replacement rates at retirement Easy access to account information Transparency and Accountability of pension funds – Publication of investment results and financial statements
Conclusions Share of pension savings in household balance sheets are relatively small but growing rapidly. Factors affecting pension fund savings – Pension reform, mandatory savings, fund performance, – Macro/Structural factors – Financial sector development Policy implications for pension fund regulations – Enhancing coverage through mandatory forms of savings, default rules and other social safety nets – Enhancing net risk-adjusted returns through increasing flexibility for diversification gains, – Reducing costs by harnessing economies of scale and minimizing other burdens – Investor protection through information and education