Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Introduction to Silicon Detectors E.G.Villani STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Particle Physics Department 1.

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Introduction to Silicon Detectors E.G.Villani STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Particle Physics Department 1."— Presentation transcript:

1 Introduction to Silicon Detectors E.G.Villani STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Particle Physics Department 1

2 Outlook Part I : Introduction to physics of Si and detection Part II: Examples of detectors Conclusions 2

3 Introduction The Si detection chain 3 Sensing/ Charge creation Charge transport and collection Conversion Signal processing Data TX E Si physical propertiesSi device propertiesSi device topologies properties Silicon Detector physics: Silicon Physical and Electrical properties Charge Transport Mechanisms Detection principles Detector examples: Conversion - pn junction Microstrips MAPS Detector system issues: Detection efficiency Power all the boxes of the detection chain process based upon Silicon 12

4 Element of IV group in the periodic table The crystalline structure is diamond cubic (FCC), with lattice spacing of 5.43 A Each atom is surrounded by 4 neighbors Polysilicon consists of small Si crystals randomly oriented; in α-Si there is no long range order. Apart from its abundance, the key to success of Si is related to its oxide SiO 2, an excellent insulator (BV ~ 10 7 V/cm). *Micro crystals but the flexible bond angles make SiO 2 effectively an amorphous: its conductivity varies considerably (charge transport in SiO 2 via polaron hopping between non-bonding oxygen 2p orbitals) Silicon properties After Oxygen, Silicon is the 2 nd most abundant element in Earth’s crust (>25% in mass) Si 1.48A 4

5 Silicon electrical properties 5 * The appearance of Energy BAND GAP, separating CB and VB (semiconductor) * The 6 CB minima are not located at the center of 1 st Brillouin zone, Indirect BAND GAP CB VB Silicon Band structure The electronic band structure can be obtained by solving many-body SE in presence of periodic potential of the crystal lattice: Bloch functions ~ a wave associated with free motion of electrons modulated by the periodic solution u n,k. The energy E is periodic in k so is specified just within the 1 st unit cell of the reciprocal lattice (the Brillouin zone).

6 The indirect BG of Si requires higher energy for charge excitation, because energy and momentum must be conserved (Phonon-assisted pair creation/recombination)  In Si an average of 3.6 eV is required for pair creation Ph  Q~10 7 m -1  Q~10 10 m -1  a 6 Silicon electrical properties

7 The detailed band structure is complicated: usually quasi-equilibrium simplifications are sufficient to study the charge transport. Assuming that the carriers reside near an extremum, the dispersion relationship E(k) is almost parabolic: Under the assumptions of small variation of the electric field, the carrier dynamics resembles that one of a free particle, with appropriate simplifications. The effective mass approximation takes into account the periodic potential of the crystal by introducing an effective carrier mass ( averaged over different longitudinal and transverse masses). The lower the mass, the higher mobility (µ  1/m*) Similar approach used to calculate the E(k) for phonons. 7

8 Silicon electrical properties The carrier density is calculated from: The density of states g(E); The Fermi distribution function F(E); At equilibrium the carrier density in CB and VB is obtained by integrating the product: The density of states g D (E) depends on the dimension In intrinsic Si a creation of e in CB leaves behind a hole in VB, that can be treated as an e with positive charge and mobility of the band where it resides In pure room temperature about 1 every atoms is ionized CB VB *Fermi level: energy 50% occupancy 8

9 Silicon electrical properties Conduction of Si T = 300K: σ = q(μ n +μ p ) n i = 3.04x10 -6 mho-cm ->329 kOhm-cm By adding atoms of dopants, which require little energy to ionize( ~10’s mEV, so thermal ambient temp is enough) we can change by many orders of magnitude the carrier concentration. Doping concentration: to cm -3 In crystalline Si ~ 5*10 22 atoms cm -3 In equilibrium the relationship between carrier concentration and E is the same as in the intrinsic case: 9

10 Charge transport Charge transport: The charge transport description relies on semi-classical Boltzmann Transport Equation (BTE, continuity equation in 6D phase space) The distribution function f(r,k) can be approximated near equilibrium: equilibrium Near equilibrium k0 Q conservation P conservation E conservation 10

11 Charge transport Under (many) simplifying assumptions the 1 st moment of BTE gives the Drift Diffusion model (DD, in many textbooks ‘The semiconductor equations’): DD expresses momentum conservation: it becomes invalid when sharp variation in energy of carriers occur (due to steep electric field gradient as in deep submicron devices)  When feature size is 0.’sμm the DD model becomes invalid: higher moments required to express energy conservation (hydrodynamic/Quantum transport/MC…computational electronics) Diffusion term Drift term 11 Even in low charge injection regime, a small E renders the drift term >> diffusion term

12 Detection principles When a charged particle penetrates in matter, it will interact with the electrons and nuclei present in the material through the electromagnetic force: the charged particle feels the EM fields of nuclei and electrons and undergoes elastic collisions. If the particle has 1 MeV energy or more, like in nuclear phenomena, the energy is large compared to the binding energy of the electrons in the atom: to first approximation, matter can be seen as a mixture of free electrons and nuclei at rest. Maximum energy transfer in the elastic collision: collisions with nucleus the particle loses little energy, its momentum can be changed remarkably collisions with electrons the particle can transfer large energy to electrons (which can have enough energy to travel macroscopic distances)  most of the energy loss due to collisions with electrons, most of change of direction due to collisions with nuclei 12

13 Detection principles Silicon detectors are commonly used in HEP (i.e. E > 1 GeV) used to localise charged particle trajectories by stacking them onto several layers  Semiconductor detectors are mostly based on Ionization: the detection of electron–hole pairs created in the semiconductor material by ionising radiation. Advantage of semiconductors detectors compared to gas detectors: The amount of energy needed to produce free pair of charge ( around 1/10 th in semiconductors compared to gas) Higher density of semiconductor means higher charge signal; High carrier mobility can improve radiation hardness; Very well developed semiconductor technology implies higher reliability and lower cost; Can be operated at room temperature; 13

14 Detection processes A: Ionization: by imparting energy to break a bond, electrons are lifted from VB to CB then made available to conduction. Most exploited concept ( ionization chambers, microstrip, hybrid pixels, CCD, MAPS…) B: Excitation: Charge or lattice (acoustic or optical phonons) some IR detectors, bolometer 14 VB CB Quantized levels

15 Detection principles 15 Ionization energy loss (/ density) : Bethe formula for charged particles through matter due to interaction with electrons 0.2 <  < 1

16 Detection principles 16 Ionization energy loss (/ density) : Bethe formula + corrections Z: charge of particle  : density of material  : relativistic parameter Ar: relative atomic weight I: mean excitation potential T max : max energy transfer  : density correction term c: speed of light  Bethe formula valid if velocity of particle is larger than orbital electrons velocity Nuclear stopping dominates low energy collisions Losses due to relativistic stretch, bremsstrahlung emissions

17 Detection principles In Silicon a Minimum Ionization Particle releases  eV/  m the average energy required to produce electrons /holes pairs in Silicon is 3.62 eV  Approximately an average of 108 electrons / hole pairs generated in Silicon /  m A typical wafer Silicon is  300  m thick ->  32,000 electrons / hole pairs on average generated in a standard thickness size Silicon detector by a MIP 17

18 Detection principles Whilst the Bethe formula describes the average energy loss of charged particles through matter, one has to consider also the fluctuations of such energy loss by ionization to estimate the most probable value of energy loss.  These fluctuations in energy loss in thin (i.e. thin compared to the particle range) detectors, due to delta electrons, are described by a Landau probability density function MPV of energy loss normalized to the mean loss of a MIP In a typical 300 μm thick sensor: * electrons / holes pair generated on average * electrons / hole generated most probable 18

19 As the particle penetrates in the medium, its energy loss per unit length will change. The energy loss increases towards the end of the range. Close to the end it reaches a maximum and then abruptly drops to zero. This maximum of the energy loss of charged particles close to the end of their range is referred to in the literature as the ‘Bragg peak’.  For example, this is of particular importance for hadron therapy applications, where the aim is to maximise the energy deposited at a specific point within the human body and spare the neighbouring ones. Detection principles 19

20 Detection principles Electromagnetic interactions of Charged Particles: Electrons: excitation and ionisation of atoms along the very irregular trajectory. At higher energies, bremsstrahlung loss mechanism becomes important. For energies > 100 keV, electrons will lose about 2 MeV/cm multiplied by the density; Positrons: same behaviour of electrons, but after coming to rest, a positron will annihilate with electrons that are always present. This annihilation gives rise to a pair of back-to-back gamma rays of 511 keV. Exploited in PET. Protons: higher ionisation compared to electrons but less than alpha particles. Straight trajectory. The range in solids is of the order of 1 mm. Muons: very high energy muons can travel kilometres in matter before losing all energy Alpha particles: The energy loss of alpha particles is of the order of 1000 MeV/cm times the density of the medium. Range of only tens of microns in solids and a few centimeters in gases. Straight trajectory. 20

21 Detection principles Interactions of photons X-rays: photons in the energy range of 1 – 100 keV Gamma rays: photons of energy > 100 keV Photoelectric process: a photon undergoes an interaction with an atom and completely disappears. The energy of the photon is used to increase the energy of one of the electrons in the atom. The electron becomes free or there is Auger emission. Compton scattering: elastic collision between a photon and an electron. Pair production : If the energy of the photon is at least two times larger than the mass of an electron, the energy of the photon can be used to create an electron and positron pair in the nucleus electric field. 21

22 10 eV Detection principles Interactions of photons 1 keV 1 MeV1 GeV.1 TeV 22

23 Detection A MIP forms an ionization trail of radius R when traversing Si, creating ~ 100 e - /μm MIP charge density Low injection regime: The associated wavelength is much smaller than mean free path: Each charge is independent from each other; The dynamics of generated carriers does not require QM The generated charge is too small to affect the internal electric field Photoelectric charge density An optical power of -60dBm (= 1nW) of 1keV photons generates ~ 6*10 6 e-/μm High injection regime: Plasma effects The internal electric field can be affected by the generated charge 23

24 Half summary Under conditions of quasi stationary conditions non degenerate semiconductor not small feature size low injection … Sensing/ Charge creation Charge transport and collection Conversion E Si physical propertiesSi device properties Charge generation: Ionization: Small injection, QM not needed; Stopping power, average ionization energy, fluctuations Charge transport: Big devices, DD adequate; Small injection, electric field as static; Physical characteristics: Quasi equilibrium; Homogeneity; ‘Room’ temperature; Non degenerate Si; 24

25 Outlook Part I : Introduction to physics of Si and detection Part II: Examples of detectors Conclusions

26 Detectors examples Strip / pixel detectors HEP, Scientific applications Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors (MAPS) Consumer and scientific applications 26 Charge Coupled Devices (CCD) Imaging, scientific and consumer applications PN junction  The working principle of almost all present-day electronic devices is based on the pn semiconductor junctions. The same principle is the basis of the use of semiconductors as detectors for ionising radiation.

27 Detectors examples 27  Almost all HEP experiments use Si detectors: The high density track region usually covered by pixel detectors; by strip at larger radius (cost reason)

28 Signal conversion: The pn junction Homojunction: two pieces of same semiconductor materials with different doping levels: In thermal equilibrium, the Fermi level equalizes throughout the structure thermal diffusion of charge across the junction leaves a depleted region, with the ionized dopants : an electric potential Φ, and a field F, develops the charge concentration depends exponentially on Φ: by applying a small voltage to decrease the barrier, the charge increases exponentially by applying a voltage to increase the barrier, the depleted region Increases Unidirectionality of current characteristics In equilibrium J = 0 28

29 Signal conversion: The pn junction when charge is generated in the depleted region is swept across by the electric field sustained by the ionized dopants and the biasing.  PN junction as signal converter: capacitor with a F across A device with a large depleted region can be used to efficiently collect radiation generated charge (Solid state ionization chamber) the capacitance is a source of noise: lower capacitance (large depleted region) increases the S/N W 29 Depletion width Capacitance

30 Signal conversion: The pn junction  To achieve large W high field region: Low doping (high resistivity) Large voltages typical values: N a = cm -3,N d = W (0V) ≈ 23 μm W(100V) ≈ 360 μm Depletion voltage vs. resistivity 30

31 Detectors examples Array of long silicon diodes on a high resistivity silicon substrate A strong F in the high resistivity Si region helps collect charge efficiently.  The high resistivity Si is not usually used in mainstream semiconductor industry: Hybrid solution: detector (high resistivity) connected (wire/bump-bonded) to the readout electronic (low resistivity) (high res) V bias ~100’sV F Strip detectors 80μm ≈ 300μm 31 Q transversal diffusion

32 Detectors examples ATLAS SCT 4 single-sided p-on-n sensors 2x2 sensors daisy chained Stereo angle 40 mrad Strip pitch 80 um 768 channels/side Binary RO Bias Voltage up to 500 V Operating temperature -2 C Space point resolution: rPhi 17um / z 50 um Power consumption: 5.6 W (initially ) to 10 W ( after 10y) Rad hard upto 2x10^14 1-MeV n eqv/cm Strip Sensors 12 RO ASIC ATLAS SCT RO ASIC (ABCD3TA) 128 channels/ASIC RAD-HARD DMILL technology ASICS glued to hybrid 40 MHz Ck

33 Detectors examples ATLAS SCT 61 m 2 of Si 6.3 * 10 6 channels 50 kW total power consumption 1 barrel -4 layers modules 2 endcaps -9 disks/each -988 modules 2 T solenoidal field 33

34 Detectors examples 34 ATLAS Tracker overview Pixel: (n+ on n) 1.8m 2, 80M channels SCT: 6.3M 61 m 2 channels TRT: 0.4M channels

35 Detectors examples 35 Barrel insertion in the ATLAS Cavern

36 Detectors examples 36

37 Detectors in operation 37

38 Detectors in operation 38

39 Detectors examples RO electronic 3T ( 3MOS) MAPS structure ≈1’s  m RO electronic MAPS detectors 39 2 D array of pixels  Monolithic solution: detector and readout integrated onto the same substrate

40 Detectors examples MAPS detectors  The charge generated in the thin active region moves by diffusion mainly: ‘Long’ collection time Small signal Low radiation hardness Complex circuit topologies allow DSP on pixels for low noise N ++ (low res) P ++ (low res) P + (low-med res) V bias ~V’s Mechanical substrate 100’s μm Active region ‘s μm Electronics 0.’s μm 40

41 Detectors examples Charge collection time (s) in MAPS vs. perpendicular MIP hit TPAC 1 pixel size 50x50 μm 2 Chip size ~1cm 2 Total pixels 28k >8Meg Transistors approximately 2000 m 2 of Silicon  pixels Example of MAPS detectors: 41  10 μW/pixel x = 10 7 W Assuming V cc =2V current consumption: 5*10 6 A

42 Radiation damage In HEP and space applications the detectors are exposed to high level of dose of radiation: LHC: 10’s Mrad (100kGy) over 10years of operation N.B.: 1 rad/cm 3 Si ~10 13 e/h pairs Lethal dose: 500 rad Total Body Irradiation 42

43 Radiation damage Radiation environment in LHC experiment TIDFluence 1MeV n eq. [cm years ATLAS Pixels50 Mrad1.5 x ATLAS Strips7.9 Mrad2 x CMS Pixels~24Mrad~6 x * CMS Strips7.5Mrad1.6 x ALICE Pixel250krad3 x LHCb VELO-1.3 x /year** All values including safety factors. 43

44 Radiation damage Microscopic effects: Bulk damage to Silicon : Displacement of lattice atoms Atoms scattered by incoming particles leave behind vacancies or atoms in interstitial positions (Frenkel pairs). Low energy particle ~ point defects High energy particles ~ cluster defects V I Vacancy + Interstitial E K >25 eV 44

45 Radiation damage Energy deposition Atoms displacement altered Lattice periodicity Band gap Spurious states The appearance of spurious band gap states affects the electro/optical characteristics of the device: Thermal generation of carriers (increased leakage current) Reduced recombination time ( quicker charge loss, reduced signal) Charge trapping Scattering Type conversion Altered Electrical characteristics Conduction band Valence band Band gap +++ Donor levels Acceptor levels generation recombination - compensation trapping 45

46 Radiation damage Macroscopic effects: Charge Collection Efficiency (CCE) is reduced by trapping Noise increases because of increase leakage current Depletion voltage increases because of type inversion MeV n-eq. 46

47 Radiation damage To increase the Radiation Hardness of Sensors: Operating conditions (cooler – lower leakage) Material engineering ( OFZ - Diamond detectors) Device engineering (n in n/p – 3D detectors) Electrodes in the bulk – lateral collection reduces the drift distance Lower depletion voltage – less power consumption difficult to manufacture 3D DDTC similar to 3D but easier to manufacture; also Better mechanical strength. n+ p+ F 47

48 The field of semiconductor detectors encompasses different fields: solid state physics, nuclear and particle physics, electrical engineering, … Some of the issues relevant to modern radiation semiconductor detectors: Development of new detection techniques based on novel and well established semiconductor material: ( phonon-based detectors, quantum detectors, compounds, low dimensional) Integration with electronics (monolithic solution to achieve more compactness and reduce cost) 3D structures Topologies optimization (power reduction is crucial for future large HEP experiments) Radiation hardness Conclusions 48

Download ppt "Introduction to Silicon Detectors E.G.Villani STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Particle Physics Department 1."

Similar presentations

Ads by Google