Presentation on theme: "Section 15.3: Slavery Dominates Politics"— Presentation transcript:
1Section 15.3: Slavery Dominates Politics Today’s Essential Question: How did slavery dominate national events after 1855?
2VocabularyRepublican Party – political party formed in 1854 to oppose slaveryunconstitutional – illegal because it violates the Constitutionarsenal – place where weapons are stored
3Check for Understanding What is today’s Essential Question?How have the goals of the Republican Party changed over time?What does it mean if the Supreme Court declares a law unconstitutional?Why would someone break into an arsenal?
4What We Already KnowAlthough the Whigs and Democrats were the two major political parties of the 1850s, there were other parties as well, such as the Know-Nothings.
5What We Already KnowAfter the failure of the Wilmot Proviso to ban slavery in the Mexican Cession, the Free Soil Party was formed to stop the spread of slavery into new territories.
6What We Already KnowThe Kansas-Nebraska Act led to widespread violence on the plains in 1854.
7The Republican Party Forms Created out of the problems caused by the Kansas–Nebraska ActThe Whig Party split; Northern Whigs joined Free Soilers and other slavery opponentsGained strength in the North as the Democrats were blamed for the violence in Kansas.
9What was the Republican Party’s main goal? To end slavery everywhere in AmericaTo return all blacks to AfricaTo stop the spread of slavery into the territoriesTo bring Canada and Mexico into the United States
1017. What issues led to the creation of the Republican Party? Choose all that are true!
1117. What issues led to the creation of the Republican Party? Northern Whigs leaving their party to join with other opponents of slaveryOpposition by James Buchanan to the Wilmot ProvisoThe emergence of Abraham LincolnProblems caused by the Kansas Nebraska ActChoose all that are true!
12Republican Candidate John C. Frémont First Republican presidential nomineeYoung, handsome, national hero for his explorations in the WestFavored admitting both California and Kansas as free states.Had no controversial record to defend.
13The Election of 1856Democrat nominee James Buchanan had taken no stand on the Kansas–Nebraska Act.Buchanan said little about slavery; his goal was to maintain the Union.He appealed to Southerners, the border states, and Northerners who were fearful of a civil war.
14The Election of 1856The Know-Nothing Party nominated former president Millard Fillmore ( ), but were divided over slavery.
15The Election of 1856Election results showed how strong the Republican Party was in the North, and that the nation was sharply split over slavery.
17Which of the following was NOT a candidate in the 1856 presidential election? Douglas of the Free Soil PartyFremont of the Republican PartyBuchanan of the Democratic PartyFillmore of the Know-Nothing Party
18What did the election results in 1856 reveal? Party differences were less sharply defined that in earlier elections.The influence of the Republican Party was declining in the North.The influence of the Democratic Party was declining in the South.The nation was sharply split over slavery.
19The Case of Dred ScottDred Scott was a slave whose owner took him to live in free territories, then returned to Missouri, a slave state.After his owner’s death, Scott sued for his freedom, but the Supreme Court ruled against him.
20Chief Justice Taney‘s Ruling As a Negro, Scott was not a U.S. citizen and could not sue in U.S courts.Slaveholders’ property rights were protected by the Fifth Amendment.Congress could not ban slavery anywhere, including the territories.
21Chief Justice Roger Taney‘s Ruling This decision made the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional.Southerners cheered the Court’s decision, while Many Northerners were outraged, but powerless.
2318. What was the Supreme Court ruling in the Dred Scott case? As a slave, Dred Scott was not a U.S. citizen.Only Congress could restrict the movement of slaves into the territories.Dred Scott was no longer a slave.Slave-owners could take their slaves everywhere, including free states and territories.The Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional.Choose all that are true!
24What consequences did the Dred Scott decision have for free blacks?
25Lincoln-Douglas Debates (1858) The Dred Scott decision angered Republicans.They claimed that Democrats wanted to open up the whole country to slavery.They planned to use this argument to challenge Stephen Douglas and other Democrats in the 1858 elections.
26Lincoln-Douglas Debates (1858) Abraham Lincoln was nominated by Illinois Republicans to run against Douglas for his U.S. Senate seat.In his first campaign speech, Lincoln expressed Republican fears that Democrats threatened to expand slavery across the whole country.
27Lincoln-Douglas Debates (1858) Lincoln warned, “A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure, permanently half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved—I do not expect the house to fall—but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing, or all the other.”
28Lincoln and Douglas Debates (1858) Lincoln called slavery was “a moral, a social and a political wrong,” but did not suggest abolishing slavery where it already existed, only that it should not be expanded.Both men believed in the superiority of whites over Negroes.Douglas argued for popular sovereignty as the most democratic method to do deal with slavery.
29Lincoln and Douglas Debates (1858) Lincoln: ‘I have no purpose to interfere with slavery in the states where it already exists. I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no desire to do so.’‘I have no intention of introducing political and social equality between the races. Their differences make it impossible to for them ever to live together as equals, and therefore I am in favor of my race having the upper position.’
30Lincoln-Douglas Debates (1858) ‘But the Negro is just as entitled to the rights mentioned in the Declaration of Independence as the white man.’‘The Negro is not my equal in color, and perhaps not in moral and intellectual development.’‘But in the right to eat the bread his labor produces without asking anyone else’s permission, he is my equal, and the equal of Sen. Douglas, and the equal of every man .’
31Lincoln and Douglas Debates (1858) Douglas won reelection, but Lincoln became a national figure and a leader in the Republican Party.
3319. What was the main issue in the Lincoln–Douglas debates? the Dred Scott rulingSouth Carolina's decision to secedeslavery in the territoriesthe trial of John Brown
34John Brown Attacks Harpers Ferry In 1859, John Brown planned to capture the U.S. arsenal at Harpers Ferry, Virginia, and use its weapons to start a slave uprising across the South.
35John Brown Attacks Harpers Ferry Brown’s group captured the arsenal, but no slaves joined the fight.
36John Brown Attacks Harpers Ferry The U.S. Marines captured Brown and six others, and ten men were killed.
37John Brown Attacks Harpers Ferry In 1859, John Brown planned to capture the U.S. arsenal at Harpers Ferry, Virginia, and use its weapons to start a slave uprising across the South.The U.S. Marines captured Brown and six others were captured, and ten men were killed.Brown’s group captured the arsenal, but no slaves joined the fight.Brown was tried and convicted for murder and treason, and was hanged.
38Reaction to John Brown and Harpers Ferry In the North, abolitionists mourned Brown’s death and called him a hero.Southerners were enraged by Brown’s actions and horrified by Northerners’ sympathetic reactions to his death.With the election of 1860 drawing near, the issue of slavery had raised sectional tensions to the breaking point.
4020. Why did John Brown attack the arsenal at Harpers Ferry? To seize the U.S. arsenal located thereTo call public attention to "Bleeding Kansas”To arm slaves with captured weaponsTo start a slave uprisingTo get weapons for South Carolina’s militiaChoose all that are true!
41Choose all that are true! 21. How did John Brown’s attack on Harper’s Ferry increase tensions between the North and the South?Southerners were enraged by Brown's actions.Northerners were horrified by Southern tributes honoring Brown.Southerners were horrified by Northern tributes honoring Brown.Some Northerners made a hero out of Brown for his actions against slavery.Some Southerners praised Brown for his violence against abolitionists.Choose all that are true!