Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Strategies for coping with SARS in the ED  Part 2; –Challenges and Lessons.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Strategies for coping with SARS in the ED  Part 2; –Challenges and Lessons."— Presentation transcript:

1 Strategies for coping with SARS in the ED  Part 2; –Challenges and Lessons

2 Overview  Controversies and challenges  SARS today  Lessons for the future  Conclusions

3 General Comments on Infectivity (WHO)  Basic R 0 (reproductive value) ~2-4  Estimate of R 0 for influenza = 10  83% of SARS patients did not transmit to anyone  Primarily transmitted in acute care hospitals (77%) and in HCW’s (44%)  20% attack rate for ED RN’s with unprotected exposure WHO/CDS/CSR/GAR/

4 General Comments on Infectivity (WHO)  Primary mode of transmission –Large droplet and direct mucous membrane (eyes/nose/mouth) –Transmission enhanced by close prolonged contact –Aerosolizing procedures seems to amplify transmission  Other? –Airborne? -occasional case that may be associated with large number of cases –Fomites? –Amoy Garden outbreak; enteric/airborne WHO/CDS/CSR/GAR/

5 Clinical Outcome  20% admitted to ICU  15% required mechanical ventilation  ~10% died –Influenza~ % –Avian influenza 15 to 70%  Increased risk of death or ICU admission if: –Increased age –Comorbidity Tsui et al. EID 2003; 9: ; Fowler et al. JAMA 2003; 290: ; Lew et al. JAMA 2003; 290:

6 Controversies and Challenges  Lack of transmission in ED’s after Mar 22- why? –natural history of disease;  able to tolerate masks  few required airway procedures –short stay –high compliance

7 Controversies and Challenges  Effectiveness of PPE?  Transmission in the setting of any precautions ; –SARS patients  22 HCW infected (1 for every 12 patients)  primarily airway care in critical care areas –SARS-2 – 129 patients  3 HCW infected (1 for every 43 patients)

8 Differences between SARS-1 and SARS-2  Added barriers –Double gloves, hair & foot covering, greens –Enhanced protection during intubation/cardiac arrest, etc.  HCW training and awareness  Practice issues –Minimize time in room –Minimize contact with patient –Medical therapy to reduce cough/vomiting –Minimize procedures that increase risk of droplets

9 Controversies and Challenges  Transmission “through” precautions often associated with unrecognized or “low risk” case - ? Compliance  Intubation; –perception of ineffectiveness of ppe led to recommendations for use of powered air purifying respirators (“PAPR”) hoods –much debate, conflict over who should perform procedures

10

11

12 Controversies and Challenges  Of ~ 50 SARS intubations (or bronchoscopy) 5 led to transmission to ~ 20 HCW’s  Several involved only partial precautions, unrecognized case and/or problems in practice  Clearly high risk procedure

13 Approach to Intubation/Airway Care  Performed by most skilled/experienced team available  Performed in the best available room  Anticipate and plan  Minimize cough, suction, using RSI if possible  No +ve pressure therapy, scavenge exhaled gases  Careful use of PPE especially undressing  Consider use of PAPR if available and familiar with it’s use

14 ED Design and Operational Issues  Implications for visitor policy and bed flow policies – avoid excessive crowding especially in corridors and curtained areas (consider max occupancy?)  Design implications – space and barriers, ventilation

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22 Mask-Fit Testing

23 Staff Training and Communications  Infection Control training  Awareness, cultural shift; –not just for rare events like SARS –ARO, c. difficile, TB  Can SARS do for resp droplets what HIV did for bodily fluids?  Receiving and distributing alerts and info 24/7 esp. with shift workers –Multiple points of reception –Use of Electronic comm, AND bulletin boards, word of mouth

24 Controversies and Challenges  Appropriate level of preparedness; –one travel case walking into an unprepared ED can set off an outbreak with billion $ impact –excessive measures are costly and encourage non-compliance –should we place everyone with fever and cough into droplet precautions? –should triage nurse be in ppe? –for how long?

25 SARS Today  Eliminated from global popn  Reservoirs in animals and lab sources  Much greater surveillance in China and HK make unannounced arrival unlikely  Vaccines in development  Therefore small but real risk of return, however most important as a prototype for other outbreaks (influenza) or bioterror

26 Conclusions  ED’s provide fertile ground for disease transmission  Require attention to system issues; –Overall ED design  hand-washing  individual care rooms and spacing –Adequate isolation rooms  en suite BR, resuscitation room with airborne protection –Avoid crowding due to excess pt’s/visitors

27 Conclusions  Adequate staff training in infection control policy and procedure, use of ppe  Focus on triage, case recognition  Communications vital; –receiving of disease alerts –transmitting info to staff

28 What do we do differently?  (Virtually) No Hallway stretchers  Equipment reviewed, changed  Selected use of open area stretchers  Strict visitor policy, control of WR  Better awareness and adherence to infection control practices  Reno to increase isolation resources  Challenges; –maintain vigilance!!! –Baseline precautions

29

30

31

32

33

34 The Future  Lessons learned; –4 Canadian provincial and federal expert panel reports –Some investments in public health –Staff training improvement spotty –System issues related to crowding unaddressed

35

36

37 Questions or more info


Download ppt "Strategies for coping with SARS in the ED  Part 2; –Challenges and Lessons."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google