Presentation on theme: "Lecture Note 3 Gendered Work in Time and Place"— Presentation transcript:
1Lecture Note 3 Gendered Work in Time and Place SOSC 102ULecture Note 3Gendered Work in Time and Place
2The Sexual Division of Labor in Preindustrial Europe (1) Agricultural Work:Men’s work: plow, threshed, harvest, build houses, hew timer, harrow, dug ditch, and cut hedgesWomen’s work: weed, harvest, raise domestic animals (milk, churn butter, make cheese and butcher these animals), make bread, beer, cloth and clothing.Manufacturing Work:Men in manufacturing substantially earned more than women and enjoyed more autonomy.Women’s workshops: most female labor in these workhouses were slaves of nobility or the monasteries or the wives and children of slaves. Others were serfs or prisons. They received their board and room in exchange for their labor. These women’s workshops became extinct before industrialization.Artisans: almost all artisans were men. They earned an income from the products they made and sold.
3The Sexual Division of Labor in Preindustrial Europe (2) Cottage industry (or putting-out system): before industrialization, women and children manufactured some goods at home through a system of cottage industry.Source: Cited from Gerhard Lenski, Jean Lenski, Patrick Nolan,Human Societies: An Introduction to Macrosociology (New York : McGraw-Hill, 1991), p. 228.
4The Industrial Revolution Major impact on the sexual division of labor: the changing economic role of a household—Family production was replaced by market production in which capitalists paid workers wages to produce goods in factories and mines….“Labor force”: people work for pay or actively seek paid work1. Wage workers2. Unemployed persons3. Nonemployed: not privileged classes who can be exempt from productive work but a growing group of unpaid workers. They cooked and cleaned for family members, raised children, cared for sick relatives, and provided social and emotional support to family, friends and community.“The distinction between paid work in the labor market and unpaid domestic work by the “nonemployed” has important consequences for gender inequality, because for the past 200 years, men have been more likely than women to belong to the labor force, and women have been more likely than men to be unpaid workers” (Padavic and Reskin, p. 20)
5Textiles Works in Halstead, England, 1825* * Based on Carol Adams, Paula Bartley, Judy Lown, Cathy Loxton, Under Control: Life in a Nineteenth-century Silk Factory (Cambridge University Press, 1983)Case study in Samuel Courtauld’s silk mill in 1825, Halstead, Essex (Southeast England)Compare the wages for men’s jobs compared with the pay for the women’s jobs (p. 17)
6Wages of Male Workers in Courtauld NumberWeekly Wages MALES11000 pounds per year Mill Manager (Also got 3 per cent of the profits)2615s-32s Overseers and clerks617s-25s Mechanics and engine drivers314s-21s Carpenters and blacksmiths15s Lodgekeeper1614s-15s Power loom machinery attendants and steamers1810s-15s Mill machinery attendants and loom cleaners55s-12s Spindle cleaners, bobbin stampers and packers, messengers, sweepers-7s-10s Watchmen5s-10s Coachmen, grooms and van driver382s-4s Winders114 Total Males
7Wages of Female Workers in Courtauld NumberWeekly Wages FEMALES410s-11s Gauze examiners9s-10s Female assistant overseers167s-10s Warpers9 Twisters6s-9s Wasters5895s-8s Weavers26s-7s Plugwinders834s-6s Drawers and doublers1882s-4s Winders899 Total Females1013 GRAND TOTAL WORK FORCE
8The Sexual Division of Labor between Paid and Unpaid Work (1) The labor force became increasingly male throughout the nineteenth century (the masculinization of labor force)Urbanization and the fall of women’s labor forceStatistics in the U. S.1840: 40% industrial workforce was contributed by women and children1890: only 17% of women was in the labor forceProtective labor laws: institutionalize the masculinization of labor force
9The Sexual Division of Labor between Paid and Unpaid Work (2) The interplay between gender and class inequality:Upper and middle-class family: The Ideology of Separate Spheres: Workplace vs. Family LifeBut labor force participation was a necessity for the poor and working-class women. The ideology of separate spheres hurt working-class wives, whose families need to be supported by double incomes. Many working-class women therefore took up the work such as doing piecework or taking in laundry, sewing, or boarders to earn money at home. The work usually has lower pay and longer working hour than a “real job”.The ideology changed after the 1970s, when the gap between men’s and women’s labor force participation rates narrowed considerably.
10QuestionAccording to Padavic and Reskin, women’s participation in unpaid domestic work (the nonemployed work) has serious consequence to gender inequality, would their status be improved by increasing their contribution to household income?
11Sexual Division of Labor in Late Imperial China (1)* * Based on Kathy L. M. Walker, “Economic Growth, Peasant Marginalization, and the Sexual Division of Labor in Early Twentieth Century China: Women’s Work in Nantong County, Modern China, Vol. 19, No. 3 (July, 1993),Nantong, a county in northwestern Shanghai.15th.—early 19th.centuries:The sexual division of labor in Nantong: men till, women weave.Raw cottonYarnCotton ClothspinweaveMen’s workWomen’s workSexual division of labor within a peasant’s household (the Nantong case, 16th. C.-19th. C.)
12Figures of “the men till, the women weave (男耕女織)” in China Wearing blue kerchiefs, women are busy with weaving, Cotton balls burst and they start to pick cotton, At market, the cotton cloth they have woven is very popular, Their products are well-respected, so are their customs. --Gu Lan Miao (preliminary translation by Jane Zhang)Francesca Bray, Technology and Gender: Fabrics of Power in Late Imperial China (Berkeley, University of California Press, 1997), p. 220.
13Sexual Division of Labor in Late Imperial China (2) Economic significance: Women’s cotton production geared the overall economic growth in China: cloth made in the Yangzi Delta district became the leader of cloth production in the country. These products were sold in northern, southern and inland market.Impact on women’s status: Women’s production for the market became crucial to family maintenance. However, women’s new “profitability” did not improve their position in the family. The income they generated was controlled not by the women themselves, but by the family head (the father, the husband or the father-in-law)
14Sexual Division of Labor in Late Imperial China (3) After the Opium War (1840s): the introduction of inexpensive foreign imported machine-spun yarn made peasant households could weave more cloth. But the foreign yarn changed the production process of cotton cloth.1. For weaving peasant families: adoption of machine yarn deepened their market dependency. Previously the wove the cotton grew locally, now they had to sell raw cotton formerly used for spinning to obtain the cash necessary to buy yarn. Peasants with insufficient land to provide (through the sale of harvested crops) for yarn purchase and for the expense of loom could not afford to weave. If they really wanted to weave, they had to obtain yarn on credit at usurious rates.2. For merchants: they could control raw materials and marketing. Merchants gained new leverage in determining both terms of trade and the type of cloth produced. These changes marked the beginning of a series of developments through which over the next decade Nantong’s merchant-industrial elite gained growing control over the forms and conditions of peasant production without undertaking its direct supervision.
15Sexual Division of Labor in Late Imperial China (4) Raw cottonYarn (spun in local factories or foreign imports)Cotton ClothSell to factoriesweaveWomen’s workMen and women’s workThese changes resulted from 1) expansion of rural industry; 2) growth of the cotton trade; 3) new modes of obtaining the rural surplus through the operation of usury-merchant capital.Also because the merchants could determine the terms and conditions of trade, they offered cloth producers with less than subsistence wage-equivalents. The peasants therefore had to make ends meet by incomes from both farming and weaving.
16Sexual Division of Labor in Late Imperial China (5) Impact on sexual division of labor: new pattern of sexual division of labor between men and women from the early 20th. Century:Women farmed and wove, while men moved into various forms of permanent, seasonal, or part-time wage work. When at home, if possible, the busiest farm seasons, men also engaged in farming and weaving. The change was a new method and strategy to forestall further land division so that cloth production and family subsistence could be maintained.
17Sexual Division of Labor in Late Imperial China (6) Was Nantong women’s status improved?“Despite the changes in their labor roles, women remained under the control of male family members and, by extension, the supervision of mothers-in-law who owed their position and primary allegiance to husbands and son. Even when women’s work became the mainstay of family subsistence, it was in major respects invisible since men controlled the marketing of the commodities and the income women generated.”“Related, the worst abuse of the family system—female infanticide, child marriage, contract prostitution, and the buying and selling of women—not only continued but in fact may have been on the rise.”
18The Women Issues in Developing Countries Today (1) 1. As western countries, those who are expected to do the unpaid domestic work in their homes are predominantly women;2. From the 1970s, women’s participation in the labor force has been increasing. Most of the growth has been in the informal sector of the economy where income, benefits, and job security are precarious;3. Women’s work is less valued than men’s work. Women’s work is paid less than men’s. Those doing unpaid domestic work receive lower prestige and power.
19The Women Issues in Developing Countries (2) Informal Sector: work under family business or family farms; self-employed work; sub-contracting piece-work (paid by productivity but not by wage—no guaranteed minimum income)Three-quarters of all workers in Africa and Asia and almost one-half of workers in Latin American are working in informal sector.Globalization: mobile capita investment from country to country; MNCs; Deregulation of state policies; migrant workers