Presentation on theme: "Great Lakes and Ohio River Division Program Overview"— Presentation transcript:
1 Great Lakes and Ohio River Division Program Overview US Army Corps of EngineersPresented by:Andy Borden, Don Johantges, and Misty JonesCincinnati, Ohio15 April 2014
2 LRD Value to the Nation FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT: $39.2B in cumulative Flood Damages Prevented thru 201211 to 1 ROIREGULATORY:14,000+ permits processed annuallyMILITARY PROGRAMS:$800M placement amount on average per year, dropping to ~$600M for FY15 and beyond (KY, IL, MI, OH, IN)INTERAGENCY SUPPORT:$98M placement for 20 Federal agenciesEMERGENCY OPERATIONS:USACE Lead Division for Temp Emergency PowerKentucky Ice Storm ’09Lower Ohio Flood ‘11Tornado Recovery ‘11Super Storm Sandy ’12Winter Storms ‘13NAVIGATION:3400 miles of commercial waterways10% of US inland waterwaysOhio River System: 86 lock chambers, 245M tonsGreat Lakes System: 6 lock chambers, 129M tons66 deep draft harbors80 shallow draft harborsRECREATION:83 M visits/year37K jobs supported$1.8B value added933K Land Acres400K Water Acres785 Rec AreasHYDROPOWER:10 Plants3.3 MWHrOVERSEAS CONTINGENCY SUPPORT:465 positions filled since 2008Flood Risk Mgt:Cumulative damages prevented through 2012: $39.2B includes impact from LRD operations along the Mississippi RiverLast year was 10:1 Return on Investment (ROI), this year 11:1(Debbie Lee x-3070/ Frank Monfelli x-3011)Recreation :83M visitors FY 12 data (FY13 not available yet)37K jobs (source is ERDC 2010 info, last available)$1.8B value (includes wages, benefits, profits, rent and tax)(Jeff DeFosse – x3192)
3 Civil Works Transformation TARGET AREASModernize planning processEnhance the budget development process through a systems-oriented watershed approach, collaboration and innovative fundingEvaluate the current and required portfolio of water resources projects through a smart infrastructure strategy to deliver solutions to water resources problemsImprove methods of deliveryOlmsted - 18 FEB 2014 Aerial View
4 Influences on Future Civil Works Program Funding Delay in Passing the Budget (Continuing Resolution): Limits new study and new construction startsNo Earmarks: Limits Congressional Adds and plus-up to Pres BudSequestration / Budget Cuts: Tied to reducing National DebtInland Waterways Trust Fund: Construction funds limited to revenuesNational/Regional Priorities: Infrastructure investments that strengthen the national economy, security & quality of lifeEnvironmental Conditions: Drought, natural disasters, flooding, = Supplement FundsBudget Transformation: Project-centric to a prioritized systems-based, watershed approachOMB and ASA(CW) Policy: Budget ceilings, Investments must support of national economic and environmental goalsWater Resources Reform and Development Act of 2013 (WRRDA 2013): Pending authorizationLocal Sponsor/Stakeholder Partnerships: Cost Sharing RequirementsPending Authorization (WRDA): (H.R and S. 601)Reflects momentum in both houses to codify internal initiatives to streamline the CW process. SMART Planning, 3x3x3 initiative, expanding economic benefits categoriesOffers new opportunities to expand the "credited, contributed and voluntary funds" methods for project development & implementation, reflects an understanding that future EWA budgets will be further constrained, explores alternative sources.Makes USACE develop a list of 15 (+/-) projects in a Pilot Program that would be ceded over to the local interests (including the associated Federal funds GI, CG) for implementationOlmsted L&D: both houses indicate a desire to change the cost sharing equation with the IWTFIdentifies the Great Lakes as a separate entity & establish new priorities for the HMTFRequires USACE to produce additional reports on Olmsted cost overrunsSets a annual National funding limit on DS program (Approx $9.2 million)Requires USACE to study & revise current levee vegetation requirementsRe-establishes an automatic De-authorization process, designed to reduce the National backlog of authorized projects, resulting in possibility of LRD authorized projects at Greenup, SOO and JT Myers be de-Authorized
5 FY15 President’s Budget includes $38.8M For Great Lakes Harbor Maintenance DredgingDuluth-SuperiorSaginaw RiverSt. Mary’s RiverDetroit RiverGreen BayMonroeMarquette HarborToledoSt. Clair RiverSanduskyIndiana HarborAshtabulaBurns HarborClevelandGrand HavenFairportChippewa HarborGrand MaraisLake SuperiorBeaver BayTwo HarborsEagle HarborLac La BelleKnife RiverGrand Traverse BayCornucopiaDuluth-SuperiorLa PointeKeweenaw WaterwayBayfieldBig BayPort WingOntonagonLittle LakeWhitefish Point HarborBlack RiverPresque IsleGrand MaraisSoo LocksAshlandSaxonMarquetteSt. Marys RiverMIChannels in Straits of MackinacManistiqueDetourLes Cheneaux IslandGladstoneGrays ReefMackinac IslandLittle Bay de nocSt. JamesMackinac CityCheboyganCross VillagePetoskeyHammond BayCedar RiverWashington IslandInland RouteWIMenomineeOcontoLelandCharlevoixAlpenaLake HuronCANADAOgdensburgPensaukeeSturgeon BayMorristownBlack River HarborBig SuamicoAlgomaGreilickvilleFrankfortHarrisvilleGreen BayKewauneeArcadiaCape VincentAu Sable HarborPortage LakeTwo RiversTawas BaySackets HarborManitowocManisteePoint LookoutPort AustinOntarioLakePort OntarioLudingtonHarbor BeachSheboyganPentwaterSaginawBay PortFY13 President’s Budget: $31.0M, 2.4M cu yards, 15 projectsOswegoWhite LakeCasevillePort SanilacCommercialRecreationalPresident’s BudgetPort WashingtonSebewaingLake MichiganMuskegonMILexingtonLittle Sodus BayGrand RiverOlcottOak OrchardRochesterIrondequoit BayGreat Sodus BayBlack RiverLittle RiverWilsonMilwaukeeGrand HavenSt. Clair RiverPine RiverHollandBuffaloKenoshaClinton RiverBelle RiverBlack Rock Lock/TonawandaNYSaugatuckLake St. ClairSturgeon PointSouth HavenLake ErieCattaraugusWaukeganRouge RiverILSt. JosephDetroit RiverDunkirkSt. Joseph RiverBarcelonaMonroeChicago HarborNew BuffaloErieBolles HarborPut-In-BayChicago RiverMichigan CityConneautPAToledoFairportAshtabulaCalumetBurns Small Boat HarborOHCooley CanalToussaint RiverPort ClintonRocky RiverBurns Waterway HarborWest HarborVermilionClevelandIndiana HarborINLorainSanduskyHuron60 Federal commercial projects80 Federal shallow draft/recreational projects
6 Current Dredged Material Management Conditions DREDGED MATERIAL MANAGEMENT STATUSCritical – Dredged Material Management issues could severely restrict channel availability within 5 yearsMINNESOTALake SuperiorPressing – Dredged Material Management issues could severely restrict channel availability within 10 years.Two HarborsDuluth SuperiorKeweenaw WaterwayNo pressing issues within next 10 years; continue to work on long range planning such as DMMPs.Presque IsleAshlandOntonagonMarquetteGrand MariasChannel in Straits of MackinacSt. Marys RiverLittle Bay de NocGrays ReefCheboyganWISCONSINMenomineeCharlevoixAlpenaLake HuronOgdensburgFrankfortANNUAL DREDGING REQUIREMENT (CY)Green BayKewauneeMICHIGANOntarioManitowocManisteeLakeLake MichiganLudington800KSheboyganSaginawHarbor BeachCANADAOswegoPort WashingtonMuskegon HarborRochester HarborNEW YORK100K – 250KMilwaukeeGrand HavenSt. Clair RiverBuffalo HarborKenoshaRouge RiverHollandChannels in Lake St. ClairLake ErieDunkirk50K – 95KWaukeganSt. Joseph HarborDetroit River<50KChicago River & HarborEriePENNSYLVANIAMonroeConneautCalumetAshtabulaINDIANAFairportILLINOISBurns Waterway HarborToledoHuronLorainClevelandSandusky HarborIndiana HarborOHIO
7 Ohio River Infrastructure Overview ChallengesDeteriorating NAV Dams (gates & structure)Miter GatesDeteriorating lock chambersAging operating machineryEMSWORTHL&DAllegheny 6 Dam Undermining 2008MARKLANDL&DBelleville Barge Accident/Pool Loss 2005OLMSTEDL&DThis slide is an overview of the Ohio River Infrastructure with its current condition assessment. As you can see, there is quite a bit of “orange” and “red” indicated due to a whole host of issues53Montgomery Dam Gates 201252LEGENDImprovementsConditionExistingA/BGreenup Unscheduled Closure 2003CMarkland Gate Failure 2009Under ConstructionDConstruction AuthorizedF
8 LRD CIVIL WORKS PROGRAM Omnibus Bill / Work Plan COMPARISON FY 2010 – FY 2013($ MILLIONS)FY 10PRESBUDAPPN.FY 11WORKPLANFY 12FY 13CRFY 14Omnibus Bill / Work PlanFY 15I1.811.02.48.65.18.85.07.53.15.42.3C397.5407.4429.2331.3403.2402.3340.3388.7272.5366.0318.3IWTF85.079.487.373.078.575.990.383.082.578.184.5C + IWTF482.5486.8516.5404.3481.7478.2430.6471.7355.0444.1402.8O&M457.6443.1437.7447.2437.1469.9431.7456.4497.3474.8TOTAL941.9940.9956.6860.1923.9956.9866.2910.9811.4946.8879.9Total PRES BUD: $900M average over past 6 yearsFlat to declining trends across all appropriationsDoes not include Emergency Supplemental fundsYear-long CR in FY13Currently under CR until 15 Jan 2014No Congressional EarmarksLegend:I – InvestigationsC – ConstructionIWTF – Inland Waterway Trust FundO&M – Operations & MaintenancePRES BUD – President’s BudgetAPPN – Congressional AppropriationHoR – House of RepresentativesSEN – Senate
9 LRD Flood Risk Management/Dam Safety Construction Projects Lake SuperiorLake MichiganLake HuronLake ErieLake OntarioOhio RiverCumberland RiverTennessee RiverChicagoDetroitBuffaloPittsburghHuntingtonLouisvilleNashvilleCincinnatiDover Dam:Muskingum River, OH$60M Estimated Federal CostDam Safety AssuranceMcCook & Thornton Reservoir:Cook County, IL$677M Estimated Federal CostConstruction of 2 reservoirsFloodwater storage > 14B gal.Impacts 341 Sq. MilesEast Branch Clarion River Lake, PA:$280M Estimated Federal Cost Dam Safety AssuranceConstruction of a full length, full depth cut-off wall preceded by a phase of site developmentRough River Lake, KY$149M Estimated Federal Cost Major RehabilitationBluestone Dam:Bluestone Lake, WV$475M Estimated Federal Cost Dam Safety AssuranceCINCINNATI (DIV HQ)BUFFALO (LRB)CHICAGO (LRC)DETROIT (LRE)HUNTINGTON (LRH)LOUISVILLE (LRL)NASHVILLE (LRN)PITTSBURGH (LRP)Center Hill Dam:Caney Fork River, DeKalb Co, TN$295M Estimated Federal Cost Dam Safety Assurance
10 LRD Navigation / Other Construction Projects Lake SuperiorLake MichiganLake HuronLake ErieLake OntarioOhio RiverCumberland RiverTennessee RiverChicagoDetroitBuffaloPittsburghHuntingtonLouisvilleNashvilleCincinnatiGreen Bay Harbor, Wisconsin:Dredged Material Disposal Facility$21M Estimated Federal CostThe project will provide sufficient capacity for 20 years of maintenance dredgingChicago Ship & Sanitary Cannel:Romeoville, IL in Cook Countyaka – Asian Carp Barrier$212M Estimated Federal CostDispersal barrier system developed to prevent the spread of invasive fish speciesLocks & Dams 2, 3, 4:Monongahela River, PA$845M Estimated Federal CostNew gated dam & rehabilitated auxiliary chamber floodway bulkhead structure;new twin 84 X 720 foot locks & below-dam scour protection at CharleroiOlmsted Locks & Dam:Ohio River, Olmsted, IL$3B Estimated Federal Cost2 – 110’ by 1200’ locks & a dam comprised of tainter gates, navigable pass, and a fixed weir
11 What is Changing in Military Programs? FY13 – Project Funding reduced iaw Sequester. Still recovering from its impacts.FY14 & Beyond – Whole Projects Delayed/Eliminated within Service PrioritiesBRAC 17 ? – DOD Consolidating using Existing Space to Reduce Support CostsReduction in MILCON program and number of projectsIncreased potential requirements for Restoration and Modernization of existing facilitiesEmphasis on design and material requirements for reduced energy demand and sustainability due to Executive Orders and 13514Executive Order of January 24, 2007Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management“…to strengthen the environmental, energy, and transportation management of Federal agencies…”“…improve energy efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions of the agency, through reduction of energy intensity by 30 percent by the end of fiscalyear 2015, relative to the baseline of the agency’s energy use in fiscal year 2003…”“…ensure that at least half of the statutorily required renewable energy consumed by the agency in a fiscal year comes from new renewable sources,and to the extent feasible, the agency implements renewable energy generation projects on agency property for agency use…”Executive Order of October 5, 2009Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance“… to establish an integrated strategy towards sustainability in the Federal Government and to make reductionof greenhouse gas emissions a priority for Federal agencies…”“…to create a clean energy economy that will increase our Nation’s prosperity, promote energy security, protect the interestsof taxpayers, and safeguard the health of our environment, the Federal Government must lead by example. It is therefore the policy of the UnitedStates that Federal agencies shall increase energy efficiency…”-26% reduction in potable water use by 2020 versus 2008 Baseline.-50% reduction in solid waste (to include construction and demolition) by 2015 versus 2008 Baseline.-All buildings from 2020 and thereafter are designed to achieve zero-net-energy by 2030.Joliet ARC
12 What does that mean to us? Installations will need support to develop project proposals that show Life-Cycle Costs that meet or beat new constructionRetrofit facilities to support functional changes – Flexible UseReduce reliance on national grid utilitiesReduce DemandUse on-site renewable energy sourceNET ZERO by 2020What does that mean to us? Be prepared to respond to:1) Installations will need support to develop project proposals showing life-cycle-costs that will meet or beat the cost of new construction.2) Successful projects will support the leadership's priorities for retrofitting facilities to support functional changes that are estimated to be required well into the future (flexible use) and …3) that reduce the reliance on utilities taken from the national grid (reduce demand and/or use on-site renewable energy power source).+ The Army is striving to manage our natural resources with a net zero strategy by:1. Producing as much energy as we use2. Capturing or reusing water equal to use3. Eliminating solid waste disposalNET ZERO can only be achieved by 2020 through the use of various Thir Party financing options, which will be employed by the military installations.
13 LRD MILCON Programs 15 Installations Lima ATP Selfridge ANG (BRAC05) SuperiorLake15 InstallationsAnchor InstallationsMichiganOther InstallationsLakeArmyAir ForceHuronOther DoDMichiganLima ATPMichiganSelfridge ANG(BRAC05)Grissom ARBLakeErieDetroit ArsenalLakeRock Island ArsenalYoungstown ARBOhioNewport AAPDSCCOur regional coverage for the Active Services and DOD with significant installations highlighted.IllinoisIndianaCrane Naval ADWright-Patterson AFBRiverScott AFBFort KnoxC.M. Price CenterOhioBluegrassFort CampbellKentucky
14 LRD FUSRAP Program Ashland1/Seaway D/ RS Creek & Ashland 2 PA/SI RI/FS RD/RACOMPLETENiagara FallsGuterlSeawayLake OntarioLindeNYHarshawLake ErieBliss &LaughlinBliss &LaughlinINThe Corps and DOE have an MOU which lays out the process for referral and designation, and returning sites to DOE for long-term stewardship once remediation is completed.Notes that the current projection is that this LRD Program will continue beyond 2020 at current funding levels.PAJoslynPainesvilleLuckeyOHShallow Land Disposal Area(Located in Parks Township)Superior Steel
15 LRD Military Outlook: Total Military Program (as of 14 Apr 2014) BRAC Workload peaked in FY 09, and complete by Sep 2011 by statute. MILCON workload peaked in 2012 at a high of $878.1M and has shown a steady decline through FY16 before steadying out.MILCONThis is a $76M reduction versus last yearInstallation SupportO&M Support to DPWs is staying even to this pointEnvironmentalThis is a $10M reduction versus last yearInternational and Interagency ServicesThis is a minor reduction versus last yearBiggest clients EPA, VA, DOE and DHS.
16 Military Architect and Design to be Advertised in Next 12 Months SDVOB - DBB task ordersSmall Business - D/B or DBB task ordersHubZone (HZ) - D/B or DBB task ordersRemarks: Contracts are 5 year (3 year base + 2 year option). Small Business MATOC – LRD Mission Boundaries including Reserves.
17 LRD FY15 & Prior Construction to be Advertised in Next 12 Months PROGIDStLocationDescriptionArmyKYFort CampbellUnmanned Aerial Vehicle MNT HangarMultifunction Aviation BDEBlue Grass Army DepotConsolidated Shipping/Receiving CenterSOFGroup Special Troops BNSystem Integration Maintenance facilityArmy ReserveNJJoint Base McGuire-Dix-LakehurstRecord Fire RangeMachine Gun RangeCOFort CarsonTraining Building AdditionCAFresnoArmy Reserve CenterNYMattydaleTustinMiramarVAFort LeeTASS Training CenterFort Hunter LiggettMDAberdeen Proving GroundMAAttleboroFt. StoryNCFt. BraggMare IslandBowieArmy Family HousingILRock Island ArsenalFamily HousingAir ForceOHWright Patterson AFBAdd/Alter Materiel LabAir Force ReserveMarch ARBRegional Deployment facilityFLHomestead AFBEntry Control ComplexDefense LogisticsMISelfridge ARBReplace Fuel Distribution FacilityDOD Educ Act.Ft CampbellElementary SchoolHigh SchoolAddition to Elementary SchoolFUSRAPPAArmstrong CountyRadiological Site RemediationTonawandaDept of EnergyTNOak RidgeFacility Site Prep – Excavation, Sediment Basin
18 Key Contracting Contacts Regional Chief of ContractingVincent MarshRegional Procurement AnalystMisty JonesDistrict Chiefs of ContractingLouisville District – Denise BushGreat Lakes District - Jeffery ErnestRiver District – Cynthia SmithBranch Contracting ContactsBuffalo – Tony Abate Chicago – Regina BlairDetroit – Sandra Kenzie Huntington – Cheryl FitzwaterNashville – Valerie Carlton Pittsburgh – Cynthia SmithLouisville Military Branch – Rita BurnsLouisville Civil Branch – Lisa BisigLouisville Business Oversight Branch – Crystal MayReorganization to focus on quality.BOB eliminating stovepipe oversight.Small Business Deputies
19 Essential LinksContractor Performance Assessment Rating System:Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System:Small Business Administration:Solicitation Website: https://www.FBO.govSystem for Award Management: https://www.sam.govDivision Website:CPARS – New merged system and whyeSRS – Subcontracting system and whySBA – Excellent contact
20 For more information visit the US Army Corps of Engineers Web Site at: Questions?For more information visit the US Army Corps of Engineers Web Site at: