Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

According to: KATHLEEN M. EISENHARDT “Building theories from case study research” We put in place the following framework.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "According to: KATHLEEN M. EISENHARDT “Building theories from case study research” We put in place the following framework."— Presentation transcript:

1

2 According to: KATHLEEN M. EISENHARDT “Building theories from case study research” We put in place the following framework

3

4

5  RESEARCH QUESTIONS 1) WHY DO MEGAPROJECTS PERFORM BEHAVE LIKE THEY DO? (BADLY) 2) WHAT CAN WE DO TO MAKE THEM PERFORM BETTER?

6  CRITERIA  INDICATORS  CAUSES

7 A PRIORI CONSTRUCTS

8  Fulfilling the purpose makes project successful???? YES  What about “the tiangle”?  For who? - FOR ALL!

9  INDICATORS Project acceptance is driver (indicator) for project performance  CRITERIA Fulfilling the purpose Cost, time, specification Benefits  CAUSES Stakeholder number and relationships influence on how project is performed Environment influence – external risks

10  Definition  Project acceptance is defined as acceptance by two major external stakeholder groups that are outside the government: A) Industrial acceptance - industry/industrial association/business associations and B) Social acceptance - citizens, environmentalist, NGOs, etc.

11 ITERACTIVE WAY (maybe one cycle) DEDUCTIONINDUCTION

12  Megaproject behaviour – HOW? Megaproject behaviour – WHY? Megaproject behaviour – WHAT TO DO? Purpose Cost Time Spec. Benefits Stakeholder network External Risks

13  Two groups – Energy and transport  Cases with enough information – 10  Criteria for selection Project acceptance   The method for case selection (Eisenhart) Looking for similarities Looking for diversities √

14 Industrial acceptance Institutional acceptanceSocial acceptance Motorway A2#NAAcceptedNot Accepted ROVIGO Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) TERMINAL#NAIndifferentNot Accepted EDINBURGH TRAM NETWORK PROJECTAccepted#NAAccepted Flamanville 3 Nuclear Power Plant#NAAcceptableNot Accepted Greater Gabbard Wind FarmAcceptedIndifferentAccepted The High-Speed Project in PortugalIndifferentAcceptedNot Accepted High-Speed Train in Spain: Madrid-Barcelona- French frontier (Figueres)AcceptedIndifferentNot Accepted High-Speed train in Spain: Seville-MadridIndifferentAcceptedNot Accepted Norra Länken (”the Northern Link”)Accepted Not Accepted MOSE project (Modulo Sperimentale Elettromeccanico – in English, Experimental Electromechanical Module)#NAAcceptedNot Accepted

15 ITERACTIVE WAY (maybe one cycle) DEDUCTIONINDUCTION

16 Industrial acceptance Institutional acceptanceSocial acceptance Motorway A2#NAAcceptedNot Accepted ROVIGO Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) TERMINAL#NAIndifferentNot Accepted EDINBURGH TRAM NETWORK PROJECTAccepted#NAAccepted Flamanville 3 Nuclear Power Plant#NAAcceptableNot Accepted Greater Gabbard Wind FarmAcceptedIndifferentAccepted The High-Speed Project in PortugalIndifferentAcceptedNot Accepted High-Speed Train in Spain: Madrid-Barcelona- French frontier (Figueres)AcceptedIndifferentNot Accepted High-Speed train in Spain: Seville-MadridIndifferentAcceptedNot Accepted Norra Länken (”the Northern Link”)Accepted Not Accepted MOSE project (Modulo Sperimentale Elettromeccanico – in English, Experimental Electromechanical Module)#NAAcceptedNot Accepted

17

18

19 WE DON’T GO INTO DETAIL WE CUT

20 Project acceptance  The typology of contract doesn’t affect the project acceptance.  Stakeholder network complexity always occurs (megaprojects are complex by definition), but seems to have no so much impact on project acceptance.  Project output performance (understood as Time, Cost, Quality) seems to be always weak but have no so significant impact on project acceptance  Environment conditions (understood as legal, political as economic) have not much impact on project acceptance.

21  Enablers Effective legal and political support  EU support and Green politics (GG)  Strategic planning process and legislative preventive measures, PPP law (HSP-P)  Disablers Nonsupportive and ineffective legal environment  (F) rigid framework,  (E) delays in regulatory approvals due to too many regulatory entities, legislative change

22  Enablers  Green politics, EU support energy strategy "Energy 2020“(GG)  Disablers Change of political party canceled whole project (HSP-P) governed by the following Legal and Regulatory frameworks - 7 entities (E)

23  Enablers  EU fundings (GG) (HSP-P)  Emploiment developement (E)  Disablers Recession (GG)

24  In terms of Project acceptance all variables considered seems to be no much effective.  If we take the project acceptance as mesure of project performace: a substantial rethinking must be put in place about the perspective from wich we are regarding the megaprogect


Download ppt "According to: KATHLEEN M. EISENHARDT “Building theories from case study research” We put in place the following framework."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google