We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAnika Pursley
Modified about 1 year ago
© 2013 O’Brien & Gere Major Changes in The Phase I ESA Standard: Implications for Watershed Protection NYC Watershed/Tifft Science & Technical Symposium, West Point Stuart J. Spiegel, O’Brien & Gere September 19, 2013
© 2013 O’Brien & Gere Major Changes the Phase I ESA Standard: Implications for Watershed Protection NOTICE This material is protected by copyright. No other use, reproduction, or distribution of this material or of the approaches it contains, is authorized without the prior express written consent of O’Brien & Gere. © Copyright, 2013 O’Brien & Gere Engineers, Inc., All Rights Reserved 2 All materials printed on recycled paper.
© 2013 O’Brien & Gere ASTM E : USERS AND PREPARERS How many people are familiar with ASTM or AAI as Users? Who is involved as a Preparer of Phase I ESAs? Who is unfamiliar with the topic? 3
© 2013 O’Brien & Gere Phase I ESAs: History, Just the Sound Bites Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA, Superfund) Petroleum Excluded Strict Liability –Liability w/o Fault Joint & Several Liability Retroactive Liability Asset Conservation, Lender Liability and Deposit Insurance Protection Act of 1996 Definition of owner/operator now explicitly excludes a lender who does not participate in management Innocent Landowner & Bond Fide Prospective Purchaser (BFPP) 4
© 2013 O’Brien & Gere Phase I ESAs: So…Who Uses Them Purchaser/Acquisition Property Corporation Seller/Divestitures Pre-divestiture evaluation Leases – Lessee or Lessor Property Environmental Quality Baseline Right-of-way, Easement Farm development easement Watershed protection Toll manufacturing 5
© 2013 O’Brien & Gere ASTM E v. AAI Rule Key Differences AAI Rule is a federal regulation issued by USEPA ›E is a trade standard of practice that is indicated in AAI as an equivalent method AAI Rule addresses only substances subject to Superfund; petroleum is explicitly excluded ›E explicitly includes petroleum products 6
© 2013 O’Brien & Gere Applications in a Watershed – Why? Property acquisition for watershed protection Conservation easement Acquisition of development rights Pre-restoration assessment Watershed protection planning 7
© 2013 O’Brien & Gere Applications in a Watershed – What? For a watershed, corridor, area or specific property: Brownfields sites Disposal sites Bulk storage facilities Industrial and commercial facilities - locations Historic industrial operations Hazardous material usage Hazardous waste generation Environmental compliance violations LUST facilities 8
© 2013 O’Brien & Gere ASTM E : Key Revisions Major Definition of Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) Vapor Migration – not mentioned in E Regulatory File Review Minor User responsibilities Industrial/Manufacturing Properties Appendices Opinion – More Descriptive than Substantive 9
© 2013 O’Brien & Gere Key Revisions: RECs REC definition simplified NEW!! IMPROVED!!! Revised definition of an HREC ›was poorly written, mis-understood, mis-interpreted, mis-used NEW! NEW! NEW! Meet the “controlled” REC, or CREC 10
© 2013 O’Brien & Gere Key Revisions: RECs REC definition not consistent with CERCLA Appeared to be too much variability in how Environmental Professionals (EPs) defined a REC “environment” not defined Present version: ›“into structures on the property” not defined, interpreted as vapor intrusion (VI) being a part of this term ›“even under conditions in compliance with laws” – confusion, nobody really knew what this meant. 11
© 2013 O’Brien & Gere Key Revisions: RECs “release” not defined in E , although it was implied to be the CERCLA definition Professional Judgment: release identification v. release hunting Changes that allow inferring of a release and affect degree of obviousness (Sect /8.3.1) ›AAI: “conditions indicative” of a release. ›Different EPs have the “indicative” line at different points 12
© 2013 O’Brien & Gere Key Revisions: RECs New definition: “the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to any release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment.” “release” and “environment” now defined, as found in CERCLA “in, on, or at a property” was “on a property” By definition, there can’t be an off-site REC 13
© 2013 O’Brien & Gere Key Revisions: HRECs Complaints that old definition was loose and vague New definition: extensive, five times as long as the old definition! HREC is not necessarily a REC Would it be considered a REC today Especially based on changes in remediation standards over the intervening period 14
© 2013 O’Brien & Gere Key Revisions: HRECs Examples: Risk-based corrective action, no property use limitations (could build or operate a day care center on the property: HREC but not a REC If anything has changed to cause an agency to re-look at the property (change in RBCA criteria, concepts of vapor intrusion), then it is a REC 15
© 2013 O’Brien & Gere Key Revisions: CRECs (controlled RECs) What happens if there is a use limitation, even if remediated to satisfaction of regulatory agency? What if remediated to industrial or commercial use, even with a NFA letter? What if there are residuals left in place Practitioners were asked to categorize a: UST that was cleaned up 10 years ago with some residuals left in place EPs put this item into all three categories available: ›REC, HREC, de minimis 16
© 2013 O’Brien & Gere Key Revisions: CRECs (controlled RECs) New category: CREC Considered a REC (subcategory of REC?) May be considered a “good” REC; may need to educate users/clients that a CREC is not necessarily bad Will this cause confusion in the marketplace? hmmmm…... 17
© 2013 O’Brien & Gere Key Revisions: How does this affect report “Findings”? Findings will have 4 categories and hierarchy: Conclusions RECsYes CRECsYes HRECsYes de minimis conditions No de minimis conditions are never RECs of any kind ! Will require education of the users/clients re: four categories 18
© 2013 O’Brien & Gere Key Revisions: CRECs (controlled RECs) Summary: If contamination has not been remediated= REC Contamination remediated but not to today’s standard= REC Remediated but restrictions present= CREC, reported as a REC, but it’s a “good” REC Remediated but no restrictions are present= HREC, not a REC 19
© 2013 O’Brien & Gere Key Revisions: Vapor Intrusion (VI) Clarification of vapor migration throughout Terms “migrate/migration” will now be defined, and includes “vapor in the subsurface” E (VI Guide) is a referenced document in new E Addressed in a revised activity and use limitations (AUL) definition: soil vapor is now included Contaminated vapor migration/vapor intrusion now specifically excluded from the term IAQ (which was a non-scope consideration) CERCLA and AAI do not differentiate the form of the release to the environment (solid, vapor, liquid) VI not to be considered differently than groundwater contamination so why is this a new concept? Not specific previously, user or counsel would fight inclusion as a REC 20
© 2013 O’Brien & Gere Key Revisions: Vapor Intrusion (VI) Section 2.1: “…use of E methodology is not required to achieve compliance with AAI Can use whatever EP considers appropriate Must be documented in report Must be reproducible by another EP IAQ exclusion had been used as a rationale not to consider vapor migration/intrusion in the Phase I If the IAQ issue is related to releases of hazardous substances/ petroleum products, then this is a scope item if vapor migration is eliminated as an issue, then there is no REC 21
© 2013 O’Brien & Gere Key Revisions: Regulatory File Review New Section of E1527, promoted by lenders If the Target Property or any adjoining property is identified as having a potential issue, pertinent files should be reviewed “should” is the magic word, not shall File review not required by AAI If EP’s opinion is that file review is not warranted, the EP must provide justification in the Phase I report Rationale likely to be: Not reasonably ascertainable Accessibility to files Cost of records from agency Time frame to obtain records, e.g., FOIA request ›Reasonable time and cost 22
© 2013 O’Brien & Gere Key Revisions: Regulatory File Review Implications There has always been a difficulty in pricing Phase I ESAs when the EP could not know the extent of the file review that might arise. Client/user tension with EP when EP claimed significant file reviews not covered in basic Phase I ESA cost. ›Now gives the EP an official out for follow-up costs, but also to designate these issues as RECs. Typically, an issue on an adjacent property had been ID’d as a REC ›Acknowledges that more information is available directly online. 23
© 2013 O’Brien & Gere Minor Revisions: User Responsibilities A benefit to EPs Liens and AUL searches the responsibility of the User Commonly found in recorded land title records Liens/AULs recorded elsewhere generally not considered to be reasonably ascertainable unless applicable statutes/regulations specify a place Does not preclude EP from looking for this information in the government records search 24
© 2013 O’Brien & Gere Minor Revisions: Industrial/Manufacturing Activities If there is a history of such uses, then “additional standard historical sources shall be reviewed if they are likely to identify a more specific use and are reasonably ascertainable, subject to the constraints of data failure.” [note: was “should, ” changed to signify importance] Additional standard historical sources (examples): Recorded land title records USGS topo maps Fire insurance maps Street directories Building department records Zoning/land use records Newspaper archives Internet sites 25
© 2013 O’Brien & Gere Minor Revisions: Revisions to Appendices Completely re-written Legal Appendix Table of Contents for report simplified New appendix on non-scope business environmental risk (BER) considerations – intended to be informational 26
© 2013 O’Brien & Gere Changes Enhance Alignment with AAI AAI tells what needs to be done but not how to do it ASTM has a recipe to tell how (process standard) The changes move ASTM closer to AAI »Christopher McCormack, Esq., Pullman & Comley 27
© 2013 O’Brien & Gere Some Final Sound Bites The Industry’s “dirty secret”: 90% of all Phase I ESAs fall short of existing ASTM standards ASTM has a mandatory 8 year sunset provision in its standards Review process started three years ago and has included the USEPA to maintain acceptability as equivalent to AAI Only 6% of the industry has been tracking the changes Revised standard due out ~September some time, subject to USEPA/OMB final review OMB 90 days USEPA 30 day comment period Will be effective immediately Thanks to Anthony Buonicore; briefing was inspiration for this presentation. 28
© 2013 O’Brien & Gere Stu Spiegel O’Brien & Gere Cell:
© 2013 O’Brien & Gere 30
Citizens Guide to Pennsylvanias Land Recycling Program.
PLANNING THE AUDIT Individual audits must be properly planned to ensure: Appropriate and sufficient evidence is obtained to support the auditors opinion;
ADOT Audit Procedures ADOT = The Standard of Excellence for Transportation Systems and Services. Arizona Department of Transportation Right of Way AUDIT.
ODOT'S ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PROCESS Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process.
Slide 1 Training Session : ITU-T Recommendation L.1420 ITU GREEN STANDARDS WEEK 17–21 September 2012 Paris, France.
ISO INTRODUCTION In the present day, environmental matter is not limited only in one country or specific area. The environmental impact effects.
Slide 1 ITU-T Recommendation L.1420 : Is it that difficult to comply with it? ITU Symposium ICTs, the Environment and Climate Change May Montreal.
ISO/DIS 9001:2008 versus ISO 9001:2000 August 2008 CER Business Line - Peter Bonnaerens.
Green Seal Standard for Product Manufacturers, GS-C1 Green Seal Standard for Product Manufacturers, GS-C1 Public Review Webinar September 15, 2010.
IP Audit "We're in an object-oriented, outsourced, and open-sourced world, and organizations are anxious to take steps to ensure that the software they.
ETHICS, INTEGRITY AND THE LAW October 22, 2013 Presented by: Thomas A. Tupitza, Esq. & Mark A. Denlinger, Esq. Knox McLaughlin Gornall & Sennett, P.C.
1 SAS #70 (as Amended by SAS #88) Service Organizations NSAA IT Conference September 28, 2006 Nashville, TN Presented by: Michael A. Billo, CISA, CGAP.
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: STEP THREE TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
Guidelines For Site Management Approaches Floyd Homer WCPA-Caribbean & SUSTRUST.
IHCDA CDBG Compliance Training. IHCDA Compliance and Asset Management Staff.
Sales Order Cycle Review Report Insert Date. Source: 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Objective, Scope & Procedures Performed4.
Washington Real Estate Fundamentals Lesson 16: Property Management © 2011 Rockwell Publishing.
Airworthiness Audit Procedures Presented by COSCAP SA.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS IN BUSINESS AND REAL PROPERTY TRANSACTIONS CATIC Breakfast Seminar Series May 25, 2005 Presented by John E. Wertam, Esq. Shipman.
Human Resource Best Practices Part I – A Solid Foundation Presented by John M. Cummings, PHR Personnel Director Employment Practices Specialist Montana.
Pre-Application Best Practices Training Prepared by NCALL Research, Inc. Updated February 2009.
Manage an IT Project. Aim This presentation is prepared to support and give a general overview of the ‘How to Manage and IT Project’ Guide and should.
CDFI Loan Policies and Procedures Portfolio Management Series Webinar Developed and delivered by.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Chris Mclaren, DIMP Coordinator US DOT PHMSA Office of Pipeline.
Legal Due Diligence for Acquiring Business in India – Dos & Don'ts of Formulating an MoU 1 August 2008, PHD chambers of Commerce & Industry, New Delhi.
CREATING A SAFETY PROGRAM for YOUR SMALL BUSINESS HCA.
UNIVERSITY OF PADUA FACULTY OF ENGINEERING Second Cycle Degree in Environmental Engineering INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REMEDIATION LAW B&P.
The External Auditors Perspective and use of Internal Audit Brent Currey Live Seminar 9:00am – 4:30pm October 12, 2011 Relationships backed by performance.
PhDs in Computer Science (FAIRS09) Frans Coenen Monday 14 December 2009 Department of Computer Science The University of Liverpool
Project Management Dr. Anbang Qi Prof. of International Business School of Nankai University.
© 2016 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.