Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Evaluation of the Scientific Production in Portuguese Medical Schools 2006/2007 Class 5.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Evaluation of the Scientific Production in Portuguese Medical Schools 2006/2007 Class 5."— Presentation transcript:

1 Evaluation of the Scientific Production in Portuguese Medical Schools 2006/2007 Class 5

2 Introduction SANTOS,Raimundo - Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, Campinas, v. 1, n. 1, p. 22-38, jul./dez. 2003 – ISSN: 1678-765X increases interest for scientific production quantitative indicators helps Scientifical and technological dynamics understanding; Political engeneering; Decision making on this area. Quantitative scientific production measured by number of articles published in scientifical journals

3 Scientific production has been increasing in the last years: Graph - Annual evolution of the portuguese scientific publications´ number on Science Citation Index (red line-totals; blue line_ with foreign’s co-authorship; space between the two lines- without foreign’s co- authorship). Source: ISI – Web of Knowledge

4 COIMBRA JR., Carlos E. A. Scientific production in public health and the international literature bases. Cad. Saúde Pública. 1999, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 883-888. http://scientific.thomson.com/free/essays/selectionofmaterial/journalselection/ Indexed journals report investigation results look up for bibliographic information ISI web of Science ALLOW TO ALLOWS ACCESS TO title author journal´s impact factor Citation data

5 EVALUATING JOURNALS Many factors are taken into account: QualitativeQuantitative journal's basic publishing standards editorial content authorship’s internacional diversity citation data Interrelated All factors determine strengths and weaknesses of the journal

6 J. M. CAMPANARIO, L. GONZÁLEZ: Journal self-citations -Scientometrics 69 (2006) IMPACT FACTOR bibliometric product more used Internacional scope and diffusing of academic journals fundamental indicator became widespread It’s use

7 Aims Research Selection Develop an objective methodology for scientifical articles In order to make it: REPRODUCTIBLE -Author’s position; -Number; -Citation´s Number; -Impact factor; -Journals. LISBON COIMBRA compare

8 Methods Two medical schools http://scientific.thomson.com/pt/produtos/WoK/wok/ FMUCFMUL Reasons: the oldest universities and the ones which have simultaneously hospital and faculty. Data base: ISI web of knowledge Gives access to the leader of database of quote (Web of Science); gathers the searched results promoting its analysis (Analyze tool); available index, records, virtual documents and electronic journals.

9 Flowchart

10 http://scientific.thomson.com/pt/produtos/WoK/wok/ Inicial queries Lisbon* medical schoolLisboa* medical school Lisbon* school of medicineFaculty of medicine of Lisboa* Faculty medicine Lisboa* Faculdade de medicina de Lisboa* Medical school, Lisbon* Medical school, Lisboa* Faculty of medicine, Lisboa*School of medicine, Lisboa* * - Coimbra FINAL QUERY : Lisboa* or Lisbon* 2005

11 Exclusion criterias : - Articles not published in faculties: - Articles with none contribution of faculty members; Inclusion criterias : - Articles with contribution of faculty members; - Articles from: LisbonCoimbra Santa Maria’s Hospital Univ Coimbra Ctr Neurosci & Cell Biol Coimbra Lisbon fac. Med.Dermatol Clin Coimbra, Portugal Med sch Hosp Univ Coimbra Int. Mol. Med Univ Coimbra, Fac Med Fac Med Univ Hosp Coimbra Ctr. Quim & Bioquim Fac Med, Coimbra

12 Information from the articles: - Author author; Other authors; Institution 1st author; Author’s position; 1st author’s filiation 1 and 2; Institution’s 1st author filiation; Author’s total number. - Journal Citation´s number  specific for the article; Index; Publication review or journal; Page; Volume;

13 Data Base creation Statistical Analysis Lables Graphs SPSS -Statistical calculations; - Results interpretation and presentation Data base creation

14 Coimbra’s results Table 1 – Coimbra’s 1st Author’s Institution Filiation Filiation Table 2 – Coimbra’s 1st Author’s Institution Filiation N Valid97 Missing0 Frequenc yPercent Valid Per cent Cumulative Per cen t Vali d Ctr Neurociencias 11,0 Ctr Neurosci 22,1 3,1 Ctr Neurosci & Cell Biol 1515,5 18,6 Dermatol Clin 11,0 19,6 Fac Med 6364,9 84,5 Hosp Pediat Coimbra 11,0 85,6 Inst Biochem 66,2 91,8 Inst Pharmacol & Expt Therapeut 11,0 92,8 Serv Dermatol 22,1 94,8 Serv Med 1 11,0 95,9 Serv Med 2 11,0 96,9 Univ Coimbra 33,1 100,0 Total97100,0

15 Graph 1 – Coimbra’s 1st Author’s Institution Filiation

16 Table 3 – Coimbra’s 1st Author’s first filiation Table 4 – Coimbra’s 1st Author’s first filiation NValid 97 Missing 0 FrequencyPercentValid Percent Cumulative Perc ent ValidAllgemeines Krankenhaus Wien 11,0 Assoc Biomed Res & Innovat Light & Image 11,0 2,1 Case Western Reserve Univ Inst Patho 44,1 6,2 Case Western Reserve Univ Inst Pathol 11,0 7,2 Charite Univ Hosp Dept Rheumatol & Clin Immunol 11,0 8,2 CNTM 11,0 9,3 Ctr Addict & Mental Hlth 11,0 10,3 Delegat Coimbra Natl Inst Legal Med 11,0 11,3 Dept Biol Univ Aveiro 22,1 13,4 Dept Expt Med Sci 11,0 14,4 Dept Ophthalmol Univ Coimbra 11,0 15,5 Dept Urol & Renal Transplantat Univ Coimbra 55,2 20,6 Dept Zool Univ Coimbra 22,1 22,7 Fac Farm Coimbra 99,3 32,0 Fac Med Coimbra 2222,7 54,6 Fac Med Dijon 11,0 55,7 Fac Med Univ Lisbon 11,0 56,7 Fac Sci & Technol Coimbra 22,1 58,8 Galderma R&D Inc 11,0 59,8 Hosp Pediat Coimbra 11,0 60,8 Inst Nacl Med Legal 11,0 61,9 Ist Super Sanita 11,0 62,9 Janssen Cilag GmbH 11,0 63,9 Johns Hopkins Univ 11,0 64,9 Karolinska Inst 11,0 66,0 Louisiana State Univ Dept Biol Sci 11,0 67,0 Lund Univ 11,0 68,0 Mario Negri Inst Pharmacol Res 11,0 69,1 NIA 11,0 70,1 Oporto Inst Mol & Cell Biol 11,0 71,1 Queen Elizabeth Hosp 11,0 72,2 Rheumatism Fdn Hosp 11,0 73,2 Tohoku Univ Sch Med 11,0 74,2 UEX Fac Med 11,0 75,3 Univ Cambridge Dept Pharmacol 44,1 79,4 Univ Coimbra 55,2 84,5 Univ Coimbra Dept Cardiol 11,0 85,6 Univ Coimbra Dept Dermatol 11,0 86,6 Univ Coimbra Dept Endocrinol 11,0 87,6 Univ Coimbra Dept Orthopaed 22,1 89,7 Univ Coimbra Dept Radiol 11,0 90,7 Univ Coimbra Dept Surg 3 11,0 91,8 Univ Coimbra Dept Zool 22,1 93,8 Univ Coimbra Serv Nefrol 11,0 94,8 Univ Fed Sao Paulo 11,0 95,9 Univ Minho Dept Biol 11,0 96,9 Univ Oxford Dept Human Anat & Genet 11,0 97,9 Univ Utrecht Med Ctr 11,0 99,0 Univ Washington Dept Anesthesiol 11,0 100,0 Total97100,0

17 Graph 2 – Coimbra’s 1st Author’s first filiation

18 Filiation2 Statistics Table 5 – Coimbra’s 1st Author’s second filiation Table 6 – Coimbra’s 1st Author’s second filiation Filiation2 NValid97 Missing0 Frequenc yPercent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid- 7981,4 Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth 11,0 82,5 Ctr Neurosci & Cell Biol 77,2 89,7 Grp Bromatol 11,0 90,7 INSERM 11,0 91,8 Inst Biochem 44,1 95,9 Inst Pharmacol & Expt Therapeut 11,0 96,9 Inst Pharmacol & Neurosci 11,0 97,9 Mol Struct Grp 11,0 99,0 Wallenberg Neurosci Ctr 11,0 100,0 Total97100,0

19 Graph 3 – Coimbra’s 1st Author’s second filiation

20 Table 7 – Coimbra’s impact factor Table 8 – Coimbra’s impact factor

21 Graph 4 –Coimbra’s journal impact factor

22 Table 9 – Coimbra’s article citation´s number Table 10 – Coimbra’s article citation´s number

23 Graph 5 – Coimbra’s article citation´s number

24 Table 11 – Coimbra’s relative position of Institution Author

25 Lisbon’s results Table 12 – Lisbon’s 1st Author’s Institution Filiation NValid108 Missing0 Filiation Statistics Table 13 – Lisbon’s 1st Author’s Institution Filiation Frequenc yPercent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent ValidCtr Quim & Bioquim 1,9 Fac Med 6560,2 61,1 Hosp Santa Maria 3027,8 88,9 Inst Mol Med 1,9 89,8 Med Sch 21,9 91,7 Univ Clin Dermatol 1,9 92,6 Univ Lisbon 87,4 100,0 Total108100,0 Filiation

26 Graph 6 – Lisbon’s 1st Author’s Institution Filiation

27 Table 14 – Lisbon’s 1st Author’s first filiation NValid 108 Missing 0 Filiation1 Statistics Table 15 – Lisbon’s 1st Author’s first filiation Filiation1 Freque ncyPercent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid-1,9 Aarhus Univ Hosp1,9 1,9 Campo Grande1,9 2,8 Ctr Quim & Bioquim1,9 3,7 Dept Quim & Bioquim1,9 4,6 Dermatopathol Gemeinschaftspraxis 1,9 5,6 Fac Med4945,4 50,9 Free Univ Brussels1,9 51,9 Hosp Santa Maria2119,4 71,3 Innsbruck Med Univ1,9 72,2 Inst Genet Med Jacinto Magalhaes 1,9 73,1 Inst Higiene & Med Trop21,9 75,0 Inst Med Genet Jacinto Magalhaes 1,9 75,9 Inst Tecnol Quim & Biol1,9 76,9 Maternidade Dr Alfredo da Costa 1,9 77,8 Rush Univ Ctr Med1,9 78,7 St Pierre Univ Hosp1,9 79,6 Univ Bonn1,9 80,6 Univ Cambridge1,9 81,5 Univ Cantabria CSIC1,9 82,4 Univ Edinburgh Coll Med & Vet Med 1,9 83,3 Univ Edinburgh Inst Cell & Mol Biol 1,9 84,3 Univ Lisbon87,4 91,7 Univ Nova Lisboa43,7 95,4 Univ Paris 111,9 96,3 Univ Roma La Sapienza1,9 97,2 Univ Texas1,9 98,1 Vanderbilt Univ1,9 99,1 Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Ctr Med1,9 100,0 Total108100,0

28 Graph 7 – Lisbon’s 1st Author’s first filiation

29 NValid 108 Missing 0 Table 16 – Lisbon’s 1st Author’s second filiation Filiation2 Statistics Table 17 – Lisbon’s 1st Author’s second filiation Filiation2 FrequencyPercentValid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid- 10496,3 IMM 21,9 98,1 Inst Higiene & Med Trop 1,9 99,1 Inst Invest Cientif Bento Rocha Cabral 1,9 100,0 Total108100,0

30 Graph 8 – Lisbon’s 1st Author’s second filiation

31 Table 18 - Impact factor Table 19 – Impact factor

32 Graph 9 – Journal impact factor

33 Table 20 – Article citation´s number Table 21 – Article citation´s number

34 Graph 10 – Article citation´s number

35 Table 22 – Relative position of Institution Author

36 Articles which 1st author belongs to faculty Coimbra:34 Lisboa:68 Lisboa:108 Coimbra:97 Number of articles Discussion and conclusion

37 Impact factor medium Coimbra: 3.02 Lisboa: 3.35 Impact factor sum up Coimbra:274.5 Lisboa:327.8 Citations number sum up Coimbra:408 Lisboa:356

38 References SANTOS,Raimundo - Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, Campinas, v. 1, n. 1, p. 22-38, jul./dez. 2003 – ISSN: 1678-765X COIMBRA JR., Carlos E. A. Scientific production in public health and the international literature bases. Cad. Saúde Pública. 1999, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 883-888. http://scientific.thomson.com/free/essays/selectionofmaterial/journalselection/ J. M. CAMPANARIO, L. GONZÁLEZ: Journal self-citations -Scientometrics 69 (2006) http://scientific.thomson.com/pt/produtos/WoK/wok/


Download ppt "Evaluation of the Scientific Production in Portuguese Medical Schools 2006/2007 Class 5."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google