Presentation on theme: "Important Questions In Environmental Ethics"— Presentation transcript:
1 Important Questions In Environmental Ethics 4/13/2017Important Questions In Environmental Ethics& important types ofenvironmental ethicsNEED NEARLY 2+ HOURS TO GO THROUGH THIS CAREFULLY- HAY 33 SLIDES(note: I made shortened version of this for 362 course, which may have some slide-additions & improvements worth dropping in here.)
2 The roots of environmental degradation 4/13/2017The roots of environmental degradationWhat are they?
3 Agriculture displaced sustainable foraging lifeways, beginning 10,000 years ago Agricultures destroyed ecosystems and the foraging societies that had co-evolved with them Paul Shephard
4 Western Monotheistic Religion? Critics cite 4 anti-nature tendencies in western religions
5 1) Domination of NatureGenesis: God commands humans to "fill the earth and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the air and over every living thing...”After the great flood God says to Noah: the animals will dread and fear you, and I will give you dominion over "everything that creeps on the ground, and over all the fish of the sea."
6 2) Rejection of animism and pantheism Animists believe that every part of the environment, living and non-living, has consciousness or spirit. Therefore, all beings deserve reverence.Pantheists identify deities with natural objects and processes. Therefore nature is sacred or holy and people should have reverence for it
7 3) Wilderness is cursed; Pastoral, agricultural, and City landscapes are Holy, Promised Lands 4) The sacred is beyond the world - earth is devalued in favor of heavenly hopes
8 Christians & Jews respond Our traditions promote a care-giving stewardship not domination of nature. (Noah story)Some admit the general destructive tendency, but say:Minority "traditions within the wider tradition" are nature- beneficent.Both traditions are currently mutating into forms increasingly concerned with the environment
9 Western Philosophy -another culprit? Critics blame its “dualism,” viewing humans as separate from and superior to nature
10 Rene Descartes is often blamed Rene Descartes ( ): believed that animals have no minds and cannot sufferHumans have minds and souls, they are different from animalsHis famous dictum -- `I think, therefore I am’ -- suggested to him that thought reveals not only existence, but also human superioritySo for Descartes, HUMANS are separate from nature and superior to it.And the natural world became an objectified "thing."Some critics say this objectification of nature is a key to science and ‘progress’
11 Francis Bacon is also blamed Francis Bacon ( ) was the father of the Scientific method.Critics say he promoted a view of nature as a machine.See, e.g., New Atlantis "a mechanistic utopia"--1624Many passages reveal that he thought nature was like women and slaves: They should be bound into the service of menMany scholars think such thinking shaped the anti-nature views of Judaism and Christianity, and thus warped human-nature relations in the west
13 More purported roots of ecological deterioration:. consumerism More purported roots of ecological deterioration: * consumerism * socialism/capitalism * Agricultures * Pastoralism
14 Two main types of Environmental Ethics: Individualistic&Holistic
15 Both holistic and individualistic environmental ethics address -- Whose interests count?Whose interests must we consider?
16 I.e.: Who has ‘standing’? Human Individuals? Anthropocentrism: The environment is valuable to the extent is useful or necessary for human well beingUsually "rationality" or some "intellectual" criterion is critical in the West for moral standingE.g. Kant & Descartes: only humans have "consciousness"William Blacksone: all have a right to a liveable environment (EE, 105)Kantian, deontological defense of human rights.Not much new here in the overall approach
17 Who has standing? Sentient animals? Sentient animals are those who can experience pleasure and/or painJeremy Bentham: an early utilitarian theorist, provided a basis for extending moral standing beyond humansPeter Singer's "Animal Liberation" theory provides a utilitarian argument pro-Animal Liberation
18 Who has Standing? Entities with ‘Interests” Living entities that have "interests" -- a good that can be harmed -- have moral standingChristopher Stone: Individual natural objects, including trees, can have standingConservator/trustee notion analogous to mentally deficient humansTom Regan: Animals who are "subjects of a life" have a "right" to that life.
19 Problems with individualistic approaches: (3) Feinberg, Regan and Singer base standing on human traits: having interests, capacity to suffer, beings subjects-of-a-life"I.e.: only if animals are like us in some important way will we grant them standingProblems with individualistic approaches:(1) Animal Liberation: How can you measure pleasure/sufferinga perennial problem with utilitarianism(2) Animal Rights: boundary of moral considerability is very restrictiveand many plants and animals left out.
20 Problems with individualistic approaches: (5) Individualistic approaches provide no basis for prioritizing concern for endangered species(4) How can we determine what the "interests" of a living thing are?How should we decide who should be the trustee for non-rational, morally considerable entities?
21 Holistic Approaches -- the basic idea: The whole is greater (and more valuable) than the constitutive parts
22 3 Holistic Approaches Biocentrism Ecocentrism Deep Ecology life-centered ethicsEcocentrismecosystem-centered ethicsDeep Ecology‘identification’ and kinship ethics
23 Biocentrism life centered ethics Paul Taylor's Respect for Nature (1986)Living things have a good of their own, a will to live, and end of their own. Thus they have inherent worthWith this perspective comes morally responsible behavior toward nature. Also:(1) humans are member of earth's life community(2) all species part of interdependent ecological system(3) all life pursues own good in own ways(4) Humans not inherently superior (all life has moral standing)Precursors include Albert Schweitzer's "reverence for life" ethics and Aristotle’s Virtue Ethics: stressing character traits; awe, the inherent worth of each life
24 Biocentrism - key problem Still pre-ecologicalnot really focused on ecosystems, but on individual life forms.
25 Ecocentrism: ecosystem centered ethics Aldo Leopold’s watershed Land Ethic, "All ethics rest upon a single premise: that the individual is a member of a community of interdependent parts.”Leopold argued that ethics involves self-imposed limitations on freedom of action and is derived from the above recognitionPrecursors:Baruch SpinozaHenry David ThoreauJohn Muir
26 Leopold’s ecosystem-centered ethics A land-use decision "is right when it tends to preserve the biotic community. It is wrong when it tends otherwise."Leopold spoke of the land as an organism, as alive."the complexity of the land organism" is the outstanding 20th century discovery."This is a mystical revelation that sounds like pantheism and anticipates James Lovelock’s Gaia hypothesisThe Land Ethic: "changes the role of Homo Sapiens from conqueror of the land-community to plain member and citizen of it. It implies respect for his fellow-members, and also respect for the [land-] community as such."
27 Lovelock’s holistic planetary Gaia theory Arguing the earth is a self-regulating living system that maintains the conditions for the perpetuation of life, James Lovelock advanced the Gaia Hypothesis.Although not intended as an ‘ethics,’ a biosphere-centered (large-ecocentric) ethics has been deduced from it, claiming:People ought not degrade this wonderful system in such a way that it can not function to keep its systems within the various delicate margins necessary for life
28 Deep Ecology Basic ideas All life systems are sacred and valuable -- apart from their usefulness to human beingsAll life evolved in the same way and thus, all are kin, with kinship obligationsAll species should be allowed to flourish and fulfill their evolutionary destinies
29 Deep Ecology The problem & solution Anthropocentrism (and reformist approaches) destroy natureA transformation of consciousness is needed, replacing anthropocentrism with a broader sense of the selfidentity should be grounded natureWhen we understand that we are part of nature, eco-defense, as self-defense, will follow
30 Holistic Approaches -- Key criticism: Individuals get hurt when you ignore them in favor of wholesThis is the key criticism of all ends-focused theoriesIn environmental ethics, the common charge is of "eco-fascism"!
31 Ethics and Environmental Ethics The Gradual Extension of Moral Concern
36 Earth CharterDescribe the Earth Charter process (history), central principles, and strategic vision, and say something about how this effort reflects some of the concerns and perspectives to which you are being introduced in this class, and would be opposed by other points of view