We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBryce Poore
Modified over 2 years ago
State Authorization: past, present and future Presentation at The UMassOnline Symposium 7 March 2012 Online Higher Education Learning Collaborative
© 2012 Eduventures, Inc. 2 How we got here… –“Program Integrity” Rules. The final version of the federal Department of Education’s “Program Integrity” rules (October 2010) require all Title IV eligible schools to obtain approval to operate in every state where they in some sense “operate”, and where the state requires said authorization –State Authority. This development is aligned with DoE concern to enhance the state role in admitting schools to Title IV funding, and points to longstanding state authority over the operation of postsecondary institutions –Widespread Concern. The Department’s (DoE) rules caused widespread concern given the contemporary scale of online delivery and other cross- border activity, inconsistent/ambiguous state rules, and very limited historical compliance by schools –Timeline Shifted. From July 1, 2011, DoE requires “good faith effort” towards full compliance, to be enforced from July 1, 2014 –Court Ruling. Federal court threw out the rule on a technicality, but state authority unaffected, and DoE appealing. Congressional action –Today. Schools and states working out individual and some collective (e.g. SHEEO survey, proposed interstate compact) strategies
© 2012 Eduventures, Inc. Only 7 states (14%) regulate out-of-state online; but 18 (35%) regulate other non-standard presence, and most regulate conventional presence 3 States where regulation diverges by school control 8?
© 2012 Eduventures, Inc. Climate moving from confusion to strategy, but school progress uneven. Minimal compliance burden for most, but extensive for some SHEEO Survey. SHEEO survey has removed considerable ambiguity from many state’s rules/interpretation –Little evidence of additional appetite to regulate wholly online delivery, but complex patchwork of regulations over various kinds of physical presence; but largely clarification/interpretation, not new rules –No sign yet of magnitude considerations, which reflects statutory language and difficulty of quick reform. In reality, magnitude drives strategy and enforcement State Forbearance. No evidence of significant “cease and desist” activity, but likely to increase medium-term School Strategy. Flurry of letters, many unnecessary, but likely advanced state thinking on rule application specifics. Many schools still only getting started. “Extreme” strategies receding, but growing number of schools barring enrollment from certain states. For many schools, compliance burden is minimal (with ongoing monitoring). Schools with complex, extensive presence incurring significant costs Short Term v. Long-Term. Value-add of state-by-state regulation for out- of-state schools questionable, so situation likely to resolve in favor of some kind of inter-state compact; but in the meantime schools must factor in state regulation when formulating out-of-state activity 4
© 2012 Eduventures, Inc. Other considerations… One-Time v. Ongoing Effort- if a school needs to be authorized once, authorization likely must be renewed routinely Beyond the Higher Education Agency 1- questions of business registration, and even taxation of unrelated business income (if state regards school presence as operational trigger) Beyond the Higher Education Agency 2- concern about professional boards (e.g. nursing, education). Emphasis appears to be on regulation of individuals wishing to practice in-state, and less out-of-state schools Long-Term Role of SHEEO? Will state agencies continue to report all and every changes or clarifications to SHEEO, or will SHEEO survey start to become an historical document? 5
© 2012 Eduventures, Inc. Thank You! Richard Garrett Managing Director Online Higher Education Learning Collaborative (OHE-LC) Eduventures, Inc. 101 Federal Street Boston, MA 02110 617-532-6081 email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org www.eduventures.com
© 2012 Eduventures, Inc. UMassOnline Speaker Series Upcoming Events April 4, 2012 - The Power of Partnering Together - Creating Synergy Between Enrollment and Technology Departments That Transforms Performance Featuring Embry-Riddle’s Bill Hampton, Becky Vasquez and John Watret April 26, 2012 – NIFTI Showcase (Needs Identification Framework for Technology Innovation) Featuring Kristine Shannon and Stefanie Henderson from UMassOnline
Establishing SARA, the State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement WCET State Authorization Network November 13-14, 2013 Denver, CO.
CONNECT Events and Groups LEARN News and Views ADVANCE Policies and Practices New Federal Regulations on State Authorization of Distance Education Distance.
EDUCATION FOR ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY Mary Clagett, Director, National Workforce Policy, Jobs for the Future The National Fund’s 5th Annual Meeting | Learn.
July 18, 2014 Jenny Parks, Director, M-SARA, Midwestern Higher Education Compact (MHEC) 1.
The State of State Authorization: Results of a National Inventory Marianne Boeke National Center for Higher Education Management Systems (NCHEMS) DETC.
SHEEO Meeting Presentation by the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) Chris Minnich, Senior Membership Director July 13, 2011.
“SARA:” State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement A Process To Make State Authorization More Uniform, Effective and Efficient April, 2012.
FOURTH CABINET RETREAT 20 – 21 DECEMBER 2011 PRESENTATION BY MOTIE.
Standards for Better Health implementation Suzie Loader Director of Nursing.
Community School Sponsor Evaluation Advisory Panel Final Recommendations.
SECRRA and SARA Updates March 4,
State Authorization Monday, April 11, 2011 Tuesday, April 12, 2011.
U.S. Treasury Efforts to Deliver Federal Benefit Payments Electronically Walt Henderson Director, Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) Strategy Division Financial.
Today’s Speakers The State of State Authorization: Regulations and Reciprocity OCICU Conference March 2015.
Determining Validity For Oklahoma’s Educational Accountability System Prepared for the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Oklahoma State.
IANA Stewardship Transition & Enhancing ICANN Accountability Panel and Audience discussion | WSIS Forum | 5 May 2016.
1 Benefits and Challenges of the Regulatory Reforms in Georgia Zaal Lomtadze, Deputy Minister of Environment 11 October 2007, Belgrade.
State Authorization Program Integrity Final Rule.
Plotting Your Course for Comprehensive Monitoring.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education Overview of Results Driven Accountability Assuring Compliance and Improving Results August.
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.