Presentation on theme: "Pedagogical Strategies for Synchronous Learning Global Learning Technology Conference Wilmington, NC October 11, 2013 * Anthony C. Holderied Instructional."— Presentation transcript:
Pedagogical Strategies for Synchronous Learning Global Learning Technology Conference Wilmington, NC October 11, 2013 * Anthony C. Holderied Instructional Technologist North Carolina State University
Agenda: 1.Why Pedagogy? 2.Building Student Engagement – Considerations, Instructional Challenges, Best Practices Creating a profile Ice Breaker Activities Pair and Share 3.Facilitating Group Interaction – Considerations, Instructional Challenges, Best Practices Breakout Rooms Interactive Whiteboards Pair and Share 4.Assessing Synchronous Learning – Considerations, Instructional Challenges, Best Practices Peer Assessment Pair and Share Polling Quizzing 5.Questions/Discussion *
Building Student Engagement Why Does Engagement Matter? 1. Cognitive Engagement Interest Motivation Retention 2. Social Engagement Community and connections Active partners in learning Teach and learn
Building Student Engagement Instructional Challenges 1. Disparate locations 2. Physical isolation 3. Too convenient to... Procrastinate Forget Become disengaged
Exercise: Edit Your Profile 1.Choose Edit Profile from the drop-down menu 2.Click the No Picture icon 3.Browse to an image on your computer 4.Choose the image 5.Click Open 6.Enter your name and other information 7.Click OK, when finished
Ice Breaker Exercise: “I learn best in classes where the instructor_____...”
Pair and Share Get with a neighbor and… 1. Exchange names, occupation, and organization 2. Brainstorm two additional ice breaker activities that could prove successful in establishing student engagement in a synchronous learning environment 3. Record and report back to the group *
Facilitating Group Interaction Why Group Work? 1.Prepares students for 'the real world' 2.Students teach and learn from each other (multiple perspectives) 3.Promote a sense of belonging 4.May cut down on prep time for instructor *
Facilitating Group Interaction Instructional Challenges 1. Achieving 'buy-in' 2. Student schedules 3. Social 'loafing' 4. Assessment *
Breakout Rooms Key features: 1.Replicate collaborative environment for small groups 2.Participants in each room may only hear/see each other 3.May be created at any time and reused throughout the session 4.Moderator can move from room to room *
Group Concept Map Exercise In this activity you will work as a group to create a concept map. Creating a concept map is an approach to learning that allows you to brainstorm and articulate different perspectives of looking at a topic or idea. Most commonly, concept maps are used to gain, share, or produce knowledge. By creating this map collaboratively, your group will benefit from having multiple perspectives contributed by you and your group members.
Concept Map Directions Assemble a concept map of pedagogical applications for a variety of learning technologies. 1.Work as a team in breakout rooms, discussing ideas collaboratively 2.Click and drag the labels on the left into the appropriate “bubbles” on the right 3.Use all of the labels by placing one per bubble. All bubbles will not be filled unless you use some labels more than once. 4.Once you have completed your map, have each member save it to their desktop (File Save Whiteboard Current Page)
Pair and Share Get with a neighbor and… Brainstorm one idea that could serve as an engaging group “breakout” activity. If helpful, think of past group activities you have facilitated that were successful in engaging students in the learning process, and how it would translate in the synchronous learning environment. *
Facilitating Group Interaction Best Practices 1. Set expectations, explain importance 2. Set up groups appropriately Self select Teacher select Randomized 3. Duration Frequent vs. Occasional Semester-long vs. Rotating groups Major project vs. In-class activity *
Assessing Synchronous Learning Implementing Peer Assessment Why Employ Peer Evaluation? 1. Grounded in Active Learning (Piaget) and Social Constructivism (Vygotsky) 2. Promotes critical thinking (re-evaluation) 3. Increased engagement through higher responsibility 4. May reduce grading time *
Implementing Peer Assessment Considerations 1. Process, product, or both? 2. Low-stakes vs. high stakes 3. Small or large groups? *
Concept Map Peer Evaluation Activity Work as a team in breakout rooms to assess another group’s concept map 1.Each group should turn in one score sheet only 2.Use the rubric provided to score the assigned concept map 3.Scoring Assignments A.Room One evaluates Room Two B.Room Two evaluates Room Three C.Room Three evaluates Room Four 4.In your Break Out room, click Load Content, then Browse for and upload the appropriate group’s concept map to the whiteboard. 5.Using the Page Explorer, check Follow, and toggle back and forth between assigned concept map, Bartel’s rubric and your group’s scoring rubric. 6.Type the Room Number, points for each category, and score total using the whiteboard’s text box tool.
Peer Assessment Rubric 4321 Participation Group member participated fully and was always on task in class. Group member participated most of the time and was on task most of the time. Group member participated but wasted time regularly or was rarely on task. Group member did not participate, wasted time, or worked on unrelated material. Leadership Group member assumed leadership in an appropriate way when necessary by helping the group stay on track. Group member sometimes assumed leadership in an appropriate way. Group member usually allowed others to assume leadership or often dominated the group. Group member did not assume leadership or assumed it in a nonproductive manner. Listening Group member listened carefully to others’ ideas. Group member usually listened to others ideas. Group member sometimes did not listen to others’ ideas. Group member did not listen to others and often interrupted them. Feedback Group member offered detailed, constructive feedback when appropriate Group member offered constructive feedback when appropriate Group member occasionally offered constructive feedback, but not always useful. Group member did not offer constructive or useful feedback. Cooperation Group member treated others respectfully and shared the workload fairly. Group member usually treated others respectfully and shared the workload fairly. Group member sometimes treated others disrespectfully or did not share workload fairly. Group member often treated others disrespectfully or did not share the workload fairly. Time Management Group member completed assigned tasks on time. Group member usually completed assigned tasks on time and did not hold up progress because of incomplete work. Group member often did not complete assigned tasks on time, and held up completion of project work. Group member did not complete most assigned tasks on time and often inconvenienced the group.
Bartel’s Scoring Rubric for Concept Maps 4321 Concepts and Terminology Shows an understanding of the topic’s concepts and principles and uses appropriate terminology and notations Makes some mistakes in terminology or shows a few misunderstandings of concepts Makes many mistakes in terminology and shows a lack of understanding of many concepts Shows no understanding of the topic’s concepts and principles Knowledge of the relationships among concepts Identifies all the important concepts and shows an understanding of the relationships among them Identifies important concepts but makes some incorrect connections Makes many incorrect connections Fails to use any appropriate concepts or appropriate connections Ability to communicate through concept maps Constructs an appropriate and complete concept map and includes examples; places concepts in an appropriate hierarchy and places linking words on all connections; produces a concept map that is easy to interpret Places almost all concepts in an appropriate hierarchy and assigns linking words to most connections; produces a concept map that is easy to interpret Places only a few concepts in an appropriate hierarchy or uses only a few linking words; produces a concept map that is difficult to interpret Produces a final product that is not a concept map Group NumberConcepts and TerminologyKnowledge of the relationships among concepts Ability to communicate through concept maps Score (12)
Pair and Share Get with a neighbor and… Brainstorm one idea that could serve as an effective peer assessment activity where students assess another student or a group of students via the use of a rubric. If helpful, think of past group activities you have facilitated that were successful and how you might involve peer assessment using a rubric in a synchronous learning environment. *
Implementing Peer Assessment Best Practices 1. Individual and group contributions 2. Fewer dimensions 3. Expectations and rationale 4. Co-develop criteria *
Exercise: Create a Poll 1.Click on the Options menu in the Participants panel, and change the Polling Type to A..D Multiple Choices. 2.If visible, make the polling responses invisible. 3.In the Whiteboard space below, use one of the Text tools to type a multiple choice question requiring an A, B, C or D answer. 4.Allow the other participants to answer the question. 5.Lock the responses. 6.Publish the responses to the Whiteboard. Question:A.B.C.D.
Sample polling questions Physics Example: An object floats in water with 3/4 of its volume, V, submerged. The ratio of the density of the object to that water is: A. 1/4 B. 1/3 C. 1/2 D. 3/4 E. None of the above F. Not enough information Law Example: Which of the concepts from the Unit 5 lecture video would you like to discuss further? A. Intentional Tort B. Negligence C. Strict Liability D. Insurance *
Flipping the Classroom Best Practices 1. Create a need to know 2. Employ engaging models 3. Consider technology 4. Allow for reflection (Miller, 2012) (Mazur, 2013)
Questions? Review 1.Building Student Engagement – Considerations, Instructional Challenges, Best Practices Creating a profile Ice Breaker Activities Pair and Share 2.Facilitating Group Interaction – Considerations, Instructional Challenges, Best Practices Breakout Rooms Interactive Whiteboards Pair and Share 3.Assessing Synchronous Learning – Considerations, Instructional Challenges, Best Practices Peer Assessment Pair and Share Polling Quizzing Thank you for attending!