We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byStacey Creacy
Modified over 2 years ago
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF Curriculum Alignment Techniques and Tools for Making it Work Innovations 2005 Judy Neill email@example.com Wisconsin Technical College System Foundation, Inc. ® Worldwide Instructional Design System
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF Curriculum Alignment Model Process Tools Products Reflections
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF What does learning alignment mean to you?
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Learning-Centered Alignment Focuses on learning Lays the groundwork for documenting learning results Sets the stage for teaching and learning excellence Encourages continuous improvement
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 All Learning Experiences Courses Programs Majors Degrees Aligned Learning Model
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Learning Activitie s Assessment Learning Outcome s What? Who? When? How? Identify learning needs. Teach the right thing. Assess what we intended to teach. Teach what we intend to measure. Aligned Learning Model Learners
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 WHO WHAT WHEN HOW Learning Colleges Align Learning.
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Why Align? Enhance the quality of student learning Ensure national or professional occupational standards are met. Infuse program outcomes. Examine the duplication of course content. Incorporate new content and/or update existing content. Facilitate collaboration among faculty.
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Aligned What How When Competencies Learning Objectives Performance Standards Exit Learning Outcomes Linked External Standards Rubrics Assessment Activities Assessment Items Learning Activities Learning Materials/Objects Delivery Modes Courses Workshops Other Learning Experiences Seminars Aligned Learning Experience
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Horizontal Alignment Aligned Learning Model College to College (Transfer)
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Horizontal Alignment Vertical Alignment Aligned Learning Model Level-to-Level (Articulation)
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Aligned Title Performance Standards Exit Learning Outcomes Linked External Standards Within a College Within a Program Across a Department Across a System Aligned Course – Multiple Iterations Competencies Description Credit Configuration Course Number Grading Rationale
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Aligned Title Performance Standards Courses titles descriptions credits Across Colleges Across Levels Horizontal Vertical Aligned Program– Multiple Iterations Competencies External Standards Program Number Program Outcomes Description Entrance Requirements Prerequisites
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 What Isn’t Aligned in Program Alignment – Multiple Iterations? College Core Abilities Learning objectives Learning activities Assessment activities Delivery mode Course sequence Textbooks Specific General Studies Courses Electives Decisions made by college, department, or individual faculty members.
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF Wisconsin Technical College System Health Occupations Statewide Alignment Wisconsin Technical College System Health Occupations Statewide Alignment
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 All 16 colleges offered Health Occupations programs. Shortage of healthcare workers led to pressure from industry align programs. Programs had different entrance requirements. Programs had different science requirements. Students couldn’t transfer between programs. Expanded online offerings increased issues of transfer/articulation among colleges. Wisconsin Situation Wisconsin Health Occupations Alignment
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Boost enrollment in health occupations programs. Ease course transferability among colleges. Facilitate collaboration among faculty state-wide (make use of best practices.) Maximize the use of statewide curriculum development dollars. Facilitate development of online courses. Align programs but allow individual teaching differences in learning objectives, learning activities, textbooks, etc. Wisconsin Goals Wisconsin Health Occupations Alignment
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Same entrance requirements Same program configuration (courses/credits) Same course titles and descriptions Same program outcomes Same course competencies Same performance standards for assessment Solution: Aligned Curriculum Wisconsin Health Occupations Alignment
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Solution: Aligned Curriculum Wisconsin Health Occupations Alignment Anesthesia Technology Clinical Laboratory Technician Cardiovascular Technologist Dental Assistant Dental Hygienist Diagnostic Medical Sonography Health Unit Coordinator Medical Assistant Medical Coding Nursing (AD, PN, and Nursing Assistant) Radiography Technologist Surgical Technologist
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Facilitate alignment process. Provide a consistent curriculum model, format and terminology. Define “above the line” and “below the line.” Allow teacher differences in learning plans and assessment tasks. Link to Professional Standards, DACUM, and Program Outcomes. Disseminate and store the curriculum electronically. Partnership with WIDS Wisconsin Health Occupations Alignment
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Aligned Core Skills Assessment Approach Professional Development Across Colleges Across Levels Horizontal Related Occupations Aligned Core Curriculum– Multiple Programs Performance Indicators External Standards “Plug and Play” Learning Activities Implementation Strategies
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF Wisconsin Technical College System Critical Core Manufacturing Skills Statewide Alignment Wisconsin Technical College System Critical Core Manufacturing Skills Statewide Alignment
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 WI manufacturers face cost and competition challenges that call for the implementation of new production efficiency measures along with automation and technology strategies. Growing sense of concern about availability of skilled workers. Concerned that manufacturing industry image is making it difficult to recruit and maintain the right workers. Industry called on WI Technical Colleges to help position manufacturing as a continuously vital part of Wisconsin’s economy. Wisconsin’s Manufacturing Situation Wisconsin Critical Core Manufacturing Skills Alignment
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Identify high level, critical core skills that are needed by all manufacturing graduates and incumbent workers. Infuse the critical core skills into all Wisconsin Technical College manufacturing programs. Develop strategies for assessing the critical core skills. Provide resources for teaching the critical core skills across the curriculum of all manufacturing programs. Wisconsin Critical Core Manufacturing Skills Alignment WTCS Critical Core Skills Project Goals
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Industry focus groups to identify the critical core skills. Twelve critical core skills and performance indicators designed to infuse across all manufacturing programs. Portfolio template with plans to go to electronic portfolios. “Plug ‘n Play” LAP’s (Learning Activity Packets). Wisconsin Critical Core Manufacturing Skills Alignment Solution: WTCS Critical Core Skills
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Provide a consistent curriculum model, format and terminology. Facilitate development of performance indicators. Assist in linking Critical Core Manufacturing Skills to national standards. Assist faculty writers in the development of LAP’s. Develop the portfolio template and research the use of electronic portfolio’s. Provide tools and model for designing professional development. Wisconsin Critical Core Manufacturing Skills Alignment Partnership with WIDS
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 The Process
Define high performance. Competency Establish WHAT learners will learn. Design learning and assessment. WIDS Learning Design Process Deliver learning and evaluate effectiveness for continual improvement. Exit learning Outcomes Core Abilities Gen Education Program External Standards Mission DACUM Performance Assessments Assessment Assessment Objects/Items Assessment Activities Criteria Scoring Guide/Rubrics Learning Plans Learning Learning Activity Learning Objective Learning Objects/Materials Program Level Course Level All Levels
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 How Long Does It Take? 1 planning day with deans and other decision-makers 3-4 days pre-work by WIDS consultant 3 two-day collaborative faculty sessions (6 days) 3-4 one-hour conference calls with deans/program managers WIDS consultant work before, after, and between sessions The Alignment Process
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 The Alignment Process 1.Establish criteria for the finished product.
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 2.Identify External Standards and Exit Learning Outcomes [Program, General Education, and Core Abilities]. The Alignment Process Note: Use accreditation requirements and standards to guide the process Link external standards to competencies and course to lay the groundwork for standards matrices reports.
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 3.Brainstorm general areas of content or skill. 4.Write competencies for each area. 5.Perform final review of competencies. The Alignment Process
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 6.Divide competencies into logical segments of learning, determining sequence and scope of competencies. 7.Create courses – competencies, title, descriptions. 8.Assign credits (3-6 competencies per credit). The Alignment Process
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 9.Determine course prerequisites and sequence. 10.Configure into semesters if applicable. 11.Develop performance standards for each competency (criteria and conditions for assessment). The Alignment Process
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 The Tools
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 WIDS Software: Supports the design of learning and assessment.
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Use only the modules that relate to your project Follow color and icon coded flowcharts as you work
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Describe program Designate external standards NLN Standards MN Nursing Abilities NCLEX Content Establish exit learning outcomes Program Outcomes (discipline specific) Core Abilities (Critical Life Skills) General Education Outcomes (degree/program level) Configure courses Link outcomes to courses WIDS Program Design Module
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Identify General Course Information Develop Course Level Outcomes Competencies and Performance Standards Learning Objectives Link Competencies to Exit Learning Outcomes Program External Standards Certification Exam Content (As needed) Program Outcomes Core Abilities Build Syllabi Plan Learning Plan Assessment WIDS Learning Design Module
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Use libraries for helpful references
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 A verb library for writing competencies and other outcomes (Select by Bloom’s domain and level)
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 A health care library with sample competencies (Includes sample performance standards for assessment)
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 A performance assessment task library
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Pre-designed performance assessment tasks-- use “as is” or adapt to your needs
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Link program and other outcomes to competencies to infuse them through the learning
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 What Is Posted? Project reports/issues Discussions Alignment Documents WIDS Program Files Program File Reports Sample Program Configuration WIDS Course Files Course Outcome Summary Reports WIDS Analyzer Reports Zip Files Model Learning Materials (when available)
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 The Products
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Alignment Documents Program Outcome Matrices Program Profile Course Outcome Summary (Syllabus) All aligned programs Developed through eTech for selected programs. Developed by individual colleges for others. Learning Plans Assessment Tasks Learning Materials/Objects Above-the-Line Below-the-Line
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WHAT IF SOMETHING CHANGES?
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Help! 1.Our standards have changed! 2.We forgot something! 3.We need more time! 4.We have too much time in this class! 5.I can’t figure out how to teach this!
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Review Process 1. Conference call with deans annually 2. Conference calls with teachers of individual courses (professional development) at the conclusion of each semester 3. Face-to-face meetings as needed Facilitate:
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Reflections
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Challenges Achieve consensus among multiple stakeholders with diverse needs and interests Move forward in the face of overt and hidden complexities and risks Produce high quality products (curriculum) that can be deployed on the frontlines of learning Coordinate a process that is effective, affordable, manageable, timely and flexible
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Keys to Success Partnership Informed Commitment Instructional Design System Defined Deliverables Process: Effective, Efficient, Flexible Easy Dissemination
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Partnership WTC System Leadership Funding 16 Wisconsin Technical Colleges Leadership Resources Deployment WIDS Facilitation ID Expertise and Tools
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Informed Commitment Enhancement of learning and increased access for learners will drive the design process. The aligned program will be different from existing programs. The program at each college will change, causing each college to do things differently Faculty members will be likely to teach different courses – perhaps in different ways. The process will be collaborative, focusing on best practices leading to measurable results that can be benchmarked to standards for excellence in learning and teaching.
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 WIDS Instructional Design System Centers on learning. Based on performance of learning outcomes Incorporates external standards. Links exit learning outcomes (program, general education, and core abilities) to course outcomes and performance standards. Connects learning outcomes to learning and assessment strategies. Provides software tools to support the process.
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Defined Deliverables
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Process: Effective, Efficient, Flexible Build buy-in Clarify expectations Align curriculum Monitor and review
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Easy Dissemination CurriculumBank Central source for most current alignment products Easy to access Provides discussion/review forum Easy to update Cost effective
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 Benefits of Alignment “This is better than the curriculum we had before. Our old curriculum reflected the biases and preferences of our own faculty. This one is based on the best thinking of teachers from 16 colleges!” Nursing Instructor, Western Wisconsin Technical College
© 2003-2005 WIDS-WTCSF WIDS 05 “Curriculum used statewide is more cost- effective than developing individual programs at each college. An aligned program is easier to evaluate. Competencies are linked to standards. The colleges now submit one curriculum the accrediting agency, jointly.” Kay Tupala, Associate Dean of Health and Public Safety, Northeast Wisconsin Technical College Financial Return?
Developing Aligned Nursing Curricula: Strategies and Tools N-OADN Annual Convention Tuesday, November 7, 2006, 10:00 a.m. - 11:15 a.m. Presented by: Terri.
Minnesota WIDS Users’ Group Connecting: Learning Teaching and Assessment Maximizing the Potential of WIDS Judy Neill Worldwide Instructional Design System.
Documenting How WTCS Colleges Assess Learning Outcomes.
Key Aspects of Incorporating Standards and Certifications From Skill Standards To Skilled Performance From Skill Standards To Skilled Performance.
Using WIDS to Document How Colleges Assess Learning Outcomes.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Set background image for this slide to change picture. A range of photos are available in the graphics folder.
Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.
Associate Degree Nursing
Assessment Tools for Today and Tomorrow. What do they need to achieve? WHO WHAT WHEN HOW Who are the learners? How will I know when they’ve achieved.
Cultivating Quality Curriculum 4 th Annual WIDS User Group Conference October 21, 2010 Valerie Bielinski & Vicki Csida Northeast Wisconsin Technical College.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Office of Service Quality
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
RED RIVER COLLEGE PLAR/RPL IN ACTION! Recognizing Prior Learning.
Jeanne M. Clerc, Ed.D. Western Illinois University (WIU) October 14, 2011.
Filling the Gaps in Online Development Tech Expo Presented by: Annette Czarnecki, WIDS Terri Johnson, WIDS Jeff Robshaw, GTC.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
School of Business University of Bridgeport Admissions Presentation Robert Gilmore, Ph.D. Associate Dean School of Business.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Perkins End of Year Evaluation Southwestern Community College May 18, 2016.
Evaluating Educational Technology and Integration Strategies By: Dakota Tucker, Derrick Haney, Demi Ford, and Kent Elmore Chapter 7.
Franklin University Dr. Lewis Chongwony, Instructional Designer
U.S. Department Of Labor (DOL) Trade Adjustment Assistance Community College Career Training (TAACCCT) Grant Making the Future: The Wisconsin Strategy.
This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1) It provides direction (1) It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
Subgrant Goals and Activities Frostburg State University.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Stage 3 Plan: Develop School Improvement Plan.
ENGAGING LEADERS FOR CHANGE AND INNOVATION ADEA CCI 2011 Summer Liaison Meeting San Diego, CA June 27-29, 2011 Janet M. Guthmiller, DDS, PhD University.
Curriculum Mapping: Academic Faculty & Subject Librarians Working Together By Barbara Tierney, Head Research & Info Services, UCF Libraries With some content.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
ABET ACCRIDITATION STATUS AND TASKS AHEAD By Dr. Abdul Azeem.
Becoming a Teacher Ninth Edition
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
Department of Physical Sciences School of Science and Technology B.S. in Chemistry Education CIP CODE: PROGRAM CODE: Program Quality Improvement.
Road To Success Kathleen Bolland, PhD Javonda Williams, PhD, LCSW SUCCESS Next Exit Aligning curricular planning, teaching, and program evaluation to facilitate.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
School of Healthcare FACULTY OF MEDICINE AND HEALTH The design and delivery of an interdisciplinary MSc in Advanced Practice Professor Claire Hale.
Marietta Rives, DE Consultant, Co-Chair of Instruction & Assessment Team Jan Norgaard, AEA 13 Associate Director, Network Team Member Deb Johnsen, AEA.
Description of a Process for Enhancing Pre-service Programs to Better Prepare General Education Teachers to Teach Students with Disabilities 2016 CEEDAR.
The Workforce, Education Commissioning and Education and Learning Strategy Enabling world class healthcare services within the North West.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
ASSESSMENT OF CORE SKILLS/ GENERAL EDUCATION OUTCOMES Angelina Hill, PhD Associate Director, Office of Academic Assessment.
Group Seminar Field Instruction Model. 1. Delivery of consistent competency based field instruction and augmented case supervision. 2. Provision of.
Closing the Loop UNLV School of Nursing BSN Program Susan Kowalski, RN, PhD November 6, 2008 Academic Assessment Symposium.
10/6/20151 David G. Loomis, Ph.D. Professor of Economics Illinois State University Lead Entity, Energy Learning Exchange Illinois Energy Learning Exchange.
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
Purpose of Instruction
Oregon Pathways for Adult Basic Skills Transition to Education and Work (OPABS) Initiative.
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.