Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

T-76.115 Project Review X-tremeIT I2 Iteration 12.02.2004.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "T-76.115 Project Review X-tremeIT I2 Iteration 12.02.2004."— Presentation transcript:

1 T Project Review X-tremeIT I2 Iteration

2 T Project Review X-TremeIT Valeria, Konstantin, Roman, Olesia, Vladislav, Seppo, Aleksandr 2 Agenda  Project status (7 min)  achieving the goals of the iteration  project metrics  Used work practices (5 min)  Completed work (30 min)  presenting the iteration’s results  demo  Plans for the next iteration (3 min)

3 T Project Review X-TremeIT Valeria, Konstantin, Roman, Olesia, Vladislav, Seppo, Aleksandr 3 Status of planned goals of the iteration  Goals:  Test cases and testing of GUI +-  Integrate system modules ++  Implement more use cases ++  UC-01/1.1 Creating objects – to be updated with more object types  Add text box to objects  UC-01/1.2 Removing objects  UC-01/1.4 Removing dependencies  UC-02/1 Saving process diagram to XML file  UC-03 Removing process diagram  UC-04 Viewing process diagram  UC-09 Printing process diagram  Testing +-

4 T Project Review X-TremeIT Valeria, Konstantin, Roman, Olesia, Vladislav, Seppo, Aleksandr 4 Status of planned deliverables of the iteration Deliveries:  Implemented software  Updated:  project plan  requirements document  technical specification  Test cases  Test report  User’s manual (Seppo)  Progress report

5 T Project Review X-TremeIT Valeria, Konstantin, Roman, Olesia, Vladislav, Seppo, Aleksandr 5 Realization of the tasks  Deviations  Architectural design  Unplanned (LOC Calculation)  Not started I2 tasks (was not reported)

6 T Project Review X-TremeIT Valeria, Konstantin, Roman, Olesia, Vladislav, Seppo, Aleksandr 6 Working hours by person MEMBERRealPlannedDiff Aleksandr31,60 41,009,40 Vladislav35,10 48,0012,90 Konstantin23,60 38,0014,40 Olesija46,00 36,00-10,00 Roman43,10 40,00-3,10 Seppo35,20 56,0020,80 Valeria41,60 41,00-0,60 TOTAL256,20 300,0043,80 MEMBERPPI1I2 Subtotal I3DE Total Aleksandr57,557,7531,60 146, ,85 Vladislav565535,10 146, ,1 Konstantin5755,7523,60 136, ,35 Olesija51,541,4546,00 138, ,95 Roman65,555,743,10 164, ,3 Seppo48,645,7535,20 129, ,55 Valeria66,562,141,60 170, ,2 TOTAL402,6373,5256, , ,3

7 T Project Review X-TremeIT Valeria, Konstantin, Roman, Olesia, Vladislav, Seppo, Aleksandr 7 Project progress tracking and control

8 T Project Review X-TremeIT Valeria, Konstantin, Roman, Olesia, Vladislav, Seppo, Aleksandr 8 Quality metrics I1I2I3DETotal Reported 033 Closed 022 Bug metrics  Small bugs were found while compiling the code  Insignificant logical bugs eliminated right on the programming sessions  3 bugs reported to Bugzilla, 2 corrected Functional areaCoverageQualityComments GUI2  Small defects to be fixed Integration testing2  Save diagram test is not passed XML parser1  Nothing serious yet

9 T Project Review X-TremeIT Valeria, Konstantin, Roman, Olesia, Vladislav, Seppo, Aleksandr 9 Configuration management  JUnit tests for every class will be written in the next phase.  We did not need Ant.  Small problems with Eclipse and CVS, but everything has been solved.

10 T Project Review X-TremeIT Valeria, Konstantin, Roman, Olesia, Vladislav, Seppo, Aleksandr 10 Software metrics PackageClassesMethodsNCSS applet communication engine serverside Total NCSS = Non Commenting Source Statements

11 T Project Review X-TremeIT Valeria, Konstantin, Roman, Olesia, Vladislav, Seppo, Aleksandr 11 Risks  Risk management  risks evaluation forms  Risks analysis (Red, Yellow, Green)  No New risks reported Status of the risk I1 Status of the risk I2 Risk IDRisk Test plan fails 1.4Wrong architectural design 2.1Lack of experience 2.2Underestimated resources for project task 2.7Project is late 3.1Requirements changed

12 T Project Review X-TremeIT Valeria, Konstantin, Roman, Olesia, Vladislav, Seppo, Aleksandr 12 Work practices  Requirements elicitation and analysis (Konstantin)  Usability tests (Roman)  Architecture design (Vlad)  Pair programming (Aleksandr)

13 T Project Review X-TremeIT Valeria, Konstantin, Roman, Olesia, Vladislav, Seppo, Aleksandr 13 Pair Programming TypeUsageProductivity (LOC / person hours) Defects (defects / LOC) Pair Programming 94,6%25,50,0259 Individual 7,4%33,50,0299 TypeUsageProductivity (LOC / person hours) Defects (defects / LOC) Pair Programming 0,66 %22,30,0256 Individual 0,34 %16,70,0299 After Iteration 1 After Iteration 2

14 T Project Review X-TremeIT Valeria, Konstantin, Roman, Olesia, Vladislav, Seppo, Aleksandr 14 Software demo  GUI  Controller  XML parser  Engine

15 T Project Review X-TremeIT Valeria, Konstantin, Roman, Olesia, Vladislav, Seppo, Aleksandr 15 Plan for the next iteration  Goals:  Implement more use cases  UC-02/1 Saving process diagram locally  ? -> to be agreed with customer after project review meeting  Careful system testing  Bug fixing  Peer testing  System is ready to deliver to the customer  Deliveries:  Implemented software  Updated:  project plan  requirements document  technical specification  test cases  user’s manual  Test report  Peer test plans  Peer test reports  Progress report

16 T Project Review X-TremeIT Valeria, Konstantin, Roman, Olesia, Vladislav, Seppo, Aleksandr 16 Plan for the next iteration

17 T Project Review X-TremeIT Valeria, Konstantin, Roman, Olesia, Vladislav, Seppo, Aleksandr 17 Thank you! Questions, comments?


Download ppt "T-76.115 Project Review X-tremeIT I2 Iteration 12.02.2004."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google