Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Chapter 20: Testing Hypotheses About Proportions AP Statistics Unit 5.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Chapter 20: Testing Hypotheses About Proportions AP Statistics Unit 5."— Presentation transcript:

1 Chapter 20: Testing Hypotheses About Proportions AP Statistics Unit 5

2 Hypotheses 0 Hypotheses are working models that we adopt temporarily. null hypothesis 0 Our starting hypothesis is called the null hypothesis. H 0 0 The null hypothesis, that we denote by H 0, specifies a population model parameter of interest and proposes a value for that parameter. 0 We usually write down the null hypothesis in the form H 0 : parameter = hypothesized value. H A 0 The alternative hypothesis, which we denote by H A, contains the values of the parameter that we consider plausible if we reject the null hypothesis.

3 Hypotheses (cont.) null hypothesis 0 The null hypothesis, specifies a population model parameter of interest and proposes a value for that parameter. 0 We might have, for example, H 0 : p = We want to compare our data to what we would expect given that H 0 is true. 0 We can do this by finding out how many standard deviations away from the proposed value we are. 0 We then ask how likely it is to get results like we did if the null hypothesis were true.

4 A Trial as a Hypothesis Test 0 Think about the logic of jury trials: 0 To prove someone is guilty, we start by assuming they are innocent. 0 We retain that hypothesis until the facts make it unlikely beyond a reasonable doubt. 0 Then, and only then, we reject the hypothesis of innocence and declare the person guilty.

5 A Trial as a Hypothesis Test (cont.) 0 The same logic used in jury trials is used in statistical tests of hypotheses: 0 We begin by assuming that a hypothesis is true. 0 Next we consider whether the data are consistent with the hypothesis. 0 If they are, all we can do is retain the hypothesis we started with. If they are not, then like a jury, we ask whether they are unlikely beyond a reasonable doubt.

6 P-Values 0 The statistical twist is that we can quantify our level of doubt. 0 We can use the model proposed by our hypothesis to calculate the probability that the event we’ve witnessed could happen. 0 That’s just the probability we’re looking for—it quantifies exactly how surprised we are to see our results. P-value 0 This probability is called a P-value.

7 P-Values (cont.) 0 When the data are consistent with the model from the null hypothesis, the P-value is high and we are unable to reject the null hypothesis. 0 In that case, we have to “retain” the null hypothesis we started with. fail to reject the null hypothesis 0 We can’t claim to have proved it; instead we “fail to reject the null hypothesis” when the data are consistent with the null hypothesis model and in line with what we would expect from natural sampling variability. reject the null hypothesis 0 If the P-value is low enough, we’ll “reject the null hypothesis,” since what we observed would be very unlikely were the null model true.

8 What to Do with an “Innocent” Defendant 0 If the evidence is not strong enough to reject the presumption of innocent, the jury returns with a verdict of “not guilty.” 0 The jury does not say that the defendant is innocent. 0 All it says is that there is not enough evidence to convict, to reject innocence. 0 The defendant may, in fact, be innocent, but the jury has no way to be sure.

9 What to Do with an “Innocent” Defendant (cont.) 0 Said statistically, we will fail to reject the null hypothesis. 0 We never declare the null hypothesis to be true, because we simply do not know whether it’s true or not. 0 Sometimes in this case we say that the null hypothesis has been retained.

10 What to Do with an “Innocent” Defendant (cont.) 0 In a trial, the burden of proof is on the prosecution. 0 In a hypothesis test, the burden of proof is on the unusual claim. 0 The null hypothesis is the ordinary state of affairs, so it’s the alternative to the null hypothesis that we consider unusual (and for which we must marshal evidence).

11 Examples 1. A research team wants to know if aspirin helps to thin blood. The null hypothesis says that it doesn’t. They test 12 patients, observe the proportion with thinner blood, and get a P-value of They proclaim that aspirin doesn’t work. What would you say? 2. An allergy drug has been tested and found to give relief to 75% of the patients in a large clinical trial. Now the scientists want to see if the new, improved version works even better. What would the null hypothesis be? 3. The new drug is tested and the P-value is What would you conclude about the new drug?

12 The Reasoning of Hypothesis Testing 0 There are four basic parts to a hypothesis test: 1. Hypotheses 2. Model 3. Mechanics 4. Conclusion 0 Let’s look at these parts in detail…

13 The Reasoning of Hypothesis Testing (cont.) 1.Hypotheses 0 The null hypothesis: 0 The null hypothesis: To perform a hypothesis test, we must first translate our question of interest into a statement about model parameters. 0 In general, we have H 0 : parameter = hypothesized value. 0 The alternative hypothesis: 0 The alternative hypothesis: The alternative hypothesis, H A, contains the values of the parameter we consider plausible when we reject the null.

14 Hypothesis Example A 1996 report from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission claimed that at least 90% of all American homes have at least one smoke detector. A city’s fire department has been running a public safety campaign about smoke detectors consisting of posters, billboards, and ads on radio and TV and in the newspaper. The city wonders if this concerted effort has raised the local level above the 90% national rate. Building inspectors visit 400 randomly selected homes and find that 376 have smoke detectors. Is this strong evidence that the local rate is higher than the national rate? Set up the hypotheses.

15 The Reasoning of Hypothesis Testing (cont.) 2.Model 0 To plan a statistical hypothesis test, specify the model you will use to test the null hypothesis and the parameter of interest. 0 All models require assumptions, so state the assumptions and check any corresponding conditions. 0 Your model step should end with a statement such 0 Because the conditions are satisfied, I can model the sampling distribution of the proportion with a Normal model. 0 Watch out, though. It might be the case that your model step ends with “Because the conditions are not satisfied, I can’t proceed with the test.” If that’s the case, stop and reconsider.

16 The Reasoning of Hypothesis Testing (cont.) 2.Model (cont.) 0 Each test we discuss in the book has a name that you should include in your report. one-proportion z- test. 0 The test about proportions is called a one-proportion z- test.

17 One-Proportion z-Test H 0 : p = p 0 0 The conditions for the one-proportion z-test are the same as for the one proportion z-interval. We test the hypothesis H 0 : p = p 0 using the statistic where 0 When the conditions are met and the null hypothesis is true, this statistic follows the standard Normal model, so we can use that model to obtain a P-value.

18 The Reasoning of Hypothesis Testing (cont.) 3.Mechanics 0 Under “mechanics” we place the actual calculation of our test statistic from the data. 0 Different tests will have different formulas and different test statistics. 0 Usually, the mechanics are handled by a statistics program or calculator, but it’s good to know the formulas.

19 The Reasoning of Hypothesis Testing (cont.) 3.Mechanics (continued) P-value 0 The ultimate goal of the calculation is to obtain a P-value. 0 The P-value is the probability that the observed statistic value (or an even more extreme value) could occur if the null model were correct. 0 If the P-value is small enough, we’ll reject the null hypothesis. 0 Note: The P-value is a conditional probability—it’s the probability that the observed results could have happened if the null hypothesis is true.

20 P-value Example 0 A large city’s DMV claimed that 80% of candidates pass driving tests, but a survey of 90 randomly selected local teens who had taken the test found only 61 who passed. Does this finding suggest that the passing rate for teenagers is lower than the DMV reported? What is the P-value for the one-proportion z-test? Don’t forget to check the conditions for inference!

21 The Reasoning of Hypothesis Testing (cont.) 4.Conclusion 0 The conclusion in a hypothesis test is always a statement about the null hypothesis. 0 The conclusion must state either that we reject or that we fail to reject the null hypothesis. 0 And, as always, the conclusion should be stated in context.

22 The Reasoning of Hypothesis Testing (cont.) 4.Conclusion 0 Your conclusion about the null hypothesis should never be the end of a testing procedure. 0 Often there are actions to take or policies to change.

23 Conclusion Example 0 Recap: A large city’s DMV claimed that 80% of candidates pass driving tests. Data from a reporter’s survey of randomly selected local teens who had taken the test produced a P-value of What can the reporter conclude? And how might the reporter explain what the P-value means for the newspaper story?

24 Alternatives Hypotheses 0 There are three possible alternative hypotheses: 0 H A : parameter < hypothesized value 0 H A : parameter ≠ hypothesized value 0 H A : parameter > hypothesized value

25 Alternatives Hypotheses (cont.) 0 H A : parameter ≠ value two-sided alternative 0 H A : parameter ≠ value is known as a two-sided alternative because we are equally interested in deviations on either side of the null hypothesis value. 0 For two-sided alternatives, the P-value is the probability of deviating in either direction from the null hypothesis value.

26 Alternatives Hypotheses (cont.) one-sided alternatives 0 The other two alternative hypotheses are called one-sided alternatives. 0 A one-sided alternative focuses on deviations from the null hypothesis value in only one direction. 0 Thus, the P-value for one-sided alternatives is the probability of deviating only in the direction of the alternative away from the null hypothesis value.

27 Steps for Hypothesis Testing for One- Proportion z-Tests

28 Steps for Hypothesis Testing for One-Proportion z-Tests (cont.)

29 Testing a Hypothesis Example Home field advantage –teams tend to win more often when the play at home. Or do they? If there were no home field advantage, the home teams would win about half of all games played. In the 2007 Major League Baseball season, there were 2431 regular-season games. It turns out that the home team won 1319 of the 2431 games, or 54.26% of the time. Could this deviation from 50% be explained from natural sampling variability, or is it evidence to suggest that there really is a home field advantage, at least in professional baseball?

30 Graphing Calculator Shortcuts 0 One Proportion Z-Test: 0 Stat  TESTS 0 5: 1-Prop ZTest 0 P o = hypothesized proportion 0 x = number of successes 0 n = sample size 0 Determine the tail 0 Calculate

31 P-Values and Decisions: What to Tell About a Hypothesis Test 0 How small should the P-value be in order for you to reject the null hypothesis? 0 It turns out that our decision criterion is context-dependent. 0 When we’re screening for a disease and want to be sure we treat all those who are sick, we may be willing to reject the null hypothesis of no disease with a fairly large P-value (0.10). 0 A longstanding hypothesis, believed by many to be true, needs stronger evidence (and a correspondingly small P- value) to reject it. 0 Another factor in choosing a P-value is the importance of the issue being tested.

32 P-Values and Decisions (cont.) 0 Your conclusion about any null hypothesis should be accompanied by the P-value of the test. 0 If possible, it should also include a confidence interval for the parameter of interest. 0 Don’t just declare the null hypothesis rejected or not rejected. 0 Report the P-value to show the strength of the evidence against the hypothesis. 0 This will let each reader decide whether or not to reject the null hypothesis.

33 Examples 1. A bank is testing a new method for getting delinquent customers to pay their past-due credit card bills. The standard way was to send a letter (costing about $0.40) asking the customer to pay. That worked 30% of the time. They want top test a new method that involves sending a DVD to customers encouraging them to contact the bank and set up a payment plan. Developing and sending the video costs about $10 per customer. What is the parameter of interest? What are the null and alternative hypotheses? 2. The bank sets up an experiment to test the effectiveness of the DVD. They mail it out to several randomly selected delinquent customers and keep track of how many actually do contact the bank to arrange payments. The bank’s statistician calculates a P-value of What does this P-value suggest about the DVD? 3. The statistician tells the bank’s management that the results are clear and they should switch to the DVD method. Do you agree? What else might you want to know?

34 What Can Go Wrong? 0 Hypothesis tests are so widely used—and so widely misused—that the issues involved are addressed in their own chapter (Chapter 21). 0 There are a few issues that we can talk about already, though:

35 What Can Go Wrong? (cont.) 0 Don’t base your null hypothesis on what you see in the data. 0 Think about the situation you are investigating and develop your null hypothesis appropriately. 0 Don’t base your alternative hypothesis on the data, either. 0 Again, you need to Think about the situation.

36 What Can Go Wrong? (cont.) 0 Don’t accept the null hypothesis. 0 If you fail to reject the null hypothesis, don’t think a bigger sample would be more likely to lead to rejection. 0 Each sample is different, and a larger sample won’t necessarily duplicate your current observations.

37 Recap 0 We can use what we see in a random sample to test a particular hypothesis about the world. 0 Hypothesis testing complements our use of confidence intervals. 0 Testing a hypothesis involves proposing a model, and seeing whether the data we observe are consistent with that model or so unusual that we must reject it. 0 We do this by finding a P-value—the probability that data like ours could have occurred if the model is correct.

38 Recap (cont.) 0 We’ve learned: 0 Start with a null hypothesis. 0 Alternative hypothesis can be one- or two-sided. 0 Check assumptions and conditions. 0 Data are out of line with H 0, small P-value, reject the null hypothesis. 0 Data are consistent with H 0, large P-value, don’t reject the null hypothesis. 0 State the conclusion in the context of the original question.

39 Recap (cont.) 0 We know that confidence intervals and hypothesis tests go hand in hand in helping us think about models. 0 A hypothesis test makes a yes/no decision about the plausibility of a parameter value. 0 A confidence interval shows us the range of plausible values for the parameter.

40 Assignments: pp. 476 – Day 1: 0 Day 1: # 1-3, 9, 11 0 Day 2: 0 Day 2: # 4, 5, 12, 14, 18 0 Day 3: 0 Day 3: # 16, 20, 22


Download ppt "Chapter 20: Testing Hypotheses About Proportions AP Statistics Unit 5."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google