Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Silberschatz, Galvin, and Gagne ©2013. Modified by Dmitri V. Kalashnikov and Nalini Venkatasubramanian.Operating System Concepts – 9 th Ed. Chapter 9:

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Silberschatz, Galvin, and Gagne ©2013. Modified by Dmitri V. Kalashnikov and Nalini Venkatasubramanian.Operating System Concepts – 9 th Ed. Chapter 9:"— Presentation transcript:

1 Silberschatz, Galvin, and Gagne ©2013. Modified by Dmitri V. Kalashnikov and Nalini Venkatasubramanian.Operating System Concepts – 9 th Ed. Chapter 9: Virtual Memory

2 2 Background Demand Paging Performance of demand paging Page Replacement Page replacement algorithms Allocation of Frames Thrashing Other Considerations

3 3 Objectives To describe the benefits of a virtual memory system To explain the concepts of demand paging, page-replacement algorithms, and allocation of page frames To discuss the principle of the working-set model To examine the relationship between shared memory and memory-mapped files To explore how kernel memory is managed

4 4 Background and Motivation Code needs to be in memory to execute, but entire program rarely used Example: Error code, unusual routines, large data structures Entire program code is not needed at the same time Consider advantages of the ability to execute partially-loaded program Program no longer constrained by limits of physical memory Each program takes less memory while running  Thus, more programs can run at the same time  Increased CPU utilization and throughput with no increase in response time or turnaround time Less I/O needed to load or swap programs into memory  Thus each user program runs faster

5 5 Background (Cont.) Virtual memory – separation of user logical memory from physical memory Only part of the program needs to be in memory for execution Logical address space can therefore be much larger than physical address space Allows address spaces to be shared by several processes Allows for more efficient process creation More programs running concurrently Less I/O needed to load or swap processes Virtual memory makes the task of programming much easier  the programmer no longer needs to worry about the amount of physical memory available;  can concentrate instead on the problem to be programmed.

6 6 Background (Cont.) Virtual address space – logical view of how process is stored in memory Usually start at address 0, contiguous addresses until end of space Meanwhile, physical memory organized in page frames MMU must map logical to physical Virtual memory can be implemented via: Demand paging Demand segmentation

7 7 Virtual Memory That is Larger Than Physical Memory backing store

8 8 Virtual-address Space Usually design logical address space for stack to start at Max logical address and grow “down” while heap grows “up” Maximizes address space use Unused address space between the two is hole  No physical memory needed until heap or stack grows to a given new page Enables sparse address spaces with holes left for growth, dynamically linked libraries, etc System libraries shared via mapping into virtual address space Shared memory by mapping pages into virtual address space

9 9 Shared Library Using Virtual Memory

10 10 Policies for Paging/ Segmentation Fetch Strategies When should a page or segment be brought into primary memory from secondary (disk) storage?  Demand Fetch  Anticipatory Fetch Placement Strategies When a page or segment is brought into memory, where is it to be put?  Paging - trivial  Segmentation - significant problem Replacement Strategies Which page/segment should be replaced if there is not enough room for a required page/segment?

11 11 Demand Paging Bring a page into memory only when it is needed. Less I/O needed Less Memory needed Faster response More users Demand paging is kind of a “lazy” swapping But deals with pages instead of programs  swapping deals with entire programs, not pages Lazy swapper – never swaps a page into memory unless page will be needed Pager -- swapper that deals with pages The first reference to a page will trap to OS with a page fault. OS looks at another table to decide Invalid reference - abort Just not in memory – bring it from memory

12 12 Demand Paging Could bring entire process into memory at load time Or bring a page into memory only when it is needed Less I/O needed, no unnecessary I/O Less memory needed Faster response More users Similar to paging system with swapping (diagram on right) Page is needed  reference to it invalid reference  abort not-in-memory  bring to memory Lazy swapper – never swaps a page into memory unless page will be needed Swapper that deals with pages is a pager

13 13 Basic Concepts When a process is to be swapped in, the pager guesses which pages will be used before the process is swapped out again. Instead of swapping in a whole process, the pager brings only those pages into memory. Thus, it avoids reading into memory pages that will not be used anyway, decreasing the swap time and the amount of physical memory needed. How to determine that set of pages? Need new MMU functionality to implement demand paging If pages needed are already memory resident No difference from non demand-paging If page needed and not memory resident Need to detect and load the page into memory from storage  Without changing program behavior  Without programmer needing to change code

14 14 Valid-Invalid Bit With each page table entry a valid–invalid bit is associated: v  in-memory – memory resident i  not-in-memory Initially, valid–invalid bit is set to i on all entries Example of a page table snapshot: During MMU address translation, if valid_invalid_bit =i  page fault

15 15 Page Table When Some Pages Are Not in Main Memory

16 16 Page Fault If the process tries to access a page that was not brought into memory, Or tries to access any “invalid” page: That will trap to OS, causing a page fault Such as when the first reference to a page is made Handling a page fault 1. Operating system looks at another table to decide: Invalid reference  abort the process Just not in memory => continue 2. Find free frame 3. Swap page into frame via scheduled disk operation 4. Reset tables to indicate page now is in memory Set validation bit = v 5. Restart the instruction that caused the page fault

17 17 Steps in Handling a Page Fault

18 18 What happens if there is no free frame? Page replacement if not free frame Find some page in memory that is not really in use and swap it.  Need a page replacement algorithm  Performance Issue - need an algorithm which will result in minimum number of page faults. Same page may be brought into memory many times.

19 19 Aspects of Demand Paging Pure demand paging Extreme case Start process with no pages in memory OS sets instruction pointer to first instruction of process,  non-memory-resident -> page fault  page faults for all other pages on their first access A given instruction could access multiple pages Causing multiple page faults  E.g., fetch and decode of instruction which adds 2 numbers from memory and stores result back to memory Pain decreased because of locality of reference Hardware support needed for demand paging Page table with valid / invalid bit Secondary memory (swap device with swap space) Instruction restart

20 20 Instruction Restart Consider an instruction that could access several different locations block move auto increment/decrement location Restart the whole operation?  What if source and destination overlap?

21 21 Performance of Demand Paging Stages in Demand Paging (worst case) 1. Trap to the operating system 2. Save the user registers and process state 3. Determine that the interrupt was a page fault 4. Check that the page reference was legal and determine the location of the page on the disk 5. Issue a read from the disk to a free frame: 1. Wait in a queue for this device until the read request is serviced 2. Wait for the device seek and/or latency time 3. Begin the transfer of the page to a free frame 6. While waiting, allocate the CPU to some other user 7. Receive an interrupt from the disk I/O subsystem (I/O completed) 8. Save the registers and process state for the other user 9. Determine that the interrupt was from the disk 10. Correct the page table and other tables to show page is now in memory 11. Wait for the CPU to be allocated to this process again 12. Restore the user registers, process state, and new page table, and then resume the interrupted instruction

22 22 Performance of Demand Paging (Cont.) Three major activities during a Page Fault 1. Service the page fault interrupt  Fast - just several hundred instructions needed 2. Read in the page.  Very slow - about 8 millisecs., including hardware and software time  1 millisec = 10 -3 sec, 1 microsec = 10 -6 sec, 1 ns = 10 -9 sec 3. Restart the process  Fast – similar to (1) Page Fault Rate 0  p  1 if p = 0 no page faults if p = 1, every reference is a fault Effective Access Time (EAT) EAT = (1 – p) * memory access + + p * (page fault overhead + swap page out + restart overhead)

23 23 Demand Paging Example Memory access time = 200 nanoseconds Average page-fault service time = 8 milliseconds EAT = (1 – p) * 200 + p (8 milliseconds) = (1 – p) * 200 + p * 8,000,000 = 200 + p * 7,999,800 If one access out of 1,000 causes a page fault, then EAT = 8.2 microseconds (10 -6 of a second). This is a slowdown by a factor of 40!! If want performance degradation < 10 percent 220 > 200 + 7,999,800 * p 20 > 7,999,800 x p p <.0000025 Less than 1 page fault in every 400,000 memory accesses

24 24 Demand Paging Optimizations Swap space I/O faster than file system I/O even if on the same device Swap allocated in larger chunks, less management needed than file system Copy entire process image to swap space at process load time Then page in and out of swap space Used in older BSD Unix Demand page in from program binary on disk, but discard rather than paging out when freeing frame Used in Solaris and current BSD Still need to write to swap space  Pages not associated with a file (like stack and heap) – anonymous memory  Pages modified in memory but not yet written back to the file system Mobile systems Typically don’t support swapping Instead, demand page from file system and reclaim read-only pages (such as code)

25 25 Copy-on-Write Copy-on-Write (COW) allows both parent and child processes to initially share the same pages in memory If either process modifies a shared page, only then is the page copied COW allows more efficient process creation as only modified pages are copied In general, free pages are allocated from a pool of zero-fill-on-demand pages Pool should always have free frames for fast demand page execution  Don’t want to have to free a frame as well as other processing on page fault Why zero-out a page before allocating it? vfork() variation on fork() system call has parent suspend and child using copy-on-write address space of parent Designed to have child call exec() Very efficient

26 26 Before Process 1 Modifies Page C

27 27 After Process 1 Modifies Page C

28 28 What Happens if There is no Free Frame? Used up by process pages Also in demand from the kernel, I/O buffers, etc How much to allocate to each? Page replacement – find some page in memory, but not really in use, page it out Algorithm – terminate? swap out? replace the page? Performance – want an algorithm which will result in minimum number of page faults Same page may be brought into memory several times

29 29 Page Replacement Over-allocation While a user process is executing, a page fault occurs. OS determines where the desired page is residing on the disk  but then finds that there are no free frames on the free-frame list;  all memory is in use We need to prevent over-allocation of memory by modifying page-fault service routine to include page replacement Page replacement If no frame is free, we find one that is not currently being used and free it.  as explained next completes separation between logical memory and physical memory large virtual memory can be provided on a smaller physical memory Use modify (dirty) bit to reduce overhead of page transfers The dirty bit is set for a page when it is modified Only modified pages are written to disk  No need to save unmodified pages, they are the same

30 30 Need For Page Replacement Process1 wants to load memory M OS needs to bring M into physical memory Problem: no free frames OS needs to do page replacement

31 31 Basic Page Replacement 1. Find the location of the desired page on disk 2. Find a free frame: - if (a free frame exist) then use it - else  use a page replacement algorithm to select a victim frame  write victim frame to disk, if dirty 3. Bring the desired page into the (newly) free frame; update the page and frame tables accordingly 4. Continue the process by restarting the instruction that caused the trap Note: now potentially 2 page transfers for page fault Increasing EAT

32 32 Page Replacement

33 33 Page and Frame Replacement Algorithms Frame-allocation algorithm determines How many frames to give each process Which frames to replace Page-replacement algorithm Want the lowest page-fault rate on both first access and re-access Evaluating different page replacement algorithms By running them on a particular string of memory references (reference string) and Computing the number of page faults on that string String is just page numbers, not full addresses Repeated access to the same page does not cause a page fault Results depend on number of frames available In our examples, the reference string of referenced page numbers is 7,0,1,2,0,3,0,4,2,3,0,3,0,3,2,1,2,0,1,7,0,1

34 34 Graph of Page Faults Versus The Number of Frames

35 35 Page Replacement Strategies The Principle of Optimality Replace the page that will not be used again the farthest time into the future. Random Page Replacement Choose a page randomly FIFO - First in First Out Replace the page that has been in memory the longest. LRU - Least Recently Used Replace the page that has not been used for the longest time. LFU - Least Frequently Used Replace the page that is used least often. NUR - Not Used Recently An approximation to LRU Working Set Keep in memory those pages that the process is actively using

36 36 First-In-First-Out (FIFO) Algorithm Reference string: 7,0,1,2,0,3,0,4,2,3,0,3,0,3,2,1,2,0,1,7,0,1 3 frames (3 pages can be in memory at a time per process) How to track ages of pages? Just use a FIFO queue FIFO algorithm Easy to implement Often, not best performing 15 page faults

37 37 FIFO Illustrating Belady’s Anomaly n Reference String: 1,2,3,4,1,2,5,1,2,3,4,5 n Assume x frames (x pages can be in memory at a time per process) 9 Page faults 10 Page faults FIFO Replacement - Belady’s Anomaly -- more frames does not mean less page faults! 3 frames 4 frames

38 38 FIFO Illustrating Belady’s Anomaly

39 39 Optimal Algorithm Called OPT or MIN Replace page that will not be used for longest period of time 9 page faults is optimal for the example How do you know this? You don’t, can’t read the future Used for measuring how well other algorithms performs -- against the theoretical optimal solution

40 40 Least Recently Used (LRU) Algorithm Use past knowledge rather than future Replace page that has not been used in the most amount of time Associate time of last use with each page 12 faults – better than FIFO but worse than OPT Generally a good algorithm and frequently used But how to implement?

41 41 Implementation of LRU Algorithm Counter implementation Every page entry has a counter  Every time page is referenced through this entry, copy the clock into the counter When a page needs to be replaced,  LRU looks at the counters to find the smallest value  Search through the table is needed

42 42 Implementation of LRU Algorithm Stack implementation Keep a stack of page numbers  Most recently used – at the top  Least recently used – at the bottom  Implemented as a double link list – Easier to remove entries from the middle – Head pointer – Tail pointer Page referenced  move it to the top  requires 6 pointers to be changed No search for replacement  But each update is more expensive LRU and OPT don’t have Belady’s Anomaly

43 43 Use Of A Stack to Record Most Recent Page References

44 44 Implementation of LRU Algorithm Notice: Hardware assistance is required for the above two LRU implementations Let’s see why The updating of the clock fields (or stack) must be done for every memory reference.  … and not only when a page fault happens How can we handle this in software? If we were to use an interrupt for every reference (to allow software to update such data structures), it would slow every memory reference by a factor of at least 10  Hence slowing every user process by a factor of 10.  The overhead is too high. Problem: Few computer systems provide sufficient hardware support for true LRU. In fact, some systems provide no hardware support, and other page- replacement algorithms (such as a FIFO algorithm) must be used.

45 45 LRU Approximation Algorithms Many systems provide hardware support only in the form of reference bit Can use it to implement approximate LRU algorithms! Reference bit – simple hardware support for LRU With each page associate a bit, initially = 0 When page is referenced, hardware sets the bit to 1 Idea:  Replace any page with reference bit = 0 (if one exists)  We do not know the order, however -- a crude method This information is the basis for many page-replacement algorithms that approximate LRU replacement.

46 46 LRU Approximation Algorithms Additional Reference Bits Algorithm l Record reference bits at regular intervals l Keep 8 bits (say) for each page in a table in memory l Periodically, shift the reference bit into the high-order bit,  That is, shift the other bits to the right, dropping the lowest bit. l During page replacement, interpret 8bits as unsigned integer. l The page with the lowest number is the LRU page.

47 47 LRU Approximation Algorithms (contd.) Second-chance algorithm (=Clock algorithm) Based of FIFO replacement algorithm  But also uses the reference_bit If page to be replaced has  reference_bit = 0 => replace it  reference_bit = 1 => – set reference_bit=0, leave page in memory – replace next page, subject to same rules Idea: If reference_bit = 1, we give the page a 2nd chance  and move on to select the next FIFO page. When a page gets a 2nd chance, its reference bit is cleared,  and its arrival time is reset to the current time. Thus, a page that is given a 2nd chance will not be replaced until all other pages have been replaced (or given second chances). In addition, if a page is used often enough to keep its reference bit set, it will never be replaced.

48 48 Second-Chance (clock) Page-Replacement Algorithm A circular queue implementation. Uses a pointer that is, a hand on the clock indicates the page to be replaced next. When a frame is needed, the pointer advances until it finds a page with a 0 reference bit. As it advances, it clears the reference bits. Once a victim page is found, the page is replaced, and the new page is inserted in the circular queue in that position. BSD Unix used this

49 49 Enhanced Second-Chance Algorithm Improve algorithm by using both reference bit and modify bit (if available) Consider ordered pair (reference, modify). 4 situations are possible: 1. (0, 0) not recently used, not modified – best page to replace 2. (0, 1) not recently used, but modified – not quite as good, must write out before replacement 3. (1, 0) recently used but clean – probably will be used again soon 4. (1, 1) recently used and modified – probably will be used again soon and need to write out before replacement When page replacement called for, use the clock scheme But use the 4 classes (different implementations are possible) Replace the 1 st page encountered in the lowest non-empty class Might need to search circular queue several times This algorithm accounts for the pages that have been modified in order to reduce the number of I/Os required. Mac OS used this

50 50 Counting Algorithms Idea: Keep a counter of the number of references that have been made to each page Lease Frequently Used (LFU) Algorithm: Replaces page with smallest count Most Frequently Used (MFU) Algorithm: Based on the argument that the page with the smallest count was probably just brought in and has yet to be used MFU, LFU Not common. The implementation of these algorithms is expensive They do not approximate OPT replacement well

51 51 Page-Buffering Algorithms Other procedures are often used in addition to a specific page-replacement algo Solution 1 Systems commonly keep a pool of free frames. When a page fault occurs, a victim frame is chosen as before. However, before the victim is written out, the desired page is read into a free frame from the pool This procedure allows the process to restart as soon as possible, without waiting for the victim page to be written out. When the victim is later written out, its frame is added to the free-frame pool. Solution 2 Possibly, keep list of modified pages When backing store otherwise idle, write pages there and set to non-dirty Solution 3 Remember which page was in each frame of the pool of free frames.  See Solution 1, last step If one of those pages is references, do not page in, just get it from the pool.  No I/O is needed in this case

52 52 Applications and Page Replacement All of these algorithms have OS guessing about future page access Some applications have better knowledge – i.e. databases Memory intensive applications can cause double buffering OS keeps copy of page in memory as I/O buffer Application keeps page in memory for its own work Operating system can given direct access to the disk, getting out of the way of the applications Raw disk mode Bypasses buffering, locking, etc

53 53 Allocation of Frames Another issue OS needs to consider -- frame allocation. Allocate frames for the OS Keep some frames as free frame buffer pool How do we allocate the fixed amount of remaining free memory among the various processes?

54 54 Constraints of Allocation of Frames Our strategies for the allocation of frames are constrained in various ways Cannot allocate more than the total number of available frames  Unless there is page sharing Must also allocate at least a minimum number of frames per process  For performance  Instruction set constraints As # frames allocated to each process decreases, the page-fault rate increases, slowing process execution. Recall: when a page fault occurs before an executing instruction is complete, the instruction must be restarted. Thus, we must have enough frames to hold all the different pages that any single instruction can reference. Example: IBM 370 – 6 pages to handle SS MOVE instruction: instruction is 6 bytes, might span 2 pages 2 pages to handle from 2 pages to handle to

55 55 Allocation of Frames (contd.) Two major allocation schemes 1. Fixed allocation 2. Priority allocation Many variations

56 56 Fixed Allocation Equal Allocation Allocate free frames equally among the processes  100 frames and 5 processes,  give each process 20 frames Proportional allocation Allocate according to the size of process l Sj = size of process Pj l S =  Sj l m = total number of frames l aj = allocation for Pj = Sj/S * m l If m = 64, S1 = 10, S2 = 127 then  a1 = 10/137 * 64  5  a2 = 127/137 * 64  59

57 57 Fixed Allocation (contd.) In both equal and proportional allocation, the allocation may vary according to the multiprogramming level. If the multiprogramming level is increased, each process will lose some frames to provide the memory needed for the new process. If the multiprogramming level decreases, the frames that were allocated to the departed process can be spread over the remaining processes.

58 58 Priority Allocation May want to give a high-priority process more memory then to low-priority processes to speed its execution Priority Allocation -- use a proportional allocation scheme but using priorities rather than size, or a combination of priority and size If process P i generates a page fault, select for replacement one of its frames select for replacement a frame from a process with lower priority number

59 59 Global vs. Local Allocation Global Replacement Process selects a replacement frame from the set of all frames  Hence, one process can take a frame from another process Cons: a process cannot control its own page-fault rate.  The set of pages in memory for a process depends on the paging behavior of other processes.  The same process may perform quite differently due to totally external circumstances. Pros: greater throughput than local, so more common Local replacement Each process selects from only its own set of allocated frames Pros: More consistent per-process performance Cons: Process is slowed down even if other less used pages of memory are available

60 60 Non-Uniform Memory Access So far all memory accessed equally Many systems are NUMA – speed of access to memory varies Consider system boards containing CPUs and memory, interconnected over a system bus Optimal performance comes from allocating memory “close to” the CPU on which the thread is scheduled And modifying the scheduler to schedule the thread on the same system board when possible Solved by Solaris by creating lgroups  Structure to track CPU / Memory low latency groups  Used my schedule and pager  When possible schedule all threads of a process and allocate all memory for that process within the lgroup

61 61 Thrashing If a process does not have “enough” pages, the page-fault rate is very high Page fault to get page Replace existing frame But quickly needs replaced frame back Quickly faults again, and again,  replacing pages that it must bring back in immediately This high paging activity is called thrashing. A process is thrashing if it is spending more time paging than executing.

62 62 Cause of Thrashing Thrashing results in severe performance problems. Consider a scenario next Actual behavior of early paging systems Thrashing scenario System is busy, a process needs more pages, but not enough frames Thrashing happens for this process If global replacement is used  The process starts taking away pages from other processes  They also start to page fault This leads to low CPU utilization  Hence, OS thinks it needs to increase the degree of multiprogramming – More processes are added to the system – More pages faults happen – System throughput plunges » No work is getting done

63 63 Thrashing (Cont.)

64 64 Dealing with Thrashing We can limit the effects of thrashing by using a local replacement algorithm (or priority replacement algorithm). With local replacement, if one process starts thrashing, it cannot steal frames from another process and cause the latter to thrash as well. However, the problem is not entirely solved. If processes are thrashing, they will be in the queue for the paging device most of the time. The average service time for a page fault will increase because of the longer average queue for the paging device. Thus, the effective access time will increase even for a process that is not thrashing.

65 65 Locality Model To prevent thrashing, we must provide a process with as many frames as it needs. But how do we know how many frames it “needs”? There are several techniques. The working-set strategy (discussed shortly) starts by looking at how many frames a process is actually using.  This approach defines the locality model of process execution.

66 66 Locality Model A locality is a set of pages that are actively used together As a process executes, it moves from locality to locality. A program is generally composed of several different localities, which may overlap. For example, when a function is called, it defines a new locality. In this locality, memory references are made to  the instructions of the function call,  its local variables, and  a subset of the global variables. When we exit the function, the process leaves this locality We may return to this locality later. The locality model states that all programs will exhibit this basic memory reference structure. Note that the locality model is the unstated principle behind the caching discussions so far in this class If accesses to any types of data were random rather than patterned, caching would be useless.

67 67 Locality In A Memory-Reference Pattern

68 68 Locality Model Suppose we allocate enough frames to a process to accommodate its current locality. It will fault for the pages in its locality until all these pages are in memory Then, it will not fault again until it changes localities. If we do not allocate enough frames to accommodate the size of the current locality, the process will thrash since it cannot keep in memory all the pages that it is actively using. n Why does thrashing occur? l  (size of locality)  total memory size

69 69 Working-Set Model The working-set model -- a strategy for preventing thrashing It is based on the assumption of locality. Defines   working-set window A fixed number of page references, e.g. 10,000 Working set The set of pages in the most recent  page references WS is an approximation of the program’s locality. If a page is in active use, it will be in the WS

70 70 Working-Set Model (contd.) WSS i (working set size of Process P i ) The total number of pages referenced in the most recent   varies in time if  too small => will not encompass entire locality if  too large => will encompass several localities if  =   will encompass entire program D =  WSS i  total demand for frames Approximation of locality Let m be the number of available frames if D > m  Thrashing

71 71 Working-Set Model (contd.) Policy: OS monitors the WS of each process  OS allocates enough frames to each WS If enough extra frames, another process can be initiated. if D > m, then suspend one of the processes  The process’s pages are written out (swapped), – and its frames are reallocated to other processes. – The suspended process can be restarted later.

72 72 Working-Set Model (contd.) Advantages of the WS model Prevents thrashing, while keeping the degree of multiprogramming as high as possible. Thus, it optimizes CPU utilization. The difficulty with the WS model How to efficiently keep track of the working set? The working-set window  is a moving window.  At each memory reference, – a new reference appears at one end, and – the oldest reference drops off the other end.  A page is in the WS if it is referenced anywhere in  Solution:  Use an approximation of the WS model  Explained next

73 73 Keeping Track of the Working Set Approximate with interval timer + a reference bit Example:  = 10,000 Timer interrupts after every 5000 time units Keep in memory 2 bits for each page Whenever a timer interrupts  copy each reference bit into the corresponding part of 2 the bits  set the values of all reference bits to 0 If a page fault occurs,  we can examine the current reference bit and 2 in-memory bits  determine if a page was used within the last 10,000 to 15,000 references.  If one of the bits in memory = 1  page in working set Why is this not completely accurate? Cannot tell where, within an interval of 5,000, a reference occurred Improvement = 10 bits and interrupt every 1000 time units But cost to service these more frequent interrupts will be higher

74 74 Page-Fault Frequency Consider another strategy to control thrashing Uses the page-fault frequency (PFF) per each process A more direct approach than the Working Set model Idea: Establish “acceptable” page-fault frequency (PFF) rate, and Use local replacement policy If actual rate too low => the process loses frame If actual rate too high => the process gains frame

75 75 Page-Fault Frequency (contd.) As with the working-set strategy, we may have to swap out a process. If the page-fault rate increases and no free frames are available: Select some process and swap it out to backing store The freed frames are then distributed  to the processes with high page-fault rates.

76 76 Working Sets and Page Fault Rates Direct relationship between working set of a process and its page-fault rate Working set changes over time Peaks and valleys over time

77 77 Memory-Mapped Files Memory-mapped file I/O allows file I/O to be treated as routine memory access by mapping a disk block to a page in memory A file is initially read using demand paging A page-sized portion of the file is read from the file system into a physical page Subsequent reads/writes to/from the file are treated as ordinary memory accesses Simplifies and speeds file access by driving file I/O through memory rather than read() and write() system calls Also allows several processes to map the same file allowing the pages in memory to be shared But when does written data make it to disk? Periodically and / or at file close() time For example, when the pager scans for dirty pages

78 78 Memory-Mapped File Technique for all I/O Some OSes uses memory mapped files for standard I/O Process can explicitly request memory mapping a file via mmap() system call Now file mapped into process address space For standard I/O ( open(), read(), write(), close() ), mmap anyway But map file into kernel address space Process still does read() and write()  Copies data to and from kernel space and user space Uses efficient memory management subsystem  Avoids needing separate subsystem COW can be used for read/write non-shared pages Memory mapped files can be used for shared memory (although again via separate system calls)

79 79 Memory Mapped Files

80 80 Shared Memory via Memory-Mapped I/O

81 81 Shared Memory in Windows API First create a file mapping for file to be mapped Then establish a view of the mapped file in process’s virtual address space Consider producer / consumer Producer create shared-memory object using memory mapping features Open file via CreateFile(), returning a HANDLE Create mapping via CreateFileMapping() creating a named shared-memory object Create view via MapViewOfFile() Sample code in Textbook

82 82 Allocating Kernel Memory Treated differently from user memory Often allocated from a free-memory pool Kernel requests memory for structures of varying sizes Some kernel memory needs to be contiguous  I.e. for device I/O

83 83 Buddy System Allocates memory from fixed-size segment consisting of physically- contiguous pages Memory allocated using power-of-2 allocator Satisfies requests in units sized as power of 2 Request rounded up to next highest power of 2 When smaller allocation needed than is available, current chunk split into two buddies of next-lower power of 2  Continue until appropriate sized chunk available For example, assume 256KB chunk available, kernel requests 21KB Split into A L and A R of 128KB each  One further divided into B L and B R of 64KB – One further into C L and C R of 32KB each – one used to satisfy request Advantage – quickly coalesce unused chunks into larger chunk Disadvantage - fragmentation

84 84 Buddy System Allocator

85 85 Slab Allocator Alternate strategy Slab is one or more physically contiguous pages Cache consists of one or more slabs Single cache for each unique kernel data structure Each cache filled with objects – instantiations of the data structure When cache created, filled with objects marked as free When structures stored, objects marked as used If slab is full of used objects, next object allocated from empty slab If no empty slabs, new slab allocated Benefits include no fragmentation, fast memory request satisfaction

86 86 Slab Allocation

87 87 Slab Allocator in Linux For example process descriptor is of type struct task_struct Approx 1.7KB of memory New task -> allocate new struct from cache Will use existing free struct task_struct Slab can be in three possible states 1. Full – all used 2. Empty – all free 3. Partial – mix of free and used Upon request, slab allocator 1. Uses free struct in partial slab 2. If none, takes one from empty slab 3. If no empty slab, create new empty

88 88 Slab Allocator in Linux (Cont.) Slab started in Solaris, now wide-spread for both kernel mode and user memory in various OSes Linux 2.2 had SLAB, now has both SLOB and SLUB allocators SLOB for systems with limited memory  Simple List of Blocks – maintains 3 list objects for small, medium, large objects SLUB is performance-optimized SLAB removes per-CPU queues, metadata stored in page structure

89 89 Other Considerations -- Prepaging An obvious property of pure demand paging is the large number of page faults that occur when a process is started or swapped in How to deal with this? Prepaging – using some strategy is to bring into memory at one time all the pages that will be needed. To reduce the large number of page faults that occurs at process startup Prepage all or some of the pages a process will need, before they are referenced But if prepaged pages are unused, I/O and memory was wasted

90 90 Other Issues – Page Size The designers of an OS for an existing machine seldom have a choice concerning the page size. However, when new machines are being designed, a decision regarding the best page size must be made. There is no single best page size. Page size selection must take into consideration: Fragmentation Page table size I/O overhead Locality Other factors Always power of 2, usually in the range 2 12 (4K) to 2 22 (4MB) On average, growing over time

91 91 Other Issues – TLB Reach TLB Reach - The amount of memory accessible from the TLB TLB Reach = (TLB Size) X (Page Size) Ideally, the working set of each process is stored in the TLB Otherwise there is a high degree of page faults Increase the Page Size This may lead to an increase in fragmentation as not all applications require a large page size Provide Multiple Page Sizes This allows applications that require larger page sizes the opportunity to use them without an increase in fragmentation

92 92 Other Issues – Program Structure Assume that pages are 128 words in size. Program structure l int[128,128] data; //assume it is paged out initially Each row is stored in one page Program 1 for (j = 0; j <128; j++) for (i = 0; i < 128; i++) data[i,j] = 0; If the OS allocates fewer than 128 frames to the entire program  128 x 128 = 16,384 page faults Program 2 for (i = 0; i < 128; i++) for (j = 0; j < 128; j++) data[i,j] = 0; 128 page faults A programmer should know this to write efficient code

93 93 Other Issues – I/O interlock I/O Interlock – Pages must sometimes be locked into memory Consider I/O - Pages that are used for copying a file from a device must be locked from being selected for eviction by a page replacement algorithm Pinning of pages to lock into memory

94 94 Operating System Examples Windows Solaris

95 95 Windows Uses demand paging with clustering. Clustering brings in pages surrounding the faulting page Processes are assigned working set minimum and working set maximum Working set minimum is the minimum number of pages the process is guaranteed to have in memory A process may be assigned as many pages up to its working set maximum When the amount of free memory in the system falls below a threshold, automatic working set trimming is performed to restore the amount of free memory Working set trimming removes pages from processes that have pages in excess of their working set minimum

96 96 Solaris Maintains a list of free pages to assign faulting processes Lotsfree – threshold parameter (amount of free memory) to begin paging Desfree – threshold parameter to increasing paging Minfree – threshold parameter to being swapping Paging is performed by pageout process Pageout scans pages using modified clock algorithm Scanrate is the rate at which pages are scanned. This ranges from slowscan to fastscan Pageout is called more frequently depending upon the amount of free memory available Priority paging gives priority to process code pages

97 97 Solaris 2 Page Scanner

98 Silberschatz, Galvin, and Gagne ©2013. Modified by Dmitri V. Kalashnikov and Nalini Venkatasubramanian.Operating System Concepts – 9 th Ed. End of Chapter 9

Download ppt "Silberschatz, Galvin, and Gagne ©2013. Modified by Dmitri V. Kalashnikov and Nalini Venkatasubramanian.Operating System Concepts – 9 th Ed. Chapter 9:"

Similar presentations

Ads by Google