Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Methodology Statistical Information University 2010-2 1.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Methodology Statistical Information University 2010-2 1."— Presentation transcript:

1 Methodology Statistical Information University 2010-2 1

2  CETYS knows the impact it has as a university, and as such is interested in reviewing one of the first programs the student comes in contact with.  Hence it took upon itself to carry out the present research project. 2

3  Get to know the perception of freshmen students regarding the opening seminar, and to establish a content correction based on data. 3

4  Universe of 271 students.  134 selected.  The use of color coded teams was the basis of selection. Variables of interest: ◦ SEX ◦ AGE ◦ MAJOR ◦ TEAM COLOR ◦ HIGH SCHOOL ◦ CITY 4

5  The research topics were 10 elements that are part of the seminar: ◦ WELCOME TO THE SEMINAR ◦ WELCOME BY THE COLLEGE ◦ WELCOME BY SPORTS AND CULTURE ◦ ENGLISH DEPARTMENT ◦ ENTREPRENUER PROGRAM ◦ EXCHANGE PROGRAMS ◦ STUDENT ADVICE PROGRAM ◦ LIBRARY PROGRAM ◦ STUDENT AFFAIRS ◦ BLACKBOARD PROGRAM ◦ ORGANIZING COMMITTE 5

6  For each one, we analyzed: ◦ Time allotted ◦ Attitude of presenters ◦ Infrastructure ◦ Attractiveness of workshop ( subjective ) ◦ Content ( information )  Importance  Usefulness  Clarity ◦ Organization ◦ Logistics ◦ Punctuality ◦ General grading 6

7  Other aspects:  English ◦ The English department requested we add:  Instructions on the exam  Service during the interview  Evaluation of English department personnel  Satisfaction with results  Organizing committee ◦ 8 central aspects, organization, punctuality, respect, friendliness, logistics, help on clarifying questions, willingness to help, involvement on activities. 7

8  The project was carried out by: ◦ Alejandro Arias Corpus (Promotion) ◦ Ernesto Romero (Entrepreneurs)  Supervised by: ◦ Psic. Alma Gurrola  Revision of the instrument: ◦ Dr. Héctor Velarde 8

9 9

10 10

11 11

12 12

13 13

14 14

15 15

16 16

17 17

18 18

19 19

20 20

21 21

22 22

23 23

24 24

25 25

26 26

27 27

28 28

29 29

30 30

31 31

32 32

33 33

34 34

35 35

36 36

37 37

38 38

39  The general perception was “good”.  Men graded higher than women.  Business major graded higher than engineering majors.  The yellow team graded lower, while the red team graded higher. 39

40  Sorts and culture department have the highest improvement opportunity (Their grade was 8.08, while the highest grade was 9.17)  81.34% wrote an open comment: ◦ Their consider that the time spent was too long ◦ Most thanked the organizing committee for the activity, and the time the spent answering their questions 40

41 ◦ Some wished that the activity would have been carried out side of campus. ◦ They requested if students from CETYS high school could skip the workshop ◦ They would like to have a speaker. ◦ The biggest are of opportunity is:  Blackboard workshop, they were not able to login 41

42  Some questions lingered with the exchange program workshop  They don’t perceivee the institution as an international one  Sports and culture department seem unprepared.  Punctuality as a general opportunity on each workshop.  CETYS High school graduates knew most of the information  Student Governing Bodies were absent 42

43  They wish to learn other languages  Sophomore students should participate more  There is a general discontent with the constant changing of rooms were the activities take place – during the summer. 43


Download ppt "Methodology Statistical Information University 2010-2 1."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google