Download presentation

Published byKenneth Addicott Modified over 2 years ago

1
**Alex Wijaya Danang Yudha Prakasa Siti Fauziah Nirmala Putri**

ARAPU Alex Wijaya Danang Yudha Prakasa Siti Fauziah Nirmala Putri

2
goal to assess and reconfigure the processes employed within Action Research to improve responsiveness and efficiency.

3
Case overview Action Response is a London-based charity dedicated to providing fast responses to critical situations throughout the world The charity receives requests for cash aid usually from an intermediary charity and looks to process the request quickly and provide funds where they are needed, when they are needed

4
Two key issue 1. There are complaints about the speed of their response. 2. Costs are beginning to spiral.

5
**what objectives should the ARAPU process be trying to achieve?**

6
**what objectives should the ARAPU process be trying to achieve?**

the very basic aim of the charity is to provide short-term aid. Therefore, unless the process can turn around applications fast, it is failing to fulfil its primary aim.

7
**what is the main problem with the current ARAPU process?**

we need to know how many claims each stage has to process how many people are available at each stage how long each person is available for processing how long on average each claim takes to process

8
**300/week Applications are in line of processing**

Opening and checking process 300/week Received and Stored by 4 Clerks Opening and checking post Coding Process by 5 clerks 100/week Proceed applications Assessing applications by 7 assessors Inputting data Secretary’s desks Recycle Waiting for committee meets on Thursday Committee ratification Ratified Accepted Declined Store applications Store applications payment payment Dispatch Process Store For Dispatch

9
If we take the average 300 applications per week, and recycle 100 after the assessment stage, how much ‘value-added ’ work is being done at each stage? receipt stage The time needed for each application is 10 minutes and the value-added workload is 400 × 10 minutes of work (4000 minutes), which is hours. coding stage The time needed for each application is 20 minutes and the value-added workload is 400 × 20 minutes of work (8000 minutes), which is hours. assessment stage The time needed for one-third of the applications is 10 minutes, and for the other two-thirds is 60 minutes. The average work time of (1/3 × 10) + (2/3 × 60) is minutes and the valueadded workload is 400 × minutes of work (17,332 minutes), which is hours.

10
The payment stage gets 150 applications per week (half of the 300 that emerge from the assessors). The time needed for each application is 50 minutes and the value-added workload is150 × 50 minutes of work (7500 minutes), which is 125 hours. The decline stage gets 150 applications per week (half of the 300 that emerge from the assessors). The time needed for each application is 30 minutes and the value-added workload is 150 × 30 minutes of work (4500 minutes), which is 75 hours. The dispatch stage gets 300 applications per week. The time needed for each application is10 minutes and the value-added workload is 300 × 10 minutes of work (3000 minutes), which is 50 hours.

11
**> 20 days throughput time = work in progress × cycle time**

The whole process output is 300 claims processed per week and from the sample taken by Susan N’tini, there are around 2000 claims in process at any given time The cycle time of the whole process is (35 / 300) = hours Throughput time = 2000 × = hours = days > 20 days

12
**How could the ARAPU process be improved?**

improvement balance the process Hired new assesors, More throughput eliminate applications that need further information Educating potential applicants

13
**simulation 300 applications per week**

cycle time is 35 / 300 = hours work in progress of 1200, throughput time × 1200 = hours (20 days)

14
**How could the ARAPU process be improved?**

Internet-based services

15
**The stages of product/service design**

16
**simulation processing 400 applications per week (Assessing stage)**

took minutes x 400 = minutes ( hours) / 35 = 8.25 Assessors WITHOUT RECYCLING 43.33 × 300 =12999 minutes ( hours) 216 / 35 = 6.19 assessors

17
THANK YOU

Similar presentations

Presentation is loading. Please wait....

OK

Part Two Design Chapter 4 Process design.

Part Two Design Chapter 4 Process design.

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on 2nd world war dates Ppt on historical places in india free download Ppt on hindu religion songs Class 11 ppt on conic section maths Ppt on personality development for school students Ppt on summary writing exercise Ppt on job rotation evaluation Ppt on condition based maintenance Tcp fast open ppt on mac Ppt on inertial frame of reference