Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 POWER & CHOICE An Introduction to Political Science 12 th Edition W. Phillips Shively, University of Minnesota PowerPoint Supplement Richard P. Farkas,

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "1 POWER & CHOICE An Introduction to Political Science 12 th Edition W. Phillips Shively, University of Minnesota PowerPoint Supplement Richard P. Farkas,"— Presentation transcript:

1 1 POWER & CHOICE An Introduction to Political Science 12 th Edition W. Phillips Shively, University of Minnesota PowerPoint Supplement Richard P. Farkas, DePaul University

2 2 The purpose of education is to replace an empty mind with an open one. Malcolm Forbes

3 3 Comparative Politics = Comparing the internal structure & behavior of political systems

4 4 Student Requirements  Diligent reading of ALL assignments read before class lecture...  Regular attendance absences are costly and reflect poorly...  Participation in classroom dialogue think, connect, articulate, question  Always bring “clicker”  Office visits recommended …

5 5 Chapter 1 The Idea of Politics

6 6 POLITICS  Use of power  Production of public choice “… the world has proved to be a strange and wonderful place.” “… one thing that has remained constant is a faith in people’s capacity to shape their futures through politics.”

7 7 Avenues for Analysis  “best conducted eclectically”  behaviors  institutions  policies  “state” as organizer of politics

8 8 More Guidelines …  see both sides of any question  keep our emotions in low key  be precise about the meaning of the words we use  be open to borrowing from other academic disciplines  recognize need for broad principles

9 9 “POLITICS”  social process  rivalry & cooperation  making of a decision  binding on a group POLITICS is a social process involving rivalry and cooperation culminating in the making of a decision binding on a group.

10 10 … or the use of power to make a common decision for a group of people

11 11 POWER  Politics ALWAYS involves the exercise of power  Power = ability of one person to cause another to do what the first wishes

12 12 “POWER”  … means by which power is exercised coercion persuasion construction of incentives  authority can be the basis of one’s power if those governed accept the relationship … other sources possible

13 13 Think about your “feeling” about the following terms …  administer, manage  manipulate, force  direct, lead  order, control

14 14 POWER & CHOICE 1. Making common decisions (choice) A way to work out rationally the best common solution to a common problem 2. Exercise of power Ability to get someone to do what you want Contrast: Implicit vs. Manifest power

15 15 Approaching “politics” …  As public choice … emphasizes the options and decisions located throughout the system & the attempt to meet needs  As power … emphasizes the management of persons in the system Example: the university classroom

16 16 “state” “sovereign state”  The political entity whose government has ultimate authority to make decisions binding upon all those within the boundaries of that entity  … country  not what Americans call “states”

17 17 Kinds of Approaches …  “Interpretive political scientists” historical, philosophical aspects built from detailed, non-numerical cases  “Behavioralists” look for broad patterns across many cases using statistical analysis of numerical data

18 18 “Theory”  Thinking about politics invites broad generalization and abstraction  We pursue generalization through theory  A theory is a statement linking specific instances to broader principles

19 19 Normative & Empirical Analysis  normative: systematic thoughts about what OUGHT TO BE  empirical: systematic examination of what IS

20 20 ACADEMIC LABELS highest form of knowing …  explanation  THEORY  prediction  HYPOTHESIS / MODEL  classification  TYPOLOGY  description  DESCRIPTION most basic form of knowing …

21 21 HOW We Know... When the METHODOLOGY is sound …  when the process is carefully planned  when the terms are clear  when the observations and measurements are precise

22 22 “Falsifiability” “Testability”  Possible that the statement is FALSE? Can the statement be tested?  “causation” vs. “correlation”

23 23 Political Science as a Discipline  American political behavior  American political institutions  American public policy  Comparative politics  International politics  Political theory many other schemes for dividing Political Science exist

24 24 Chapter 3 The Modern State

25 25 “unit of analysis” “level of analysis”  group / family / friends  organizations  neighborhoods  towns / cities  regions / sections / districts  “sovereign” states  multi-state organizations  global

26 26 Development of the State  History, Napoleon & the “modern” state  Colonialism brought elsewhere  Hand & glove evolution: *complex industry & commerce needed the state & the state was invented; *commerce & industry made controlling and taxing people easier enhancing the evolution of the state

27 27 Review …  Need to generate “public goods”  Government decisions on WHAT?  Government need for revenue to PAY  Creation of identity that could mobilize masses  Result: CONTROL by state

28 28 Public Goods  emphasizes needs & choice …  something that benefits all members of the community but that no one can be prevented from using  test: whether it is impossible to deny it to any member of the group; if a public good is available to any, it is available to all

29 29 “state” “sovereign state”  The political entity whose government has ultimate authority to make decisions binding upon all those within the boundaries of that entity  … country  not what Americans call “states”

30 30 “nation”  Ethno-cultural identity of a group  Common culture, language, history, religion, physical and/or behavioral characteristics, race, images, myths  … a people  Commonness found “in the blood”  Essentially: emotional attachment

31 31 nation vs. state  key: boundaries …  “nation-state” “multi-state nation” “multi-national state”  allegiance / identity to state: PATRIOTISM  allegiance / identity to nation: NATIONALISM

32 32 More State – Nation Distinctions  “State” as level of analysis vs. local  “State” as political identity  “State” as government authority  “Nation” as identity, based upon culture Congruence? tension? ( state vs. nation) inclusive vs. exclusive rational vs. emotional integrating vs. disintegrating

33 33 GOVERNMENT and the State  The state’s principle actor is the government  government = a group of people who have the ultimate authority to act on behalf of the state  theory of the autonomous state = state acts without prodding from people in conflict or decision-making  civil society = organized and active part of society that is not controlled by government and whose objectives are self-identified  “the natural counterweight to government” in affairs of the state

34 34 Challenges to the STATE “State-building” Problems that transcend boundaries … “globalization” environment trade, economics, finance security communication

35 35 More challenges …  Civil society: issues below the state radar  Pressures from “parts” seeking authority (autonomy)  Questions about “original” boundaries; “our land”  “Failed States”  “Transitional States”

36 36 Alternatives … to the state  Regional integration: European Union, NAFTA -- “macro-states”  United Nations Organization  Communications  world culture  “Emerging” (?) International Law

37 37 Examples: State-building  common 21 st century phenomenon!  Nigeria (text) state vs. nation  European Union (text) institution-building  Iraq, Slovakia, Bosnia, Kosovo, Palestine, Palau, Ukraine, Puerto Rico, other …

38 38 Chapter 2 Modern Ideologies & Political Philosophy

39 39 “Ideology”  philosophy: coherent set of ideas about what ought to be (normative)  19th century idea: people should determine their political fate  ideology = philosophy + instructions  what people should do to make it happen  “isms”

40 40 Uses of Ideology  Simplify processing of ideas: filter  Connect people to other people  Umbrella for mobilization  Shorthand for packaging pol. ideas  Glue that ties ideas together  Guide decisions ideology NOT static !

41 41 AMERICAN confusion! American ideologies: “loosely organized, inconsistent, untidy” … no internal coherence … constantly migrating shaped by squeezing into coalitions rather than by any intellectual reasoning

42 42 AMERICAN liberalism =  government needs to be active in the assistance it provides to those in need; in course, providing services  aggressively defends freedom of expression  classically suspect of “elites” exercising power

43 43 AMERICAN conservatism =  government should shrink from activities and permit authority to devolve...  maintain an efficient, minimally regulated economy; fiscal prudence  advocate common morality & common spirituality

44 44 “Classic” Ideologies Who Should Make Decisions?  LIBERALISM develop individual capacities to the fullest  American liberalism & conservatism = variants  CONSERVATISM tradition, maintain ordered community, press for common values  SOCIALISM liberalism but …  FASCISM conservatism but …  COMMUNISM depends on normative vs. empirical

45 45 Origins of Classic Liberalism  invented by intellectuals  result of general artistic & scientific restlessness  practical pressures from large scale commerce & industry

46 46 Principles … classic liberalism  People must be maximally responsible for their own actions and circumstances  Liberals see politics as choice  As many choices as possible should be kept private  The sphere of politics should be limited Champion: John Stuart Mill

47 47 Origins of Modern Conservatism  reaction to the advent of Liberalism  rationale for maintaining traditional European political structures  rationale for maintaining centralization of power and military establishments  caution about transfer of political responsibility to the common man

48 48 Principles of Modern Conservatism  People must be maximally responsible for their own actions and circumstances  belief that society is MORE than the sum of the individuals in it  greatest good possible in community  order, structure, community and all things that reinforce and maintain it  web of social responsibilities Champion: Edmund Burke

49 49 21 st Century Ideologies  tendency to “blend” commitments  “post-material issues” & objectives (the environment)  neo-liberalism & globalization (economics)  historical & religious sources of ideas … (fundamentalism)  relevance of class  comfort with welfare state

50 50 The CLASSIC Ideological Continuum LEFT________________________RIGHT Liberal _________________Conservative Anarchist _________________Monarchist Locus of Power Individual_____________ State Choice ______________ Power

51 51 Juxtaposing ideologies... Test your understanding: RIGHT or LEFT?  liberalism  conservatism  socialism  fascism  communism (Marx’ concept)  communism (Stalin’s reality)  feminism  anarchism  environmentalism  militarism  Bureaucracy / governmentalism  militarism  Religion / spiritualism  Law / legalism  welfare / humanitarianism

52 52 American awkwardness … Your text and large numbers of Americans and American scholars will suggest that “nationalism” is a “passionate identification” with the state. It is more useful, but not always possible, to use the terms in a way that enables comparative politics to differentiate identities found in many parts of our world. This is the distinction offered on the previous slide.

53 53 Classic Conservative ideology emphasizes: (a) The importance of the maintenance of an ordered community and common values (b) The importance of individualism and freedom of choice (c) The importance of fiscal responsibility (d) The importance of limited government (e) The deterioration of human rights

54 54 Chapter 4 Policies of the State

55 55 How Much Do Governments Do?  What level of government activity do we find?  Do we find variation in terms of TYPES of policies?  How could we MEASURE how much government does? # of policies, amount of money spent, % of economic activity, or ?

56 56 In What Kind of System Does Government Grow?  large or small?  rich or poor?  socialist or capitalist?  democratic or non-democratic?  industrial or agricultural?  Asian, African, European, North or South American?

57 57 How Big Is Government? Why? Growth of government linked to:  Rise in wealth, revenue, capacity  Demands by the citizens  “Natural” bureaucratic tendencies  World more complicated place  Electoral politics choice or power perspective?

58 58 Labeling what Governments Do One scheme  transfer resources  provide subsidies  regulate  administer Second scheme  rule-making  rule-application  rule adjudication  “capabilities” (functions) extractive distributive symbolic responsive

59 59 KINDS of policies made … variations and rankings  Education  Defense  Technology  Health  Social welfare  Industrial  Agricultural  Consumer  Tax  Environmental  Transportation  Energy  Social control  Fiscal/monetary  Political design  other

60 60 Other Queries …  Does type of political system impact on what policy areas receive attention?  What other variables could account for differences?  Relationship: how POWER is distributed and resulting policy choices …  Solid analysis of policy requires both choice and power perspectives

61 61 Challenges of Policy-making  Demographics & Aging your decision?  “Economic” vs. “Human” Development your decision?  AIDS in Africa your decision? Examine the basis for your positions …

62 62 Chapter 6 What Lies Behind Policy: Questions of Justice and Effectiveness

63 63 Concept Review …  EMPIRICAL – examines what IS  NORMATIVE – examines what OUGHT TO BE Keep in focus with this chapter!

64 64 CHOICES: Justice How do we judge political systems? … evaluate political systems? Is one a normative question; the other an empirical question? JUSTICE & FAIRNESS same thing? “people should be treated as they deserve”

65 65 The Right Thing …  “Justice” equality or need or contribution ?  Substantive vs. procedural justice  What is “due process?”  not arbitrary  special basic rights (survive, free speech, privacy)  overriding social needs DREAM or DOABLE? Normative or Empirical? end justifies the means?

66 66 CHOICES: Effectiveness  Equation: greatest benefits; least cost  Complications? Doable? ? whose perspective ?  Subtlety: What is government supposed to do? Unintended consequences …

67 67 CHOICES: Modes of Decision  Authority-based vs. Market-based Policy-making Upside vs. downside of each mode Radical vs. Incremental policy-making  Re-visit: Types of power; ideology; equality; effectiveness Your choices … ?

68 68 Policy-making in the REAL world  policy-making is ALWAYS complicated  complexity could paralyze a regime  policy-making requires constant reexamination  courage … choices might be “wrong”

69 69 Political Choice & Implications  Need-based Scholarships / “Affirmative Action”  Water Pollution  Children as a “Collective Good”  Gender-based Pension payments

70 70 Chapter 8 How Individuals Relate to the State, and the State to the Individual

71 71 AUTHORITY  Power to make policies based upon an institutionalized mechanism, procedure or by coercive force -- examples …?  Any limits to governmental authority?  Gov. authority = efficient & powerful  once established, requires little investment  Authority, if widely accepted, is easier to exercise

72 72 LEGITIMACY  Belief by a large number of citizens that a particular government properly has authority  Individual or collective agreement that (1) a person or group has the right to issue certain sorts of commands and (2) that those commands shall be obeyed.  normative and tentative perception!

73 73 Sources of Legitimacy  Legitimacy by RESULTS  Legitimacy by HABIT  Legitimacy by IDENTITY  Legitimacy by PROCEDURES Consider legitimacy of: professor, mother, mayor, judge, clergy, ambassador

74 74 More concepts …  “democratic citizen” normative or empirical ? tolerance ? active participation ? high level knowledge / interest ? “varying” support for the state ?  social capital reservoir of trust, efficacy & expectations

75 75 More concepts …  political culture texture of political society  religion & political culture  political socialization process of political learning “agents” of socialization

76 76 Authority & Legitimacy: Cases  German case facts trends meaning...  US contrast trends causes...

77 77 Chapter 9 Constitutions and the Design of Government

78 78 Designs of Government constitution = set of rules by which power is distributed among the offices of government variations in formality … virtue of vagueness principles of constitutional design:  limit break with tradition  amendability (flexibility over time)  incentive compatibility

79 79 Distribution of Power  geographic concentration of power (a) centralized or de-centralized (b) federal or unitary  focus: revenue and/or services?  conceptual difference: (a) vs. (b) … four combinations centralized federal; de-centralized federal; centralized unitary; de-centralized unitary

80 80 “constitutionalism” form & function  commitment to rules, rights, laws  law constructed from constitutional values  constitutionalism = faithful adherence to the letter and spirit of the constitution

81 81 Examples  Text: United Kingdom, Russia  Other cases worth investigating: Bosnia, European Union, Costa Rica

82 82 Chapter 10 Elections

83 83 The appeal of elections  “elections” ooze legitimacy  … invite respectability  … cause many to assume democracy  … illuminate “choice”  … demonstrate “participation”  … actually serve many non-democratic objectives

84 84 Elections  functions: select leaders / policies mobilize; build support  tough questions: Is the outcome in doubt? Are the choices significantly different? Do the mechanics of the elections reinforce or undermine the citizens’ choices?

85 85 Types  choosing leadership or policies typical labels: “election” “referendum”  Electoral systems: SMDP vs. PR ? mechanics, advantages, biases ?

86 86 Single member district plurality  SMDP: name provides detail …  Political system divided into districts  One winner in each district  Winner is the candidate with the largest number of votes  Upside: direct link – leader to constituency  Downside: lost voices of losers  Upside/downside: distribution of voters = crucial

87 87 Proportional Representation  PR: name provides detail …  a political system has x number of representatives to be elected.  all political parties create a composite list of their candidates (for all the seats)  if a political party gets ALL the votes, it gets all the seats  if it gets a percentage of the votes, it gets that percentage of the seats

88 88 PR  Upside: the pattern of votes cast by citizens is reflected in the elected representatives; minorities have a voice and all votes “count” wherever they may be located  Downside: because names are taken from the party lists (top to bottom order), folks in one place may not perceive that they have a specific representative to whom they can turn for service; party loyalty is much more important to the leader in a PR system

89 89 Other dimensions …  Referendum … more “democratic?” more power, more choice? more problems … ?  Participation … more “democratic?” more power, more choice? more problems … ?

90 90 Electoral Participation  Who? logic? reasoning?  “paradox of voting” no one who is sensible should vote  How much is “best?” comparing …  Bases for choices: long vs. short term party, race, gender, age, region, language, ethnicity, economic role, other ?

91 91 Examples  Text: Israel Nigeria  Others worth investigating: Bosnia Iraq Mexico

92 92 Chapter 11 Parties: A Linking and Leading Mechanism in Politics

93 93 Political Parties  A group of officials or would-be officials who are linked to a sizable group of citizens in an organization designed to ensure that its officials gain or retain power.  FUNCTIONS: “linking & leading”

94 94 Specific functions:  What does a “political party” do? or would like to be able to do … mobilization recruitment socialization source of political identity “channel of control”

95 95 Form & Function of Parties  Organizational structure ? impact on function  Financial structure: sources of revenue government: “public funds” foreign governments private: individuals, groups, businesses shadowy sources

96 96 Parties …  “Iron Law of Oligarchy”  Party systems: Dominant Party Systems Two Party Systems Multi-Party Systems  Mass vs. Ideological Party systems nature of appeal to members …  Examples: China; Canada

97 97 Chapter 12 Structured Conflict: Interest Groups and Politics

98 98 Interest Groups  Definition: “workhorses of political advocacy” alternate vehicle for representation  Barriers to effectiveness: poor organization priority voices (“disproportionate voices”) interest distortion  Variation: (a) degree of organization (b) degree of direct involvement in government

99 99 Collective Action Logic of Collective Action collective goods vs. costs factors that could draw membership to interest groups  size  selective incentives  coercion  relative muscle

100 100 Types, types, types  Sectoral  Institutional  Promotional  Interest articulation & interest aggregation  Anomic, revolutionary, other …

101 101 Tactics  control of information & expertise  electoral support & activity  use of economic power  campaign contributions  public information campaigns  violence & disruption  litigation

102 102 Mechanics  PLURALISM *competitive political environment *level playing field for competing interest groups  NEO-CORPORATISM *government solicits and institutionalizes some voices, some interest groups *preferential treatment ? Ombudsman power & choice...

103 103 Examples: complexities, hybrids, combinations  France (text)  Japan (text)  European Union (contrast)

104 104 Chapter 14 National Decision-making Institutions: Parliamentary Government

105 105 PARLIAMENTARY GOVERNMENT Characteristics  Elected parliament (often large)  Sovereign  Executive power in the Cabinet  Cabinet power ONLY as long as retains “confidence” (commands a majority of votes)  Cabinet members remain in parliament  PM can “dissolve” parliament

106 106 Some structural details  Head of State: formal, symbolic position  If a single party emerges from an election with a majority of seats, it will identify its leadership as the PM and cabinet; if a coalition is formed to establish a majority, a combination of leaders from various coalition partners will be positioned in the cabinet

107 107 Cabinet management & control  Policy agenda  Debates (real or ?)  Voting (pre-ordained ?)  Policy coherence …  Policy clarity …  Policy boldness …

108 108 Functions of PARLIAMENT  becomes the forum for public debate  government policies are scrutinized in advance of becoming policies  monitors the administration of policies  insures accountability via question time  enhances transparency by exposing the policy process  testing ground for leadership

109 109 “Representation”  DELEGATE mirror constituent views … upside – downside?  TRUSTEE invest in official’s judgment upside – downside?  What’s wrong with a “mix” or ambiguity?

110 110 Special features  Accountability … “Question time” must answer questions put to the leadership!  Parliamentary committees: not generally autonomous / weak  Curbs & limits on Parliament consensus parliamentarism federal systems autocratic systems

111 111 Advantages … Disadvantages  “power” (exec & leg power) is united enabling more quick and responsive policy-making  policy-making responsibility CLEAR -------------------------------------------------  majority (coalition) CONTROL;  minority vulnerable/ignored  non-regular turnover … instability possible  added problems with “minority cabinet”

112 112 Chapter 15 National Decision-making Institutions: Presidential Government

113 113 Presidential Government  executive & legislature elected separately  shared responsibility … competition, conflict  role of parties different / less party discipline  different parties may occupy leg / exec  exec. & leg. claims of “representation”  cabinet tied to executive; not linked to legislative success

114 114 Pres. & Parl. Systems Compared  policy leadership  identifying policy “responsibility”  making “comprehensive” policy  recruiting leadership  review & control  flexibility & fixed terms  separation: symbolic - political responsibilities  constitutional review

115 115 Characteristics: Presidential Systems  Presidential policy leadership  Unclear policy responsibility  Less comprehensive policy  Different kinds of leaders  Problems with review & control  No division of symbolic and power aspects of the executive office

116 116 For discussion: Greenstein’s Six Qualities of Leadership  proficiency as a public communicator  organizational capacity  political skill  vision  cognitive style  emotional intelligence either system have edge?

117 117 Examples: Ch. 14 & 15  Parliamentary: India & Germany  Presidential: France & Mexico  ? New insight into American system ?  What is the suggested relationship between constitutions, power and resources?

118 118 Chapter 7 Democracy and Autocracy

119 119 Democracy defined  regime in which all fully qualified citizens vote at regular intervals to choose, from among alternative candidates, the people who will be in charge of setting a state’s policies  any ambiguity in this definition? more than or less than thing?

120 120 Democracy What is the “democratic bargain?”  accept possibility of losing  expect to get something from the political process More characteristics: critically appraise … fragile, rich states/poor states, longevity, sustainability, greater dignity for all citizens, strong protection against arbitrary treatment

121 “Democracy” VALUES Tolerance Obligation Voice Constraint Transparency Legitimacy 121

122 122 Trend?  “Overall, there has been a clear movement toward democracy”  Third Wave -- wave of democratization  Transitions in Central & East Europe Where is the threshold when new systems have ENOUGH of the characteristics to be considered democracies?

123 123 Causes or catalysts?  fatigue of authoritarian regimes  international pressure  protection from arbitrary treatment  desire for economic development

124 124 Lessons learned …  creation of democracy and/or continuation of democracy are NOT necessarily natural or normal  democracies are harder to sustain  importance of pacts (deal between democratizers and those replaced)

125 125  sudden changes (often not predicted)  economic crisis as stimulant  relationship: prosperity & democracy? freedom & democracy? capitalism & democracy?  ? Participation, ? Pluralism, ? Tolerance

126 126 Autocracy  regime in which those who hold power did not gain power by any regular constitutional process and are not responsible in their exercise of power to any formal set of rules  are you comfortable with the level of focus and clarity of this concept?  Autocracy vs. Democracy distinct categories or continuum?

127 127 Autocratic government  “Dictatorship,” “authoritarian,” “autocratic”  ? Stability in democracy vs. autocracy  MILITARY Governments “Coup” fragile short-lived: lack of legitimacy ineptitude internal disunity

128 128 One Party States more common than military government -- one political PARTY: one avenue to power; one lever for exercising power  links -- government to people  arena for debate -- limited  facilitates leadership transition  relatively stable

129 129 Monarchies  regime where the power to rule is inherited through descent in a family  most exist in the Middle East & Asia  in “constitutional” monarchies, the power of the monarch is generally limited to symbolic functions

130 130 Theocracies  regime ruled by a set of religious leaders who derive their power from their positions in a religion; legitimacy stems from the religious faith of the governed  structures and procedures vary but a quality of all-knowing, un-challengable infallibility is common

131 131 Democracy vs. Autocracy  Economic growth  Quality of life Power: exercised more by ? Choice: more evident and frequent in ?

132 132 Lessons of history … TEXT EXAMPLES –  Spain  Peru  Iran OTHER EXAMPLES -- Vatican, Iraq, Cuba, Switzerland, Japan Do revolutions bring democracy ?

133 133 LAW  rules laid down by government, binding all members of the state, including members of the government itself  sets society’s norms and rules for behavior  sets rules by which individuals and groups must relate to each other

134 134 The LAW  Composite rules that reinforce the ‘community’ of people by uniform application of those rules  ? Relationship: law & “freedom”  ? LAW without authority (“international law”)  Courts: interpreting & adjudicating prioritizing rules in the face of conflicts …

135 135 Legal Systems  Case law; Code law blending pattern; convergence  Religious law: Sharia  Perspectives … thinking comparatively contrast boundaries of the above … law as power; law as choice

136 136 Modes of social control: law The law could be understood as a mechanism by which government manages the governed; that is, as it exercises power. An earlier chapter introduced concepts of fairness and efficiency. Two models of social control follow (“line” and “cloud”). Examine in terms of those criteria: how arbitrary vs. how cost effective …

137 137 The LINE  Western systems of law require specificity, precision, clarity of rules  In a composite sense, laws specify the “line” between what one can and cannot do  In Western systems, persons are encouraged to ‘use’ all the latitude they are given  As a consequence, elaborates systems must be put in place to “guard” the line i.e. social control

138 138 The CLOUD  In Communist systems (and elsewhere) rules are presented to the public in purposively ambiguous terms  Against the law to engage in “anti-system behavior;” or “hooliganism”  The “line” designating what you can or cannot do is embedded in a cloud that you cannot see into …  Result: given the uncertainty, you do not do anything that could be judged illegal  Consequence: highly efficient social control citizens self-restraining their behaviors

139 139 ` Graphic: Line & Cloud illegal behaviors legal behaviors

140 140 The BIG Picture Drawing thoughts from the whole text …

141 141 Seminal Questions  Who has POWER?  How do they exercise it?  Who has choice?  How is it framed?  How does the dynamic relationship between POWER & CHOICE inform us about our world?

142 142 Final thought …  Shively “This book has emphasized the analysis of politics … I hope you will also remember the importance of passion and belief …”  Farkas POWER & CHOICE provides you with all the tools you need to approach the complex political world of the 21 st Century.

143 143 Homeostasis vs. flexibility 1. political systems change (adapt) 2. bureaucracy often most affected 3. once change imposed, bureaucracy reacts 4. homeostasis is the “natural” impulse to return procedures, policies, behaviors to their previous “steady-state.” 5. essentially, to minimize the impact of change Correlation: larger the bureaucracy, greater homeostatic tendency

Download ppt "1 POWER & CHOICE An Introduction to Political Science 12 th Edition W. Phillips Shively, University of Minnesota PowerPoint Supplement Richard P. Farkas,"

Similar presentations

Ads by Google