Presentation on theme: "Partnering with the Child Welfare System Lisa Blunt, MS, LMHP Chief Operating Officer Child Saving Institute Barbara Jessing, MS, LIMHP Clinical Director."— Presentation transcript:
Partnering with the Child Welfare System Lisa Blunt, MS, LMHP Chief Operating Officer Child Saving Institute Barbara Jessing, MS, LIMHP Clinical Director Heartland Family Service
Babies and toddlers, even before they can speak, can show us, through their interactions with others and their emotions, that they are struggling and need help. We have to learn to be better observers and more knowledgeable about ways to identify them and provide them with the services they need. Child-Centered Practices for the Courtroom and Community: A Guide to Working Effectively with Young Children and Their Families in the Child Welfare System (Katz, Lederman and Osofsky
How do we bring learning about early attachment into every decision made in the child welfare system? How do we bring the voice and the perspective of young and vulnerable children into the child welfare system?
What is your role? Where are you from? Any questions you bring?
Every decision made in the child welfare system should be made through the lens of attachment Does this decision SUPPORT healthy attachment of this child? Does this decision SUPPORT timely permanency for this child? Timing of services is critical.
Clinical assessment of the parent child relationship -- birth to five years Interventions Safe Start Assessment Child-Parent Psychotherapy Family Support Lessons learned in partnering with the Child Welfare System
Separated suddenly and often traumatically from parent Prior history often includes trauma, stress, deprivation Disrupted placements
Trauma exposure leading to removal Inconsistent caregiving in placement Disrupted foster care placements Respite Care Child Care Changes Case Manager turnover Cumulative negative developmental impact
Goals of Child Welfare System SAFETY PERMANENCYWELL BEING
To bring the voice and perspective of the young child into the child welfare system To strengthen and repair the parent- child bond; To promote the child’s social and emotional development; To minimize harmful developmental consequences of disruptions in care giving because of abuse or neglect.
Parent-Child Relationship Assessment Child- Parent Psychotherapy Family Preservation and Family Support Services
2005: Douglas County, NE and Zero to Three “Safe Babies” Court Team initiated 2006: Child Saving Institute and Heartland Family Service partnership with Family Drug Treatment Court/Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services : Interface with Child Welfare Reform in Nebraska
SAMHSA Grant Awarded 2010 Grantee: Nebraska Supreme Court, Office of Problem Solving Courts; Nebraska Court Improvement Project Eligible participants are clients in Douglas County Juvenile Court Drug Court/Family Drug Court Participating Provider Agencies: Child Saving Institute Heartland Family Service Lutheran Family Services
A structured, observation- based, multi session assessment of the relationship between parent and child Model developed by Joy Osofsky, PhD and colleagues; Louisiana expert in child exposure to violence Based on the “Prevent” Assessment model used in the Miami Safe Start Initiative
Initial interview of parent or parents for personal, family, and child history Record Review Structured observation of parent #1 and child Structured Observation of parent #2, foster parent, or other caregiver and child Ages and Stages Questionnaire: Developmental observation and evaluation of child with parent or other caregiver Observation sessions are videotaped Interactions are objectively rated according to specific dimensions of parent child relationship and interaction
Psychosocial interview Adult attachment interview and relevance of parent’s early experience to present relationship with child Goal: Insight into parent’s mental representation of child and internal experience of being a parent.
Highly relevant to getting a complete picture of parent’s current functioning Understanding “what happened to you” vs “what’s wrong with you?”
Parent directs assigned tasks with prompts from therapist by phone: Free play Bubbles Clean up and transition to new activity Several brief interactions around developmentally appropriate toys of increasing challenge Brief separation (or withdrawal of parent’s face for infant) and reunification of parent from child Therapist ratings are based on these observations
Reason for referral may relate to abilities of one or both parents If both parents are involved in permanency plan, observations are done with both Observation of other significant caregivers such as foster parent or grandparent is also productive Assessment documents strengths as well as problems; shows child’s relationships with various caregivers
Objective ratings of parent child interaction Used to develop treatment targets Used as measure of outcome of therapy or other recommended interventions
Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist CBCL Ages 1 ½ or older Ages and Stages ASQ 3 (2 months and up) ASQ SE (Social and Emotional Development)
How can the parent transition the child from one task to another? How does the child respond to a parent’s directive? “Bubbles” are a great measure of how much joy and pleasure there is in this relationship
How enthusiastic is the child? How persistent is the child, faced with a difficult task? How does the parent respond to child frustration? Emotional Behavioral
How does the parent prepare the child? How does the child respond? How does the child cope?
How does the child respond to the withdrawal of parent attention? How energetic and emotional is the child’s reaction? What is the emotional tone of the reunion?
Report is KEY COMMUNICATION To Judge, Case Manager, and Provider To Parents Summary of presenting issue and results/recommendations Relational treatment needs: how to build on the strengths in the parent child relationship what specific issues are to be addressed in the dyadic therapy, if recommended Developmental intervention needs
Child Parent Psychotherapy Other referrals as appropriate for therapy, parent education and support Parent Support and Education Programs Family Support Substance Abuse or Mental Health Treatment
26 week course of dyadic therapy Promote and strengthen a close, safe, and nurturing relationship between parent and child Observation, guidance, and coaching of the parent Deals with parent’s unresolved early abuse or trauma which interferes in the present Promotes adjustment/attachment as child transitions from foster care to home One hour weekly, in office
Behavior-based interventions Parent support and coaching Interactive parent-child play Verbal interpretation of transactions between parent and child.
Improved parent-child relationship Progress toward permanency goals Improvement in child developmental status Reduction of abuse/neglect
Family Support Specialist integral member of treatment team Opportunity to reinforces generalization of skills gained in CPP Observations inform CPP process
Mandated parent treatment Lack of clarity of clinician role Scope and limits of confidentiality Different perceptions of best interests “The contagion of dysfunctionality” Alicia Lieberman and Patricia Van Horn
Massive changes in the child welfare system co- occurred with our efforts to implement Changes in administration, workers, foster parents Groundhog Day: constantly restating our case Like trying to fill a bucket with a hole in it
“Parallel Process” System under high stress: “trauma contagion” As children and families struggle to survive – so does the system; so does the worker
The same skills that help us with traumatized and attachment- disrupted children and parents.... Help us deal with a traumatized system
Patience Trust Psycho-education on the impact of trauma (including trauma contagion) Relationship building Good self care and community with like minded colleagues
Key Judges have been supportive Zero to Three support for family drug court Model Court initiated new program development Systemic training of court personnel across the state “Critical Mass” is building Brain development and science foundation
Children participating in court teams leave foster care three times as fast as the comparison sample…. Reunification is most common for Court Team Babies (38%) whereas adoption is most common for comparison group (41%) “Moving Young Children From Foster Care to Permanent Homes”. Kimberly McCombs-Thornton; Zero to Three Journal; May 2012, Volume 32, Number 5
Judicial Leadership Regular Court Team Staffings (cases reviewed at least monthly)
To Dr. Joy Osofsky for teaching and mentoring us through this process To the families we learn from To the volunteer parents and children who agreed to be videotaped
Lisa Blunt, MS, LMHP Chief Operating Officer Child Saving Institute Barbara Jessing, MS, LIMHP Clinical Director Heartland Family Service familyservice.org