What does this prove about nature v. nurture? Remember the hypothesis of the experiment: “If an environment (nurture) is significant, then it can overcome heredity (nature) in regards to intelligence.” Thoughts?
When the environment was normal (as in environment #2) nature (heredity) seems to be the major factor in intelligence. When the environment was significant (really bad as in environment #1 or really great as in environment #3) nurture (environment) seems to overcome nature.
Are slums version of the restricted cage? Is being raised in affluence comparable to being in environment #3?