1. Experiences Described by Novice Teaching Academic Staff in Baccalaureate Nursing Education: A Focus on Mentoring Melissa Anibas, MSN, RN Gail Hanson Brenner, MSN, RN CeCelia Zorn, PhD, RN Sigma Theta Tau International – Mu Lambda Chapter Minnesota State University, Mankato September 14, 2007

2. Faculty Shortage Early Retirement (Faculty Census Survey, 2003) National League for Nursing (Kovner, Fairchild, & Jacobson, 2006) – Vacancy Rates Increased 32% from 2002 -2006 – 2/3rds were 45 – 60 years old in 2006, and likely to retire in the next 5-15 years

3. Increased Utilization of Teaching Academic Staff (TAS) Often Part Time Experts in Concurrent Practice Positions Little Formal Preparation for Educator Role Minimal Preceptorship or Mentorship Availability

4. Ample literature focused on novice tenure track faculty or those in community college settings, but no study examined experiences of novice TAS

5. Research Questions “What are the experiences described by novice TAS in a baccalaureate nursing program and how do these experiences compare to their expectations and needs?” “How was mentoring experienced by novice TAS?”

6. Experiences Feel Overwhelmed High Anxiety – Performance, balance, keeping up, and isolation Coping – Independently sought out professional support systems

7. Mentoring Mentoring roles Stages of the mentoring relationship Qualities of a mentor Mentor versus preceptor Formal versus informal

8. Method Design: Descriptive, naturalistic inquiry

9. Sample: Convenience, Ten novice TAS – Age (26-65); all Caucasian – 9 Female, 1 Male – Highest degree completed – Master’s degree – Variable FTE’s – 7 Classroom and clinical; 3 clinical only Setting: 3 Midwestern baccalaureate nursing programs – 2 public, 1 private Data Collection: Focus group interviews

10. Feelings – Anxiety, Frustration, Uncertainty, Isolation, Awkwardness, Expendability, Confusion – Confidence, Feeling supported, Belonging Preparation for Role and Expectations – Previous work, education, and life experiences – Familiarity with content – Expectations influenced by student characteristics – No expectations

11. Resources – Sources – Relationship with faculty colleagues – Characteristics of support persons as experienced – Helpful things others can do

12. Challenges – How to teach – How to evaluate – Personal – Organizational

13. Mentorship – Description and comparison with preceptorship – Mentorship experienced – Becoming and preceptor or mentor

14. Novice TAS experience is consumed with feelings and challenges Some support exists - need to strengthen Inconsistent use of “Preceptor” and “Mentor”

15. Transitional Process (inadvertent findings) Jumping in Surviving day by day Moving forward

16. Lessons Learned: Our Reflections Personal connection with topic Stick with the data (living the topic has tendency to influence interpretation) Experiences with interview skills Group research is enriching and fun; different talents are brought together Dissemination is simultaneous and ongoing

17. Acknowledgements Research Participants University of Wisconsin – Eau Claire – Small Research Grants – Sigma Theta Tau International – Delta Phi Chapter – Data transcriptionists

18. References Angelique, H, Kyle, K., & Taylor, E. (2002). Mentors and muses: New strategies for academic success. Innovative Higher Education, 28(3), 195-209. Bower, D., Diehr, S., Morzinski, J., & Simpson, D. (1998). Support-challenge-vision: A model for faculty mentoring. Medical Teacher, 20(6), 595-597. Cawyer, C. S., & Friedrich, G. W. (1998). Organizational socialization: Processes for new communication faculty. Communication Education, 47, 234-245. Faculty census survey of RN and graduate programs. (2003). Nursing Education Perspectives, 24(2), 106-109. Fox, E.C., Waldron, J.A., Bohnert, P., Hishinuma, E.S., & Nordquist, C.R. (1998). Mentoring new faculty in a department of psychiatry. Academic Psychiatry, 22(2), 98-106. Golding, T. & Gray, E. (2002). Mentoring mathematics faculty: A model. Pimus, 12(1), 87-95. Grosshaus, O., Poczwardowski, A., Trunnell, E., & Ransdell, L. (2003). Senior faculty retrospectives on mentoring. American Journal of Health Education, 34(3), 146-153. Knafl, K.A. & Webster, D.C. (1998). Managing and analyzing qualitative data: A description of tasks, techniques, and materials. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 10(2), 195-218.

19. Kovner, C., Fairchild, S., & Jacobson, L. (2006). Nurse educators 2006: A report of the faculty census survey of RN programs and graduate programs. New York: National League for Nursing. Leslie, K., Lingard, L., & Whyte, S. (2005). Junior faculty experiences with informal mentoring. Medical Teacher, 27(8), 693-698. Lewallen, L. P., Crane, p. B., Letvak, S., Jones, E., & Hu, J. (2003). An innovative strategy to enhance new faculty success. Nursing Education Perspectives, 24(5), 257-260. Pierce, G. (1998). Developing new university faculty through mentoring. Journal of Humanistic Education & Development, 37(1). Provident, I. (2005). Mentoring: A role to facilitate academic change. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 3(2). Ross, K. (1996). Follow the leader. Australian Nursing Journal, 3(2), 35-38. Sands, R., Parson, L., & Duane, J. (1991). Faculty mentoring faculty in a public university. The Journal of Higher Education, 62(2), 174-193.

20. Sarmiento, T., Laschinger, H., & Iwasiw, C. (2003). Nurse educators’ workplace empowerment, burnout, and job satisfaction: Testing Kanter’s theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 46(2), 134-143. Siler, B., & Kleiner, C. (2001). Novice faculty: Encountering expectations in academia. Journal of Nursing Education, 40(9), 397-403. Solem, M., & Foote, K. (2004). Concerns, attitudes, and abilities of early-career geography faculty. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(4), 889- 912. Turnbull, B. K., & Roberts, K. (2005). Nurse-academics’ mentorship: Rhetoric or reality? Collegian, 12(2), 33-38. Zanting, A., Verloop, N., & Vermunt, J. (2002). Student teachers’ beliefs about mentoring and learning to teach during teaching practice. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 57-80.