Presentation on theme: "Orientalism, Occidentalism and Area Studies"— Presentation transcript:
1Orientalism, Occidentalism and Area Studies Yong Haeju #I 29012Lee Jinse #I 33010Lee Hoggie #I 34009
2ContentsAbout Edward Said /“ORIENTALISM” 1978 / From Orientalism to Area studiesOrientalist Past and the Future of Middle East Studies / The West and the Rest: Discourse and PowerOccidentalism / Beyond Occidentalism
3Edward Said 1935~2003. 9. 24 Studied in Victoria University, 1935~Studied in Victoria University,Cairo, EgyptIn 1950, Ph.D.in Harvard University.
4“ORIENTALISM” 1978The distinction between pure and political knowledgeThe methodological questionThe personal dimension
5From Orientalism to Area Studies Area studies need to be understood in its relation to Orientalism in terms of its being the heir to this academic discipline.SociologyEconomicsPolitical scienceIdiographic historyAnthropologyOrientalism
6From Orientalism to Area Studies Orientalism and Area studies must be taken into consideration is the novel forms that this heritage takes under the geopolitics of the post-World War II era.Orientalism as a Western style for dominating, restructuring, and having authority over the Orient.Orientalism is one of the haapiest and most durable marriages of power and knowledge housed under the unequal relationship between the West and the East, one stemming from the structure of the capitalist World-system.
7From Orientalism to Area Studies Area studies and Orientalism will be the distinctive and disruptive places that these two disciplines hold within the organization of the social sciences.Oriental societies do not exist anymore, and no more Oriental congresses convene.What was the result of all these efforts: surveys, policy recommendations, governmental decisions, foundation support?
8Questions & AnswerDoes Orientalism still correctly define the society of Asia?How should we develop or use “Area studies” properly?
9The Relevance DebateMartin Kramer presents a critique of Middle Eastern Studies.Time for Middle East specialists to put their house in order anddrop fashionable theories - a legacy of Edward Said’s Orientalism.Kramer thinks in favor of straightforward policy-relevant work by adopting approaches that would explain and predict changes in the Middle East.He said this could be remedied by going back to their roots in Oriental Studies to restore some continuity with great tradition.He also maintains that the last thing Middle Eastern studies have sought to do has been to serve American foreign policy or private initiative.
10The Legacy of Said’s Orientalism Orientalism is a great tradition which was discredited by Said writings in Said is critical of the Orientalist tradition because he considers it a ‘supremacist ideology of difference, articulated in the West to justify its dominion over East’.Said understands Orientalism as a style of thought based upon an ontological and epistemological distinction made between the Orient and the Occident. In Kramer’s view, it was during this period that Middle East studies ceased to be relevant to U.S. interests. This was mainly because they alienated policy makers by producing work critical of U.S. policies.
11The Legacy of Said’s Orientalism American Orientalism is defined as a tendency to underestimate the peoples of the region and to overestimate America’s ability to make a bad situation better.U.S. governments were victims of the Orientalist outlook that not only limited how they were able to think about the Middle East but also established a hierarchical distinction between the Middle East and the West, thereby resulting in an underestimation of Middle Eastern actors and overestimation of what the U.S. was capable of.
12The Legacy of Said’s Orientalism Martin KramerEdward SaidGoing back to Orientalist rootsEmphasizes the need for approaches that would explain and predict.Expects academic to talk more to practitioners and produce policy-relevant work by restoring the links between scholarship and policy making.Going beyond the distinction between Orient/OccidentConsiders Orientalist tradition ‘supremacist ideology of difference, articulated in the West to justify its dominion over East’.Contributing to the maintenance of the status quo is what Orientalist tradition did best by providing knowledge for the imperial power.
13The Relationship between Scholarship and Policy Making Kramer argues that Middle East studies have failed its major funder, U.S. government and that the remedy would be found by going back to its roots in Oriental studies to re-establish links between Middle East scholarship and policy making.Thanks to the Middle East centers based in U.S. universities, an American prevalence exists in Middle East studies.This phenomenon of the indigenization of Middle East studies in the USA could be viewed as a sign of success for Middle East studies.Area studies centers have been highly influential.Such a development would have been unfathomable within the limits imposed by the Oriental studies tradition that rested on the Orient/Occident divide and did not allow the Middle East to represent itself.
14Where and what is ''the West"? “The West" is no longer only in Europe, and not all of Europe is in "the West."The Eastern Europe doesn't belong properly to "the West"; whereas the United States, which is not geographically in Europe, definitely does.These days, technologically speaking, Japan is "western," though on our mental map it is about as far "East" as you can get.By "western" we mean the type of society : a society that is developed, industrialized, urbanized, capitalist, secular, and modern.The meaning of this term is therefore virtually identical to that of the word "modern."
15Functions of the concept “The West” The concept or idea of "the West" can be seen to function in the following ways:It allows us to characterize and classify societies into different categories – e.g. "western," "non-western."It is an image, or set of images. It condenses a number of different characteristics into one picture. It functions as part of a language, a "system of representation.” e.g.) "western" = urban = developed; or "non-western" = non-industrial = rural = agricultural = under-developed.It provides criteria of evaluation against which other societies are ranked and around which powerful positive and negative feelings cluster. e.g.) "the West" = developed = good = desirable; or the "non-West" = under-developed = bad = undesirable. In short, it functions as an ideology.
16Internal DifferenceThe very term "the West," makes the West appear unified and homogeneous. But the West has always contained many internal differences.The same necessary simplification is true to "the Rest." This term also covers enormous historical, cultural, and economic distinctions - for example, between the Middle East, the Far East, Africa, Latin America, indigenous North America, and Australasia.It can equally encompass the simple societies of some North American Indians and the developed civilizations of China, Egypt, or Islam.In short, the discourse, as a "system of representation," represents the world as divided according to a simple dichotomy - the West/the Rest.
17The consequences of expansion for the idea of ''the West" Gradually, despite their many internal differences, the countries of Western Europe began to conceive of themselves as part of a single family or civilization - "the West.“But in the Age of Exploration and Conquest, Europe began to define itself in relation to a new idea - the existence of many new "worlds," profoundly different from itself.The two processes - growing internal cohesion and the conflicts and contrasts with external worlds - reinforced each other, helping to forge that new sense of identity that we call "the West.“
18Discourse about the West and the Rest Discourses are ways of talking, thinking, or representing a particular subject or topic. They produce meaningful knowledge about that subject. This knowledge influences social practices, and so has real consequences and effects. Discourses always operate in relation to power.Europe brought its own cultural categories, languages, images, and ideas to the New World in order to describe and represent it. It tried to fit the New World into existing conceptual frameworks, classifying it according to its own norms, and absorbing it into western traditions of representationThe discourse of "the West and the Rest" could not be innocent because it did not represent an encounter between equals.
19Mis-recognizing difference Idealization, FantasyA major object of the process of idealization was Nature itself.Sexuality was a powerful element in the fantasy which the West constructed.Mis-recognizing differenceSaid says that "the essence of Orientalism is the ineradicable distinction between Western superiority and Oriental inferiority.“Europeans were immediately struck by what they interpreted as the absence of government and civil society - the basis of all "civilization" - among peoples of the New World.Rituals of degradationLiving close to Nature meant that they were “uncivilized”.The extent of any cannibalism was considerably exaggerated.
20Stereotypes, dualism, and "splitting" 1) idealization; 2) the projection of fantasies of desire and degradation; 3) the failure to recognize and respect difference; 4) the tendency to impose European categories and norms, to see difference through the modes of perception and representation of the West.These strategies were all underpinned by the process known as stereotyping.The stereotype is split into two halves - its "good" and "bad" sides; this is "splitting" or dualism.The world is first divided, symbolically, into good-bad, us-them, attractive-disgusting, civilized-uncivilized, the West-the Rest. All the other, many differences between and within these two halves are collapsed, simplified.
21"Noble" vs “Ignoble savages" The philosopher John Locke claimed that the New World provided a prism through which one could see "a pattern of the first ages in Asia and Europe" - the origins from which Europe had developed."In the beginning," Locke said, "all the World was America". He meant by this that the world (i.e. the West) had evolved from a stage very much like that discovered in America - undeveloped, and uncivilized.The history of "rude" and "refined" nationsIt produced the idea that the history of "mankind" occurred along a single continuum, divided into a series of stages. A different mode of subsistence, these stages being defined as hunting, pasturage, agriculture and commerce.Without ‘the Rest’, ‘the West’ would not have been able to recognize and represent itself as the summit of human history.
22From' ''the West and the Rest" to Modern Sociology Karl Heinrich MarxMax WeberAsiatic mode vs. Capitalist systemThe Asiatic mode is characterized by: (a) stagnation, (b) an absence of dynamic class struggle, and (c) the dominance of a swollen state as a universal landlord.Marx saw capitalist system as progressive, driving social development forward.Societies dominated by the "Asiatic" mode of production have no internal class conflicts and lack a basic ingredient of social change.Islam vs. Western EuropeThe essential conditions for the transition to capitalism and modernity are: (a) ascetic forms of religion, (b) rational forms of law, (c) free labor, and (d) the growth of cities.Islam as a "mosaic" of tribes and groups, never cohering into a proper social system, existing under a despotic rule with factional struggles.Employs a basic dichotomy between the feudal economies of the West and the patrimonial political economies of the East.
23Questions & AnswerCan Orientalist tradition be a good approach for the future of Area Studies? What is the proper way of studying a specific area?It is unfair to characterize both the West and the Rest in a simple dichotomy because of internal differences within.I concur with Edward Said’s view that Orientalism is the distinction based on Western superiority and Oriental inferiority.Going back to Orientalist roots and restoring the links between scholarship and policy-relevant work is not the proper way in area studies.Study into a specific area should be based on the scientific approaches and disciplinary-oriented ways in conjunction with particular studies into the country to expect and predict changes in the region more accurately.Orientalist outlook not only limited how the U.S. was able to think of the Middle East but also established a hierarchical distinction between the Middle East and the West, thereby resulting in an underestimation of Middle Eastern actors and overestimation of what the U.S. was capable of.Scholars should go beyond the distinction between Orient and Occident and reflect the Middle Eastern perspectives to produce more accurate and relevant knowledge that would enable specialists to predict the changes in the region.
24“OCCIDENTALISM: THE WORLD TURNED UPSIDE DOWN” Orientalisms and OccidentalismsOrientalismAttracts the most attentionEthno-orientalismEssentialist renderings of an alien societies by the member s of those societies themselvesEthno-occidentalismEssentialist renderings of the West by members of alien societieOccidentalismThe essentialistic rendering of the West by Westerners.
25Gifts and Commodities Gifts Commodities Archaic societies Dominated by kinship relations that define individuals and their connections with and obligations to one another.Money is only a part, ‘people’ is the important element.Household relation resembles gift relationModern Western societiesMembers are alienated from the people and the objects around them.Transactions in which alienated individuals give and take alienated objects in monetary transactions in the market.
26Gift and commodity relations means that each is shaped by the other Occidentalism makes sense only when it is juxtaposed with its matching Orientalism, the essentialized society of the gift, the West is the society of the commodity – these two essentializations defining and justifying each other dialectically.
27Essentialism and Antiessentialism Essentialism is a view that, for any specific kind of entity, there are a set of characteristics all of which any entity of that kind must have.Antiessentialism is Seeking to reduce or eliminate Orientalist tendencies, the critics have urged anthropologists to look at societies in less stereotyped ways or to adopt new textual or representational devices for portraying them
28“BEYOND OCCIDENTALISM: TOWARD NONIMPERIAL GEOHISTORICAL CATEGORIES” Imperial MapsMapsA medium for representing the world as well as for problematizing its representation.The West and the EastThe West: the occident, the center, the first world: often identified with Europe, the States,us, we, the modern SelfThe East: the orient, the periphery, the third world: underdeveloped, the other
29Three Occidentalist Representational Modalities The Dissolution of the Other by the SelfIn this modality, Western and non-Western cultures are opposed to each other as radically different entities and their opposition is resolved by absorbing non-Western people into an expanding and victorious WestThe Incorporation of the Other into the SelfIn this second modality of Occidentalism, a critical focus on Western development unwittingly obscures the role of non-Western people in the making of the modern world, subtly reiterating the distinction between Other and Self that underwrites Europe’s imperial expansion.The Destabilization of Self by OtherIn this form, non-Western people are presented as a privileged source of knowledge of the West.the depiction of radical Otherness is used to unsettle Western culture.
30Modernity and Occidentalism The examination of Western representations of Otherness can be encompassed within an interrogation of why Otherness has become such a peculiarly modern concern from the perspective of a critique of Occidentalism.The map of modernity is being redrawn by global changes in culture, aesthetics, and exchange that are commonly associated with the emergence of post-modernity.Toward Nonimperial Geohistorical Categories.The interaction between geography and history involves an exchange between past and present and present and future.
31Question & AnswerWhat is the difference between Orientalism and Occidentalism?If Orientalism was the creation of the center, then Occidentalism is the creation of the periphery. It means that Orientalism was created by the “great states” of the West in order to achieve their objectives; whereas Occidentalism is created by an oriental élite working and living in the West and became lured by its principles and values. So, Occidentalism depends on Empiricism that is to say experience because they live and work in the place of study; whereas Orientalism calls for Rationalism that is shaping the values and beliefs of others to their reason.