Presentation on theme: "Simply Effective CBT Supervision For Low and High Intensity IAPT"— Presentation transcript:
1Simply Effective CBT Supervision For Low and High Intensity IAPT Dr Michael J Scott Wednesday, September 10th 2014 For this presentation and notes me, if I have not replied in 48hrs send an appropriate reminder!
2Resources1. Simply Effective Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Supervision (2014) London: Routledge Michael J Scott 2. Collaborative Case Conceptualization (2009) New York: Guilford Press Willem Kuyken, Christine A. Padesky and Robert Dudley
3Learning ObjectivesTo distil a viable model of supervision in which supervision is seen as a crucible for reflective thinking which reciprocally interacts with knowledge and skillsTo appreciate the similarities and differences between traditional supervision and supervision for evidence based practiseUnderstand a framework for ensuring the EBP of SuperviseesEnsure Supervisees practice flexibility within fidelityAppreciate that competence without adherence is meaningless – fidelity = adherence + competenceDistinguish competences: stage specific, diagnosis specific and genericAppreciate that a failure in one competence sabotages the others
4‘I’m stuck with……….’This is a reflection on a difficulty with a client that the supervisee feels they are unable to resolveThe supervisor determines whether there is a gap in the supervisees knowledge and/or skill in the matterCollaboratively supervisor and supervisee determine how these gaps may be closedThis is the opening gambit of most supervisees in most supervision sessions
5Thinking Back to Your Last Session as a Supervisor or as a Supervisee (if you haven’t yet Supervised):Was a gap in knowledge identified?Was a gap in skills identified?How were the gaps closed?If gaps in knowledge or skills were not identified and stepstaken, what therapist/supervisor learning has taken place?Overall in your supervision sessions is there a balance of didactic and experiential learning?Take 5 mins to recall your session and make notes on it then Discuss in groups of 4-6 for 15 mins whether there could have been better identification of gaps and better ways of closing gapsRelective ThinkingDeclarative knowledgeProcedural knowledge
6Important Dimensions of The Supervisory Relationship – in the last session did my supervisor (or me) provideSafe base e.g the supervisor was respectful of my viewsStructure – sessions were structuredCommitment – did my supervisor pay attention to my anxieties feelingsReflective education – did my supervisor encourage me to reflect on my practiceRole model – did I respect my supervisors skillsFormative feedback – was my supervisors feedback on my performance constructiveP161 The Supervisory Relationship Questionnaire. Spend a few mins reflecting on how you fare on these dimensions and make some notes. Anyone want to make a Confession? Any plans for moving forward?
7Role Play Supervision re: Mark Going to do a short role play of Supervision session, and then have plenary discussion of itHow do you think the Supervisor did in terms of the Supervisory relationship?Will look at problems surrounding TFCBT in later clips, we will come back to Mark
8Commonalities In Supervision Across Treatment Modalities Identifying gaps in knowledgeIdentifying gaps in skillsBridging the gapsMaintaining a good supervisory relationshipBalancing didactic and experiential learning
9What Is Specific About Supervision In IAPT? To answer this we have to ask, what is the ultimate rationale for supervision?
10Defining The Primary Function of Supervision What are we trying to build with supervision?
11The Supervisor As A Conduit for EBT’s Evidence-based treatment (EBT)SuperviseeSupervisor
12A Top Down Account of Evidence-Based Provision Academic CliniciansRandomised Controlled TrialsScientist Practitioner ModelCBT Training CoursesManagersSupervisorsClinician Providers of CBTClientsThe top down model assumes supervisors, managers and training courses are aware of the results of rct’s but is this the case?Put up your hand if you currently supervise? Count the number xOf the current supervisors how many routinely read Behaviour Research and Therapy or the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology?Where do you supervisors get your knowledge of rcts from?How many are not current supervisors Count numberHow many of current non-supervisors routinely read BRAT or Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology Count numberWhere do you non-supervisors get your knowledge of rcts from?How many Managers Count numberHow many Managers read Brat or Journal of ConsultingOverall few managers supervisors are accessing materials on rcts
13Question TimeHow many studies show the superiority of behavioural activation to cognitive therapy or vice versa?In what area/condition was a difference demonstrated?What, if any, are the implications for routine practice?How do you assess therapeutic competence in these modalities?PlenaryDimidjian et al (2006) Pandomised trial of behavioral activation , cognitive therapy and antidepressant medication in the acute treatment of adults with major depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74,Only difference BA> CT for the severeley depressed but just one studyBA inrended to be simple no guided discovery CTRS therefore inappropriate
14The Consequences of Not Appreciating The Strength of Evidence Manager pressurising CBT therapist to provide a group for all comersInappropriate limiting of the number of sessionsAdoption of strategies based on eminence/convenience rather than evidencePromotion of interventions that are new but have no demonstrated added value over a traditional CBT intervention
15The Supervisor As Foreman How do you ensure that the treatment your supervisee is providing is evidence-based?If treatment is only as good as a reliable assessment, how do you ensure the latter?How do you ensure that you don’t stop at the first disorder/major problem identified?Multiple disorders are the norm, how do you help supervisees address this?Spend 15 mins in groups discussing these, then plenary
16The GAP Between Supervision in RCT’s and In Routine Practise FrequencyFocus on fidelity (adherence plus competence)Diagnosis specific protocolsUse of a manualSupervision takes place in the context of ‘Gold standard assessments’, standardised semi-structured interviews such as the SCIDIt isa myth that in rcts patients have only one disorder
17To The Extent That Supervision In Routine Practise Departs From That In RCTs It Is Less Likely To Be Evidence BasedDiscussion How could you close the gap?
18‘This Is Complex’Imagine Mark visits the garage a few days after the accident the mechanic is peering under the bonnet of his car and proclaims ‘This is Complex’ His thoughts might be ‘is he/she working a fast one? Is this going to cost me an arm and a leg’?’Departures from protocols are often justified on the basis that this case is ‘Complex’I want to suggest that when someone decribes a case as ‘complex’ a warning bell should soundThe comment engenders scepticism, I think supervisors should be sceptical when supervisees use the term ‘complex’
19Complexity Is Largely A ‘Fuzzy’ There is no evidence that it is not possible to interweave protocols for different disorders e.g Falsetti (2005) the treatment of panic attacks and PTSD Scott (2009) has given detailed examples of the interweaving of protocols There is no evidence that you have to treat one disorder e.g alcohol abuse before treating a co-existing disorder e.g PTSD, Gulliver (2010)
22For the CBT car to go need both a body to the car and an engine
23The Competence EngineGeneric competenceDiagnosis Specific CompetenceStage Specific CompetenceUse example of person checking more post trauma and therapist concludes got ocd, follows protocol faithfully but gets no where cause top cog not working not got ocd, even dong skillful therapy e.g good socratic getting nowhere, nothing turning
24Competence in initial evaluation is crucial as most CBT treatments are diagnosis specific e.g Ehlers and Clark treatment of PTSD
25Diagnosis Specific Competences E.gTreatment fidelity in depressionAdherence: How thoroughly were specific treatment targets and techniques addressed in the session?Competence:How skillfully was the target addressed using the particular techniques? Rate 1-7 where no competence 1 and 7 total competenceNot done ExtensivelydiscussedTreatment targetTechniqueScoreInactivityDeveloping wide-ranging modest investmentsExtract p94, table 8.1 explainTreatment fidelity scales for depression and the anxiety disorders are on p’s
26Generic Competence Can use one question Competence is globally rated for each session with a single rating on a 7-point scaleClearly Fair Good ExcellentInadequateA therapist is rated as excellent if she or he has warm, supportive, collaborative, Socratic Style and was able to articulate the concepts clearly, making them personally relevant to the client in the setting and review of homework.Adapted from Huppert et al (2001)p100
27Generic Competence and the CTRS-R It has only been found to relate to outcome in CBT for depression (Shaw et al 1999) and the effect was modest, accounting for 19% of variance in outcome on a clinician administered measure and no relation with self-report outcome measuresAspects most associated with outcome were setting of agenda, assigning relevant homework and pacing the session. Guided discovery did not predict outcomeThe CTRS-R is arguably a ‘silver standard’ and not a ‘gold-standard’P53 CTRS-R
28First Video Clip of Supervision Session re: Mark In this clip the Supervisee has adhered to Foa’s treatment prolonged exposure, but hasn’t achieved the expected outcome. The Supervisor has updated the current understanding of the protocol and highlighted a new treatment target ‘buying’ into the model. In this way the Supervisor has bridged a knowledge gap but there is also a skills gap and the Supervisor has bridged this with a role play’ i.e has addressed both declarative knowledge and procedural knowledge as supervision should be both didactic and experiential.
29References On Reduction of SUDS Bluett et al (2014) Does change in distress matter? Mechanisms of change in prolonged exposure for PTSD. Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry,Meuret at al (2012) Does fear reactivity during exposure predict panic symptom reduction? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,
30Second Video Clip of Supervision Session Re: Mark This clip highlights how things can go badly wrong because the initial evaluation was likely wrong, systematic enquiry had not been made about a wide range of disorders. The Supervisee had stopped at the first disorder suggested and had not reliably checked out whether this diagnosis was appropriate. Although she has faithfully adhered to Foa’s protocol the CBT car has stopped because of a poor initial evaluation, because the top cog has stopped rotating the others have ground to a halt
31Reliable Initial Evaluation – a stage specific competence Screen for a wide range of disordersEnquire about each symptom of a DSM criteria, endorse a symptom as present only if it produces significant impairment e.g a person may report nightmares of a trauma but if currently it does not cause them to wake up, then wouldn’t endorse symptom as present now. See Scott (2008) Simply Effective Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Routledge: LondonExpect that there will usually be more than one disorder present and to be targettedMy little old lady!
32Depression Group Life Role Play Use Depression Fidelity Scale to assess Therapist CompetenceAlso Use One Item Measure of Generic competenceCould also have used CTRS-RThere is a Group CBT Cognitive Therapy Rating Scale in Simply Effective Group Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (2009) Scott, as well as self-help manuals for depression and each of the anxiety disorders (these are available as free download fromNow do a group role play with me being the therapist 4 volunteers to be their last depressed case and use the Depression Fidelity Scale (slide 25) and the measure of Generic Competence to assess. Imagine it’s the 2nd therapy session and the first session has been about encouraging them to be more active and to read the depression Survival Manual that is a free download. Do role play 15 mins then discuss
33Guided Self Help - Fidelity Checklist for Depression Did the therapist focus on this and were applicable its’ implementation?Yes (3), Yes, but insufficiently (2), No (1)1.Assess - using CBT Pocketbook, (beginning and end of contact)2.Psychoeducation – Section 1 How depression develops and keeps going3.Section 2 No investments, no return4.Section 3 On second thoughts5.Section 4 Just make a start6.Section 5 Expectation versus experience and recalling the positive7.Section 6 Negative spin or how to make yourself depressed without really tryingThere are also checklists you can use in Low intensity Interventions
34GSH Fidelity Scale for Depression contd. 8.Section 7 An attitude problem9.Section 8 My attitude to self, others and the future10.Section 9 Be critical of your reflex first thoughts not how you feel11.Section 10 Preventing Relapse12.Collaboratively plan homework13.Seek feedback on session14.Clarify if there are further questions15.Agree next appointment16.Review homework
35The Supervisory Context and Organisational Mandates – some examples Low intensity IAPTPain ManagementEating Disorders UnitP55, the Supervisor may be subversive asin these examples, is your context problematic?
36The CBT Therapist As Engineer May Challenge Received Wisdom For example prolonged exposure for PTSD is an advocated EBT but few CBT therapists use it – Scott and Stradling (1997) found that only 57% of clients in routine practise complied with listening to a trauma tape. Therapists will not swallow wholesale the findings of EBT’s.The Engineer is concerned at the sabotage of EBT by a) the use of surrogate outcome measures e.g self report measures used in IAPT studies and b) poorly specified populations e.g no semi-structured standardised interview to determine what the client is suffering from in IAPT studiesThe Engineer is alarmed when a study of low intensity IAPT is described as ‘haemorrhaging clients’ Richards and Borglin (2011)
37Scientist Practitioner Model Defunct? CBT therapists are not an homogenous group, they consist of academic clinicians, involved in rct’s and Engineers delivering a service in routine practice. For effective dissemination and implementation communication must be bottom up as well as top down Engineers also likely to use a ’friends and family test’ would you recommend this treatment delivered by these practitioners to a friend or family member Engineers operate in a scientific paradigm, testing out the viability of interventions in different contexts
40Does Supervision in IAPT, or indeed in CBT generally, make any difference to client outcome? Is it proven, not proven or false?
41The Facts Of The MatterBambling et al (2006) compared supervision v’s no supervision in problem solving therapy for depression:The clients of therapists undergoing supervision did significantly better.Dropout rates were 35% in those not supervised and 4.5% in those supervised.P9-10 of book
42The Facts Of The Matter contd. 2. Bradshaw et al (2007) compared the effects of a 2 day course for supervisors, to enable supervisee nurses delivering a family and CBT intervention to the care givers of patients with schizophrenia, with the same intervention delivered by nurses without any supervision. Those patients indirectly linked to supervision showed greater reduction in total psychotic symptoms.
43The Facts Of The Matter contd. yet further 3. White and Winstanley (2010) trained supervisors via a 4 day course, and supervised nurses over the course of a year; the results were compared with patient outcomes where there was no supervision provided. The result was no difference in outcome.
44Opinion Not a lot to go on Just 2 studies involving CBT- questionable whether representative of normal supervision with supervisees with diverse clientsNo study of the effectiveness of supervision for guided-self-help (GSH)Is supervision evidence-based?An evidence based intervention presumes the attainment of some target, what is the target in supervision?
45Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) CodeQuality of EvidenceDefinitionAHighFurther research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.Several high-quality studies with consistent resultsIn special cases: one large, high-quality multi-centre trialBModerateFurther research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.One high-quality studySeveral studies with some limitationsCLowFurther research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.One or more studies with severe limitationsDVery LowAny estimate of effect is very uncertain.Expert opinionNo direct research evidenceOne or more studies with very severe limitationsFrom Grade Working Group based on ‘Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations’ BMJ, (2004)NICE give similar gradings on evidenceAs a rough rule thumb The treatments in High Intensity IAPT are A’s and B’s, whereas in low Intensity IAPT they are C’s and D’s, whatever the precise grading there is a transition from High evidence to Low evidence as you go from High intensity to Low Intensity IAPT.
46‘Individually tailored ICBT is an effective and cost-effective treatment for primary-care patients with anxiety disorders with or without comorbidities’ Nordgren et al (2014), 59, 1-11.‘we did not administer the SCID – interview at post-treatment or at follow up, giving us no possibility to answer questions regarding remission or recovery from the initial diagnoses’‘we rely on self-report measures’The SCID was used initially to diagnose patients and to determine which protocol was usedFuzzy outcome measures this was internet delivered cbtWe don’t use SCID in IAPT to diagnose and determine treatment so is this applicable, does IAPT assessment have to change
47‘All you need is a hot cross bun, a PHQ9 and a GAD7’
48‘ Evaluating Research Is Too Complex/Time Consuming Just Help Supervisee Make A Good Formulation’ Discuss