Download presentation
Published byCooper Crumpler Modified over 9 years ago
1
Rectal Cancer: A Complete Clinical Response…Now what?
University of Virginia
2
Objectives Outline a protocol at UVA for the non-operative management of patients with a complete clinical response following neoadjuvant chemoradiation for a locally advanced rectal cancer
3
Standard of Care (NCCN) Locally Advanced Mid/Low Rectal Cancer
Neoadjuvant chemoradiation Radical surgery with a Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) Adjuvant chemotherapy
4
Total Mesorectal Excision after Chemoradiation
Very good oncologic outcomes!!! BUT…..
5
Total Mesorectal Excision after Chemoradiation
Mortality, in some series 2% Need for stoma APR about 30% Low anastomosis, temporary or permanent Sexual and bladder dysfunction Functional problems Bowel function Depression, body image Wound complications
6
Are we overtreating?
7
Less Surgery
8
Pathological complete response!!!
8-24% Lancet 2010, Mass M.
9
5 Year Outcomes Complete response after radical surgery
Local Recurrence pCR 2.8% No pCR 9.7% Distant metastasis free survival pCR 88.8% No pCR 74.9% 5-year risk for local recurrence was 2·8% (95% CI 1·6–5·1) in the pCR group (12/455 patients had local recurrences) and 9·7% (8·4–11·2) in the no pCR group (202/2478; unadjusted HR 0·33, 95% CI 0·19–0·60; p<0·0001). 5-year distant- metastasis-free survival was 88·8% (84·8–91·8) for patients with pCR (38/419 had distant metastasis) and 74·9% (72·9–77·0) for patients without pCR (512/2257; unadjusted HR 0·40, 0·29–0·55; p<0·0001). 5-year overall survival was 87·6% (83·6–90·7) for patients with pCR (53 deaths in 465 patients) and 76·4% (74·4–78·3) for those without pCR (614 deaths in 2538 patients; unadjusted HR 0·51, 0·38–0·67; p<0·0001). Lancet 2010, Mass M.
10
5 Year Outcomes Complete response after radical surgery
pCR 2% No pCR 10% pCR 90% No pCR 77% OncoTargets and Therapy 2013, Solanki A
11
Question For selected individuals with a complete clinical response can we forego radical surgery??
12
Annals of Surgery, October 2004
13
Protocol 265 patients, 1991-2002 Tumors <= 7 cm from the anal verge
50.4 Gy 5-FU (425 mg/m2/d) and folinic acid (20 mg/m2/d) IV for 3 consecutive days on the first and last 3 days of radiation therapy. NO ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY
14
Protocol Assessed at 8 weeks
If complete response patients followed monthly If sustained over 12 months response they were enrolled and considered complete responders. 14 patients “recurred” in first year (16%) 71 enrolled (27% of group)
15
Incomplete response Radical Surgery
16
Local Recurrence 2/71 luminal recurrence 0/22 pelvic recurrence
Both treated locally and no recurrence No pelvic failures 0/22 pelvic recurrence
17
Systemic Recurrence 3/71 (4.2%) 3/22 (13.6%) Mean Follow up
Observation 57.3 months (12-156) Resected 48 months (12-83)
18
Survival Data Observation vs Resected
5 yr Disease Free Survival Observation 92% Resected 83% 5 yr Overall Survival Observation 100% Resected 88%
19
Concerns Late recurrences with radiotherapy Single institution
Determining clinical response Correlation between clinical response and pathological response
20
But….. Reaction Made surgeons very uneasy Not ready for prime time
Used when patients are elderly, frail or with metastatic disease But…..
21
Netherlands experience, 2011
192 patients CRT, 21 CR (11%) Long course CRT (Oxali, CAP) 17/21 (81%) got adjuvant chemotherapy
22
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY 2011, Mass, M.
Netherlands
23
Surveillance Program Year CEA DRE Endo MRI CT for distant mets 1 4x 2x
3 4 5 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY 2011, Mass, M.
24
Results Mean Follow up 25 months
1/21 developed endoluminal recurrence Refused radical surgery and got a local excision and now disease free 20 disease free 2-year DFS is 89% OS is 100%. Comparable to control with ypT0N0M0 after radical surgery
25
Conclusions Similar overall survival Better functional outcomes
Salvage surgery possible Very strict criteria, so some with a ypT0N0M0 still got surgery Adjuvant chemotherapy
26
Watch and Wait Strategy
Dalton: 50% recurred in first year. All salvaged by surgery. 2 developed mets though. But same as control NATUREREVIEWS|GASTROENTEROLOGY&HEPATOLOGY Minsky, 2013
27
Conclusions Highly selective non-operative therapy may be appropriate
Salvage surgery possible
28
Can we increase the number of complete responders?
Wait longer Double complete response if you wait longer than 8 weeks More radiation Different chemotherapy regimens Oxaliplatinum, Avastin Different timing Adjuvant chemotherapy
29
Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, 2013
30
Inclusion Criteria Palpable tumors, no more than 7 cm from anal verge cT2-T4, cN0-N1, cM0 High resolution MRI or 3-D Endorectal ultrasound Chest/Abd/Pelvic CT scan
31
Treatment 54 Gy 45 Gy via 3-field approach 9-Gy boost to the primary tumor and perirectal tissue (54 Gy total). 3 cycles bolus 5-FU (450 mg/m2), 50 mg of leucovorin for 3 consecutive days every 3 weeks After radiation, patients received 3 additional cycles of chemotherapy every 3 weeks.
32
No adjuvant chemotherapy
Inclusion criteria Assessed at 10 weeks Complete response based on physical exam, endoscopy and radiology (MRI or PET/CT scan) No adjuvant chemotherapy was given
33
Patient Demographics Copyright © 2013 Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
34
Surveillance Strategy
Copyright © 2013 Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
35
Watch and Wait Results Copyright © 2013 Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
36
Salvage Procedures Early Regrowth
Radical surgery was offered to everyone as the first line. FTLE was only done if patient refused radical surgery Copyright © 2013 Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
37
Salvage Procedures Early Regrowth
Salvage procedures seem successful Low local re-recurrence Systemic recurrence an issue Follow up relatively short Frequent assessment critical to success!!!
38
Salvage Procedures Late Recurrences
Radical surgery was offered to everyone as the first line. FTLE was only done if patient refused radical surgery Copyright © 2013 Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
39
Salvage Procedures Late Recurrences
Salvage surgery seems successful Low local recurrence Systemic recurrence thus far not as big an issue Follow up pretty good Continuing assessment critical to success!!!
40
Conclusions Extended Chemoradiation with 54 Gy
Initial complete response 68%!! 17% failure in first 12 month 10% failure long term Salvage surgery likely 51% handled non-operatively!!
41
What are we doing Last several years offering non-operative therapy to those that have a complete response and: 1. Have metastatic disease 2. Too frail for surgery 3. Refuse surgery
42
What we would like to do Develop a UVA protocol for this patient population Inclusion criteria Follow up protocol Track outcomes
43
Significant regression
Neoadjuvant XRT 8 Week Assessment Complete Response Enroll Significant regression RE-Assess in 8 weeks Complete response? Yes – Enroll No - Radical Surgery Poor response Radical Surgery
44
Enroll Encourage adjuvant chemotherapy Follow up
Discretion of referring oncologist Follow up Flexible Sigmoidoscopy and exam every 3 months CEA every 3 months Imaging every 6 months – Alternate MRI and PET CT scan For how long??
45
Imaging options Endorectal ultrasound PET CT Scan Pelvic MRI
Techniques (Diffusion weighted) Combination
46
Questions and Concerns
Do we need minimal standards for neoadjuvant XRT? Recommend or require adjuvant chemotherapy? Define complete clinical response or just surgeon discretion? Recommend “boost” if don’t operate? Decide on imaging follow up How long do we follow?
47
Thank you
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.